SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Why it wont be 10th for Ullmark

Créé par: NHLfan10506
Équipe: 2024-25 Devils du New Jersey
Date de création initiale: 6 juin 2024
Publié: 6 juin 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
An Ullmark-to-NJD trade appears unlikely.

But even if it does occur, there is very little to suggest 10th overall pick would be involved.



1. There is no "extended Ullmark" option before draft. The earliest he can sign extension is July 1, 2024, three days after the draft. Before July 1, 2024: Sweeney may speak with him about contracts, but may not extend him. Other teams may not speak with Ullmark. (The draft is on June 28-29, 2024). Between July 1, 2024 and July 1, 2025, Sweeney may extend Ullmark, Sweeney may grant permission to other teams to talk to Ullmark, but other teams cannot extend Ullmark. After July 1, 2025: Ullmark becomes free agent and other teams may sign him.

2. There is no "sign and trade" scenario. First, see #1 why it cannot happen before draft. Second, the minute he signs an extension, he is likely to get NMC, which would give him much more control of where he will play. The only window for sign-and-trade would be after 2024-25 season, before free agency.

3. We know that, at deadline, Fitzy asked about Swayman (was told no obviously). But it may indicate Fitzy didn’t like Ullmark, or Ullmark didn’t like Devils.

4. Ullmark blocked a trade to New Jersey in March. (link: https://ottawacitizen.com/ottawa-senators/senators-will-likely-take-another-run-at-ullmark). Players submit lists of of teams for Modified No Trade Clauses in July. Whatever teams were on his list in March will still be on his list in June. So even if Ullmark were to change his list, it would not be done before draft.

5. Fitzgerald’s comments indicate he wants goalie with term. He has said in recent days he wants played for "tomorrow and wherever the controllable future"

6. Fitzgerald's comments also indicate he is aiming for younger goalie: "I’m more than willing to move the pick for the right asset. One that we control, one that’s probably in the same demographic as our team — maybe not 23, 24 years old but somebody we control for a few years.“

7. Until Swayman is actually extended, I don’t believe Ullmark goes in the block. If contract negotiations run longer (ie, goes into Arb period in July) there is a chance an Ullmark trade never happens just based on timing.

8. We seen a lot of chatter about NJD and other goalies (Markstrom, Saros, etc) but very little about Ullmark and NJD. It’s mostly fan speculation.

9. The number of goalies that have been traded alone for top-20 picks in NHL could be counted on your thumbs. Neither were rentals.

-- 1971 (#10): Pete McDuffe
-- 2013 (#9): Cory Schnieder

There are others that have been in packages, but still but many

-- 1973 (#10): Bernie Parent, 2nd
-- 1982 (#9): Don Edwards, Richie Dunn
-- 1984 (#8): Rick Walmsley, two 2nds, 3rd
-- 1987 (#15): Dale Hunter, Clint Malarchuk
-- 1993 (#14): Ron Hextall, 1st (#23) (with Mark Fitzpatrick)
-- 1999 (#4): Dan Cloutier, Niklas Sundstrom, 2000 1st, 2000 3rd
-- 2000 (#4): Kevin Weekes, Kristian Kudroc, 2nd (with 4th, 7th)
-- 2002 (#20): Ron Tugnutt, 2nd
-- 2007 (#13): Vesa Toskala, Mark Bell (with 2nd, 4th)
-- 2017 (#7): Antti Raanta, Derek Stepan (with DeAngelo)
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
23 000 000 $
21 000 000 $
21 000 000 $
2800 000 $
2800 000 $
2800 000 $
Transactions
1.
NJD
    Trades listed below are alternatives if we are to see a trade between Boston and New Jersey for a goalie before 2024 draft
    BOS
    2.
    NJD
      Linus Ullmark
      BOS
        Package without 1st
        3.
        NJD
          Linus Ullmark
          (additional asset)
          BOS
            10th overall
            4.
            NJD
              Jeremy Swayman
              BOS
                10th overall
                Frais appliqués
                Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
                2024
                Logo de NJD
                Logo de NJD
                Logo de WPG
                Logo de NJD
                Logo de COL
                Logo de NJD
                2025
                Logo de NJD
                Logo de NJD
                Logo de WPG
                Logo de NJD
                Logo de NJD
                2026
                Logo de NJD
                Logo de NJD
                Logo de NJD
                Logo de NJD
                Logo de DAL
                Logo de WPG
                Logo de NJD
                Logo de NJD
                Logo de NJD
                TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
                2187 700 000 $73 901 397 $1 538 897 $5 950 000 $13 798 603 $
                Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
                Logo de Devils du New Jersey
                8 800 000 $8 800 000 $
                AG, AD
                NMC
                UFA - 7
                Logo de Devils du New Jersey
                8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
                C
                UFA - 6
                Logo de Devils du New Jersey
                7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
                AD, AG
                NMC
                UFA - 7
                Logo de Devils du New Jersey
                6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
                AG, AD
                NMC
                UFA - 3
                Logo de Devils du New Jersey
                7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
                C
                M-NTC
                UFA - 3
                Logo de Devils du New Jersey
                3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
                AD, C
                RFA
                Logo de Devils du New Jersey
                800 000 $800 000 $
                AG
                RFA
                Logo de Devils du New Jersey
                3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
                C, AG
                NTC
                UFA - 2
                Logo de Devils du New Jersey
                894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
                AD, AG
                RFA - 1
                Logo de Devils du New Jersey
                775 000 $775 000 $
                AG
                UFA - 1
                Logo de Devils du New Jersey
                1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
                AD, C
                UFA - 1
                Logo de Devils du New Jersey
                800 000 $800 000 $
                AD, C
                RFA
                Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
                Logo de Devils du New Jersey
                3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
                DG
                M-NTC
                UFA - 4
                Logo de Devils du New Jersey
                9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
                DD
                NMC
                UFA - 4
                Logo de Devils du New Jersey
                1 925 000 $1 925 000 $
                G
                M-NTC
                UFA - 1
                Logo de Devils du New Jersey
                925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 850 000 $$2M)
                DG/DD
                RFA - 1
                Logo de Devils du New Jersey
                918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance3 250 000 $$3M)
                DD
                RFA - 2
                Logo de Devils du New Jersey
                1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
                DG
                RFA - 1
                Logo de Devils du New Jersey
                4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
                DD
                M-NTC
                UFA - 3
                Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
                Logo de Devils du New Jersey
                1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
                AD
                UFA - 1
                Logo de Devils du New Jersey
                800 000 $800 000 $
                DG
                RFA

                Code d'intégration

                • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
                • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

                Texte intégré

                Cliquer pour surligner
                6 juin à 8 h 53
                #1
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: avr. 2019
                Messages: 5,995
                Mentions "j'aime": 6,659
                This is the one Boston fans will skip and keep posting their crazy ullmark trades. Appreciate the effort though
                exo2769 et Archiv3 a aimé ceci.
                6 juin à 9 h 6
                #2
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: juill. 2022
                Messages: 551
                Mentions "j'aime": 180
                If it were 10th overall in next years draft maybe the Bruins would entertain a Swayman trade
                6 juin à 9 h 6
                #3
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: mars 2024
                Messages: 10
                Mentions "j'aime": 1
                I don’t think Ullmark nixed a NJ trade I think Sweeney said no Ullmark definitely derailed an LA deal though didn’t want to move west
                Gofnut999 a aimé ceci.
                6 juin à 9 h 7
                #4
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: févr. 2023
                Messages: 2,508
                Mentions "j'aime": 1,044
                I saw something that broke down possible trade targets for the devils and they looked more along the lines of:

                Top Tier -
                Jesse Saros (High Cost)
                Jacob Markstrom (Semi-High Cost)
                John Gibson (Medium Cost)

                Middle Tier -
                Filip Gustavson (Higher Cost)
                Darcy Kuemper (Mid-lower Cost)
                Varlomov (Higher Cost)

                More Unproven Tier
                Askarov (High Cost, Prospect and Very Unproven)
                Veggie (Utah, Mid-Cost)
                Ukka Pekka Lukkenon (Higher Cost, slightly more unproven)

                Lower Teir:
                Jonathan Quick (Age and decline as a starter)
                Stolarz
                6 juin à 9 h 9
                #5
                I Love J Boqvist
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: janv. 2023
                Messages: 14,202
                Mentions "j'aime": 3,902
                Quoting: Logicalicesports
                I saw something that broke down possible trade targets for the devils and they looked more along the lines of:

                Top Tier -
                Jesse Saros (High Cost)
                Jacob Markstrom (Semi-High Cost)
                John Gibson (Medium Cost)

                Middle Tier -
                Filip Gustavson (Higher Cost)
                Darcy Kuemper (Mid-lower Cost)
                Varlomov (Higher Cost)

                More Unproven Tier
                Askarov (High Cost, Prospect and Very Unproven)
                Veggie (Utah, Mid-Cost)
                Ukka Pekka Lukkenon (Higher Cost, slightly more unproven)

                Lower Teir:
                Jonathan Quick (Age and decline as a starter)
                Stolarz


                What the hell a polar bear doing in Arlington Texas (Gibson’s dog**** ass in high tier)
                Logicalicesports, A_Habs_fan, SociallyHawkward and 2 others a aimé ceci.
                6 juin à 9 h 11
                #6
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: févr. 2023
                Messages: 2,508
                Mentions "j'aime": 1,044
                Quoting: dgibb10
                What the hell a polar bear doing in Arlington Texas (Gibson’s dog**** ass in high tier)


                I believe the reasoning for it was the fact that he is a multi-time allstar and he has term. Still semi young for a goaltender too
                6 juin à 9 h 15
                #7
                I Love J Boqvist
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: janv. 2023
                Messages: 14,202
                Mentions "j'aime": 3,902
                Quoting: Logicalicesports
                I believe the reasoning for it was the fact that he is a multi-time allstar and he has term. Still semi young for a goaltender too


                He’s been kinda dog**** for the last half decade
                SociallyHawkward a aimé ceci.
                6 juin à 9 h 21
                #8
                LongtimeLeafsufferer
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: juill. 2015
                Messages: 61,312
                Mentions "j'aime": 23,610
                IMO isn't ]Ullmark to traded. It's almost like the Marner situation. CF fans just because a player is one year away from UFA, he HAS to be traded. Maybe the Bruins should be traded Marchand tootears of joy

                Ullmark can change his "trade list" with Bruins approval at any time. Ullmark may want to be traded (to a good team) but that certainly doesn't mean a good team what give up THAT much for him as there are limited suitors for Ullmark.. Bruins just might feel that freeing up 4m 5m (Ullmark minus his 1m replacement) in cap to resign another player is the real benefit.
                SociallyHawkward a aimé ceci.
                6 juin à 9 h 30
                #9
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: mai 2023
                Messages: 5,561
                Mentions "j'aime": 1,868
                Modifié 6 juin à 9 h 36
                Quoting: Dadoinks
                I don’t think Ullmark nixed a NJ trade I think Sweeney said no Ullmark definitely derailed an LA deal though didn’t want to move west


                I’ll start this off by saying anyone that believes that NJD are going to trade the #10’ for Ullmark without other considerations is unrealisiic. Just like anyone who believes that Boston is trading Swayman for #10 in this draft is also. Both are based on woefully optimistic fans hopes.

                That said, this poster:

                1. Points to an article by Bruce Garrioch as proof that Ullmark said no to a NJ deal

                Same reporter also said that it would take Chychrun, the Boston 2024 first, and other considerations to get a Ullmark deal done, which people on both sides are openly mocking.

                Despite comments on his credibility since the old ownership left by Ottawa fans, I’m quite fascinated that he broke the story of the Boston - NJ deal over national pundits and local journalists. Ottawa fans should be proud of how good a local reporter is.

                2. Conveniently disregards that national reporter, Pierre Lebrun, stated that Markstrom and Ullmark were the NJD’s top 2 choices after the press conference where he mentioned the term control once in a fairly innocuous statement.

                On a side note. Can Boston give permission to a team to talk to Ullmark and his reps if they are on his NTC to try and convince him to waive? I’ve made the assumption the answer is yes. They obviously can’t formally discuss an extension for tampering rules.
                6 juin à 9 h 54
                #10
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: janv. 2017
                Messages: 20,246
                Mentions "j'aime": 9,042
                I don’t think anyone in their right mind thinks NJ gives up the 10th overall for Ullmark straight up.

                I never thought they’d even consider it until Fitz brought it up.

                If it were to happen it would be more something like Boston 25 1st/Ully for NJ 24 1st/Dawes or Schmid. Possibly other pieces involved as well.

                Personally i have maintained the NJ 25 1st with top 15 protection gets the deal done on both sides.

                I highly doubt Ullmark blocked a trade to NJ. I heard he blocked a trade to Ottawa last offseason. I heard Boston turned down NJ offer. 🤷🏻‍♂️

                I think Gustavson from Minnesota is their preferred target at this point but they will have competition for him.
                6 juin à 10 h 3
                #11
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: juin 2016
                Messages: 12,674
                Mentions "j'aime": 5,481
                Quoting: SociallyHawkward
                This is the one Boston fans will skip and keep posting their crazy ullmark trades. Appreciate the effort though


                Most Ullmark trades have had Devils 2025 1st, not the 2024 1st.
                6 juin à 10 h 34
                #12
                I Love J Boqvist
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: janv. 2023
                Messages: 14,202
                Mentions "j'aime": 3,902
                Quoting: Celtics21
                I’ll start this off by saying anyone that believes that NJD are going to trade the #10’ for Ullmark without other considerations is unrealisiic. Just like anyone who believes that Boston is trading Swayman for #10 in this draft is also. Both are based on woefully optimistic fans hopes.

                That said, this poster:

                1. Points to an article by Bruce Garrioch as proof that Ullmark said no to a NJ deal

                Same reporter also said that it would take Chychrun, the Boston 2024 first, and other considerations to get a Ullmark deal done, which people on both sides are openly mocking.

                Despite comments on his credibility since the old ownership left by Ottawa fans, I’m quite fascinated that he broke the story of the Boston - NJ deal over national pundits and local journalists. Ottawa fans should be proud of how good a local reporter is.

                2. Conveniently disregards that national reporter, Pierre Lebrun, stated that Markstrom and Ullmark were the NJD’s top 2 choices after the press conference where he mentioned the term control once in a fairly innocuous statement.

                On a side note. Can Boston give permission to a team to talk to Ullmark and his reps if they are on his NTC to try and convince him to waive? I’ve made the assumption the answer is yes. They obviously can’t formally discuss an extension for tampering rules.


                My biggest concern with the validity of the article, and this is the same as the Markstrom won’t waive to LAK one in that Kypreos article, is how it’s not even thrown in as a scoop from his sources.

                And how it hasn’t been really picked up anywhere.

                They both threw it in there like it was well known, for pieces that no other reports had mentioned before.
                Celtics21 a aimé ceci.
                6 juin à 10 h 51
                #13
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: mai 2023
                Messages: 5,561
                Mentions "j'aime": 1,868
                Quoting: dgibb10
                My biggest concern with the validity of the article, and this is the same as the Markstrom won’t waive to LAK one in that Kypreos article, is how it’s not even thrown in as a scoop from his sources.

                And how it hasn’t been really picked up anywhere.

                They both threw it in there like it was well known, for pieces that no other reports had mentioned before.


                That’s journalism 2024. It’s click bait and accuracy isn’t a consideration. Friedman is the most credible. The next ones are probably LeBrun, Seravelli, Weekes, Johnston. Probably missing someone, but I read that article and basically dismissed it.

                Ottawa is not trading Chychrun and a 2024 Boston 1st for Ullmark. All the reports are that Ullmark wants an eastern time zone team with easy travel to Sweden and a competitive team. My guess is with those parameters that Jersey wouldn’t be on his NTC list and blocked.

                I’m curious about a few things?

                1. When did Ullmark set his current NTC and when can he change it?

                2. When can the Bruins let another team talk to him if he has them on his NTC?
                6 juin à 11 h 0
                #14
                I Love J Boqvist
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: janv. 2023
                Messages: 14,202
                Mentions "j'aime": 3,902
                Quoting: Celtics21
                That’s journalism 2024. It’s click bait and accuracy isn’t a consideration. Friedman is the most credible. The next ones are probably LeBrun, Seravelli, Weekes, Johnston. Probably missing someone, but I read that article and basically dismissed it.

                Ottawa is not trading Chychrun and a 2024 Boston 1st for Ullmark. All the reports are that Ullmark wants an eastern time zone team with easy travel to Sweden and a competitive team. My guess is with those parameters that Jersey wouldn’t be on his NTC list and blocked.

                I’m curious about a few things?

                1. When did Ullmark set his current NTC and when can he change it?

                2. When can the Bruins let another team talk to him if he has them on his NTC?


                Ullmarks NTC is set again on July 1st. I’m not sure how it works for NTCs that don’t change in size, if they submit once or every year, but Ullmarks goes from 16 to 15 so he’ll be changing it fs.

                Ullmark with the bruins permission can talk to any team post June 1st, whether they are on his NTC or not. But not entirely sure why he would want to talk to a team on his NTC.
                6 juin à 11 h 5
                #15
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: mai 2023
                Messages: 5,561
                Mentions "j'aime": 1,868
                Quoting: dgibb10
                Ullmarks NTC is set again on July 1st. I’m not sure how it works for NTCs that don’t change in size, if they submit once or every year, but Ullmarks goes from 16 to 15 so he’ll be changing it fs.

                Ullmark with the bruins permission can talk to any team post June 1st, whether they are on his NTC or not. But not entirely sure why he would want to talk to a team on his NTC.


                I could see him opening up to a team on his NTC if they guarantee a contract now. He’d have more leverage and be closer to his Vezina.
                dgibb10 a aimé ceci.
                6 juin à 12 h 3
                #16
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: mai 2023
                Messages: 113
                Mentions "j'aime": 33
                Quoting: Celtics21
                I could see him opening up to a team on his NTC if they guarantee a contract now. He’d have more leverage and be closer to his Vezina.


                I think his largest thing which people seem to be ignoring, was he shut down a trade so he didn't uproot his family mid school year and didn't want to leave them. Other thing i heard is ease/length of travel to/from Sweden. I think something like NJD he'd be open to as long as it's set with a bit of stability
                6 juin à 12 h 10
                #17
                LongtimeLeafsufferer
                Avatar de l'utilisateur
                Rejoint: juill. 2015
                Messages: 61,312
                Mentions "j'aime": 23,610
                Quoting: Celtics21
                That’s journalism 2024. It’s click bait and accuracy isn’t a consideration. Friedman is the most credible. The next ones are probably LeBrun, Seravelli, Weekes, Johnston. Probably missing someone, but I read that article and basically dismissed it.

                Ottawa is not trading Chychrun and a 2024 Boston 1st for Ullmark. All the reports are that Ullmark wants an eastern time zone team with easy travel to Sweden and a competitive team. My guess is with those parameters that Jersey wouldn’t be on his NTC list and blocked.

                I’m curious about a few things?

                1. When did Ullmark set his current NTC and when can he change it?

                2. When can the Bruins let another team talk to him if he has them on his NTC?


                The M NTC are usually set July 1st and sometimes changed January 1st. Now if Ullmark and the Bruins agree, they could change the teams that are on list.
                The Bruins could let any team talk to Ullmark about a trade/extension but of course they would notify Ullmark if he would agree to that (Why wouldn't he)
                But the most likely situation is that Bruins and the "new" team have a trade in place, and the trade only takes place if Ullmark agrees to an extension. Certainly Bruins aren't going to allow a team to offer an extension without a trade agreement in place.
                 
                Répondre
                To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
                Question:
                Options:
                Ajouter une option
                Soumettre le sondage