PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
Scouting Reports FAQ
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
SCOUTING
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Scouting Reports
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Scouting Reports
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Scouting Reports
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
SCOUTING REPORTS
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
Scouting Reports FAQ
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
Mediumyeet
Membre depuis
23 oct. 2020
Messages dans les forums
3271
Messages par jour
2.9
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
il y a 11 heures
Sujet:
Next Year with Buch at this deadline
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>remowilliams</b></div><div>Well hes the boss and your just a peon like the rest of us.So chances are You are Wrong.But you probably know better cause your one of those so called experts.Typical know it all.</div></div>
No I'm just not as naive as you. Have a good one.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Hier à 22 h 22
Sujet:
Next Year with Buch at this deadline
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Fox_Czar_Cup</b></div><div>It was an ongoing issue. Teams usually contain stuff, but it was daily and interrupting the group. No I didn't keep the clippings</div></div>
Ya I'm going to go ahead and assume those are BS rumours just like Miller and Horvat having a feud. Thanks though.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Hier à 22 h 21
Sujet:
Next Year with Buch at this deadline
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>remowilliams</b></div><div>Oh ok I guess hes wrong then.</div></div>
I know it's shocking that GM's don't always tell the truth in the media. Who would have thought.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Hier à 21 h 38
Sujet:
Fair offer for buch
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Dickie_Dunn</b></div><div>Massive overpay. Who's coming back McDavid? Brustewicz is a first rounder in the redraft, so three firsts a second and Garland for Buchy!!! Hard pass......................and it will never happen. Take a close look at Patrick Allvin trades in the last year or so....................</div></div>
Podkolzin doesn't have the value of a 1st anymore. Garland is a cap casualty, he is a fine player but has 0 value. Brust is a solid prospect that has upped is draft stock significantly yes, would probably be a late 1st or early 2nd in a re-draft. Don't over value your prospects.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Hier à 21 h 36
Sujet:
Next Year with Buch at this deadline
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Fox_Czar_Cup</b></div><div>Jonathan Tanner bullied lil Buch daily in NY, Buch says no all day long</div></div>
Has anyone involved ever confirmed that or is it just more BS internet rumours? I'd assume it's the latter unless you can provide a credible source.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Hier à 19 h 36
Sujet:
Next Year with Buch at this deadline
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TheAlien</b></div><div>1.5 years still isn't much control</div></div>
It's not but it is still a significant boost to our roster for 2 playoff runs during the Demko/Hughes contract window and can always re-evaluate where we are at with extending Buch at the end of his current deal. I just think he is the exact type of player we need on this roster and would elevate us into a position where we could conceivably come out of the western conference. Obviously there are no gurantees but I think it puts us right into the conversation with Dallas and LA (Colorado and Vegas I will leave in a tier above since they've proven it with recent cups). Right now I think we are a bit below Dallas and LA.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Hier à 18 h 53
Sujet:
Next Year with Buch at this deadline
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>remowilliams</b></div><div>Cant see the Canucks making this trade.Our GM just publicly stated we are NOT moving a first.</div></div>
I think they will be open to moving it if its for a significant upgrade somewhere and not a rental.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Hier à 18 h 49
Sujet:
Fair offer for buch
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mokumboi</b></div><div>My friend. Forget "fair". Think of the specific pieces that would convince the Blues to come off Buch. This assortment is presumably not gonna resonate with Army.</div></div>
You've said elsewhere that they would want a dman. You're getting a good defense prospect in this + a reclamation project that could still pan out in Podkolzin (can swap him with Raty if a C is preferred) + Garland who is a solid middle 6 player for the short term + a couple of picks that can either be used in the draft or used to acquire younger players that fit the blues core of Thomas and Kyrou.
Willander isn't getting dealt and you're not likely to get a Willander type prospect from anyone. Those guys are very very rarely traded. St Louis could ultimately just keep Buch but I think this offer would be right there with the best of offers.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Hier à 18 h 45
Sujet:
Moving Buch
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GreatWhiteNorth</b></div><div>Way too much for Vancouver to pay here. No chance there’s a possibility of 2 1st round picks plus 2 quality prospects plus a roster player.. I understand asking for more to start negotiations but realistically take out the 2nd and the conditions and 1 of the prospects.
This is just way too rich for anyone to consider.</div></div>
I mean the 2 1sts only happen if Van is in the Stanley Cup Finals. I'd say the trade paid off if that is the case and wouldn't worry about the late 1st being tacked on. Garland is in here as a cap casualty. He is a solid player but in order for Van to improve the top 6 he is unfortunately the guy that needs to be involved so I don't put any value on him being included in this deal. So that leaves you at a good defense prospect + a reclamation project in Podkolzin + a 1st + a 2nd. It isn't a cheap price but Buch is a damn good player that would make a difference for two playoff runs. Have to give to get. If you drop the 2nd round pick and one of Brustewicz or Podkolzin there is no chance Blues consider.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Hier à 18 h 37
Sujet:
Next Year with Buch at this deadline
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>buffdaddy</b></div><div>I would highly advise against paying Z that much for that long. Roy is a King at that price tag, too.</div></div>
I just have a feeling managment sees Zadorov as a pretty significant piece and are going to pay him but roughly have 9mil to spend between him and Roy here however that shakes out. If Roy doesn't work out I would pivot to targeting Tanev to fill that spot or even Cole on another short term deal.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Hier à 18 h 34
Sujet:
Fair offer for buch
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>Meier was a few years younger, a pending RFA who wanted to be in NJ and was going to sign long-term (and probably better overall player…but I am biased). Buchnevich is 2-year rental…and next contract starts at age 30.</div></div>
Oh I know. Meier should have more value than Buch. The trade isn't exactly the same but just emulating it. SJ got another decent young dman in that Meier deal and also sent back a 5th rather than the 3rd coming back in this one. I do value the idea of Buch on this roster at 5.8mil for two playoff runs quite a bit here. It isn't the perfect comparison but given not wanting to trade Lekkerimaki or Willander in this deal I figured that trade had a solid framework to it to build this one off of.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Hier à 18 h 5
Sujet:
Fair offer for buch
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>buffdaddy</b></div><div>If the Blues were completely out of the playoff picture this would be hard to turn down, assuming Buch isn't part of the long term plans. That's a big if though.</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>A_K</b></div><div>It seems like a reasonable blueprint to me. The people that will tell you otherwise probably just value keeping Buch over trading him. Because realistically it's tough to pull premium assets in any trade. I could see the Blues locking in on Willander and then maybe it just goes nowhere. In terms of "this is the most VAN can put up" I think you're pretty accurate.</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>Bit of overpay…I’d add a little retention and take out 2nd</div></div>
I've roughly emulated the Timo Meir trade with this offer. I know it is a lot to give up and dependant on long term plans for buch as well as where St Louis is at come the deadline but I just really think Buch is the type of difference maker the Canucks need on the wing and will elevate them into a contender out of the west.
Mukhamdulim = brustewicz
Johansson = Garland
Zetturlund = Podkolzin
1st + conditional 2nd
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Hier à 17 h 57
Sujet:
Moving Buch
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BDHockey</b></div><div>I would argue that Buchnevich is worth way more than 1 Prospect (excluding Willander and Lekkermari), Garland and a 1st. Especially if there is retention.</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GreatWhiteNorth</b></div><div>I’m not saying he’s not, but there’s definitely a middle ground between that kinda offer and the one posted. The one posted is similar to Eichel value if not more and Buchnevich is not on the same level at all.</div></div>
This offer is roughly emulating the Timo Meir trade.
Mukhamdulim = brustewicz
Johansson = Garland
Zetturlund = Podkolzin
1st + conditional 2nd.
There were some other minor pieces to that trade but essentially the base of it. I know Meir was a bit younger and pending RFA but with Buch you get a year and a half at a lower cap hit.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
jeu. à 15 h 6
Sujet:
Offseason
I think that is a fair deal. I wonder if van is looking for someone with more size than Fabbro though.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
jeu. à 14 h 23
Sujet:
My realistic fix
Reimer would be a very on brand acquisition for the Oilers. Not only is he a ****ty goalie but also a ****ty person.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
jeu. à 2 h 15
Sujet:
Laine
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Dickie_Dunn</b></div><div>Not sure I understand the advantage?</div></div>
Change of scenery for both guys.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
jeu. à 1 h 37
Sujet:
Laine
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>pens1991</b></div><div>I'd definitely gamble on someone like Laine still, specially a team that has high upside this season (VAN) but feel like CBJ would want picks or a better asset.
end of the day he's still only 25 and the skill is there.</div></div>
Maybe but Kuzmenko is no slouch either and Laine and CBJ is a disgruntled situation. CBJ also has a few young Russians that aren't sure about being there. Kuzmenko has a very positive infectious attitude that might help.
Laine is also on a pretty big ticket and with how everything has gone I think that hurts his value.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
jeu. à 1 h 30
Sujet:
Laine
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ktownchef</b></div><div>So you wanna trade one struggling player for another but you want to take on the guy with the bigger cap hit and the longer term. Why?? No, just no!</div></div>
I'm taking the gamble that Laine can still be a game changing talent in the right environment. Particularly an environment that has 2 elite playmaking C's. It's a risk but if it pays off it's a move that bumps us up a notch.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mer. à 18 h 37
Sujet:
The Hughesfecta
Try Hischier + Nemec + 4 1st round picks as a starting point
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mer. à 15 h 29
Sujet:
Willy
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>RipNasty</b></div><div>Why? What leverage does he have? One point per game season and a hot start this year? Nah that's now how it works.</div></div>
Wait and see
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mer. à 13 h 42
Sujet:
Willy
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>RipNasty</b></div><div>Just like when Matthews was 100% going to leave as a free agent eh? Hilarious how wrong you guys are all the time but never change</div></div>
I'm not saying he's going to leave but he's not signing for less than Marner.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mer. à 1 h 52
Sujet:
With Beau Gone VAN Acquires Tanev
Absolutely outrageous ask for Tanev. Clearly a flames homer post.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mer. à 1 h 51
Sujet:
With Beau Gone VAN Acquires Tanev
Absolutely outrageous ask for Tanev. Clearly a flames homer post.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mar. à 1 h 39
Sujet:
Willy
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>RipNasty</b></div><div>Marner has been on a 100 point pace for 3 seasons. Nylander has 1 point per game season. Marner is a selke finalist as well. And Matthews is Matthews. How would Willy command the same cash? Get real, no common sense here. Just an overwhelming desire to see TO burn.</div></div>
You're in for a rude awakening friend. Best of luck.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
lun. à 0 h 3
Sujet:
Willy
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>RipNasty</b></div><div>Why? Because he had a really good 17 games to start the season? That trumps everything else that's happened in his career or what's been happening in the league? He's not Pastrnak who's been way better for a lot longer. Willy has had 1 40 goal season and 1 point per game season. Don't get me wrong, he's amazing and I want him resigned but this whole adding a million to his "asking" price every month of the season is just silly. That's now how negotiations work. Just as an example of how silly this is, all you guys on here are saying Willy will only sign for 11 or more now. And yet, not many think Petterson will get more than 11. How does that work? Petterson is a centre and he's younger and he's produced more than Nylander and somehow Nylander is getting the same pay? Or is Petterson getting 13 because he is a top 5 player in the game?
I am fully prepared to hear "because Toronto over pays their stars" argument or the tax issue and both of those are just nonsense statements that ignore all rationality. Bonus money is as big an advantage as lower tax states and they don't overpay their stars. They got market fair deals at the time they signed them. Cap percentages at the time of their signings prove this. No one could have predicted a global pandemic would come and cause the cap to be flat. Ignoring that is just blatant sensationalism.
Nylander is a terrific player and I truly believe he has a 50 goal 100 point season in him maybe 2 but he'll be signing for less 10 million for 8 years. He wants to play in TO and they want to sign him. It'll happen</div></div>
Nylander ain't taking less than Marner. He got screwed on his last deal compared to Matthews and Marner the next year. He's taking what is due to him. Sorry you can't come to terms with that.
1
2
Suivant
Page 1
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2023 CapFriendly.com