Avatar

NV94

Membre depuis
19 août 2021
Équipe favorite
Canucks de Vancouver
Messages dans les forums
1116
Messages par jour
1.7
Forum: Armchair-GM9 mai à 20 h 44
Sujet: Columbus Blue Jackets
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>squashmaple</b></div><div>At first glance, the Vancouver trade doesn't make sense for either side. But both sides have troublesome contracts the teams would probably like to get out from under. I'm sure there's buyer's remorse on the Miller deal already. Take Elvis and Miller out and that's a vastly more than fair offer for Demko. Elvis has many less years left compared to Miller and was a very good goalie before he suffered a massive personal tragedy right in front of him. In the end, I think it balances out in terms of value but I don't think either team would be remotely motivated to pursue it.</div></div>

You’re kidding right?

Demko is a #1 goalie on a great contract. And tho Millers contract isn’t the best he’s still a PPG C.

CBJ is going to have to put together a hell of a better offer than that to get those guys. Not even remotely fair
Forum: Armchair-GM4 févr. à 12 h 36
Sujet: Trade deadline
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>spockrock</b></div><div>

A link and quote for your convenience:

“ Garland, even more so than Boeser, is a player Canucks management would prefer to move off of — even if just to clear cap space.”

https://theathletic.com/4144756/2023/02/02/vancouver-canucks-nhl-trade-deadline-tiers/?source=user_shared_article

“…even if just to clear cap space…” - now how is that synonymous with “cap dump”? …hmmmm, oh yeah, it’s the literal definition.

You were saying?</div></div>

I stand corrected. I don’t subscribe to the Athletic so I can’t see that link.

However speculation is just speculation. Just because someone is reporting it doesn’t mean Canucks will trade him as a cap dump. Until it happens it’s all just hearsay
Forum: Armchair-GM1 févr. à 12 h 26
Forum: Armchair-GM1 févr. à 11 h 56
Sujet: Preds TDL Rebuild
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>EvanderKanesLawyer</b></div><div>I cant see any of these trades making much sense.

Saros won't be moved. His contract lines up with Askarov's development, and Edmonton won't part with Bouchard.

I'm fine with the Granlund trade, but we could net a first for him.

The Fabbro trade is brutal. Garland has little to no value, especially considering it's rumoured that VAN might buy him out. I'd rather wait for that to happen and keep Fabbro unless an offer we can't refuse comes across the table.

And Smith <em>might</em> get us a 6th or a 7th, but it would be to a contending team.</div></div>

Garland has value and there has been no rumours of buying him out. Unless you count people from this site as legit rumours lol

This site is so silly sometimes lol. In that case nobody on Nashville has any value either so they cancel out