Éditer l'avatar
  • png, jpeg
  • La grandeur minimale recommandée se veut de 800px par 800px
  • Grandeur maximale: 1MB
Glisser l'image pour repositionner
Sauvegarder
Annuler

GrinReaper

Membre depuis
28 aoû 2020
Équipe préférée
Oilers d'Edmonton
Messages dans les forums
932
Messages par jour
4.03
Sujets de discussion
22
Forum: Armchair-GMMon at 7:40 am
Sujet: Vancouver Cupnucks
Think the numbers you have signed Pettersson and Hugh’s works on a 3 yr bridge deal, if you want term Pettersson comes in around 9 and Hugh’s 8.25 and you sign them both for 7 yrs, I think with both having poor seasons to their standards and the flat cap, you strike and lock them up long term, both probably come in at a mil under what they would have got in a normal yr with the cap still going up every yr, might look like a steep price to pay right now but the last 4 yrs will look like good value contracts. One has to take into consideration on a 3 yr bridge deal we probably see our first cap increase that offseason which drives their next deals up and there will be no more playing nice, Nuks will have back the brink trucks up to play them that extra bump for taking bridge deals, but that at least insure there nuks for the next 10 yrs.
Forsberg 1.25
Boyd 950k
Martinez 4.5 x 2
Pass on Reilly
Eriksson your probably going have to add a mid level prospect or a 3rd
Don’t see Florida or the Bruins doing those trades
Virtanen is going to be tough to move his value couldn’t be any lower and the backloaded contract don’t see anyone qualifying him at that # unless he has a massive bounce back yr and scores 20, last offseason was the time to move him

Your right it’s hard to find anyone on here that doesn’t rip you for the moves you’ve make and then they turnaround and massively overvalue their players.
It can be toxic at times
Forum: Armchair-GMSun at 3:58 pm
Sujet: What should these three teams pay for this player
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JmoneyTalk</b></div><div>I stand by what I previously said, it wouldn't be a bad move. Obviously a too 6 LW with term is the main target but if Sam can be had for cheap, as a king time Oilers fan I wouldn't be upset. I could care less about any insiders talking about it, I just answered the question that was asked for this post specifically while referring to what they say in the video. An RFA is still a solid grab and I'm sure something could get worked out, he's not going to be worth anymore then Nuge.</div></div>

I’m a life long oilers fans, go look at Sams career stats, he’s a -95 for his career 37% in the faceoff dot for his career how in world do you think this guy is a good fit, can’t win a draw to safe his life so your not using him at centre and he’s a defensive liability every time he steps on the ice, that last thing this team is another guy that can’t defend and we have a log jam on the right wing, this guy wouldn’t even be on Holland’s radar because he contradicts everything this team needs.
Forum: Armchair-GMSat at 11:01 pm
Sujet: What should these three teams pay for this player
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JmoneyTalk</b></div><div>It made sense in the fact you slide 1 down the RW and you're just that much deeper there and he can play center, Draisaitl play with McDavid on the LW and Nuge play with Sam on the LW. Doesn't hurt to have wingers/centers that are versatile. And he actually didn't say they were untouchable, he said nothing about Broberg actually but either way he said he would trade the first for a top 6 player with term. The fact that Sam is an RFA pretty much puts him in that category, not to mention he may not cost as much either considering he's a 50 point player with one season in the 60s. I also did say Holland would very much sooner make a move for a LW in that category. Either way, is Sam was actually available and he could be had for cheap I can't see a team not trading for him and as a lifetime Oilers fan I wouldn't be upset if it costs a first and good prospect. Regardless, can't see BUF trading him, he's young, he's good, he's an RFA.</div></div>

First Holland’s not moving his first ever pick as the oilers GM a yr after he drafted Broberg plus he’s Klefs replacement as Klef is never playing again.
Correct he did say he’d move his first for a player with term, Sam isn’t that guy he’s a pending RFA meaning zero cost certainty, secondly Sam is more a playmaker then a finisher not something Edmonton needs in its top 6, they need finishers as Kahun has been a bust as Draisaitls trigger man.
Again he makes zero sense to the oilers, doesn’t have term and doesn’t fit into our top 6, again they pulled this out of their asses no one else is taking about this.
Forum: Armchair-GMSat at 7:26 am
Sujet: Someone needs to do this to Jim Benning this summer
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Chigurrhh</b></div><div>And then they are screwed because they only budgeted for bridge contracts for Hughes and Pettersson. This is why a team should do this and punish them for their cap mismanagement.

If they match, they have to start paying tons of assets to other teams to take their bad contracts.</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>theleano1</b></div><div>well the fact pettersson and hughes want the same bridge contract acording to their agent i don't see pettersson siging an offer sheet not only that it's still easily matched</div></div>

You would need to have 1 team offer sheet Pettersson and another team offer sheet Hugh’s to put van in real trouble, first off you have to get them to agree to a offer sheet which I don’t see happening unless Benning completely sours them in negotiations which is a possibility, secondly Van would easily match a Pettersson offer sheet and sign Hugh’s to a 1 yr deal and make it up to him the next yr after, Eriksson, Roussel and Beagle are all off the books.

Offer sheeting just one of them doesn’t put van in cap trouble, unless you offer sheet Pettersson at 7yrs times 12mil then ownership doesn’t match but no teams doing that.