Membre depuis
5 fév 2016
Équipe préférée
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Deuxième équipe préférée
Predators de Nashville
Messages dans les forums
Messages par jour
Sujets de discussion
I'm a little weird, just like everyone else.
Forum: Armchair-GMil y a 11 heures
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>keep_ups12</b></div><div>Peeke for sure. He was great for Columbus when they have a boat load of injuries. Whitecloud is good but most likely not otb.
Roy is probably not otb either. Peeke would be great though</div></div>
This is exactly why we have zero interest in trading him for so low. He's going to be needed if/when Savard moves on.

<p class="c">* * *</p>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>keep_ups12</b></div><div>So why the hell do you guys want to keep Savard so badly? And yes he is suppose to be the replacement. Oh and i didn't forget Jones is a top 10 d man right?</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>keep_ups12</b></div><div>I brought up Jones because "he is a top 10 d man" who can carry the right side. Since he is that good you don't need Savard. You also have Nut (Who i don't if he could play on the right side). And no that is not trolling. And I was asking again "why do you sell so high on Savard". He isn't worth a 2c, which is a pretty high ask. And I was thinking since you have so many defense man you don't need Peeke but I guess not</div></div>
The "many defensemen" we have are mostly LHDs. Jones/Savard/Peeke are the only three NHL-quality RHDs we have - Nutivaara and Kukan can both play RD, but they're both lefties. Also, there's something to the idea of having quality on every pairing.

<p class="c">* * *</p>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ajp_18</b></div><div>Dude... if you read a later comment I agreed and also said Jones wasn’t a top 10 RHD in the NHL.... I was more asking why he brought Jones up in that comment because I never said anything about him. Read dude.</div></div>
FYI, that's the guy who thinks Jones doesn't even qualify as top-4. Not "top-4 in the NHL", "top-4" as in "<a href="">not good enough for the second pairing</a>".
Forum: Armchair-GMSun at 9:42 pm
Forum: Armchair-GMSun at 9:29 pm