Ehh, f*ck it, I've started working on the idea lol, who cares about schoolwork anyways

lmao that last part, felt that
do remember to create a shareable link + give everyone comment access to start

Yep, working on the Intro sheet page so kind of the base and rules, then I'll make a sheet page for every team, makes it easier to navigate than 1 long sheet page

Here's the link for the prospect pyramid sheet https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/16trmzNXNRB8fNT_5T3uS4hNTHFsNEj5LGH-YNhc6Awg/edit#gid=0
I'll input the names and add CF links for all the names later

Can someone let me know if commenting works

You have to ask permission to the Doc owner

To do what?

To comment

Did you see my comment?

Yep, I see your comment that says Mailloux

What is this exactly?

It is as proposed by BuFfaLOFaN , what will be CF's prospect pyramid, where we CF users rank prospects collectively, I'll input the prospect pyramid from the Schouching blog where he made one from every team ( where we got the idea ) and then we'll change the players around to our will, it's easier that way

I feel like the Intro sheet sums it up pretty well and everyone with the link can comment ( so you can voice opinions but not edit since everyone with edit would be hell )

I would like to announce I have made some changes to the prospect sheet, I have protected most sheets ( protected=only I can edit them ) but I have left a comment/suggestion sheet that all of you can edit. You can also still comment on the protected sheets

Here's the link for the prospect pyramid sheet https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/16trmzNXNRB8fNT_5T3uS4hNTHFsNEj5LGH-YNhc6Awg/edit#gid=0
I'll input the names and add CF links for all the names later

What is your definition of a prospect? Under 25 games played?

Canucks defense today:

Hughes-Hamonic
Schenn-Myers
Burroughs-Poolman

Boston has no excuse not to light the canucks up like a Christmas tree

Playing devil's advocate here, we should use the same criteria that Pronman does for his prospect tier lists for the Athletic. Could compare them year over year and see if he's got the better eye for prospects or if we do.

What does he use as his criteria?

To be eligible for inclusion, a skater must be:

1. Under 23 years old as of Jan. 1. We now know that by the time a player turns 23, he is largely done the steep upward progression we see in prospects and will begin to plateau.
2. Not a full-time NHL player. This is the only arbitrary section of the criteria. Here, I trust my judgment for whether or not a rostered NHL player is still likely to bounce between levels more than any pre-determined games played cutoff. Preference for inclusion as an NHL prospect is more likely to be given to teenagers than 22-year-olds.
3. Either signed to an NHL contract or selected in the entry draft, without the expiration of either of those rights.
Players who are signed to AHL contracts were not considered.

To be eligible for inclusion, a goalie must be:

1. Under 25 years old as of Jan. 1. This expanded age criteria (it was set at under-24 last year) is more reflective of the typical goalie trajectory and allows for the continued consideration of goalies who are very much still prospects.
2. Not currently established as one of their NHL club’s two go-to options.

Room for some common-sense judgement but it's a pretty standard notion.