I would get if Chicago pays 1st and 2x2nd for taking Seth Jones, not the otherway around

Jackets easily pass, we dont want either or those players. Id rather just keep Boqvist on the bench

Detroit passes, We don't need more Goaltending, But RHD is a need and Antti Tuomisto is one of few we've within our organization.

We'll have Trevor Zegras and Frankie Vatrano at LW in the top two lines next season, so Trevor Hall -- sorry, Taylor Hall -- is redundant and too expensive for a #3LW. But Connor Murphy is a lively off-season possibility. We definitely need veteran RhDs.

Los Angeles won't be needing forwards from outside the organization.

That Seth Jones trade is...certainly a trade.

More like a fleecing

Sabres would have no interest in ANY of that nonsense

Sorry, but none of these trades have a chance of happening. And the roster as constructed is like $25m below the cap floor, so there's that...

Dear God just look at that roster, poor bedard

Honestly this whole post is a complete waste of time.

Obviously the sabres are not doing either one of those trades

Hilarious that you think Jones has positive trade value.

And that Anaheim trade never happens

There is a lot of bad here it’s kinda hard to know where to start. Ignoring the trade values & realism of them happening individually: you have made 7 trades sending out 11players & getting 2 new ones. If you listen to any of Kyle Davidson’s recent interviews he has been talking about roster continuity & not having as much turn over as they have had . Sounds to me like the stripping down phase is in the past & the building up stage is on the present.