Éditer l'avatar

Mediumyeet

Membre depuis

23 oct 2020

Messages dans les forums

933

Messages par jour

3.87

Sujets de discussion

153

MESSAGES

SUJETS

MENTIONS "J'AIME"

ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG

Forum: Armchair-GMFri at 11:00 pm

Sujet: Your killing me Smalls

Really hope the Canucks don't trade Woo. I think they'll regret that if they do.

Forum: Armchair-GMThu at 5:20 pm

Sujet: Really good top 9

Huge overpay on that Johnson deal. It'll cost them more than their 1st just to get rid of him.

Forum: Armchair-GMThu at 12:45 pm

Sujet: Reinhart and 3C

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Smitty426</b></div><div>We need ready to play D on both sides and Woo or Rathbone would have to be on this list. We are not trading Wood most likely so its probably not worth discussing</div></div>

Wood isn't involved in this trade...

Forum: Armchair-GMThu at 2:57 am

Sujet: Punting the season

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>The_Rocket</b></div><div>I would prefer an aggressive offseason, where they add one or two good pieces while shedding some cap. I’m just not sure this management group is capable of it. It’s a lot easier to simply punt the season, take a couple flyers, and see what happens</div></div>

I'm fine either way. What I fear is they pay to move some contracts out via trade and buyouts but then use the money to sign guys like Haula, Savard or pretty much any other mid tier UFA's to deals in the 3-4m range (both AAV and term) in an attempt to improve depth. If they're going to be aggressive clearing cap then they need to use that cap on an impact player. If not then punt the season and see what happens.

Forum: Armchair-GMThu at 2:36 am

Sujet: Kadri and Manson Trades

I think Manson pre expansion could be a 2nd and a B prospect but not Rathbone.

I don't think the Avalanche will have any interest in moving Kadri but if they did I think it'd be a one for one swap for a similar caliber player. Can't see them being interested in picks or prospect package that the Canucks would be able to offer.

Forum: Armchair-GMThu at 2:30 am

Sujet: Reinhart and 3C

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jdfitz77</b></div><div>We don’t need “a lot of leverage”
There’s MANY teams out there interested in Reinhart
YOU have to beat them with the best bid

9oa in a weak draft is unlikely to be the winning bid imo</div></div>

That's where I disagree. I don't think they're going to get a better offer than that especially with reports that he wants to play out west. That limits the number of teams that will be confident they can get an extension done. 9th or 10th overall is the end of the basically consensus top tier of players in this draft. I don't think anyone is going to offer a prospect that has more value than a 9th overall pick.

To be fair I'd easily add Lind or Gadjovich or MacEwen or something like that to the deal I just don't think it will need that in reality.

Forum: Armchair-GMThu at 2:12 am

Sujet: Reinhart and 3C

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jdfitz77</b></div><div>Not enough for Sam

The hope would be that 9oa turns into a player as good as Reinhart…. but that’s VERY FAR from proven
You’d need to add another piece imo</div></div>

I disagree. I think 9OA gets it done if the Canucks are willing to pull the trigger. Buffalo doesn't have a lot of leverage.

Forum: Armchair-GMThu at 1:43 am

Sujet: Reinhart and 3C

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sporkknife</b></div><div>Yup, agree all. Hope this is the case. I fear that CAA is going to put Jimbo through the wash. Fingers crossed</div></div>

He's done well so far on RFA deals so heres to hoping it continues. But I'm with you, the whole situation makes me nervous.

Forum: Armchair-GMThu at 1:41 am

Sujet: Reinhart and 3C

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Tjm220</b></div><div>You’d have to add another pretty good asset to that Reinhart trade if you want to make it work. Not to mention you’re adding at least $1 million to the contract you gave him, he’s not signing long term for less than $7 million anywhere.</div></div>

I know he goes for more on here typically but I think in reality 9th OA gets it done if Canucks are willing to pull the trigger.

I think Reinhart would probably sign 6 yrs at 6.75. I think going to 8 years could bring the AAV down from 6.75. but if need be I'd go 6.75x6 and I think that gets it done.

Forum: Armchair-GMThu at 1:36 am

Sujet: Reinhart and 3C

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sporkknife</b></div><div>This is good stuff Mediumyeet. I think the Hughes and Pettersson deals are just a touch wishful thinking but hopefully not by much. Either way, a few guys on this roster would end up in Abby out of sheer numbers making the math work anyway. I'd be honestly quite happy if this is how we lined up next year.</div></div>

Ya Petey could go up by 250k. Only reason I've got Hughes so cheap is I went 2yrs. I have a feeling they're going to struggle on coming to an agreement at 4yr or 6yr team and 5yr should be an absolute no go for the nucks.

Thought process on 2yrs it allows them to sign Hughes long term before Petey. I think Petey signing long term first could inflate Hughes contract too much.

Forum: Armchair-GMThu at 1:32 am

Sujet: Reinhart and 3C

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>chortis</b></div><div>Lmao you are the guy I was just talking to on Reddit. I guess we’re on the same page</div></div>

Hahaha cheers friend! Well now you can see my whole offseason plan rather than just my reddit suggestion.

Forum: Armchair-GMThu at 1:28 am

Sujet: Reinhart and 3C

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>chortis</b></div><div>I like it. I think we could go with a stopgap 3C this year though. A guy like Soderberg maybe.

I also think we could probably get Hamonic and Edler back for ~3m.</div></div>

We could go with a stop gap 3C but I'd rather solve that spot for the long-term (hopefully) if you can get McLeod for something similar to this.

If Edler and Hamonic come back for similar money to this then I'd be fine with that as well though I prefer McCabe over Edler. McCabe is solid and the only reason he might come this cheap is the question marks after knee surgery and hardly playing for 18 months.

Forum: Armchair-GMWed at 6:43 pm

Sujet: Buffalos offseason with multiple teams in on Eichel

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TheAlien</b></div><div>I wonder if Holtby could be the guy. If Ullmark leaves Buffalo would need a goalie it would also give Holtby the chance to start which could get him to agree to Buffalo. You could also threaten to bury Roussel that might also get him to waive</div></div>

Ya it's possible that there's some scenarios that would get guys to waive for Buffalo. I typically try to avoid sending them to Buffalo on here but you make a good point with both Holtby and Roussell.

Forum: Armchair-GMWed at 4:43 pm

Sujet: Buffalos offseason with multiple teams in on Eichel

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TheAlien</b></div><div>If the Canucks trade for Reinhart there has to be cap going to Buffalo or it's just impossible. It doesn't have to be Eriksson but you gotta take Roussel for a trade to be possible</div></div>

It's possible without it. Would make things alot easier with it though. Big issue is Beagle and Roussell have m-NTC they could both just outright refuse. So does Eriksson for that matter but I feel like he's less likely to be included and less likely to refuse.

Forum: Armchair-GMWed at 3:10 pm

Sujet: Devils fans what do you say

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>yztnuK</b></div><div>what makes you think the 41st oa and a real potential of a 7th rounder making a NHL impact worth getting a meddling prospect that can crack the Devils</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Devil1122</b></div><div>McLeod isn't a prospect. He's a good 3C</div></div>

Ya McLeod is a young player that has developed nicely into a defensive 3C and he's a right hand shot. I agree that the 41st and Persson (who could be a steal for a 7th rounder) is a bit nerve racking to give up. But 3C is one of the Canucks biggest holes and McLeod pretty much fits what they need perfectly now and into the future.

Forum: Armchair-GMWed at 3:07 pm

Sujet: Devils fans what do you say

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Devil1122</b></div><div>Yup. Spot on</div></div>

How much do you like Bastian and Merkley? I'm just curious that if they got a solid enough return for McLeod and they particularly like Bastian, for instance, but aren't as high on Merkley. Would it make sense to move McLeod and allow them to protect Bastian?

Forum: Armchair-GMWed at 3:01 pm

Sujet: Devils fans what do you say

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Devil1122</b></div><div>Devils pass. They want to keep McLeod long term.

Would the Canucks be interested in Merkley instead?</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>I am not sure what McLeod's market would be if Devils shopped him around, but that seems about right.
I'd prefer to keep him though...looked good this year in 4C role.</div></div>

Curious, what does your expansion protection list look like on forward?
Id assume it's:
Hischier, Wood, Bratt, Zacha, Kuokkanen, McLeod, Sharangovich?

Leaving: Merkley, Bastian, Johnsson exposed?

Forum: Armchair-GMWed at 2:56 pm

Sujet: Devils fans what do you say

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>yztnuK</b></div><div>Vancouver says NO</div></div>

I said yes for Van so that's unfortunate.

Forum: Armchair-GMWed at 2:39 pm

Sujet: Devils fans what do you say

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Devil1122</b></div><div>Devils pass. They want to keep McLeod long term.

Would the Canucks be interested in Merkley instead?</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>I am not sure what McLeod's market would be if Devils shopped him around, but that seems about right.
I'd prefer to keep him though...looked good this year in 4C role.</div></div>

I don't really have interest in Merkley but McLeod is someone I'd definitely want.

Glad to hear the value is probably close, whether devils are willing to move him is another story for sure.

Forum: Armchair-GMWed at 2:35 pm

Sujet: Devils fans what do you say

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>qwertymann</b></div><div>VAN fans says no to both</div></div>

Not what I'm asking. I like both of these trades for Van although I would prefer to give up less more McLeod.

Forum: Armchair-GMTue at 10:36 pm

Sujet: ReinhartPetterssonHughes Hometown Discounts

Love the Reinhart deal. Easy accept by Buffalo.

Forum: Armchair-GMTue at 9:11 pm

Sujet: Bertuzzi

I think that's a pretty decent offer for Bertuzzi. I'm not convinced it is what Detroit would be looking for. It would really depend on how they value Robertson and as others pointed out Dermott probably isn't a good option unless it's post expansion. But good job here it's a decent attempt for sure.

Forum: Armchair-GMTue at 9:05 pm

Sujet: Who says no

Tampa says no. They need to clear the capspace getting Roussell in doesn't help with that.

Even if the Canucks get Tyler Johnson, his and Tyler Myers NTC say no for the Buffalo trade.

A 2nd isn't close to enough for Reilly. He gets dumped on here a lot but the guy is still a legitimate top 4 dman. A 2nd round pick isn't enough for guys like that.

Forum: Armchair-GMTue at 7:59 pm

Sujet: Okay you can at me this time

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Chapee44</b></div><div>Buffalo will likely offer him 4 x 3.
The injury concern is real but someone will have to beat what Buffalo will give him as their #2 dman and biggest leader.</div></div>

Ya it'll be interesting to see what happens. I don't think that's out of the question but his situation feels very up in the air. Could largely depend on if he wants to come back to Buffalo too.

Forum: Armchair-GMTue at 7:58 pm

Sujet: Okay you can at me this time

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>nhn1405</b></div><div>i actually really like this all around</div></div>

Thanks! I think the Reinhart move is a long shot but I think Wallmark is a guy that will be available for cheap and could be a good option for the Canucks with the limited cap space. Really like targeting Blais in a trade too as he brings speed and physicality. Paquette can be a solid cheap addition that kills penalties and plays 4th line.

12 Suivant

Page 1

PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE

LANGUE

ARCHIVES

CBA

CALCS

OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY

OUTILS

JOUEURS

OUTILS INTERACTIFS

Mediumyeet

Membre depuis

Messages dans les forums

Messages par jour

Sujets de discussion