SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

23-24 Blow Up This Team

Créé par: SensCanucksFan67
Équipe: 2023-24 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 11 déc. 2022
Publié: 11 déc. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Management won’t do this and they will overpay Horvat and double down on this team. This is how it should play out.

2023 1sts:

Zach Benson
Colby Barlow
Cam Allen
Axel Sandin Pellikka
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3925 000 $
3925 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
64 200 000 $
31 650 000 $
31 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
32 500 000 $
76 750 000 $
Transactions
1.
VAN
  1. Newhook, Alex [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (COL)
COL
    Bo to the Avs before the TDL
    2.
    VAN
    1. Walsh, Reilly [Droits de RFA]
    2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (NJD)
    Détails additionnels:
    Andreas Johansson part of the deal at the TDL
    NJD
    1. Myers, Tyler (1 500 000 $ retained)
    3.
    VAN
    1. Ceulemans, Corson [Liste de réserve]
    2. Johnson, Kent
    3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (CBJ)
    CBJ
    1. Pettersson, Elias
    Détails additionnels:
    Pre 2023 draft blockbuster. CBJ made a splash with Johnny Hockey. Now they can get an elite centre.
    4.
    VAN
    1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
    EDM
      Kuzmenko TDL
      Rachats de contrats
      Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
      Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
      2023
      Logo de VAN
      Logo de COL
      Logo de CBJ
      Logo de EDM
      Logo de VAN
      Logo de NJD
      Logo de VAN
      Logo de VAN
      Logo de NYR
      Logo de VAN
      2024
      Logo de VAN
      Logo de VAN
      Logo de VAN
      Logo de VAN
      Logo de VAN
      Logo de VAN
      2025
      Logo de VAN
      Logo de VAN
      Logo de VAN
      Logo de VAN
      Logo de VAN
      Logo de VAN
      Logo de VAN
      TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
      2282 500 000 $68 362 917 $850 000 $2 700 000 $14 137 083 $
      Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
      C, AG, AD
      NMC
      UFA - 7
      Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
      925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 850 000 $$2M)
      AG, C
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      4 950 000 $4 950 000 $
      AD, AG
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
      AG, AD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 3
      4 200 000 $4 200 000 $
      C, AG
      RFA - 4
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
      AD, AG
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
      AG, AD
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      883 750 $883 750 $
      C
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      6 650 000 $6 650 000 $
      AD
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      825 000 $825 000 $
      AG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
      AD, C
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      762 500 $762 500 $
      AD, C
      RFA - 1
      Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
      DG
      UFA - 4
      6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 8
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
      G
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
      DG
      UFA - 1
      2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      762 500 $762 500 $
      G
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
      DG
      RFA - 1
      1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 1
      Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      762 500 $762 500 $
      C
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
      850 000 $850 000 $
      DG
      UFA - 1

      Code d'intégration

      • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
      • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

      Texte intégré

      Cliquer pour surligner
      11 déc. 2022 à 11 h 5
      #1
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2015
      Messages: 20,030
      Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
      avs are not trading newhook for a rental, full stop
      TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
      11 déc. 2022 à 11 h 14
      #2
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mars 2017
      Messages: 4,812
      Mentions "j'aime": 2,012
      Quoting: coga16
      avs are not trading newhook for a rental, full stop


      What on God's Green Earth makes Canuck fans beleive they can get Newhook for Horvat from the Avs? The 1st I get, but Newhook is 100% untouchable at this point.

      It's wishful thinking.
      TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
      11 déc. 2022 à 11 h 16
      #3
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2015
      Messages: 20,030
      Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
      Quoting: swinny
      What on God's Green Earth makes Canuck fans beleive they can get Newhook for Horvat from the Avs? The 1st I get, but Newhook is 100% untouchable at this point.

      It's wishful thinking.


      they never look at these proposals for the other teams side. So they move newhook...now avs have a hole on their 3rd line bc they have horvat on the 2nd. So create one problem to solve another. Next year the will have a hole at 2C and on the 3rd line bc they cant extend Horvat and now they dont have newhook. So now the are are worse off next year with multiple problems in their middle 6

      Avs and horvat is just a bad trade fit, and thats been explained so many times but its an echo chamber on this site of people posting the same trades every day despite sound logic being applied why they dont work
      TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
      11 déc. 2022 à 11 h 20
      #4
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mars 2017
      Messages: 4,812
      Mentions "j'aime": 2,012
      Quoting: coga16
      they never look at these proposals for the other teams side. So they move newhook...now avs have a hole on their 3rd line bc they have horvat on the 2nd. So create one problem to solve another. Next year the will have a hole at 2C and on the 3rd line bc they cant extend Horvat and now they dont have newhook. So now the are are worse off next year with multiple problems in their middle 6

      Avs and horvat is just a bad trade fit, and thats been explained so many times but its an echo chamber on this site of people posting the same trades every day despite sound logic being applied why they dont work


      See that in a lot of posts lol.

      It is ok to disagree with a proposal (often happens), but when it is so obvious that such a deal would never materialize based on the other organizations set up, try something else! Please!
      TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
      11 déc. 2022 à 11 h 23
      #5
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2015
      Messages: 20,030
      Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
      Quoting: swinny
      See that in a lot of posts lol.

      It is ok to disagree with a proposal (often happens), but when it is so obvious that such a deal would never materialize based on the other organizations set up, try something else! Please!


      exactly, sometimes trades just dont make sense, despite someone assuming the player would be a fit on that team, the way to make that happen just isnt remotely possible.
      TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
      11 déc. 2022 à 11 h 25
      #6
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: août 2021
      Messages: 4,485
      Mentions "j'aime": 2,288
      So the Devils are paying for the RIGHT to have Tyler Myers?

      Yeah...no...pass.
      11 déc. 2022 à 11 h 30
      #7
      Démarrer sujet
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: août 2020
      Messages: 431
      Mentions "j'aime": 91
      Quoting: swinny
      What on God's Green Earth makes Canuck fans beleive they can get Newhook for Horvat from the Avs? The 1st I get, but Newhook is 100% untouchable at this point.

      It's wishful thinking.


      Show me one trade for Horvat where each side agreed with it? I’ll wait.
      TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
      11 déc. 2022 à 11 h 31
      #8
      Future Norris guy
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: août 2022
      Messages: 15,605
      Mentions "j'aime": 8,625
      AVs aren't giving up Newhook for a rental in Bo Horvat.

      And how many times need it be said, that they don't have the cap space to extend Horvat. Who's probably coming in between 8 x $8,500,000 to 8 x $9,000,000 give or take.
      TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
      11 déc. 2022 à 11 h 39
      #9
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2015
      Messages: 20,030
      Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
      Quoting: Ottawa67s
      Show me one trade for Horvat where each side agreed with it? I’ll wait.


      thats the point, there isnt one, they are not good trade partners, you cant make a trade work for both sides when it just doesnt in principle.

      you are demonstrating exactly that, its an awful trade that doesnt work for the avs now or long term
      turtlemountain et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
      11 déc. 2022 à 11 h 44
      #10
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mars 2017
      Messages: 4,812
      Mentions "j'aime": 2,012
      Quoting: Ottawa67s
      Show me one trade for Horvat where each side agreed with it? I’ll wait.


      Isn't the point of not agreeing, it's the point of recognizing the Avs would never do it. Not even a possible fit.

      Now, if I through out there a deal say Horvat to the Kings for Roy/Walker and a 1st, I could at least defend why the Canucks may do it, and defend why the Kings may do it, but most would disagree that the return makes sense for either side.

      Point is..... I could defend it at least as a possibility.
      TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
      11 déc. 2022 à 11 h 55
      #11
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2022
      Messages: 1,266
      Mentions "j'aime": 689
      On what planet do you honestly think New Jersey would accept that trade?
      11 déc. 2022 à 12 h 23
      #12
      mostly harmless
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: févr. 2016
      Messages: 6,809
      Mentions "j'aime": 3,292
      Our 1st this year unprotected, AND KJ, AND Ceulemans? Vancouver literally does not possess the caliber of asset necessary for us to do that.

      And Petterson probably wouldn't be a target here in any case - yes, he's awesome and what we would need, but his agent would ensure we don't get to keep him - like said agent already did with Jones and Dubois and tried to do with Werenski before Werenski fired him.
      dopplsan, squashmaple, Friendly_Cannon and 2 others a aimé ceci.
      11 déc. 2022 à 12 h 29
      #13
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2015
      Messages: 2,697
      Mentions "j'aime": 3,013
      Quoting: Ottawa67s
      Show me one trade for Horvat where each side agreed with it? I’ll wait.


      You’re gonna be waiting a while here. That’s the point lmao.

      Vancouver can probably get a big futures haul for Horvat from a team that can re-sign him to an 8 year deal. The Avs don’t have enough futures or enough cap space to do that type of deal.

      It’s a bad fit, but that won’t stop ACGMs from posting it every day until March.
      TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
      11 déc. 2022 à 13 h 1
      #14
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: août 2021
      Messages: 1,159
      Mentions "j'aime": 582
      I find it hilarious that Avs fans think Newhook is so untouchable when his stats don’t exactly say he’s anything more than a 3rd liner rn. We will see in a couple years but I vaguely remember Avs fans saying the same thing about Jost and look how that turned out lol
      11 déc. 2022 à 13 h 29
      #15
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2015
      Messages: 2,697
      Mentions "j'aime": 3,013
      Modifié 11 déc. 2022 à 13 h 37
      Quoting: NV94
      I find it hilarious that Avs fans think Newhook is so untouchable when his stats don’t exactly say he’s anything more than a 3rd liner rn. We will see in a couple years but I vaguely remember Avs fans saying the same thing about Jost and look how that turned out lol


      Your memory of Jost seems to be a little different from mine. He was never untouchable, maybe except right after he was a top 10 pick. Teams generally don’t move on from a top 10 pick unless they have a good reason. Not sure what else you could be referring to. Not to mention that Newhook’s rookie year goals and points totals would be career highs for Jost.

      Newhook is a 21 year old who just hit 100 NHL games. His top linemates this season have been Evan Rodrigues and Martin Kaut (who just passed through waivers for the second time this year). Before the start of the season, I also said I didn’t think Newhook was ready for 2C duties. But he’s young enough that we can hope he grows into that role. I think it’s fair to wait to see how he looks with quality NHL wingers before pulling the plug on a 21 year old.

      The other part about Newhook is that the Avs are about to enter a cap crunch when MacKinnon’s extension kicks in. We need cheap players that can hopefully play above their contract. Trading Newhook for a player that’s going to make $8M next year is just something that doesn’t make sense for Colorado.
      TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
      11 déc. 2022 à 13 h 44
      #16
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: janv. 2017
      Messages: 9,645
      Mentions "j'aime": 4,598
      Quoting: Ottawa67s
      Show me one trade for Horvat where each side agreed with it? I’ll wait.


      That perhaps tells you something!
      turtlemountain et squashmaple a aimé ceci.
      11 déc. 2022 à 13 h 46
      #17
      do not Devil my ass
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: sept. 2020
      Messages: 4,908
      Mentions "j'aime": 4,268
      Why would the Devils trade Walsh + a 2nd rd pick for one of the league's worst performing defenders over the last 3-4 years when they could just play Walsh at 3RD next season themselves?
      11 déc. 2022 à 14 h 16
      #18
      not a he )
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2022
      Messages: 3,299
      Mentions "j'aime": 4,560
      What, you didn’t want Jiricek, Mateychuk, Peeke, and Sillinger, too?
      Friendly_Cannon, Ajp_18 et Viqsi a aimé ceci.
      11 déc. 2022 à 17 h 31
      #19
      18 lotteries, 0 wins
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: oct. 2017
      Messages: 1,233
      Mentions "j'aime": 754
      jackets need defensive help before a center tbh
      Ajp_18 et Viqsi a aimé ceci.
      11 déc. 2022 à 18 h 22
      #20
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mars 2018
      Messages: 9,851
      Mentions "j'aime": 6,441
      Quoting: AndrewPawlack
      jackets need defensive help before a center tbh


      Having a top end center is one of the most overrated thing on this website, I don’t see all these trade posts targeting Minnesota where their 1c is currently Sam Steel or Ryan Hartman.
      AndrewPawlack et Viqsi a aimé ceci.
       
      Répondre
      To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
      Question:
      Options:
      Ajouter une option
      Soumettre le sondage