PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
Historique des masses salariales
Compensation maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports d’entrée en vigueur du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Coût par point
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports d’entrée en vigueur du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Coût par point
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
Historique des masses salariales
Compensation maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Tintin
dont Devil my graph
Membre depuis
28 sept. 2020
Équipe favorite
Devils du New Jersey
Messages dans les forums
3547
Messages par jour
4.1
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
New Jersey Devils
il y a 7 heures
Sujet:
New Jersey Devils Season Discussion Thread #1
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Devil</b></div><div>If he plays 9 games then yes</div></div>
Oh, it's like standard rules for ELCs in the case of Luke Hughes also.
Neat.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
il y a 7 heures
Sujet:
Would this lineup be a contender
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mbaer84</b></div><div>i am aware of him thats why i said VAN should push for him.</div></div>
So why do you think Gritsyuk would be going back to the Canucks in a Boeser trade, let alone to be added on top of a 2nd + McCarthy?
The Canucks would be short of value to the tune of a 1st rd pick to make that fair...
Forum:
Armchair-GM
il y a 7 heures
Sujet:
Would this lineup be a contender
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>remowilliams</b></div><div> they want 26 and younger players that can help us this year or next , cap space and Defense.</div></div>
I seriously doubt whether the Canucks can get any of that in return for Boeser, even less so without retaining 50%.
If the Canucks can get as much as a 3rd + 4th (Björkstrand return) to get under Boeser's contract, they should seize that opportunity.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
il y a 7 heures
Sujet:
Would this lineup be a contender
I just don't really see the point in paying that much to get Boeser in.
He really isn't playing well this year and is unlikely to be good value at even 4.65m.
Maybe if the Canucks retained all the way to 50% he could be interesting, but even then I'd just rather have Mercer in the top 6 over him.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mbaer84</b></div><div>i think so, at least they would be fun as hell to watch. I would push to swap Gritsyuk for Stillman just since it seems like VAN has committed to being a destination for Russians.</div></div>
I get that you may not be aware of who Gritsyuk really is but moving him for Boeser is completely out of the question.
By the start of the 23/24 season, and if Gritsyuk is in NA by then, it wouldn't surprise me one bit if he were an outright better player than Boeser at that point in time, if he isn't already.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
il y a 9 heures
Sujet:
Meier and Ekholm next year
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ecupirate07</b></div><div>add at least 750k to Bratt and Meier and start from there with contracts.</div></div>
while 8.125m might be in the lower range for their next contract those aavs are perfectly plausible in my opinion.
I could see them both getting closer to 9m though
Forum:
Armchair-GM
il y a 9 heures
Sujet:
Meier and Ekholm next year
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>PantsOffnJacket</b></div><div>So your just going to let severson and graves walk? Their new teams thank you...</div></div>
I think it makes the most sense to move on fromm them as there are a ridiculous amount of up and coming defensemen in the Devils pipeline with NHL upside:
Hughes
Bahl
Walsh
Okhotiuk
Nemec
Vilén
Casey
Mukhammadulin
Edwards
McCarthy
Orlov
Gotta make use of some of the guys on the list here.
Besides, they all have the benefit of being ahead of their peak years whereas Severson and Graves are either peaking now or exiting their peak.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
il y a 9 heures
Sujet:
Meier and Ekholm next year
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Shaners79</b></div><div>Wouldn't you rather Gravy on another deal, probably around 4.5 than Ekholm?</div></div>
No, Ekholm is a little better and I think Graves's next contract may be a little problematic for however signs it, be it with term, AAV or NTCs.
The appeal with Ekholm is that his contract will be quite easily moveable when the defensive logjam starts kicking in around the 24/25 season.
Also, if Graves signs with the Devils to something like 5x5 and then gets traded one year later, future potential free agents will lose trust in the Devils front office.
Trading for Ekholm and his contract, and moving it on the year after, doesn't carry the same reputational costs.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TheFastAndTheFleuryous</b></div><div>Not to mention that Ekholm’s too good and too expensive to be on the 3rd d-pair.</div></div>
This strikes me a rather outdated idea.
The biggest contributing factor to the Devils success this year is that, when healthy, all three of their defense pairs have the capability to heavily tilt the ice in their favour.
That's the point of getting Ekholm in.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
il y a 11 heures
Sujet:
Meier and Ekholm next year
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>EvanderKanesLawyer</b></div><div>Give us Mukh and a 1st and we do it.</div></div>
nah too pricey
Forum:
Armchair-GM
il y a 12 heures
Sujet:
Bruins tdl
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dgibb10</b></div><div>Ahh okay, In that case I'd keep severson for the year if you can still get 3 years of NHL play on Nemec's ELC.
What are the implications contract wise of bringing Nemec and Hughes up for the end of the season/playoffs, as I've seen an article saying thats what the devils plan to do with Luke when michigans season is done
But honestly in this case i'd be more than riding with Clifton on the 3rd pairing if it means we get another asset to help us get a star like Meier</div></div>
With Nemec it's fairly straightforward, as long as he doesn't play more than 9 regular season games in either this or next season his ELC slides both years.
I think playoff games are exempted from this but at the moment I'd think there's at least three guys in the organization better suited to playoff hockey than Nemec.
As for Luke I'm not entirely sure, but the way I understand it is that since he'd still be 19 if signing his ELC when the NCAA season is over but the NHL season is still going (whether still regular season or playoffs), his ELC should be ok to slide until the 23/24 season, provided that he doesn't play more than 9 games in the regular season.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dgibb10</b></div><div>But honestly in this case i'd be more than riding with Clifton on the 3rd pairing if it means we get another asset to help us get a star like Meier</div></div>
If the Bruins would deal a 1st along with Clifton for Severson the Devils should 100% do it.
Clifton would not be that much of a downgrade from Severson and, as you say, that extra pick could be moved for a big acquisition but I wouldn't mind the Devils just using that pick in what's looking like one of the strongest draft classes this century.
Forum:
New Jersey Devils
il y a 12 heures
Sujet:
New Jersey Devils Season Discussion Thread #1
Hey gang, question for ya.
Does Luke Hughes burn a year of his ELC if he signs with the Devils at the conclusion of the NCAA season but before the NHL season is done?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Hier à 16 h 23
Sujet:
Bruins tdl
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dgibb10</b></div><div>Nemec's ELC has already started regardless hasn't it?</div></div>
His ELC has the ability to slide this season and next.
Would make a ton of sense from the Devils perspective to let that happen given that they're gonna be right up against the cap for the rest of the 20s as they're contending.
Forum:
NHL
Hier à 15 h 59
Sujet:
2022-23 NHL Season Discussion Thread #9: Bruce, There it Goes
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MatthewsFan</b></div><div><div class="tweet"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">This was a troubling revelation. ⬇️ <a href="https://t.co/yBhClcAzlE" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">https://t.co/yBhClcAzlE</a></p>— Craig Morgan (@CraigSMorgan) <a href="https://twitter.com/CraigSMorgan/status/1621589246225285121?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">February 3, 2023</a></blockquote>
</div></div></div>
Send them to Atlanta and bring the Thrashers back.
NHL in Georgia deserves a better fate.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Hier à 11 h 55
Sujet:
Vancouver with Bedard 84M cap next year
Somehow Richardson and Fitzgerald switches their brains off. Miracle.
Forum:
NHL Signings
Hier à 11 h 19
Sujet:
Washington Capitals signed Dylan Strome (5 Years / $5,000,000 AAV)
That's the same contract as his brother's got
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Hier à 9 h 25
Sujet:
Blue Devils
Doesn't make sense for the Devils.
This season's best performing player present in the deal is Tomas Tatar, he is been ridiculously good this year and his impacts are far clear of what Tarasenko, O'Reilly and Barbashev has put up.
Besides, Barbashev and more so Mikkola are unlikely to be any upgrade for this Devils team, they are more likely downgrades.
Zetterlund and Bastian should be in the lineup over Barbashev (and McLeod)
Any of Smith, Okhotiuk, Bahl or Walsh should be in the lineup over Mikkola.
Fitzgerald is notoriously anti rental anyways so there's no real risk a deal like this would ever go through.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Hier à 8 h 54
Sujet:
Trading McLeod and Wood forcing Ruff to stop ruining the lineup with them
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>KDev</b></div><div>Not into Ekholm at all. He’s a great player but the term on his contract doesn’t fit what we need. His contract could become a serious problem especially if we are also looking to extend Bratt. I’d rather get a guy like Brendan Dillon in Winnipeg who has an extra year on his deal so he doesn’t inadvertently block Luke from a top 4 spot.</div></div>
Getting Ekholm in would do a lot of things for the Devils.
It'd make them better now as he'd push Smith out of the lineup.
Ekholm also negates the need to resign Graves to what I'd imagine being a rather problematic contract in its own right.
Ekholm has the benefit of being rather easily moveable in 2024 or 2025 when Nemec develop past him (and possibly guys like Vilén, Orlov and Edwards).
If this deal were to go down, I'd want the Devils to set the 23/24 defence up like this:
Siegenthaler - Hamilton
Hughes - Marino
Ekholm - Walsh
// Smith
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Hier à 8 h 47
Sujet:
Trading McLeod and Wood forcing Ruff to stop ruining the lineup with them
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Shaners79</b></div><div>Your as cold as ice.</div></div>
Can't tell if compliment or insult.
It is a bit chilly where I am at to be fair so I suppose you have a point there.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>Wood has been slumping but McLeod has been fine...even has had some strong games lately.
I don't think either have a ton of trade value.
We need one line to play heavy, put pressure on opponents defense.
It makes the other lines better.
And not something that shows up much on any stat.</div></div>
I don't see it.
Wood and McLeod have all the tools to be playing heavy, but they are doing the complete opposite.
These last 15 games they haven't been hard for the opposition to play against in the slightest.
In my view, they are responsible for putting more pressure on the other lines to make up for their own shortcomings.
I don't see them bringing anything in terms of juju or spirit to team either.
The Devils are better off without them.
Boqvist and Zetterlund does achieve in putting pressure on opponents defense.
They are the ones capable of getting results by forechecking and being difficult to play against.
The skillsets of Boqvist, Zetterlund, Bastian and Haula make the other lines better.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Hier à 3 h 50
Sujet:
Graviteh Trades for Timo
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>areax91</b></div><div>
- NJ gets: Timo
- SJ gets: Holtz, Sharangovich, Blackwood, lottery-protected 1st, 2024 3rd (for Blackwood cap dump)</div></div>
This is way too much for Meier.
If Holtz is dealt with a 1st rd pick alone the Devils are overpaying, nevermind adding Sharangovich to the deal.
Also, Blackwood isn't capdump, he's quietly been pretty good in a limited role this year.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Hier à 3 h 36
Sujet:
Nothing but Dreaming 2025
Given what Björkstrand and Patches went for (both superior to Boeser) I cannot see the Canucks getting both Walsh and a conditional 1st, especially not if they aren't retaining 50%.
They'd be lucky to get Walsh alone back for Boeser at 5m.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Hier à 3 h 34
Sujet:
The Gamble
I love the idea of offersheeting Pinto.
If the Senators are looking to be competitive next season and keep DeBrincat they'd be right up against the cap.
There's a real chance that Dorion wouldn't be able to match an offer sheet for Pinto at 4m.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Hier à 3 h 31
Sujet:
Offseason
Just because Myers is cheap in real dollars doesn't mean that a 6m cap hit for one of the league's worst defenders doesn't hurt them, especially for competitive teams.
The Canucks are better off just burying him in the minors for his last year if they Canucks aren't competing, cus they'd sooner have to pay some other team to take Myers on than getting anything of value back in return.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Hier à 3 h 26
Sujet:
Are either of these players worth a 1st
Some team could spend a 1st on Demko, but the Canucks are more likely to have to deal a 1st with Boeser then get a 1st back for him.
Patches and Björkstrand, both superior to Boeser went for nothing and next to nothing, respectively.
Boeser is getting outscored, ooutchanced and outshot at a terrible rate, meaning his points cost the Canucks a fair bit more than they are worth.
An on-ice net negative winger at 4.65m shouldn't return much of anything at this point in time.
If the Canucks can get the Björkstrand return for Boeser without retaining 50% then Alvin should jump on that opportunity.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Hier à 3 h 22
Sujet:
Team Czechia
Tatar is Slovakian.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Hier à 3 h 19
Sujet:
BACK SCRATCHING 2
I cannot see why the Devils would have any appetite for this.
Vanecek is probably performing like a top 15 goalie for this season, he is their bonafide starter for the playoffs.
The Devils also have 3 reasonable options for backup in Blackwood, Daws and Schmid.
There's really no need to get Varlamov in for the Devils, and especially not at the cost of a top 6 wing, Tatar has been ridiculously good this year.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
jeu. à 14 h 22
Sujet:
Make me the GM
Zetterlund > Boeser , but knowing your penchant for analytics you're probably already aware of this Db
1
2
Suivant
Page 1