SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Fauteuil - DG

TDL and draft

Créé par: NewDG
Équipe: 2023-24 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 18 janv. 2024
Publié: 28 janv. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Lindstrom, Cayden
3950 000 $
Hutson, Lane
2900 000 $
Transactions
1.
MTL
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (CAR)
2.
MTL
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (CHI)
3.
4.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de MTL
Logo de CAR
Logo de CHI
Logo de COL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MIN
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de SJS
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de EDM
Logo de WSH
2025
Logo de MTL
Logo de CGY
Logo de MTL
Logo de PIT
Logo de MTL
Logo de VAN
Logo de MTL
Logo de DET
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
2026
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $69 638 750 $1 170 000 $5 040 000 $13 861 250 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 8
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 500 000 $$4M)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 362 500 $3 362 500 $
C, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 4
Lindstrom, Cayden
950 000 $950 000 $
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance420 000 $$420K)
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Hutson, Lane
900 000 $900 000 $
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
890 000 $890 000 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
867 500 $867 500 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
766 667 $766 667 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
828 333 $828 333 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
762 500 $762 500 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
28 janv. à 15 h 15
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,537
Mentions "j'aime": 5,032
Canes decline. You're not getting a 1st for a 3C that plays maybe 40 games a year
28 janv. à 15 h 15
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 5,638
Mentions "j'aime": 5,788
Take out the 2nd and I still doubt the hawks take Dvorak off your hands
JK74, Garak, YeahRighttt and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
28 janv. à 15 h 17
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,181
Mentions "j'aime": 18,356
Rumor is that Kent offered Slafkovsky+1st for Holtz and Fitzy declined.
28 janv. à 15 h 17
#4
Misses Danault
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 309
Mentions "j'aime": 180
Quoting: Caniac2000
Canes decline. You're not getting a 1st for a 3C that plays maybe 40 games a year


He's outproducing Lindholm and hasn't missed a game all year, only making 2M against the cap too
NewDG a aimé ceci.
28 janv. à 15 h 20
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 9,246
Mentions "j'aime": 2,965
canes pass. rangers or another team will overpay for Monahan.
28 janv. à 15 h 22
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,537
Mentions "j'aime": 5,032
Quoting: reelnb
He's outproducing Lindholm and hasn't missed a game all year, only making 2M against the cap too


Don't want Lindholm either, and is still a 3C with a LONG injury history. In Carolina, he may not even be a 3C. You're not likely to get a 1st for him, especially from Carolina. It's just delusional
28 janv. à 15 h 25
#7
Misses Danault
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 309
Mentions "j'aime": 180
Quoting: Caniac2000
Don't want Lindholm either, and is still a 3C with a LONG injury history. In Carolina, he may not even be a 3C. You're not likely to get a 1st for him, especially from Carolina. It's just delusional


Not saying it'll be you guys specifically, but given his production, position, and cap hit, he's going to be in demand. Even if the Flames do decide to trade Lindholm (not a certainty given recent reports) there just aren't many forwards available this deadline, much less centers who are easy on the cap. Someone is going to pay for Monahan.
28 janv. à 15 h 25
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2022
Messages: 1,502
Mentions "j'aime": 3,120
Farrell is good but he's not worth a 2nd. Dvorak has negative value which costs to dump.
Garak, YeahRighttt et Hawksguy81 a aimé ceci.
28 janv. à 15 h 30
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 406
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Monahan : 35 points, did not missed any games, healthy, 55% in draws, good in all aspects of the game and 200 feet player. You are saying KK, Staal and Drury are better ? Hurricanes should jump on him IMO. You can disagree if you want but I think he would be great help and Brind'Amour would love him.
28 janv. à 15 h 36
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,537
Mentions "j'aime": 5,032
Quoting: reelnb
Not saying it'll be you guys specifically, but given his production, position, and cap hit, he's going to be in demand. Even if the Flames do decide to trade Lindholm (not a certainty given recent reports) there just aren't many forwards available this deadline, much less centers who are easy on the cap. Someone is going to pay for Monahan.


Not a 1st, not with his injury history. He cannot stay on the ice. That's not worth a 1st. I could see a 2nd, but he's not worth more
28 janv. à 15 h 59
#11
Subbanator
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 7,362
Mentions "j'aime": 3,361
Quoting: Caniac2000
Not a 1st, not with his injury history. He cannot stay on the ice. That's not worth a 1st. I could see a 2nd, but he's not worth more


He's been the best center on the market this year and also has the most affordable AAV, add in retention and it's even more of a deal. If Monahan isn't worth a 1st then no other rental on the market this year is
NewDG a aimé ceci.
28 janv. à 16 h 3
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,537
Mentions "j'aime": 5,032
Quoting: Subbanator7667
He's been the best center on the market this year and also has the most affordable AAV, add in retention and it's even more of a deal. If Monahan isn't worth a 1st then no other rental on the market this year is


I majorly disagree with this. The reason he's not worth it isn't because of his production. It's his known injury history. Looking at other players looking like they're going to be available this deadline, there's players like Lindholm who don't have the lengthy injury issues, or Tarasenko whose been healthier in the last 3 season or so. I understand wanting a lot for him, but the reasons he won't return it aren't fixed by his on-ice production
28 janv. à 16 h 4
#13
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,336
Mentions "j'aime": 25,247
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Rumor is that Kent offered Slafkovsky+1st for Holtz and Fitzy declined.

Poe's Theorem will apply.
28 janv. à 16 h 9
#14
Subbanator
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 7,362
Mentions "j'aime": 3,361
Quoting: Caniac2000
I majorly disagree with this. The reason he's not worth it isn't because of his production. It's his known injury history. Looking at other players looking like they're going to be available this deadline, there's players like Lindholm who don't have the lengthy injury issues, or Tarasenko whose been healthier in the last 3 season or so. I understand wanting a lot for him, but the reasons he won't return it aren't fixed by his on-ice production


His injury history far less of a worry than I think those in the outside think. Every team has doctor recommendations and can see the players history. Monahan needed a new hip and got one, hasn't been a problem since. Last year he broke a bone in his foot which happens to a lot of players with full recoveries.

And this year he's been getting better and playing consistently well while being injury free. I get the concern but I think teams doctors would be telling them that the risks for Monahan are the same as any other rental.
NewDG a aimé ceci.
28 janv. à 16 h 16
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,537
Mentions "j'aime": 5,032
Quoting: Subbanator7667
His injury history far less of a worry than I think those in the outside think. Every team has doctor recommendations and can see the players history. Monahan needed a new hip and got one, hasn't been a problem since. Last year he broke a bone in his foot which happens to a lot of players with full recoveries.

And this year he's been getting better and playing consistently well while being injury free. I get the concern but I think teams doctors would be telling them that the risks for Monahan are the same as any other rental.


Look at how many players stay healthy after getting a new hip. He missed games last year, Backstrom got one and can't skate. Kane got one and he's healthy, ish, but not at his best. There are a lot more cases of players struggling to come back from that than succeeding.
28 janv. à 16 h 24
#16
Subbanator
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 7,362
Mentions "j'aime": 3,361
Quoting: Caniac2000
Look at how many players stay healthy after getting a new hip. He missed games last year, Backstrom got one and can't skate. Kane got one and he's healthy, ish, but not at his best. There are a lot more cases of players struggling to come back from that than succeeding.


He missed games because of his foot last year, not his hip. Hip is now two years old and is fully functioning. Kane and Backstrom are both more than 5 years older than Monahan and had hip surgery in their 30s, not at 27, very different situations.
NewDG a aimé ceci.
28 janv. à 16 h 25
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 10,812
Mentions "j'aime": 10,564
Farrell isn't even enough to dump Dvorak. So, adding that 2nd is definitely a no go.
YeahRighttt, Hawksguy81 et JK74 a aimé ceci.
28 janv. à 16 h 25
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,537
Mentions "j'aime": 5,032
Quoting: Subbanator7667
He missed games because of his foot last year, not his hip. Hip is now two years old and is fully functioning. Kane and Backstrom are both more than 5 years older than Monahan and had hip surgery in their 30s, not at 27, very different situations.


That's what I mean, it's not just his hip. He's had injury problems for years. He's not worth a 1st if he can't stay on the ice. He's had foot injuries, hip, concussions, shoulder. He's another LTIR stint waiting to happen.
28 janv. à 16 h 27
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,181
Mentions "j'aime": 18,356
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Poe's Theorem will apply.


I heard Kent offered PLD for OldNYIfan straight-up, one-for-one
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
28 janv. à 16 h 38
#20
Subbanator
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 7,362
Mentions "j'aime": 3,361
Quoting: Caniac2000
That's what I mean, it's not just his hip. He's had injury problems for years. He's not worth a 1st if he can't stay on the ice. He's had foot injuries, hip, concussions, shoulder. He's another LTIR stint waiting to happen.


Guy was a 70 + game a year player before his hip went and he had to miss significant time. Before that it was the normal bumps and bruises every NHL player goes through. There's only a hand full of players that actually play 82 games a year.

I get your point to make your argument but he's showed that he is back to form this year and I think teams will have to meet Hughes price of they want him
NewDG a aimé ceci.
28 janv. à 17 h 54
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,537
Mentions "j'aime": 5,032
Quoting: Subbanator7667
Guy was a 70 + game a year player before his hip went and he had to miss significant time. Before that it was the normal bumps and bruises every NHL player goes through. There's only a hand full of players that actually play 82 games a year.

I get your point to make your argument but he's showed that he is back to form this year and I think teams will have to meet Hughes price of they want him


Then the Habs are going to be stuck with Monahan instead of futures that they need. It's very very unlikely he's going to get a first for Monahan
28 janv. à 18 h 14
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,550
Mentions "j'aime": 6,145
Kings not interested. They're not going to trade one healthy scratch for another, especially considering their recent problem is not enough scoring.
28 janv. à 18 h 29
#23
Lets Get Kraken
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 8,643
Mentions "j'aime": 3,472
Canes have no interest in Monahan. They need more 5v5 offense, and there are better options that are less injury prone that will do a better job at 5v5 offense. Canes already have an elite PP this year, and Monahan wouldn’t be getting the PP1 time that he has been getting.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage