JaredOfLondon

Membre depuis
25 mai 2019
Équipe préférée
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Messages dans les forums
1355
Messages par jour
3,59
Sujets de discussion
4
Forum: Armchair-GMil y a 4 heures
Sujet: Strengthening - moves with NSH TOR CAR
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>justaBoss</b></div><div>Cuz they save money and could be in better position to sign a RHD like DeMelo for example. Also they don't have a first rounder - after this trade they do.</div></div>

except that you dont trade for cap space because you might maybe could potentially if you think about it hard enough sign a free agent who could just as easily sign with 30 other NHL teams. And if you are doing that you dont trade your best trading chip to do it.
the 29th over all pick isnt that valuable or necessary for the Leafs, they are very unlikely to get someone even half as good as Kapanen, and that player wont be in the NHL (if they make it at all) for like 3-4 years most likely.
after this trade they are worse
Forum: Armchair-GMWed at 11:26 am
Sujet: BUF and TOR
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>EvanW</b></div><div>.

The general consensus on my post was stated above. If you take a look at recent TOR AGM teams, trades involving only Johnsson return a single draft pick (your most recent included). When taking all things into consideration, from a value standpoint it is pretty fair. If I wanted to make TOR better I probably would’ve made a leafs AGM.</div></div>

well that's just putting words in my mouth, my recent trade value of Johnson was "if the leafs were trading him simply to make cap space" and the value was "would be picks and prospects, probably one of each" and that isnt a specific value, that is a framework.
A mid to late 3rd rounder and a 24 year old who cant crack the NHL doesnt cut it.
You may not care about making toronto better, but if you dont want leaf fans calling your proposal bad, then you can at least pretend to try to give up something leaf fans want