PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
19
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
jonh514
HuGo is a Boss GM
Membre depuis
4 déc. 2021
Équipe favorite
Canadiens de Montréal
Deuxième équipe favorite
Avalanche du Colorado
Messages dans les forums
6661
Messages par jour
7.9
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Montreal Canadiens
il y a 12 heures
Sujet:
Caufield is a better player this year than last year
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Leafsfan98</b></div><div>From the games I've seen of him, I don't see it the passing. When the Leafs play the Habs, I don't think of Caufield as a playmaking threat but it could be me not seeing it</div></div>
Not sure what to say to that. Maybe because you have Marner & Nylander, Caufield's playmaking seems ordinary?
Forum:
Montreal Canadiens
il y a 16 heures
Sujet:
Caufield is a better player this year than last year
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Leafsfan98</b></div><div>I know... But I think it's fair to say that he's worse this season than last...</div></div>
His shooting is worse, his passing is much better. His overall points totals are better.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
il y a 17 heures
Sujet:
6 Newhooks is better than 3 Laines
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Blazingbat11</b></div><div>Lol I just made a thread trading for Lundell (didn't see this one beforehand).
I suggested Barron being the target for FLA, with additional assets added as well (I guess Evans could be a good candidate, as you said, FLA are in win now). FLA might have more interest in Barron's higher ceiling then Xhekaj's higher floor. Not to mention FLA are thin at RD, especially if Montour leaves for free agency.
I've said this many times before. I think Habs management have fully committed to Xhekaj and have clearly put him in the "not for sale" category. and I doubt Lundell would change that stance (even though I think Lundell is more valuable than Xhekaj). I believe Barron is also "not for sale", but for what he provides, not to the same extent of "not for sale"ness as Xhekaj lol</div></div>
Thanks for sharing your position.
I have been asking a lot of Habs fans who say that to do a small exercise. Can you please project for me what your 3 D-pairs are in 2025-26? Is Xhekaj on the 3rd pair? If yes, can you please tell me why a 3rd pair defender based on our depth cannot be traded to shore up the top 6?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
il y a 17 heures
Sujet:
6 Newhooks is better than 3 Laines
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>AntiAnalytics</b></div><div>Except the defense won’t be the same- not at all really
Byram will be here for the full year, and he & Dahlin together on our top pair has been DOMINANT
This allows Samuelsson to slide down to pair3 and improve that pairing (with Clifton)
And pair2 of Power & Jokiharju is the only real question mark here, as it’s uncertain if we want to spend the $$$ to keep Jokiharju, or if we wanna spend even more on a UFA upgrade at that spot
Either way, our defense next year will look quite a bit different than it did last season
Also, we’ve stabilized our goaltending with UPL taking such a big leap forward- and that obviously helps
Plus, there’s holes at forward we have to figure out
3C, top9 winger, checking line (the whole thing, lol)
So there’s still room for us to make some changes here
We just got started on them already at the deadline by trading for Byram & shipping out our Captain (Okposo)
No offense, but i went into detail here bc u seemed to have a rather pedestrian view of us.
Back to your trade though…. we aren’t gonna want Barron.
He isn’t a top4 guy, and our RD3 is already set with Clifton for the next 2 years.
Plus, (again), we aren’t looking to move Krebs.
Trading Mittelstadt has actually freed up room for him to get a shot at a more offensive role in our top9, so we’ll see how that goes.
I get how the trade makes sense to you,
but with a little more thought i hope u can see why we clearly wouldn’t make this deal</div></div>
As strange as it is to say because it was the biggest trade of the TDL... I actually forgot that you got Byram... makes a lot of sense now.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
il y a 18 heures
Sujet:
6 Newhooks is better than 3 Laines
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>AntiAnalytics</b></div><div>We won’t though
We don’t have a spot to play Barron in
He’s not a top4 guy, and john514 is wrong, we can’t play him at RD3 bc Clifton is signed for 2 more years & occupies that slot
The trade just doesn’t make sense for us
Especially now with Krebs getting his shot on the 3rd line in a more offensive role
He’s also not a guy we are looking to trade
Just don’t see any way something like this happens
If we trade for a RD- and that’s a big IF- then it’s gotta be a top4 guy to play w Power & replace Jokiharju
But we could just sign Jokiharju & go forward with the defense “as is” too
*we don’t actually “need” a RD anymore
At this point, even bringing one in just doesn’t make sense unless it’s an upgrade over Jokiharju</div></div>
I think you would know better than us AA. I guess I just question why a team which misses the playoffs year after year would not want to try and make some changes. Don't get me wrong, the Habs have similar challenges, I'm not crapping on Buffalo, but playing the same D-core and expecting them to be better because they are a few months older seems a bit too optimistic to me.
I totally get that Barron doesn't solve any problem, but I guess I am saying the mix is off and the team feels like they are contributing less than the sum of their parts.
This is said with all due respect, I am not trying to pick a fight.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
il y a 18 heures
Sujet:
6 Newhooks is better than 3 Laines
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Matt1567</b></div><div>not sure about dobes as the backup but if he's not ready i'm sure they could find someone to be the backup
really like the Krebs - Barron swap, personally I've started to lose hope in Barron being anything more than a Tony DeAngelo type player (PP specialist that you can't fully trust in his own zone)
I really like the idea of Lundell too, love Xhekaj and it would suck to see him go but as you've been saying, he's likely our 5/6 dman in a few years, and Lundell could be a Danault type player with more offensive upside if it works out, and that's worth moving Arber for</div></div>
While I have not given up on Barron, I recognize that it's Mailloux's turn to get a shot and it feels wrong to make him wait in Laval because Barron's contract dictates he must play in Montreal next season. If Barron could remain on a 2-way deal for 1 more season, I would keep him. I believe he's gonna be a really good player for a lot of years. Anyone Crosby praises generally deserves it. The CBA being what it is, it's time to move on from Barron rather than make him the 7th D by default.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
il y a 18 heures
Sujet:
6 Newhooks is better than 3 Laines
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>squashmaple</b></div><div>I've never seen a Montreal post that's so fair and balanced for what the other teams might want or need. Well done.</div></div>
Thanks sir, I am blushing!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
il y a 18 heures
Sujet:
6 Newhooks is better than 3 Laines
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>AlakHul</b></div><div>just OS or trade them assets they could use at next tdl, maybe their own pick and our 2nd with Engstrom, so 2 picks between 20-40 and another top 4 Dman that'll be on a elc.</div></div>
OS is never gonna happen.
Teams do not value Engstrom, an untested/unsigned european defender, as a potential top 4. If we could wait 2 years to make a deal, then your trade idea could make sense, but we need to improve our forward group right away, because this team needs to contend for the playoffs next year.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
il y a 18 heures
Sujet:
6 Newhooks is better than 3 Laines
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Shanesaw9</b></div><div>I think Xhekaj is a top 4 defenseman (2nd Pair), but he will be playing 3rd Pair on MTL and that's great. So you're trading a top 4 D here with Evans for a top 6 C which is really a fair trade, but in my opinion Xhekaj's skillset is just too rare to trade and that's why I would keep him.</div></div>
Understood. I just think most of the ice time in a few years will be going to the pair of:
Hutson Reinbacher
Guhle Mailloux
or maybe
Guhle Reinbacher
Hutson Mailloux
Either way I don't think Arber gets enough ice time to make the sort of impact he's been making the past 5 games.
Forum:
Montreal Canadiens
il y a 18 heures
Sujet:
Caufield is a better player this year than last year
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Leafsfan98</b></div><div>Or, maybe Juraj Slafkovsky's been doing very well and Caufield's points have been propped up due to the 23.5% Ozone starts?
I mean Brendan Gallagher does have more expected goals per 60...</div></div>
Players generally take a year following shoulder surgery. Reserve judgement until next season is my recommendation.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
il y a 19 heures
Sujet:
6 Newhooks is better than 3 Laines
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>KentMcNally</b></div><div>I am not one of those people that see Lundell as a big upgrade to Montreal's roster. I think if Dach can come back and put his health issues behind him then he could be a good 2nd line center. This year they will probably draft a talented forward (Eiserman, Catton, Lindstrom) to eventually be that 2nd line player with Dach. Hopefully one of Newhook, Roy or even Mesar could fill out the 2nd line. I could see Owen Beck being a very good 3rd line center for the Habs.
With Lundell his offensive numbers have decreased each year in the league (0.67 points per game in his rookie year to 0.45 points per game last year to 0.43 points per game this year). To me that does not indicate a 2nd line center on a contending team. He is not a 2nd line center in Florida and they are a contending team.
So if Lundell is a 3rd line center, how does that impact Owen Beck's placement in the lineup moving forward?
I believe that Montreal has a top 9 forward group that could look like the following in the future:
Caufield Suzuki Slafkovsky
Newhook/Roy Dach 2024 First Round PIck
Newhook/Roy Beck Mesar/Free Agent/ 2025 draft pick
I am not saying that Lundell is bad, I just do not see a pressing need to give up assets to acquire a guy who looks like he has a ceiling of a 2nd line winger (if things turn around for him in a significant way) or a 3rd line center who would displace one of our other good prospects.</div></div>
It's a fair argument, but not all draft picks and prospects pop. I think it's likely the guy we draft this year (let's say Catton) has a 3 year journey to being a valuable contributor in the NHL (as Lundell/Dach/Newhook are now) and maybe another 2 years to hit his stride. That is a long time to wait.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
il y a 20 heures
Sujet:
6 Newhooks is better than 3 Laines
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Shanesaw9</b></div><div>I'd keep Primeau over Turcotte, Barron over Krebs, and personally I'm not trading Xhekaj under any circumstances and I don't think Florida would do that trade anyways.</div></div>
Well that's no fun.
Shane, maybe you will answer where none of the other "never trade Xhekaj" crowd refuses to. Where do you see Xhekaj playing in 2025-26? 3rd pair, 2nd pair, top pair, is he a winger now? Because if it's 3rd pair... I just don't get it.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
il y a 20 heures
Sujet:
6 Newhooks is better than 3 Laines
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>AlakHul</b></div><div>Xhekaj could be a version of Roy, plays in 3rd line but can go up and down in the lineup. Struble also doesnt bring what Xhekaj brings and thats law and order on the ice, I doubt that 6'3 220 players would be afraid of 6 ft 200 Struble in a fight, but would be less inclined to fight a 6ft 4 230 Xhekaj, imo. Struble, Harris and Engstrom are the ones that dont fit long term imo.</div></div>
Seriously? For Lundell. 6'1 center picked 12th OA who plays a 200 ft game and has offensive upside for days, you won't trade a defender you plan to play on your 3rd pair because he can fight in a league where fighting is disappearing?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
il y a 20 heures
Sujet:
6 Newhooks is better than 3 Laines
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>tryger</b></div><div>Not for Turcotte, LA will need him next season if they can't reup Lizotte.</div></div>
I mean... Isn't it easier to find a bottom 6 center in free agency than a Goalie on a 1M deal who can put up a 0.910 save percentage?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
il y a 20 heures
Sujet:
6 Newhooks is better than 3 Laines
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>my_name_is_Fil</b></div><div>arber xhekaj is not available.
at all; for antyhign short of mcjesus retained.
go fish.</div></div>
Sure he is. Are you playing him in the top 4 in the next 2 years? So then please tell me where you are sending Hutson, Reinbacher, Matheson, Guhle? Cause that's the top 4 of this team and when Matheson moves on, Mailloux, Struble, or Engstrom will take his spot.
Why are you so sure Xhekaj is a top 4 player, and if he's not, why is he not expendable for a top 6 center?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
il y a 20 heures
Sujet:
6 Newhooks is better than 3 Laines
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jpsnow13</b></div><div>I'm against those deals because I prefer MTL players ceilings to those of the other (older) players, but IMO you did a good job of making valuable offers adressing to the other teams needs, which doesn't happen a lot around here.
I can't say those are unrealitic 👍</div></div>
That's high praise around here. Thanks!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
il y a 21 heures
Sujet:
6 Newhooks is better than 3 Laines
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jackaille</b></div><div>value is there for sure, so props on that. Doubt Primeau has this kind of value though.
As much as I love Lundell and I think the value is fine, I wouldn't deal Xhekaj</div></div>
Turcotte is not exactly lighting it up with 6 points this season. Primeau has a 0.910 save percentage on one of the worst teams in hockey. When you tack on the salary and the King's needs, I think the value is more than fair.
As for Xhekaj. I love the man but Struble gives you 90% of what Xhekaj gives you as a 3rd pair defender. Between Guhle's eventual swap back to the left, Matheson, Hutson, Engstrom, maybe even Trudeau one day, I don't think we have room for a Xhekaj in the top 4 on the left.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
il y a 21 heures
Sujet:
6 Newhooks is better than 3 Laines
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>AlakHul</b></div><div>what does preds fans have to do in the panthers trade?? and why would we trade Xhekaj for Lundell? im sure some other prospects would be much better, or picks, or even an OS lmao</div></div>
Oops gonna change it. Sorry. Need more ☕
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Hier à 20 h 50
Sujet:
Who says no
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Garak</b></div><div>Eh... It's hard not to go straight on the defensive on this site. People can be real pricks on here, and then you get jaded, and then you end up becoming the prick that you hate. haha. No worries, though.
Haha. Exactly! I get the same way sometimes. I'll stop posting for a while and then I'll re-engage and get jaded all over again and back off. It's a vicious cycle.</div></div>
I would have expected Garak to say, "I live in hope that one day, you'll come to see this website for what it truly is, rather than what you'd wish it to be."
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Hier à 13 h 9
Sujet:
Who says no
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Garak</b></div><div>I was talking to Just_a_guess and their comment, not directly to you or your post.</div></div>
Fair enough. Sorry to get prickly with you, appreciate your comments sir!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Hier à 13 h 6
Sujet:
Who says no
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Just_A_Guess</b></div><div>Ooof, I love it and hate it at the same time... honestly probably a both decline scenario. Hawks fans been declining everything for a while now so we know they won't be happy lol</div></div>
I know. I felt dirty even posting it. Slaf is so good and Roy seems like a diamond in the rough. But how do you turn down Celebrini unless you already have Bedard...
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Hier à 12 h 32
Sujet:
Who says no
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Garak</b></div><div>That's because everyone either wants us to pay for their garbage or wants to buy our players for peanuts. It's not hard to decline every trade when they are almost always proposed in bad faith and without considering CHI's current position and status. Not to mention CHI just isn't at a point in their rebuild where they should be ready to make moves like those that most ACGM's have proposed.</div></div>
Our 1st overall pick from 2 years ago who had 17 points in his last 20 games at 19 years old is hardly garbage. His best comparable is Rantanen who's development curve he's ahead of.
Roy is also a nice top 9, ideally top 6 forward.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Hier à 10 h 22
Sujet:
Bolduc
There are other ways to extract value from a player besides trading them.
Using them to set an example for your rookies and younger veterans is another way. Yes you lose them for nothing, but you gain all they were able to teach about being a pro and dealing with tough game situations.
Holding Savard is a great example of this.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Hier à 7 h 6
Sujet:
You just HAD to be a Habs fan during this
It's crazy to see the turnover of players from then to now. 15 players if you include Staal have either retired, LTIR retired, or have moved onto other teams.
Edit: Forgot Merrill & Tatar. 17 players!!!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
lun. à 18 h 32
Sujet:
Hyman hits 50 at age 31
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>littlejerryseinfeld</b></div><div>That's a big difference from 50 plus!</div></div>
Sure is, but for 5.5M at 60 pts, he's bringing more value than tons of young "stars" in the league.
1
2
Suivant
Page 1
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com