SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Getting C depth

Créé par: Jacketsman61
Équipe: 2023-24 Blue Jackets de Columbus
Date de création initiale: 26 mai 2023
Publié: 27 mai 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Montreal in this scenario is enamored with Leo Carlsson. They want him and plan to sign Dubois to an offer sheet come July 1. The Jackets take Will Smith in this scenario as The Sharks take Michkov. For trading down two spots and having to wait a year at least on Will Smith the Jackets get some depth down the middle by getting Dach and Dvorak. The Jackets throw in Roslovic to even the value.

The Jackets land Hanifin to secure the left side of the defense for years to come. The Jackets give up two 1st in the deal while also giving up Boqvist but Hanifin would be a huge get and moving Boqvist opens up a spot for Jiricek to get NHL PT.

The Kings trade is simply getting an expiring contract that is useable to help bridge the gap for Jiricek. Roy is very serviceable and the Kings need to move one and the Jackets move Jake Bean who is also an expiring contract who fills depth on the left side.
Transactions
1.
CBJ
  1. Dach, Kirby
  2. Dvorak, Christian
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (FLA)
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (MTL)
MTL
  1. Roslovic, Jack
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (CBJ)
2.
CBJ
  1. Hanifin, Noah
  2. Vladar, Daniel
Détails additionnels:
Hanifin extends 6x6.5
CGY
  1. Bemström, Emil
  2. Boqvist, Adam
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (LAK)
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (FLA)
3.
CBJ
  1. Roy, Matt
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2023 (LAK)
LAK
  1. Bean, Jake
  2. Bjork, Marcus [Droits de RFA]
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (CBJ)
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de MTL
Logo de CGY
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de WPG
Logo de BOS
Logo de LAK
Logo de CBJ
2024
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de LAK
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
2025
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de VGK
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $71 805 833 $0 $4 550 000 $11 694 167 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
9 750 000 $9 750 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 362 500 $3 362 500 $
C, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C, AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 850 000 $$2M)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 525 000 $1 525 000 $
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
975 000 $975 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
762 500 $762 500 $
AG, C
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
9 583 333 $9 583 333 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance1 000 000 $$1M)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
825 000 $825 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
27 mai 2023 à 6 h 40
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,693
Mentions "j'aime": 721
I don't see Mtl trading those 4 pieces for 2d overall, let alone 3rd.

I could see them trading Dach+5th OVR for 2nd OVR.

At the end of the day, the prices for moving up in the draft are too high. They bring too much risk. If teams rly ask these pieces for changing from 3rd to 5th ovr, it's a surefire way to FastTrack GMs to being relieved of their duties.
Now, if you look at the GMs picking in the top 5, only CLB has a veteran GM...so the rest wouldn't dare take on this risk.
Indy a aimé ceci.
27 mai 2023 à 6 h 40
#2
Dekesaladekes
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 3,003
Mentions "j'aime": 1,074
So you have the 3OA pick with the potential of picking a franchise Center prospect in Leo carlsson and instead you trade down to get a lesser prospect and acquire an average 3C in Dvorak and Kirby dach who is terrible at Center and played RW all year for Montreal?

Sure sounds like improving your Center depth.

Boone Jenner is on your 4th line LW and he’s still the best Center on your team.

You are way better of with Leo Carlsson.
And maybe giving him a year longer to develop and running with sillinger and Jenner as your top 6 centers.


Calgary trade I feel is unnecessary too with mateychuk in the system and probably a year or 2 out from cracking the roster
27 mai 2023 à 6 h 42
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,693
Mentions "j'aime": 721
The Jack Roslovic piece is interesting though, MTL would flip him for 1st rd pick 2024 + prospect easy
27 mai 2023 à 6 h 43
#4
Dekesaladekes
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 3,003
Mentions "j'aime": 1,074
Quoting: Ste_Catherine_Street
I don't see Mtl trading those 4 pieces for 2d overall, let alone 3rd.

I could see them trading Dach+5th OVR for 2nd OVR.

At the end of the day, the prices for moving up in the draft are too high. They bring too much risk. If teams rly ask these pieces for changing from 3rd to 5th ovr, it's a surefire way to FastTrack GMs to being relieved of their duties.
Now, if you look at the GMs picking in the top 5, only CLB has a veteran GM...so the rest wouldn't dare take on this risk.



Montreal would jump on that trade in a heartbeat.

Roslovic and Dvorak are of similar skill level one better offensively the other defensively.
Dach isn’t a true Center and was somewhat carried by Suzuki and caufield when he was their RW.

And you get the pick to select Leo Carlsson who has the potential to be Montreal’s franchise Center, he has a much higher ceiling the Suzuki does
Civil_Eng_PE a aimé ceci.
27 mai 2023 à 6 h 50
#5
HuGo is a Boss GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 7,008
Mentions "j'aime": 3,060
Everyone has their opinion, but IMO Dach will be a 70-80 point Center in his prime. He protects the puck better than Suzuki. He has great vision and is equally creative. He has started to attack the net.

I am too high on Dach to trade him. I would do something like 5th OA, Florida pick, Dvorak, Kidney to move up and pick 3rd OA.
27 mai 2023 à 6 h 58
#6
Pop Pop
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 14,633
Mentions "j'aime": 8,285
Just take Carlsson 3oa and don't overthink it, if you like Smith better take him. Your risking not getting either here in this deal if the sharks don't want michkov
Ste_Catherine_Street et Indy a aimé ceci.
27 mai 2023 à 6 h 58
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 976
Mentions "j'aime": 835
This is pretty interesting. It's one of the few ACGMs where we move 3rd ovr that doesn't instantly make me wanna throw up, so that says something. There's a lot of temping things here and the explanations are very justified. Here would be my list of concerns/criticisms

* Carlsson looks like a world beater right now. The deal is very temping, but I'm wondering if Dach + the other parts is worth the drop, which says a lot about how Carlsson has looked
* No need (or room) for Vladar with Elvis/Tarasov, so I'd take him out and change the value a bit. (Maybe change the LA 1st to CBJ 2nd or something along those lines.
* I like Roy as a player, so I'm cool with picking him up, but givne your explanation, I wouldn't really want to give up pick 34 (on top of whatever value you give Bean) if the plan is just a 1 year stop gap. I'd probably try to change that to our 3rd and drop the 5th in return, but not sure if that's realistic value or not. Regardless, I'd wanna plan to resign Roy if possible, either to an extension or during FA to a 1-2 year deal. Would love him as 1RD and sliding down to 2RD whenever Jiricek is ready, then holding that spot for Ceulemans and allowing Peeke to play a more fitting 3rd pairing spot.

Very very interesting ideas.
27 mai 2023 à 7 h 47
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,693
Mentions "j'aime": 721
Quoting: Dekes
Montreal would jump on that trade in a heartbeat.

Roslovic and Dvorak are of similar skill level one better offensively the other defensively.
Dach isn’t a true Center and was somewhat carried by Suzuki and caufield when he was their RW.

And you get the pick to select Leo Carlsson who has the potential to be Montreal’s franchise Center, he has a much higher ceiling the Suzuki does


How many Habs games did you watch last year?
Dach drove the net, carried the puck up the ice, won puck battles.
If anything, he carried Suzuki. His production dropped when Dach got injured.
You're too low on Dach, but ok.
Habs wouldn't do this.
27 mai 2023 à 7 h 48
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,693
Mentions "j'aime": 721
Quoting: Dekes
Montreal would jump on that trade in a heartbeat.

Roslovic and Dvorak are of similar skill level one better offensively the other defensively.
Dach isn’t a true Center and was somewhat carried by Suzuki and caufield when he was their RW.

And you get the pick to select Leo Carlsson who has the potential to be Montreal’s franchise Center, he has a much higher ceiling the Suzuki does


Just noticed you're a Bruins fan. Now it makes sense. Any games you watched the Habs play were on NESN with two baffoons calling the game.
27 mai 2023 à 8 h 18
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 245
Mentions "j'aime": 59
Value aside, those saying Dach is not a true center has clearly never watched a single Habs game in their life.
TheRealisticGuy et Xavier02 a aimé ceci.
27 mai 2023 à 8 h 23
#11
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,499
Mentions "j'aime": 25,388
Matt Roy is too central to our defense for us to trade him, even for the 34th overall pick in this draft and more. We're pretty confident that he'll re-sign with us, so the fact that he's on an expiring contract isn't really a concern, and won't be unless and until we approach the trade deadline next February and we still don't have a deal.
27 mai 2023 à 8 h 51
#12
Habs4Ever
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 4,297
Mentions "j'aime": 1,737
Quoting: Ste_Catherine_Street
I don't see Mtl trading those 4 pieces for 2d overall, let alone 3rd.

I could see them trading Dach+5th OVR for 2nd OVR.

At the end of the day, the prices for moving up in the draft are too high. They bring too much risk. If teams rly ask these pieces for changing from 3rd to 5th ovr, it's a surefire way to FastTrack GMs to being relieved of their duties.
Now, if you look at the GMs picking in the top 5, only CLB has a veteran GM...so the rest wouldn't dare take on this risk.


Mais qu’est-ce que je lis
Une chance t’es pas DG, Dach + 5th OA for Fantilli 😂😂
27 mai 2023 à 8 h 51
#13
Habs4Ever
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 4,297
Mentions "j'aime": 1,737
Quoting: Dekes
So you have the 3OA pick with the potential of picking a franchise Center prospect in Leo carlsson and instead you trade down to get a lesser prospect and acquire an average 3C in Dvorak and Kirby dach who is terrible at Center and played RW all year for Montreal?

Sure sounds like improving your Center depth.

Boone Jenner is on your 4th line LW and he’s still the best Center on your team.

You are way better of with Leo Carlsson.
And maybe giving him a year longer to develop and running with sillinger and Jenner as your top 6 centers.


Calgary trade I feel is unnecessary too with mateychuk in the system and probably a year or 2 out from cracking the roster


Now Leo Carlsson is a Franchise Center prospect
What
27 mai 2023 à 9 h 32
#14
Prime Primeau
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 5,469
Mentions "j'aime": 2,173
Quoting: Dekes
Montreal would jump on that trade in a heartbeat.

Roslovic and Dvorak are of similar skill level one better offensively the other defensively.
Dach isn’t a true Center and was somewhat carried by Suzuki and caufield when he was their RW.

And you get the pick to select Leo Carlsson who has the potential to be Montreal’s franchise Center, he has a much higher ceiling the Suzuki does


No, Montreal decline. Dach is a center. He played almost all year at center (except the few games with Suzuki and Caufield). Remove 5 overall and add Calgary's pick and it's more fair
27 mai 2023 à 9 h 45
#15
Subbanator
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 7,437
Mentions "j'aime": 3,402
MTL is fine at center so they have no incentive to move up and pick a center. They're likely going to see who is left over between Smith and Michkov, draft one of them and sign PLF later, win - win
27 mai 2023 à 9 h 54
#16
CbjSabresDucks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 4,721
Mentions "j'aime": 2,180
wayyyy too much for Hanifin, holy cow
Civil_Eng_PE a aimé ceci.
27 mai 2023 à 11 h 8
#17
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 4,410
Mentions "j'aime": 900
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Matt Roy is too central to our defense for us to trade him, even for the 34th overall pick in this draft and more. We're pretty confident that he'll re-sign with us, so the fact that he's on an expiring contract isn't really a concern, and won't be unless and until we approach the trade deadline next February and we still don't have a deal.


Interesting take. But serious question, what are the Kings going to do with Spence, Durzi, and Clarke all being RD. Seems overcrowded.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
27 mai 2023 à 11 h 11
#18
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,499
Mentions "j'aime": 25,388
Quoting: Jacketsman61
Interesting take. But serious question, what are the Kings going to do with Spence, Durzi, and Clarke all being RD. Seems overcrowded.

It IS overcrowded, no doubt. I expect Sean Walker and one of Sean Durzi or Jordan Spence to be traded. It's highly unlikely that Matt Roy gets traded -- one of the primary objectives of this off-season is to find a partner for him.
pocke a aimé ceci.
27 mai 2023 à 11 h 55
#19
Indy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 381
Mentions "j'aime": 293
Quoting: Ste_Catherine_Street
I don't see Mtl trading those 4 pieces for 2d overall, let alone 3rd.

I could see them trading Dach+5th OVR for 2nd OVR.

At the end of the day, the prices for moving up in the draft are too high. They bring too much risk. If teams rly ask these pieces for changing from 3rd to 5th ovr, it's a surefire way to FastTrack GMs to being relieved of their duties.
Now, if you look at the GMs picking in the top 5, only CLB has a veteran GM...so the rest wouldn't dare take on this risk.


He's also has a reputation to swindle too when he's in the seller's seat so I think most GMs would be cautious too. This is actually the first 3OA trade proposal that doesnt want me to weap for humanity but as you say game theory says that Sharks will possibly take Michkov so what do you gain with those assets being moved basically having your second option land in your lap. Too expensive for Montreal for even two spots when anyother year that 5th pick is basically a 2nd with the amount of skill in this draft.
27 mai 2023 à 12 h 7
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2017
Messages: 611
Mentions "j'aime": 498
I don't think Habs would chose Carlsson and Roslovic over Dach, Michkov, Dvorak and 31st/32nd.
27 mai 2023 à 12 h 54
#21
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 4,410
Mentions "j'aime": 900
Quoting: ohmyjlord
I don't think Habs would chose Carlsson and Roslovic over Dach, Michkov, Dvorak and 31st/32nd.


The Habs aren’t going to take Michkov. Montreal is just like Columbus in the idea they want to be better sooner than later. Waiting three yrs for Michkov is out of the question.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
29 mai 2023 à 0 h 49
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2017
Messages: 611
Mentions "j'aime": 498
Quoting: Jacketsman61
The Habs aren’t going to take Michkov. Montreal is just like Columbus in the idea they want to be better sooner than later. Waiting three yrs for Michkov is out of the question.

It doesn't matter...the value just isn't there. Dach + Michkov (even if you have to wait) + Dvorak + 31st/32nd >> Carlsson + Roslovic.
29 mai 2023 à 0 h 57
#23
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 11,990
Mentions "j'aime": 3,174
Quoting: Ste_Catherine_Street
I don't see Mtl trading those 4 pieces for 2d overall, let alone 3rd.

I could see them trading Dach+5th OVR for 2nd OVR.

At the end of the day, the prices for moving up in the draft are too high. They bring too much risk. If teams rly ask these pieces for changing from 3rd to 5th ovr, it's a surefire way to FastTrack GMs to being relieved of their duties.
Now, if you look at the GMs picking in the top 5, only CLB has a veteran GM...so the rest wouldn't dare take on this risk.


Dach is not nearly enough to get to fantilli. Dach had TWENTY even strength points last year.
29 mai 2023 à 6 h 48
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,693
Mentions "j'aime": 721
Quoting: dgibb10
Dach is not nearly enough to get to fantilli. Dach had TWENTY even strength points last year.


i said Dach PLUS(+) 5th overall dude applaud
and then I said it's too risky and no one will move in the top 5
29 mai 2023 à 12 h 14
#25
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 11,990
Mentions "j'aime": 3,174
Quoting: Ste_Catherine_Street
i said Dach PLUS(+) 5th overall dude applaud
and then I said it's too risky and no one will move in the top 5


Yes, Dach isn't nearly enough to move up from Will Smith to Fantilli
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage