SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Would Hugues play for Zegras

Équipe: 2023-24 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 10 févr. 2024
Publié: 10 févr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
ANA fans won't like this, but that's the only play I would give to ANA for Zegras. I don't see how ANA are over asking for a player they seem to have given up the towel on at 22 years old. If the argument of a rebuild comes in, I'll just respond with a "he's 22... you rebuild with young players... so..." I think it's the attitude, I don't see Hugues overpaying for Zegras.

I'm guessing another team will want to over pay, maybe Philly who got crapped on by a freaking 0 games played player. They may over pay at this point.

**Some may see my move to bring in Reinbacher, even if he's in Europe right now, the reason I put him there is that there are talks they may bring him in as soon as his season ends in order to develop him properly in MTL or Laval. - Most probably in Laval, but you never know.. His size may make him jump now to see his current skills.

***Avs Fans, before you judge the Girard move, read the trade info, I think the AVS would look to get another hard hitting defensman with the room they just got from the Habs, plus the ability to trade out their own 2nd pick again. They have lots of players becoming UFAs again this year, and trading out 5M$ vs 1.925M$ gives them more room to get going for another cup run next year.
Transactions
1.
MTL
  1. Zegras, Trevor
Détails additionnels:
ANA seem ready to move from Zegras; Is this enough? I thin other teams will be playing this out, but given they receive 2 RHD, Beck and picks plus Pearson to help end the season with support for the younger guys. I think this would be the only available play for a player who's not been up to par with his attitude and defensive skills.
ANA
  1. Beck, Owen
  2. Harris, Jordan
  3. Kovacevic, Johnathan
  4. Pearson, Tanner
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (MTL)
  6. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (MIN)
Détails additionnels:
*1st is a conditional pick; If Habs get top 5; then ANA have the choice of the best of the two 2025 1st rounds picks they have, plus PITT's 2025 2nd round pick
2.
MTL
  1. Beaucage, Alex
  2. Girard, Samuel
Détails additionnels:
AVS trade out Girard and his cap hit, with Beaucage but get in return their own 2nd draft pick and Allen with retention.

This also bring in another move from AVS to trade for a bigger Defenseman somewhere else, get a very reliable 2nd goalie for this year, and a posssible chip in the offseason to trade out if they wish.
COL
  1. Allen, Jake (1 925 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (COL)
Détails additionnels:
Habs get a home player, and a home prospect; for Allen and a 2nd pick.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de WPG
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de SJS
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de EDM
Logo de WSH
2025
Logo de MTL
Logo de CGY
Logo de MTL
Logo de PIT
Logo de MTL
Logo de VAN
Logo de MTL
Logo de DET
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
2026
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $82 183 749 $1 170 000 $5 252 500 $1 316 251 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 8
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 500 000 $$4M)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
812 500 $812 500 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
775 000 $775 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance420 000 $$420K)
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
890 000 $890 000 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
867 500 $867 500 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
828 333 $828 333 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 000 000 $$1M)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
775 000 $775 000 $
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 362 500 $3 362 500 $
C, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance275 000 $$275K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
762 500 $762 500 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
10 févr. à 21 h 6
#1
Future Norris guy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 15,605
Mentions "j'aime": 8,624
Anaheim declines, Only the 1st has value the rest of it you can keep.
10 févr. à 21 h 6
#2
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,336
Mentions "j'aime": 25,253
We Anaheim guys have never asked for more than Owen Beck plus your 2024 first assuming that you want to trade it (see your esteemed cohort @Campabee for the somewhat complicated conditions). This is a trade that could only happen at the draft because it would be contingent upon who was available to both Anaheim and Montreal. For example, we assume that the Canadiens wouldn't want to trade the pick if Demidov were still on the board.
MoSeider53, Campabee, LosPatos and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
10 févr. à 21 h 11
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 2,621
Mentions "j'aime": 1,668
Habs easily pass on that holy.

They are not giving up their top 10 pick for him.
10 févr. à 21 h 20
#4
Future Norris guy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 15,605
Mentions "j'aime": 8,624
Quoting: Black61
Habs easily pass on that holy.

They are not giving up their top 10 pick for him.


No Problemo, Then Zegres will never play in Montreal.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
10 févr. à 21 h 23
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 2,621
Mentions "j'aime": 1,668
Quoting: MoSeider53
No Problemo, Then Zegres will never play in Montreal.


Great I dont want him too.
10 févr. à 21 h 24
#6
Future Norris guy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 15,605
Mentions "j'aime": 8,624
Quoting: Black61
Great I dont want him too.


A massive rebuilding team like Montreal, Shouldn't be trading for players like Zegras. just stay the course.
10 févr. à 21 h 24
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 4,888
Mentions "j'aime": 3,248
Quoting: OldNYIfan
We Anaheim guys have never asked for more than Owen Beck plus your 2024 first assuming that you want to trade it (see your esteemed cohort Campabee for the somewhat complicated conditions). This is a trade that could only happen at the draft because it would be contingent upon who was available to both Anaheim and Montreal. For example, we assume that the Canadiens wouldn't want to trade the pick if Demidov were still on the board.


Would you still consider if it was the WPG first instead of Beck? Let's assume the WPG pick is 25 or later. Just curious.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
10 févr. à 21 h 28
#8
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,336
Mentions "j'aime": 25,253
Quoting: Just_A_Guess
Would you still consider if it was the WPG first instead of Beck? Let's assume the WPG pick is 25 or later. Just curious.

Oh, I think so. Four picks in the top 35? Yeah.
Just_A_Guess a aimé ceci.
10 févr. à 21 h 31
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 4,888
Mentions "j'aime": 3,248
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Oh, I think so. Four picks in the top 35? Yeah.


Personally, I'd rather move that pick over moving Beck.

Zegras, CGY '25 1st with conditions, WPG '27 3rd with conditions for MTL '24 1st with conditions... Now that's asset management lol
10 févr. à 21 h 31
#10
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 9,866
Mentions "j'aime": 6,656
Where is the evidence we've thrown the towel in on him? Frank Seravalli is the source of all Zegras rumors, and the guy has the same track record of being right about Anaheim as I do scoring with Victoria's Secret models.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
10 févr. à 21 h 32
#11
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 9,866
Mentions "j'aime": 6,656
Quoting: Just_A_Guess
Personally, I'd rather move that pick over moving Beck.

Zegras, CGY '25 1st with conditions, WPG '27 3rd with conditions for MTL '24 1st with conditions... Now that's asset management lol


No conditions, it would be a draft day trade.
Just_A_Guess a aimé ceci.
10 févr. à 21 h 32
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 4,888
Mentions "j'aime": 3,248
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
No conditions, it would be a draft day pick.


I know, but it's based on who is available to draft.
10 févr. à 21 h 38
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 2,621
Mentions "j'aime": 1,668
Quoting: MoSeider53
A massive rebuilding team like Montreal, Shouldn't be trading for players like Zegras. just stay the course.


https://twitter.com/JFreshHockey/status/1744842893913653570?lang=en

Using a top 10 pick on a replacement level defense player whos never had 70 point seems like a bad investment.

He is always going to be a guy who you cant rely on as a top line player because he cant play against other teams best lines. He will and already does get destroyed.

Atleast with somepne like Catton or helenius even if they they end up as a 50ish point guy they can atleast be versatile enough to not have to shelter like crazy
10 févr. à 21 h 48
#14
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,336
Mentions "j'aime": 25,253
Quoting: Black61
Using a top 10 pick on a replacement level defense player whos never had 70 point seems like a bad investment.

I always wondered why Cole Caufield fell to #15 after Trevor Zegras was selected ninth.

At least after this season, you can finally say CC has achieved the 60-point mark.
mv21227 a aimé ceci.
10 févr. à 22 h 0
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 10,084
Mentions "j'aime": 9,347
Quoting: Black61
https://twitter.com/JFreshHockey/status/1744842893913653570?lang=en

Using a top 10 pick on a replacement level defense player whos never had 70 point seems like a bad investment.

He is always going to be a guy who you cant rely on as a top line player because he cant play against other teams best lines. He will and already does get destroyed.

Atleast with somepne like Catton or helenius even if they they end up as a 50ish point guy they can atleast be versatile enough to not have to shelter like crazy


So would you not use a top 10 pick on Caufield? Because he’s replacement level defensively and has never had a 70 point season. Hasn’t even had a 50 point season (although he likely will this year)
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
10 févr. à 23 h 8
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 2,621
Mentions "j'aime": 1,668
Quoting: mv21227
So would you not use a top 10 pick on Caufield? Because he’s replacement level defensively and has never had a 70 point season. Hasn’t even had a 50 point season (although he likely will this year)


Caufields defensive metrics have improved significantly this season hes not replacement level anymore.

Caufield wasnt a top 10 pick.

Even if he was still that bad defensively doesnt that prove how stupid to suggest spending a top 10 pick on ANOTHER defensive black hole.
10 févr. à 23 h 18
#17
Habs 7th round 1983
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 1,623
Mentions "j'aime": 749
Wondering why Drysdale was traded to PHI and not Zegras

Just my 2 cents
10 févr. à 23 h 20
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,400
Mentions "j'aime": 9,040
You are smoking some serious weed with that COL trade no sane team trades a 25yr old top 4 dman locked in for 3 more seasons for a back up goalie.
LaTornade, NMAvsFan et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
10 févr. à 23 h 22
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,400
Mentions "j'aime": 9,040
Quoting: VladislavTretiak
Wondering why Drysdale was traded to PHI and not Zegras

Just my 2 cents

Because PHI was looking for a young dman, they supposedly asked COL for Byram and COL said you are adding and that ended it.
NMAvsFan et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
10 févr. à 23 h 53
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 2,697
Mentions "j'aime": 3,013
Avs trade their third best defenseman and a mediocre prospect for a backup goalie and a 2nd.

Help me understand this?
LaTornade, NMAvsFan, BStinson and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
11 févr. à 3 h 25
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 314
Mentions "j'aime": 414
Imo Girard is easily the Avs 3rd best D atm. He’s not someone you move to free up cap for a backup goalie and depth pieces (appreciate your explanation though) Hell, i would be more inclined to move Byram than Girard at this point (not saying that i would like to trade either).
NMAvsFan et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
11 févr. à 9 h 20
#22
Representing the 505
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,492
Mentions "j'aime": 3,682
Quoting: Xqb15a
You are smoking some serious weed with that COL trade no sane team trades a 25yr old top 4 dman locked in for 3 more seasons for a back up goalie.


There's some dillweed posting things around here claiming that Girard sucks and the Avs are trying to trade him and he has no value so, yeah, there are still people who think Girard is nothing more than a small, puck-moving D that isn't any good.
Xqb15a, LaTornade et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
11 févr. à 9 h 49
#23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,400
Mentions "j'aime": 9,040
Quoting: NMAvsFan
There's some dillweed posting things around here claiming that Girard sucks and the Avs are trying to trade him and he has no value so, yeah, there are still people who think Girard is nothing more than a small, puck-moving D that isn't any good.


But what cracks me up is that these guys do these trades on the basis he isn’t good then when they build their rosters they drop him right into the top 4🤦🏻‍♂️
NMAvsFan, LaTornade et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
11 févr. à 11 h 56
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 2,697
Mentions "j'aime": 3,013
Quoting: Xqb15a
But what cracks me up is that these guys do these trades on the basis he isn’t good then when they build their rosters they drop him right into the top 4🤦🏻‍♂️


It’s a roster with Savard on the top pairing. Top 4 isn’t saying much
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
11 févr. à 20 h 47
#25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 9,569
Mentions "j'aime": 4,573
Easy peasy nope from the Avs. Not even close.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage