SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Which Pearson trade is the best

Créé par: RC333
Équipe: 2020-21 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 27 févr. 2021
Publié: 27 févr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
So the canucks will probably trade Pearson. He's a a guy who can score goals and play a great 2 way game. That includes the the penalty kill.
Transactions
1.
VAN
  1. Amirov, Rodion [Liste de réserve]
2.
NSH
    Pearson
    3.
    MIN
      Pearson
      4.
      VAN
      1. Benning, Michael [Liste de réserve]
      FLA
        Pearson
        5.
        6.
        VAN
        1. Honka, Anttoni [Liste de réserve]
        CAR
          Pearson
          7.
          BOS
            Pearson
            8.
            WSH
              Pearson
              Rachats de contrats
              Frais appliqués
              Enfoui
              Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
              2021
              Logo de VAN
              Logo de VAN
              Logo de VAN
              Logo de VAN
              Logo de VAN
              Logo de VAN
              Logo de VAN
              2022
              Logo de VAN
              Logo de VAN
              Logo de VAN
              Logo de VAN
              Logo de VAN
              Logo de VAN
              2023
              Logo de VAN
              Logo de VAN
              Logo de VAN
              Logo de VAN
              Logo de VAN
              Logo de VAN
              Logo de VAN
              TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
              2781 500 000 $81 701 003 $1 700 000 $5 732 500 $-201 003 $
              Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
              Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
              5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
              C, AG, AD
              UFA - 3
              Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
              4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
              C
              UFA - 3
              Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
              5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
              AD
              UFA - 2
              Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
              3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
              C
              M-NTC
              UFA - 2
              Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
              4 375 000 $4 375 000 $
              AD, C
              M-NTC
              UFA - 1
              Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
              3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
              AG
              M-NTC
              UFA - 2
              Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
              950 000 $950 000 $
              C, AD
              UFA - 1
              Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
              2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
              AD, AG
              UFA - 2
              Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
              891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance200 000 $$200K)
              AG, AD
              RFA - 3
              Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
              925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
              C, AG
              UFA - 1
              Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
              800 000 $800 000 $
              AD, AG
              UFA - 1
              Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
              825 000 $825 000 $
              AD, C
              UFA - 2
              Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
              874 125 $874 125 $
              C
              UFA - 1
              Logo de Capitals de Washington
              925 000 $925 000 $
              C
              RFA - 5
              Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
              Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
              6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
              DG
              NMC
              UFA - 1
              Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
              6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
              DD
              NTC
              UFA - 4
              Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
              4 300 000 $4 300 000 $
              G
              M-NTC
              UFA - 2
              Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
              5 950 000 $5 950 000 $
              DG/DD
              M-NTC
              UFA - 5
              Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
              1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
              DD
              NMC
              UFA - 1
              Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
              1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
              G
              UFA - 1
              Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
              2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
              DG/DD
              M-NTC
              UFA - 1
              Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
              700 000 $700 000 $
              DD
              UFA - 1
              Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
              916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
              DG
              UFA - 1
              Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
              863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
              DG
              UFA - 1
              Logo de Predators de Nashville
              925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
              DD
              UFA - 1
              Logo de Wild du Minnesota
              795 000 $795 000 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
              DD
              RFA - 3
              Logo de Bruins de Boston
              2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
              DD
              UFA - 1
              Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
              Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
              750 000 $750 000 $
              AD
              UFA - 1
              Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
              3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
              AG, AD
              NMC
              UFA - 3
              Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
              1 225 000 $1 225 000 $
              AG, AD
              UFA - 2
              Équipe de réserve
              Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
              6 000 000 $6 000 000 $ (4 925 000 $$5M4 925 000 $$5M)
              AG, AD
              M-NTC
              UFA - 2
              Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
              811 667 $811 667 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
              G
              RFA - 2
              Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
              700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
              DG
              UFA - 1
              Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
              700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
              AG, C
              UFA - 1
              Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
              700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
              DG
              UFA - 1
              Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
              700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
              DD
              UFA - 1

              Code d'intégration

              • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
              • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

              Texte intégré

              Cliquer pour surligner
              27 févr. 2021 à 16 h 27
              #1
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: juill. 2019
              Messages: 6,376
              Mentions "j'aime": 3,069
              With no term remaining, he's not going to get any of these.
              villenash, gmgb, SomeonesOffended and 3 others a aimé ceci.
              27 févr. 2021 à 16 h 29
              #2
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: mai 2019
              Messages: 10,341
              Mentions "j'aime": 7,171
              He's a UFA... come on.
              DirtyDangle a aimé ceci.
              27 févr. 2021 à 16 h 30
              #3
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: janv. 2020
              Messages: 6,915
              Mentions "j'aime": 5,343
              Gotta think most of these teams walk away as soon as you mention those names.
              DirtyDangle a aimé ceci.
              27 févr. 2021 à 16 h 31
              #4
              Banni
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: févr. 2021
              Messages: 378
              Mentions "j'aime": 122
              Quoting: Byrr
              With no term remaining, he's not going to get any of these.


              Agreed. And Toronto couldn't without some money going the other way. Vancouver would have to eat half and take Engvall or something. Then you could do conditional picks or something like that.
              RC333 a aimé ceci.
              27 févr. 2021 à 16 h 31
              #5
              CHI NYI
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: mai 2018
              Messages: 4,685
              Mentions "j'aime": 2,260
              Colorado is probably the most realistic, although Jost has been pretty good for the Avs this year, so I don’t even know if that would go. I think what’s most likely is that he gets traded for like a 2nd and a 5th or something like that and Vancouver either retains to make it work or takes an expiring contract back
              Wqrrior a aimé ceci.
              27 févr. 2021 à 16 h 32
              #6
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: juin 2015
              Messages: 20,030
              Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
              Avs are trading jost for a bottom 6 pending ufa, they will keep the cost controlled cheaper rfa vs 3.75m cap hit they can’t even accommodate on with their roster
              TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
              27 févr. 2021 à 16 h 33
              #7
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: juin 2015
              Messages: 20,030
              Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
              Quoting: ForsbergForVezina
              Colorado is probably the most realistic, although Jost has been pretty good for the Avs this year, so I don’t even know if that would go. I think what’s most likely is that he gets traded for like a 2nd and a 5th or something like that and Vancouver either retains to make it work or takes an expiring contract back


              Nah, least realistic bc Avs don’t have any cap space, and they don’t want to add any right now to get off of ltir money so they can apply makars bonus money to this season.

              They can’t do this deal even with they wanted to
              TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
              27 févr. 2021 à 16 h 34
              #8
              CHI NYI
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: mai 2018
              Messages: 4,685
              Mentions "j'aime": 2,260
              Quoting: coga16
              Nah, least realistic bc Avs don’t have any cap space, and they don’t want to add any right now to get off of ltir money so they can apply makars bonus money to this season.

              They can’t do this deal even with they wanted to


              Then I stand corrected. Didn’t know they were so short on cap space
              TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
              27 févr. 2021 à 16 h 36
              #9
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: juin 2015
              Messages: 20,030
              Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
              Quoting: ForsbergForVezina
              Then I stand corrected. Didn’t know they were so short on cap space


              Yeah they are in a bit of cap issues bc of all the injuries they dealt with. They can’t accrue the cap space they need since know they have to use ltir on Francoiz, they need to create cap space for that bonus money, if they add at the deadline it’s a money in for the same money Out type of deal
              ForsbergForVezina et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
              27 févr. 2021 à 16 h 36
              #10
              retired
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: avr. 2020
              Messages: 8,893
              Mentions "j'aime": 4,761
              you might want to lower your expectations.
              Saskleaf et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
              27 févr. 2021 à 16 h 40
              #11
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: juin 2017
              Messages: 8,697
              Mentions "j'aime": 7,072
              Wow, just what the Wild need: a rental left shot wing /s

              I'd be very surprised if we ever traded Addison, and if we did it would be in a package for a legitimate #1 center. Can't see us being even remotely interested in this trade.
              Caerii et Lightman13 a aimé ceci.
              27 févr. 2021 à 16 h 41
              #12
              retired
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: avr. 2020
              Messages: 8,893
              Mentions "j'aime": 4,761
              Quoting: ForsbergForVezina
              Then I stand corrected. Didn’t know they were so short on cap space


              it's tight but not that tight. they might be able to do pearson - jost at the deadline. maybe with a tiny bit of retention. bonuses are allowed to carry over but it's not ideal.
              TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
              27 févr. 2021 à 16 h 41
              #13
              The commissioner
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: févr. 2020
              Messages: 946
              Mentions "j'aime": 105
              Hey Meth is bad you should stop using it especially if it makes you think that Toronto trade is at all acceptable in your mind. Here’s a hint if needed Amirov>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Pearson
              Saskleaf a aimé ceci.
              27 févr. 2021 à 16 h 45
              #14
              Démarrer sujet
              Sexiest in the world
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: oct. 2017
              Messages: 937
              Mentions "j'aime": 159
              Quoting: Jameshgfgn
              Hey Meth is bad you should stop using it especially if it makes you think that Toronto trade is at all acceptable in your mind. Here’s a hint if needed Amirov>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Pearson


              My thought process was Toronto is already a contender, adding Pearson may push them over the hump which would make it worth giving up a decent prospect for a better chance at Lord Stanley
              MapleLeafs4ever34 a aimé ceci.
              27 févr. 2021 à 16 h 50
              #15
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: mai 2019
              Messages: 20,236
              Mentions "j'aime": 7,513
              yikes, the value is all over the place. No way he gets anything like Amirov or Carlo.
              Jost is probably the best you could hope for out of these
              27 févr. 2021 à 16 h 51
              #16
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: mai 2017
              Messages: 3,694
              Mentions "j'aime": 634
              That Florida or Carolina trade might work. You are looking at a second round pick or equivalent plus whatever. And maybe money back.
              27 févr. 2021 à 17 h 0
              #17
              Saskoiler for now
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: avr. 2020
              Messages: 13,357
              Mentions "j'aime": 9,283
              Quoting: RC333
              My thought process was Toronto is already a contender, adding Pearson may push them over the hump which would make it worth giving up a decent prospect for a better chance at Lord Stanley


              Amirov is arguably their best prospect besides Robertson. Maybe a lesser prospect like Hirvonen. Most likely a second round pick would be what Pearson would fetch from Toronto.
              MapleLeafs4ever34 a aimé ceci.
              27 févr. 2021 à 17 h 3
              #18
              The commissioner
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: févr. 2020
              Messages: 946
              Mentions "j'aime": 105
              Quoting: RC333
              My thought process was Toronto is already a contender, adding Pearson may push them over the hump which would make it worth giving up a decent prospect for a better chance at Lord Stanley

              Think of it this way it would be the 15th overall pick for Pearson who is a rental and you would not give up a 1st even if he wasn’t
              Saskleaf a aimé ceci.
              27 févr. 2021 à 17 h 18
              #19
              Banni
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: févr. 2021
              Messages: 378
              Mentions "j'aime": 122
              Quoting: RC333
              My thought process was Toronto is already a contender, adding Pearson may push them over the hump which would make it worth giving up a decent prospect for a better chance at Lord Stanley


              Aside from the compensation back (either conditional picks or player-to-be-named) it wasn't a bad idea. We could really use a bigger-bodied (one that uses it) winger that can bury it when given the chance. He would look really good with JT and Willie. If we had the cap room, it would be nice to see if a deal could be worked out.
              27 févr. 2021 à 17 h 21
              #20
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: mai 2019
              Messages: 11,217
              Mentions "j'aime": 5,213
              Quoting: RC333
              My thought process was Toronto is already a contender, adding Pearson may push them over the hump which would make it worth giving up a decent prospect for a better chance at Lord Stanley


              ok but he's worth like maybe a 2nd and a 3rd at absolute best, and that's if you retain 50% on him, because he's a UFA. Pretty well all of these teams decline
              MapleLeafs4ever34 et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
              27 févr. 2021 à 17 h 27
              #21
              Banni
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: févr. 2021
              Messages: 378
              Mentions "j'aime": 122
              Quoting: leafs101
              ok but he's worth like maybe a 2nd and a 3rd at absolute best, and that's if you retain 50% on him, because he's a UFA. Pretty well all of these teams decline


              That's what I was thinking. A second turned into a first if he's extended (or the team makes the finals or something).
              27 févr. 2021 à 17 h 49
              #22
              Hakuna Matata
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: févr. 2020
              Messages: 35,241
              Mentions "j'aime": 21,369
              u aint getting Amirov for a rental
              27 févr. 2021 à 17 h 50
              #23
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: août 2020
              Messages: 11,848
              Mentions "j'aime": 9,430
              Quoting: DirtyDangle
              it's tight but not that tight. they might be able to do pearson - jost at the deadline. maybe with a tiny bit of retention. bonuses are allowed to carry over but it's not ideal.
              no they can’t because of Frankie being on LTR and I wouldn’t trade Jost for Pearson anyway.
              TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
              27 févr. 2021 à 18 h 6
              #24
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: août 2020
              Messages: 5,959
              Mentions "j'aime": 3,715
              Quoting: MapleLeafsForever34
              That's what I was thinking. A second turned into a first if he's extended (or the team makes the finals or something).


              You can't put an extension condition on picks anymore, but it wouldn't be a 1st anyway. It would just be additional mid level pieces.
              MapleLeafs4ever34 a aimé ceci.
              27 févr. 2021 à 18 h 17
              #25
              retired
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: avr. 2020
              Messages: 8,893
              Mentions "j'aime": 4,761
              Quoting: Xqb15a
              no they can’t because of Frankie being on LTR and I wouldn’t trade Jost for Pearson anyway.


              i wouldn't either but i think the avs can do that trade at the deadline if the wanted to. the cap friendly team breakdown seems to support the idea.
              TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
               
              Répondre
              To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
              Question:
              Options:
              Ajouter une option
              Soumettre le sondage