CaseyFlyman

Membre depuis

7 sept. 2018

Équipe favorite

Blue Jackets de Columbus

Deuxième équipe favorite

Bruins de Boston

Messages dans les forums

250

Messages par jour

0.1

MESSAGES

SUJETS

MENTIONS "J'AIME"

ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG

Forum: Armchair-GMHier à 20 h 44

Sujet: yep yap patty wack

I think the Jackets take that

Forum: Armchair-GMHier à 20 h 42

Sujet: scoring top 6

The Jackets would absolutely take that.

Forum: Armchair-GMjeu. à 18 h 30

Sujet: trading out

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JuanDamienNebraska</b></div><div>Roslovic for him one for one makes so much sense.</div></div>

I'd suggested that in an ACGM and seen it elsewhere one for one. I think it makes sense, but a couple people didn't want to take on Roslovic's contract (which, why not, and what about potential retention?).

Either way, Gryz for the 3rd OR for Roslovic both make sense, and I'd like to see either of them.

Forum: Armchair-GMjeu. à 18 h 26

Sujet: more Swedes

\<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>PantsOffnJacket</b></div><div>It's not a bad trade, but the jackets don't really need any more wingers. They've got too many atm as is</div></div>

I don't mind it, even with the excess of wingers. Garland > Bemstrom, Rathbone and Bjork might be about even (and we don't really need to keep Bjork), the 3rd probably just about evens it out. Garland probably slots in on the 3rd line where Bemstrom might have. I don't know if I'd take it, but I'm not sure what I'd change either.

Forum: Armchair-GMjeu. à 16 h 31

Sujet: Ideas on how to improve the team but still get younger

I don't hate the CBJ trade, but you can probably take out the 4th and both RFAs. CBJ are looking for quality over quantity, but it does clear a RD logjam while filling two positions of need (although arguably not as well as we could) and adds a high pick. I'd at least entertain it.

Forum: Armchair-GMjeu. à 13 h 19

Sujet: Consensus CBJ ACGM - Attempt 1

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ajp_18</b></div><div>No, because Columbus would need to fill that role of 3rd pair LD with someone, Boqvist and Blankenburg can’t be 100% trusted to be in the line up for all 82 games, Peeke or in this case Kulak can be.

Honestly with Columbus’s injury history on the backend have int a lot of depth on the blueline will be a need for us so we aren’t having to trust to play Berni as the top pair LHD next season.</div></div>

In this instance, we still have Bean buried in the AHL...I'm not sold on him being a reliable 3LD, but it's an option. Otherwise, maybe a UFA? Or a package of Bean + LAK 1st + ??? for someone like Hanifin, which I've seen a lot? I agree with you on injury history at D, that's a major concern.

Forum: Armchair-GMjeu. à 13 h 17

Sujet: Consensus CBJ ACGM - Attempt 1

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Civil_Eng_PE</b></div><div>Yeah, I feel like Jack can be sent somewhere else and the Boston trade is more likely going to be Bemstrom + a 3rd.

Also, Bean is not getting buried. He is 100% getting traded or he's on the main squad next year. He isn't bad enough to get sat in the AHL, he'd 100% get picked up on waivers</div></div>

Jack probably stays to start the year and gets moved half-retained at the deadline, but I liked this proposal too. Bemstrom + CGY's 3rd would probably work for CBJ.

And yes, Bean isn't getting buried, that's my glaring issue #1 that would get fixed in the 2nd iteration. I'd either move him as part of a package for a 2C or nix the Kulak deal and just keep him on the 3rd pair.

Forum: Armchair-GMjeu. à 13 h 14

Sujet: Consensus CBJ ACGM - Attempt 1

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Gofnut999</b></div><div>While the trade works in principle. Boston really needs to move Grizz without taking cap back. Picks or prospects preferred.</div></div>

What would the price be, would Calgary's 3rd get it done? Or Roslovic with retention instead, then Boston adds a pick to even up?

Forum: Armchair-GMjeu. à 13 h 10

Sujet: Consensus CBJ ACGM - Attempt 1

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dk325</b></div><div>I think Murray to Columbus just isn't going to happen. Jarmo has not taken on a cap dump in his entire tenure as GM and the $6M he is owed in real cash is likely too large a pill for McConnell to swallow for some draft capital.</div></div>

That's the most likely trade to get cut entirely from Attempt #2. I've seen it a bunch so I wanted to use it as a feeler, but my guess is Columbus would be indifferent at best, even for a 1st.

Forum: Armchair-GMjeu. à 13 h 9

Sujet: Consensus CBJ ACGM - Attempt 1

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Oiler_fan88</b></div><div>Would be hard to do that trade while sending out kulak</div></div>

If Columbus trades for Gryz, Kulak wouldn't fill a direct need...maybe Peeke for a 2nd straight-up?

Forum: Armchair-GMjeu. à 13 h 8

Sujet: Consensus CBJ ACGM - Attempt 1

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SNipeSHowInc</b></div><div>Leafs decline. Sooner to buy out Murray than give away a first for a 3rd</div></div>

That's 100% valid, it looks like his buyout is $687,500 this upcoming season and $2,000,000 next, which might hurt. Is there a trade you'd consider to avoid that? Columbus could take it or leave it.

Forum: Armchair-GMjeu. à 13 h 4

Sujet: Consensus CBJ ACGM - Attempt 1

It's a starting point, but I want to know what you think. The glaring issues I still see are:
1. Bean isn't on the NHL roster
2. Danforth as 3C doesn't sit right with me, Jenner is better suited for that role which means we'd still need a 2C.
3. The LAK 1st is burning a hole in my pocket.

Maybe there's a package involving Bean + LAK 1st for a legit 2C? What are the options out there?

Forum: Armchair-GMmer. à 15 h 59

Sujet: my leafs

Why trade for Tanev only to trade him for picks? Seattle I imagine would rather keep him, and it's not like they're hurting for roster spots or cap space where he'd be the casualty. It feels a little lopsided Toronto's way, maybe both 1sts, the 2nd, and a 3rd in total for Nylander?

I doubt Arizona takes the Crouse deal, though I'm not familiar enough with the roster construction to say so definitively.

Anaheim could consider the Murray deal, depending on how much Terry and Zegras end up costing. There's definitely no room on the NHL roster, but they could probably just waive him and send him to the AHL.

Columbus takes the Peeke deal and doesn't look back!

Forum: Armchair-GMmer. à 13 h 20

Sujet: Bonkers Central

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Logicalicesports</b></div><div>I don't understand your detest to this, its a hypothetical.</div></div>

On the surface, sure, it fills a need for Columbus. But to include 3OA and Tex, it's like hypothetically robbing our house and slapping our mother on the way out, then acting confused as to why we don't invite you over anymore.

Forum: Armchair-GMmer. à 13 h 13

Sujet: Lindell and Peeke

I'd take that for CBJ, though I'd hate playing against Peeke so much every year.

Forum: Armchair-GMmer. à 13 h 6

Sujet: Admiral Conroy and Captain Backs Sparrow

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Westerner69</b></div><div>I was not aware, after doing some research I understand. Who would you replace him with IYO?</div></div>

If you're looking for a young winger, Bemstrom could use a change of scenery and is the same age as Tex but cheaper. Roslovic half-retained could also work, he's another player that's useful as a center or on the wing and has looked really good at times, but also disappears at times. Something around one of those two would work for CBJ, it's just hard to gauge Tex's trade value so there's not a clear one-for-one swap.

Forum: Armchair-GMmer. à 0 h 21

Sujet: Fire the Cannon

This team feels incomplete, for obvious and less-obvious reasons. Replace Engvall with Chinakhov and I love the top 9...but where's the 4th line? Why move Boqvist to play Peeke on the top pair, and Gudbranson at all? Why move Dumais? Where's Tarasov, is he actually totally out of the picture in 3 years?

This feels like it's getting there for the 2024-25 roster, but it's not a complete 2025-26 roster.

Forum: Armchair-GMmer. à 0 h 15

Sujet: Last year

Dang, I like POJ and Chinakhov...I might take that deal but I'd wait until closer to the deadline and see what we actually might have in Chinakhov. He was injured most of last year, but has looked pretty good when healthy. It just feels too early to move him.

Forum: Armchair-GMmer. à 0 h 9

Sujet: Jim GRIT

Get out of here with that Jenner nonsense.

Forum: Armchair-GMmer. à 0 h 7

Sujet: Bradley

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bricher33</b></div><div>Columbus Accepts As long as late into the of season we still have the cap space.</div></div>

There's also a chance Murray is on LTIR, too, though I'd take the trade and obviously hope he can play.

Forum: Armchair-GMmer. à 0 h 5

Sujet: Admiral Conroy and Captain Backs Sparrow

CBJ might actually accept that trade, but you'd have to take Texier out or replace him with another forward. Columbus supported him all year and he's finally ready to come back...we're not going to toss him into a trade from a purely human standpoint.

Forum: Armchair-GMlun. à 17 h 10

Sujet: F it we ball

At least it's a Lindholm trade that doesn't involve 3OA?

I'd like to see top-10 protection on that 2024 1st, and that's a package that sells low on Boqvist and Sillinger. For that package I'd want to see Hanifin included instead of Tanev+3rd (trading a RD for RD doesn't fix our RD logjam), then add to the CBJ side to make it work.

Forum: Armchair-GMlun. à 17 h 6

Sujet: JT Miller trade options 1

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dg92</b></div><div>Maybe not win now in the sense of all in but they’ll want to tmake the playoffs. You don’t sign Johnny Gaudreau and Erik Gudbranson if you’re not trying to be competitive.</div></div>

Gudbranson was an attempt to get more physical and change the makeup of the back end. If you get a chance to sign a superstar for free, you take it, regardless of where you are.

I think the FO is overly optimistic about the current roster, but they're not about to mortgage the best shot at a legit 1C in franchise history to try and hammer the window open to compete now. Laine and Gaudreau will still be in their prime in 2-3 years when that pick is ready to play at the NHL level. They're going to be very good for another 5-10 years. There's no need to make a huge trade with the 3OA.

"Aaron Portzaline who covers the jackets for the Athletic reporter that it could be possible that they move #3 overall." -> Portzline is generally an okay source, until he proposes something asinine with zero basis, which is what he's done here. It's created a windfall of 3OA trades on here that just aren't at all what the team is looking for.

Jarmo has said he's not trading 3OA unless we get back a 1C under 25, and there's only 2 or 3 in the league that would even be an option. It's just not going to happen.

Forum: Armchair-GMlun. à 16 h 57

Sujet: JT Miller trade options 1

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dg92</b></div><div>Laine at C 😂😂😂</div></div>

We tried it at the end of last season with a lame-duck coach and few options. It didn't go well...

Forum: Armchair-GMlun. à 16 h 51

Sujet: Huge Trade with Toronto

The Jackets don't really need another goalie, but we'd take Zadorov for Bean and the 3rd.

12 Suivant

Page 1

PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE

COTES DES PARIS

LANGUE

ARCHIVES

CBA

CALCS

OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY

OUTILS

JOUEURS

CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST

CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST

OUTILS INTERACTIFS

CaseyFlyman

Membre depuis

Équipe favorite

Deuxième équipe favorite

Messages dans les forums

Messages par jour