Obtenir CapFriendly PremiumObtenir CapFriendly Premium
Avatar

Black61

Membre depuis
5 sept. 2020
Messages dans les forums
2115
Messages par jour
1.8
Forum: Armchair-GMdim. à 18 h 33
Sujet: Moves that could make sense for Calgary
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dgibb10</b></div><div>Outdated stats, which wouldn't be relevant for a veteran but that's from february. so it includes only the 47 games he played up that point in 22-23. Meaning it ignores half of his career.
If you want to cite Jfresh cards you're more than welcome to.

Overall last year+this year he's in the 71st%ile xGoal wise, overall 77th%ile in proj war.

Good PK, solid offense, average defense. Small, sheltered sample size

Siegs in 18-19 was in the 80th proj war%ile
He was in the 88th%ile offensively, 97th%ile defensively (his finishing and penalty differential weighed him down a tad)
Then in a larger sample in 19-20, siegs was even better, finishing in the 90th%ile in proj war.

50% offensively, 97% defensively, and a quality PK guy.

Like I said, Siegs underlyings were FANTASTIC.

so, 2 guys with good underlyings, 23 years old, sheltered role+small sample size. Both being pushed out of a team for different reasons. Comparable</div></div>

Harris isnt playing a sheltered role hes played top 4 minutes most of the last 2 seasons
Forum: Armchair-GMsam. à 14 h 38
Sujet: Deadline Adds
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Celtics21</b></div><div>Copp and Bertuzzi weren’t traded with a first round pick to get off their contracts and didn’t have to sign a 1 year, $1.9m contract because of injury considerations.

Maybe I’m being too flippant with the third and a good prospect as being value, but I certainly hope my team doesn’t trade a first or an A prospect for him.

Do you think Montreal is going to sign him to a long term contract? Great story , but do you want a long term contract next to Monahan’s name? You should if you view him as having that type of value .

Hes a great rental for a team with the discipline to not sign him long term. He’d be great on short term prove it contracts at a little higher dollar figure than a long term one. That probably does warrant a second round pick.</div></div>

Your own placement of him in the lineup should tell ypu how stupid your assertions are.

2nd lince centre rentals (which YOU put him as) are easy 1st + trades
Forum: Armchair-GM27 nov. à 19 h 34
Sujet: threeway trade bouch bomb dot com
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>The_Rocket</b></div><div>Matheson has the same number of goals as Bouchard, nearly the same amount of shots, and the same amount of powerplay points. plays similar minutes as well. don't get me wrong, he is a downgrade, but not a huge downgrade.

in return, oilers add a quality starter for 500k cap hit, a 22 year old scoring at approx a p/g pace in the AHL (ignore podkolzin's draft position, evaluate him for what he is today and its a probable NHLer with middle 6 upside with team control) and the canucks top prospect.

beauvillier's 29 5v5 points last year would have been 2nd on the habs behind only suzuki. granted he has been snake bitten this year with a 5.41% shooting percentage and a 9.46% on-ice shooting percentage in all siuations. that's why i included a 4th to offset that.

meanwhile, montembeault and matheson, while good, aren't worth a ton on their own. matheson has almost a $5 million cap hit so nay trade involding him would require cap coming back. i think a 1st plus a B prospect is fair when you look at historical comparables on Dmen and Goalies. especially since the 1st has 0 protection</div></div>

The dont want him. They have 8 wingers signed past this year.

The habs dont need or want to trade matheson. He is the only letter wearer who speaks French. He is 16th among dmen in points and 8th in atoi. 2 1sts+ for the habs to consider.

Your offer isnt close