SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Which defenseman would Elliotte Friedman have in mind for trading 4th overall

Créé par: sensonfire
Équipe: 2021-22 Devils du New Jersey
Date de création initiale: 28 juin 2021
Publié: 28 juin 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
NJD
  1. Drysdale, Jamie
Détails additionnels:
According to Thought #10 in his 31 thoughts blog, Elliotte Friedman believes the Devils would consider trading the 4th overall pick for a good, young defenseman.
ANA
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (NJD)
Détails additionnels:
Knowing that the Devils won't have a lot of right shot RDs, these are some people I came up with.

Do you think Elliotte Friedman thought of somebody like Jamie Drysdale ...
2.
CHI
    Or Adam Boqvist ...
    3.
    EDM
      Or Evan Bouchard?
      4.
      CBJ
        I know Columbus really wants to trade Seth Jones but at this point in time for the Devils, acquiring Seth Jones wouldn't make any sense whatsoever.
        5.
        NJD
          Expansion Draft
          SEA
          1. Johnsson, Andreas
          Détails additionnels:
          Which defenseman do you think Elliotte Friedman had in mind for trading the 4th overall pick?

          Let me know your thoughts and I'll see you in the comments :)

          https://www.sportsnet.ca/nhl/article/31-thoughts-blackhawks-must-publicly-address-sexual-assault-allegations/
          Rachats de contrats
          Frais appliqués
          Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
          2021
          Logo de NYI
          Logo de NYI
          Logo de NJD
          Logo de NJD
          Logo de BUF
          Logo de NJD
          Logo de ARI
          2022
          Logo de NJD
          Logo de NJD
          Logo de NJD
          Logo de NJD
          Logo de EDM
          Logo de NYI
          Logo de NJD
          Logo de CBJ
          Logo de NJD
          Logo de NJD
          2023
          Logo de NJD
          Logo de NJD
          Logo de NJD
          Logo de NJD
          Logo de NJD
          Logo de NJD
          Logo de NJD
          TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
          1781 500 000 $48 507 763 $0 $5 882 500 $32 992 237 $
          Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
          Logo de Devils du New Jersey
          2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
          C, AG
          UFA - 1
          Logo de Devils du New Jersey
          925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
          C
          UFA - 1
          Logo de Devils du New Jersey
          2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
          AD, AG
          UFA - 1
          Logo de Devils du New Jersey
          2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
          AG
          UFA - 1
          Logo de Devils du New Jersey
          7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
          C
          UFA - 6
          Logo de Devils du New Jersey
          925 000 $925 000 $
          C, AG
          RFA - 1
          Logo de Devils du New Jersey
          863 333 $863 333 $
          AG
          RFA - 3
          Logo de Devils du New Jersey
          809 167 $809 167 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
          C, AG
          UFA - 1
          Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
          Logo de Devils du New Jersey
          863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
          DG/DD
          RFA - 2
          Logo de Devils du New Jersey
          9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
          DD
          UFA - 1
          Logo de Devils du New Jersey
          2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
          G
          UFA - 2
          Logo de Devils du New Jersey
          2 822 764 $2 822 764 $
          DG
          UFA - 1
          Logo de Devils du New Jersey
          4 166 666 $4 166 666 $
          DD
          UFA - 2
          Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
          925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
          DD
          RFA - 2
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
          DD
          RFA - 1
          Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
          863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
          DD
          RFA - 2
          Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
          5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
          DD
          M-NTC
          UFA - 1

          Code d'intégration

          • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
          • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

          Texte intégré

          Cliquer pour surligner
          28 juin 2021 à 18 h 35
          #1
          Speak of the Devil
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: nov. 2017
          Messages: 23,940
          Mentions "j'aime": 26,437
          Check this ACGM out: https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/2508619
          sensonfire a aimé ceci.
          28 juin 2021 à 18 h 35
          #2
          Mac1010
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: mars 2018
          Messages: 1,690
          Mentions "j'aime": 730
          oilers pass bouchard will be in their line up this year
          sensonfire, OldNYIfan et GrinReaper a aimé ceci.
          28 juin 2021 à 18 h 35
          #3
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: nov. 2017
          Messages: 27,925
          Mentions "j'aime": 14,597
          Well Anaheim won't do it
          sensonfire, OldNYIfan et QuackAttack a aimé ceci.
          28 juin 2021 à 18 h 36
          #4
          Rangers 2023
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: nov. 2017
          Messages: 19,043
          Mentions "j'aime": 5,430
          Chicago might take that honestly
          sensonfire a aimé ceci.
          28 juin 2021 à 18 h 37
          #5
          TopDawgReese
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: août 2020
          Messages: 1,241
          Mentions "j'aime": 253
          Personally I don’t think they’ll move it unless Luke Hughes is taken before that.

          If you’re moving number 4 you’re looking for a young proven dman. I would honestly call Airzona about Jakob Chychurun and you could have a strong left side with Smith, Chychurun, and Butcher
          Devil, Boomer125 et sensonfire a aimé ceci.
          28 juin 2021 à 18 h 39
          #6
          Hire Dusty Imoo
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: mai 2021
          Messages: 1,030
          Mentions "j'aime": 535
          theodore in vegas maybe, but thats probably a reach
          sensonfire a aimé ceci.
          28 juin 2021 à 18 h 39
          #7
          In Connor We Trust
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: juill. 2020
          Messages: 3,315
          Mentions "j'aime": 2,080
          Quoting: Ragsandbluesfan
          Chicago might take that honestly

          Nah, Adam Boqvist showed an elite offensive game throughout some parts of the season and he’s been improving his defensive game. I’d rather keep him and let him grow to his full potential.
          sensonfire, OldNYIfan, Aussie_Blackhawk and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
          28 juin 2021 à 18 h 41
          #8
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: mars 2021
          Messages: 3,017
          Mentions "j'aime": 1,265
          Morgan Rielly ?
          MisstheWhalers a aimé ceci.
          28 juin 2021 à 18 h 42
          #9
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: août 2020
          Messages: 9,527
          Mentions "j'aime": 8,968
          I just don’t think it makes sense to move Drysdale or Bouchard (those teams need young RD and I prefer both over Clarke). Jones and Dumba are probably a little old. I think I’d prefer 4th over Boqvist. There might be the possibility that they trade down a bit for a decent D rather than aiming for a high end one.

          Grans or Faber + 8oa? LA could move up to snag one of Hughes/Edvinsson, they’ve long expressed interest in adding a high end young LD, Grans and Faber are both decent prospects, both right shot D, and NJD is still in position to take a guy like Johnson at 8.

          Lundkvist + 15oa? High end young RD that’s pretty close to NHL ready, he’s expendable for the Rangers because of Fox/Trouba/Schneider, and they may also want a high end LD to round out the left side (they’ve got Miller and not much else, Lindgren’s okay but you probably want someone better when you’re competing). Becomes much more appealing for the Rangers if Beniers slips to 4 somehow. They might even take McTavish.
          Mediumyeet, sensonfire et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
          28 juin 2021 à 18 h 43
          #10
          Hurricane Waddell
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: mai 2018
          Messages: 8,734
          Mentions "j'aime": 3,601
          It’s obvious Jake Bean…next question!
          OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
          28 juin 2021 à 18 h 43
          #11
          Dubas intern
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: juill. 2020
          Messages: 857
          Mentions "j'aime": 116
          Quoting: Beetlejuice
          Nah, Adam Boqvist showed an elite offensive game throughout some parts of the season and he’s been improving his defensive game. I’d rather keep him and let him grow to his full potential.


          I would take the 4th overall pick
          NickC1988 a aimé ceci.
          28 juin 2021 à 18 h 44
          #12
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: avr. 2019
          Messages: 7,138
          Mentions "j'aime": 1,640
          Quoting: jet11567
          Morgan Rielly ?


          Maybe with an extension , I'd think without an extension there's much more going to NJ
          sensonfire et SociallyHawkward a aimé ceci.
          28 juin 2021 à 18 h 45
          #13
          Démarrer sujet
          sensonfire
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: févr. 2021
          Messages: 11,905
          Mentions "j'aime": 4,469
          Quoting: Devil1122
          Check this ACGM out: https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/2508619


          The thing about the New Jersey Devils next season is that they won't have a lot of right-shot RDs to write home about.

          The only right shot defenseman that is featured in that ACGM post is Adam Boqvist.


          Looking at the big scheme of things, I'm of the opinion that the Devils should just draft Luke Hughes or Brandt Clarke at 4th overall.

          I also think it would be helpful if Elliotte Friedman gave some examples in his blog post as well.
          OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
          28 juin 2021 à 18 h 46
          #14
          LongtimeLeafsufferer
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: juill. 2015
          Messages: 59,855
          Mentions "j'aime": 22,863
          If cap is an issue, I wonder if Cal Foote of Tampa is an option. He's 22, his brother plays for Tampa. I would even think Tampa might add in a trade
          sensonfire et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
          28 juin 2021 à 18 h 47
          #15
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: oct. 2020
          Messages: 3,618
          Mentions "j'aime": 1,319
          Quoting: Alfie11
          I just don’t think it makes sense to move Drysdale or Bouchard (those teams need young RD and I prefer both over Clarke). Jones and Dumba are probably a little old. I think I’d prefer 4th over Boqvist. There might be the possibility that they trade down a bit for a decent D rather than aiming for a high end one.

          Grans or Faber + 8oa? LA could move up to snag one of Hughes/Edvinsson, they’ve long expressed interest in adding a high end young LD, Grans and Faber are both decent prospects, both right shot D, and NJD is still in position to take a guy like Johnson at 8.

          Lundkvist + 15oa? High end young RD that’s pretty close to NHL ready, he’s expendable for the Rangers because of Fox/Trouba/Schneider, and they may also want a high end LD to round out the left side (they’ve got Miller and not much else, Lindgren’s okay but you probably want someone better when you’re competing). Becomes much more appealing for the Rangers if Beniers slips to 4 somehow. They might even take McTavish.


          I think the Rangers could make sense for something around 15th and Schneider or Lundkvist if there is someone on the board at 4 that they really like (such as Beniers).

          I also think something with Nashville could make sense around 18th and Fabbro.
          Alfie11, sensonfire et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
          28 juin 2021 à 18 h 50
          #16
          Rangers 2023
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: nov. 2017
          Messages: 19,043
          Mentions "j'aime": 5,430
          Quoting: MauriceArthur15
          Personally I don’t think they’ll move it unless Luke Hughes is taken before that.

          If you’re moving number 4 you’re looking for a young proven dman. I would honestly call Airzona about Jakob Chychurun and you could have a strong left side with Smith, Chychurun, and Butcher


          Arizona is not moving their best player
          28 juin 2021 à 18 h 50
          #17
          In Connor We Trust
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: juill. 2020
          Messages: 3,315
          Mentions "j'aime": 2,080
          Quoting: klaw2
          I would take the 4th overall pick


          Adam Boqvist has played less than 82 games, and has put up 30 points that’s not bad for player that isn’t fully developed. Again he’s shown an elite offense game, so I’d rather trade for a reliable LD that can play alone side with him and help his game grow.
          sensonfire, SociallyHawkward, OldNYIfan and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
          28 juin 2021 à 18 h 50
          #18
          Banni
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: juin 2018
          Messages: 19,215
          Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
          why would a rebuilding team trade a #4 pick. This is just dumb
          sensonfire et MisstheWhalers a aimé ceci.
          28 juin 2021 à 18 h 51
          #19
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: août 2020
          Messages: 9,527
          Mentions "j'aime": 8,968
          Quoting: Mediumyeet
          I think the Rangers could make sense for something around 15th and Schneider or Lundkvist if there is someone on the board at 4 that they really like (such as Beniers).

          I also think something with Nashville could make sense around 18th and Fabbro.

          I could see Fabbro + 18oa as well. I guess it depends how much NJD likes guys like Chibrikov or L’Heureux, because it’s either a slightly lower end LW at 15/18 plus a higher end young RD, or a lower end RD in Faber/Grans, but a higher end LW in Johnson.
          sensonfire et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
          28 juin 2021 à 18 h 51
          #20
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: oct. 2020
          Messages: 3,618
          Mentions "j'aime": 1,319
          Quoting: palhal
          If cap is an issue, I wonder if Cal Foote of Tampa is an option. He's 22, his brother plays for Tampa. I would even think Tampa might add in a trade


          I think Cal Foote would make sense as a target but not for 4th overall. Tampa would have to add something pretty significant. If NJ has interest in Palat, Killorn, Gourde then it could make sense but I think all of those guys are too old for the fit in NJ.
          sensonfire, palhal et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
          28 juin 2021 à 18 h 53
          #21
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: oct. 2020
          Messages: 3,618
          Mentions "j'aime": 1,319
          Quoting: Alfie11
          I could see Fabbro + 18oa as well. I guess it depends how much NJD likes guys like Chibrikov or L’Heureux, because it’s either a slightly lower end LW at 15/18 plus a higher end young RD, or a lower end RD in Faber/Grans, but a higher end LW in Johnson.


          Could potentially get Ceulmans at 18 who is a RHD. Then all of a sudden you have Fabbro and Ceulmans in the system for the right side and things don't look so bleak anymore.
          sensonfire et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
          28 juin 2021 à 18 h 53
          #22
          Démarrer sujet
          sensonfire
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: févr. 2021
          Messages: 11,905
          Mentions "j'aime": 4,469
          Quoting: pharrow
          why would a rebuilding team trade a #4 pick. This is just dumb


          I'm wondering the same thing smile
          OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
          28 juin 2021 à 18 h 54
          #23
          Jinx god
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: sept. 2019
          Messages: 10,203
          Mentions "j'aime": 13,730
          Why does every team have rumours while Dallas only has Blake Comeau’s signing going for them?
          sensonfire, Mediumyeet, OldNYIfan and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
          28 juin 2021 à 18 h 56
          #24
          Banni
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: juin 2018
          Messages: 19,215
          Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
          Quoting: EsoYeezus69
          Why does every team have rumours while Dallas only has Blake Comeau’s signing going for them?


          maybe dallas fans are lucky enough to not have idiots delivering fake news?
          You shouldn't complain, really
          EsoYeezus69 et sensonfire a aimé ceci.
          28 juin 2021 à 18 h 56
          #25
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: avr. 2018
          Messages: 2,260
          Mentions "j'aime": 672
          Quoting: Alfie11
          I just don’t think it makes sense to move Drysdale or Bouchard (those teams need young RD and I prefer both over Clarke). Jones and Dumba are probably a little old. I think I’d prefer 4th over Boqvist. There might be the possibility that they trade down a bit for a decent D rather than aiming for a high end one.

          Grans or Faber + 8oa? LA could move up to snag one of Hughes/Edvinsson, they’ve long expressed interest in adding a high end young LD, Grans and Faber are both decent prospects, both right shot D, and NJD is still in position to take a guy like Johnson at 8.

          Lundkvist + 15oa? High end young RD that’s pretty close to NHL ready, he’s expendable for the Rangers because of Fox/Trouba/Schneider, and they may also want a high end LD to round out the left side (they’ve got Miller and not much else, Lindgren’s okay but you probably want someone better when you’re competing). Becomes much more appealing for the Rangers if Beniers slips to 4 somehow. They might even take McTavish.


          I don’t think the Rangers would move Lundkvist straight up for #4. They’ve invested a lot of time and think very highly of him, plus this draft’s top talents (at least the ones around at 4) have a lesser star probability per Byron Bader’s model.

          That goes before mentioning that I doubt either team could stomach trading such a valuable asset to the other
          sensonfire a aimé ceci.
           
          Répondre
          To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
          Question:
          Options:
          Ajouter une option
          Soumettre le sondage