PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
Campabee
Membre depuis
3 nov. 2018
Équipe favorite
Canadiens de Montréal
Deuxième équipe favorite
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Messages dans les forums
15430
Messages par jour
7.7
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
il y a 2 heures
Sujet:
Pens
Did you not see Hughes end of season press conference? He literally said he is <strong>not</strong> trading for <strong>and</strong> short-term D that will block Reinbacher and Mailloux from developing at the NHL level
Forum:
Armchair-GM
il y a 5 heures
Sujet:
Blockbuster
Habs pass, Savard is too important in the lineup and lockerroom.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
il y a 5 heures
Sujet:
slight changes
Considering in the season ending presser Hughes stated that he is not making an trades for D men that would block Mailloux and Reinbacher's paths to the NHL, I think this is a very easy pass for the Habs
Forum:
Armchair-GM
il y a 5 heures
Sujet:
Blues and Montreal fans thoughts
Habs would rather pick 5th, even at 8th there would be better players available (even if they are D men). Habs would probably be looking more at a Neighbors for 5th swap than a Snuggerud.
Forum:
Fauteuil - DG
il y a 18 heures
Sujet:
Need top 6 forward
Too much money and assets for a player who has a career average of 55 points per season. Take out Xhekaj an drop 2 mil off the contract an Hans might consider it
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Hier à 11 h 40
Sujet:
Trading up
Wow, it's like a two year old with no concept of reality made this ACGM. Habs counter with Neighbors for a 7th
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Hier à 9 h 14
Sujet:
Sometimes common knowledge is wrong
I have said this for years, you build a contender from the net out and build a playoff roster as opposed to a regular season roster. There are teams built to win championships and teams built to win the regular season, most of the time these two do not align. Habs need to focus on building the right way, from the net out and worry less about regular season scoring titles
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mar. à 18 h 52
Sujet:
Back in the playoffs next season
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div>First, let's dispel the "bad contract" misconception.
Fowler leads the team in time on ice and all Anaheim defensemen in scoring. He's a lifelong Duck and provides leadership and mentoring for the young defensemen (Mintyukov, Zellweger, LaCombe, etc.). As ggha777 says, he has a big cap hit but by no means is he considered to be a bad contract or have negative value. Josh Anderson, on the other hand, is a pure cap dump. You can take them both out of this deal.
Next, let's looks at some statistics, to define our terms:
Trevor Zegras, first 180 games: 49 goals, 90 assists = 139 points, -39
Cole Caufield, first 196 games: 73 goals, 66 assists = 139 points, -43
Without making excuses for this injury-riddled season:
Trevor Zegras, 210 games: 55 goals, 98 assists = 153 points, -41
Cole Caufield, 204 games: 80 goals, 68 assists = 148 points, -39
My point is nothing more than that Trevor Zegras is a good player.
Now let's look at what you've offered here: Farrell, an undersized forward with at best middle-6 potential; Ylonen, 18 months older than Zegras, drafted the year before, with half as many games played and 1/5 the number of points, and waiver-wire fodder; and Barron, who has second-pairing potential at best; plus a late first that duplicates the Edmonton pick and a 2025 first that may become a 2026 pick. What amongst that stew can you confidently argue will even be on the Anaheim roster next season? Or ever? And for all of those possibilities, we should give up a 23-year-old who has two 60-point-plus seasons under his belt already and seems to have made a better recovery from his recent surgery than Cole Caufield, whose historical shooting rate of 14.1% has declined to 8.8% this season?</div></div>
Absolutely, the Ducks should want to get back at least what they give up, I would if I was the Ducks GM or had Zegras on my team. I don't really think the Ducks will move Zegras since they are trying to compete but if they did they should absolutely ask for the other teams best players/picks/prospects cause otherwise why trade him? You don't make trades just for the sake of trading, you make trades to 1. Improve your team 2. Because the player asked for it or 3. Because of the teams cap situation. The last 2 don't apply to the Ducks so the only way they are trading Zegras is to improve the team, I think that's what a lot of fans that make these types of trades do not understand
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mar. à 17 h 24
Sujet:
Back in the playoffs next season
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jonh514</b></div><div>I don't think they want Newhook. Like a lot of players on the Habs, I value Newhook a lot more than other fans do and see him as a top 7 forward on any team in the league.</div></div>
That's the point really, any Zegras move from the Ducks side is going to be a lateral move
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mar. à 17 h 13
Sujet:
If hes available Hawks should be in
Get ready, Canes fans are gonna want Nazar + 1st for Necas
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mar. à 17 h 8
Sujet:
Back in the playoffs next season
I think a serious offer has to start with Newhook + a prospect like Beck. Newhook is a speedy young winger with 50-70 point potential but has never hit that level yet, so the Ducks would get back some of the scoring at a cheaper cap hit and get a good prospect back. That is the only way that they are giving up Zegras, and it's really just a lateral move for both sides anyway.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mar. à 16 h 36
Sujet:
Back in the playoffs next season
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jonh514</b></div><div>Ylonen value = 0
Farrell value = extremely low. Don't get me wrong, I believe in the kid, but his floor is an AHL player. There is an argument to be made that he might never establish himself in the NHL.
Barron value = 2nd round pick. He's at least a project-able bottom pair defender, with a shot at middle 6 upside. I think he's worth more, but the value does not hold up in a trade because he's never played a full season.
It's one thing if Anaheim were starting a rebuild. But they are a few years in and just like the Habs they are itching to make the playoffs. Do a couple of 17-32 picks get Zegras? Maybe, but personally if he were on my team, I would hold out for better.</div></div>
I agree, this isn't the type of move Anaheim would be making, it would be a 1st in the 6-10 range + at least Beck or Mesar, it really depends where in that range the 1st falls and even then the Ducks are trying to move from rebuild to WC contender next year, prospects and picks don't help them do that
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mar. à 13 h 7
Sujet:
Matheson Guhle Reinbacher Hutson Mailloux Xhekaj Struble top 7
I think the goal is to pair Mailloux with Guhle and Hutson with Reinbacher, if we can somehow achieve this and Keep both Matheson and Xhekaj in the top 6 that will be a very good D corps. The issue is though that Matheson isn't gonna be relegated to the 3rd pairing and 4 of the 6 are LHD
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mar. à 12 h 54
Sujet:
just messing around
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ggha777</b></div><div>It’s only been one game but Hutson looked good. If he looks good again tonight and continues it next year into training camp and pre season, then I don’t see the need to have him in Laval…..I guess time will tell but if Hutson can make an impact now then I don’t see why we would need to send him to the AHL.</div></div>
I agree for the most part but also know that sending him to Laval wouldn't be because he wasn't making an impact, it would be to help hone his decision making and to build chemistry with the player whome he is most likely to be poured with through most of his career in Montreal, which sometimes can be more important than just having an impact on the ice.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mar. à 12 h 46
Sujet:
Matheson Guhle
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LuckyMoneyPuck</b></div><div>what am I talking about?
https://www.hockey-reference.com/players/m/mathemi01.html
you go look at those 5v5 numbers and figure it out.
Even your points thing is just wrong.
11G 17A in pit
4G 17A in MTL this year
Career highs......
His 5v5 play is going down hill there and those are the most important numbers.
We rehabbed him... you are sinking him :tearsofjoy</div></div>
I never said his career highs were at 5 vs 5, I said he had career highs in TOI, G, A, P and Blks, perhaps you should understand the distinction before commenting back. Also I literally explained that his play hasn't dropped off, it's that he is playing with less experienced guys like Guhle, Harris, Barron, Struble and Xhekaj, their lack of situational experience causes them to make mistakes that lead to extended D zone and shortened O zone times. As these young guys gain experience they won't get hemmed in and will be able to extend their O zone time, meaning Matheson's numbers will also increase. It is much easier for Matheson to produce at 5 vs 5 when his partner is Letang and he knows he has an experienced guy over there to cover than having a young guy on the other side and worrying about the guy on the other side. Montreal hasn't "ruined" Matheson, we have asked him to take on more of a leadership role than he had in Pittsburgh which will just make him an even better layer in the long run.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mar. à 11 h 45
Sujet:
My dream off-season for the habs
I think the Habs are going to look drastically different up front heading into next season. I also think Hutson goes to Laval and Mailloux starts in Montreal, making the pairings Guhle-Mailloux, Matheson-Savard and Struble-Xhekaj
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mar. à 11 h 20
Sujet:
just messing around
The options, especially on D and in FA are pretty much endless. I would love to see our future top 6 D be something along the lines of Guhle-Mailloux, Hutson-Reinbacher, Xehkaj-Konyushkov. Next year if we entered the season lining up Matheson-Savard, Guhle-Mailloux, Struble-Xehkaj that would allow Hutson-Reinbacher to develop and dominate the AHL
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mar. à 10 h 35
Sujet:
Fiala Comparison
Oh boy, most Canes fans think Necas starts with one of Suzuki, Caufield or Slafkovsky + 1st, get prepared for some majore backlash for this proposal.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mar. à 10 h 33
Sujet:
Moving up
I personally don't think Mesar will be moved, I think Hughes really likes both him and Beck too much to move them
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mar. à 10 h 29
Sujet:
Matheson Guhle
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LuckyMoneyPuck</b></div><div>I think MTL rushed Guhle.
He needs more time to develop. You really don't know what you have there yet.
As for Matheson I don't know what MTL did. He left PIT an actual competent player whole career turned around...now...he's going down hill fast again.</div></div>
What are you talking about? Matheson is playing the best hockey of his career right now. Career highs in TOI, goals, assists, points and blocked shots, sure his possession metrics have taken a hit but that is expected with a D corps comprised of mostly under 25 full time players who are only in their 2nd or 3rd year in the league, the mistakes from those youngsters will get ironed out and Matheson's possession numbers will get better as a result as well.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mar. à 9 h 35
Sujet:
Matheson Guhle
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hockeyfan1986</b></div><div>Let's be honest. Montreal is NOT in a cup window. Not ready to truly compete for 2-3 years(basiccaly when Reinbacher is ready to play in the NHL). So, they are able to move 10-year vets. I do agree that Savard is wanting to stay. Matheson I am not sure. He may want to win a cup before "settling in Montreal on a second stint".</div></div>
Matheson is signed until 2025-26 (2 more seasons) if Habs are entering their cup window in 2-3 years then that aligns exactly with Matheson's extention and he may just want to ride out the 2024-25 season in Montreal knowing that the 2025-26 or 2026-27 season is when they will be contending. That I why I said the team might not be willing to move Matheson or Savard and my look at extending both. If you move them at the 2025 tdl then in 2025-26 or 2026-26 you have to go out and find some veteran replacements that might not gel with the team as well as these two do. If you extend Savard for 3 years that takes the contract to the end of 2027-28 (1-2 years into their cup window) and Matheson 4 or 5 then you lock up the vet leadership that you know will gel with the rest of the team. I know it blocks some of the younger guys but the team likely values Matheson and Savard differently than the fans do. Savard is the easier of the two to lock in since we only have Reinbacher and Mailloux who can push him out and that would only push him down to 3RD, if Konyushkov is coming over and does push for a spot, it won't be until the 2026-27 season and Savard could be traded or possibly retire by then
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mar. à 8 h 2
Sujet:
Matheson Guhle
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hockeyfan1986</b></div><div>I would like Hutson and Reinbacher in Laval next year. Or have Savard and Hutson on the 3rd pairing.
Matheson and Mailloux(raise his value and gameplay for the NHL).
I see it more like Matheson or Savard will be moved(or both) at the TDL 2025. Unless somehow Habs are in the playoff picture.</div></div>
The problem is, teams won't move 10 year vet leaders when they are entering their cup window. Savard <strong>may</strong> be moved but I kind of doubt it, I also expect that both will be extended (Matheson 3-5 years, Savard 1-3 years). I think being 100% honest that the fact that both are also Quebecois makes it even more unlikely either will be moved and neither will be resigned. Right or wrong, that's how I see it from the teams perspective
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mar. à 7 h 34
Sujet:
Look like next year
You are about 7 years too long on Necas at that cap hit, if he signs for less than 7.5 it's on a 1 or 2 year deal to bet on himself and get a huge raise when he hits FA. Jarvis gets at least 8 mil, Drury 4 mil, Arizona passes easily and that D isn't gonna be enough to keep them in them as serious contenders.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mar. à 7 h 15
Sujet:
Matheson Guhle
IMO it's very unlikely they keep both beyond next year and right now it's 50/50 on which of the two they decide to move. On the one hand you have Guhle, a big mobile D man that is rarely caught out of position (Weber type but way better skater) on the other hand you have Matheson a big mobile veteran D who puts up massive points. The question is will Hutson and Mailloux put up enough points to alleviate the loss of Matheson or can we find another Guhle type of RD to offset the loss of him. Both will be hard to replace and both will be missed when/if they get moved.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
lun. à 15 h 15
Sujet:
LANE DA GANE
Habs aren't offering Hitson to <strong>any</strong> team until they know he isn't gonna hit Hughes/Makar/Fox level production
1
2
Suivant
Page 1
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com