Because he is playing in the bottom 6 or why?

WWWW

No

Its because hes been healthy scratched 4/5 games and Hynes would rather play Smith or Sanford over him

If u aint gonna play the kid night in and out trade him to a team who could use him every night

Why in the world did they sign him in the first place? It makes no sense.

Would've preferred the Bruins did their due diligence and exercised some common sense in the first place, but at least they finally got there I guess...

I have a stupid feeling the NHL commissioner in a private meeting told Sweeney to part ways of there would be consequences

But still the whole thing just doesnt make sense.

Why do I have the feeling Bruins signed Miller just to get their 5 seconds of fame then so that after a day of trending and with people demanding him gone they made themselves look like the good guys and part ways with the kid

That or the AHL/ECHL told Boston we dont want him

Honestly while im not saying I approve or condone what Miller did why get his hopes up

Hopefully everyone can just move on and we dont see any more of this ****

The Bruins actually signed Miller knowing there would be backlash then let him go 2 days later after backlash due to “not knowing everything” come on, give me a break, be better Boston

Also RIP to the CF mod team who probably had to moderate a lot of things about Miller after his contract signing only for his contract to last 2 days

rangers kept the wrong guy

">

Why do I get the feeling a key guy on the Bruins went to Sweeney and said terminate the Miller deal or I will request a trade

And not pointing fingers but I got a sneaky feeling it was Bergeron who did that if not Pastranak/Marchand

So if thats the case

Bergy would never
He should- but I doubt he wouldve

In general Rangers did some things right this offseason but than backtracked on others

Despite the diff in production Copp had better chemistry with Panarin then Trocheck so far. Should have found a way to keep Vatrano and Motte, while finding a way to dump Goodrow

I think it was either him, Pasta, or Marchand who did it

But yeah might be more towards Pasta

As he is a UFA this year and having Miller in that Org might have affected his decision to stay. Well not anymore as the kids gone

What's the age difference on these 2?

Lundkvist is a year older

1 year I believe

crazy that the end result of all of this is that the bruins endured several days of terrible PR for no reason and mitch miller gets $95,000

Man if u think about it, if NYR never signed Goodrow and extended Blais they could have kept Vatrano and Motte who they could really use rn

Also I still feel moving on from Copp for Trocheck was a mistake as to me Copp looked better with Panarin.

Like imagine

Kreider-Zibanajad-Kravstov
Panarin-Copp-Vatrano
Laf-Chytil-Kakko
Motte-Carpanter-Vesey

Not bad

Sweeney wanted 5 seconds of media focused attention and he got it

For some reason I feel like I was involved in a scam lul

Alright. Give it a year

In general both play different styles. Lundqvist is more of an offensive guy while Schneider is more of the hard hitting D guy. So it was a tossup. I feel the forward changes they decided on were the bad ones

This whole Miller saga has been so stupid. What the heck was Bruins thinking? Yeah I get it, he's been really good in USHL past year, and it never hurts to add some young potential player, but honestly who the heck would be so stupid to expect any other outcome than this?

Signing him was stupid. Releasing him after few days after "not knowing everything" is extremely naive.

All in all, one just have to question the competence of some individuals in Bruins front office.

Schneider has more NHL games under him that Lundkvist. Experience wise these two are equal, despite Nils being one year older.