Gofnut999

Membre depuis
6 jan 2017
Messages dans les forums
8686
Messages par jour
6,97
Sujets de discussion
10
Forum: Armchair-GM 7 avr à 13 h 13
Sujet: next year again
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>bsilk18</b></div><div>1. You just admitted what I said. Which was that stud will be C and Coyle will be RW.
2. Fine "criticized" not "yelled at", but no I dont have issues, i was just choosing a word.
3. Really? Dont be a dick, be an adult and have an adult conversation like I am with people</div></div>

1. I would not be surprised if Stud plays RW next year. Take some pressure off him and get his feet wet. Like what Vegas did with Glass and Canes did with Necas.
2. Was not even critical.
3. I am. An adult conversation involves two people discussing different ideas. Impossible when one of them only wants to be told they are right and gets offended/defensive when that does not happen. Just look at your response. Very first thing. ‘“See, you are saying i’m right”. It’s a broken record. I’m right. I’m right. I’m right. Even when given an alternative theory you always twist it back to you being right and others just going out of their way to say you are not. Give it rest. Opinions are neither right or wrong.
Forum: Armchair-GM26 mar à 12 h 28
Sujet: next year again
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>bsilk18</b></div><div>This is really good, the only thing I see in a tiny more for debrusk and Krug (he will get a discount, but I dont see less than. 6.75).
And Halak: Hes gonna go for 4.5+ somewhere that needs a starter (Oilers? plenty of teams)
Other than that, I have been yelled at for putting Coyle on the RW, but Im fine with it, so have fun with <a href="/users/Gofnut999" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@Gofnut999</a> lol</div></div>

Lol. Yelled at? Jesus you have issues. Maybe you need to understand that any dialogue that does not tell you how great you are might NOT actually be an attack but just a conversation. A little oversensitive or insecure? 🤷🏻‍♂️

What i have said to you and everyone else was Coyle has excelled at 3C and the Bruins prefer to keep him there. That is their preference, and fact, but it is not set in stone. If it makes the team better than of course they will move him. What they are less likely to do is move him to RW to put a lesser player at 3C. They would look to improve RW instead. That is their desired option. Moving him to RW is a fallback. If/when Studnicka is deemed ready for NHL center that will change the dynamics.
Forum: Armchair-GM25 fév à 18 h 17
Sujet: Lines post deadline
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>bsilk18</b></div><div>I agree, but given that, is Kuhlman a 4th liner or do they send him down to develop more?</div></div>

I think strictly from a numbers game he goes down. Doesn’t deserve to, but more minutes is not a bad thing for him.


Not very often i agree with Joe Haggerty but his response to someone saying Nick’s a downgrade from Heinen and was just a cap move was a gem:

“How on God's green earth is Danton Heinen better than Nick Ritchie when Ritchie has more goals, averages more points per game, he has twice as many hits. He's actually someone you notice during the game from time to time throwing a hit or actually putting his body in front of the net. We never notice Danton Heinen doing anything when we watch him play.”

That sums it up. Lol.
Forum: Armchair-GM25 fév à 12 h 23
Sujet: Lines post deadline
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>bsilk18</b></div><div>Yes, im sure you said that. And you are right, i did say both of those things, im not gonna deny that. But i suppose they did make sense.
But I also said they wouldnt get Palmeri, I said Kreider wouldnt move, I said Stud and Urho were untouchable (keeping Lauzon and Beecher were wins too), I said they would move Backes (which too many people tried telling me they wouldnt do), I said they would get rid of Hienen which they did.

So yes i got 2 out of my like 15 predictions wrong. and I will admit that. But hey it was a good TDL, nothing major though (which isnt a bad thing)

Hey im not complaining about them not making that many moves</div></div>


You are not complaining about their lack of moves, plenty are.

In the end most of the teams that gave up long term assets for a boost will fall short and regret it. I think they did just fine.

Everybody scrambles to say who won. Most are onboard with Carolina or Caps. To me it’s NJ. They added 2 1sts, 2nd, 3rd, that could become 2nd or 1st, 5th, and 5 prospects. Nice haul.
Forum: Armchair-GM25 fév à 11 h 32
Sujet: Lines post deadline
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>bsilk18</b></div><div>Wish they had done more I guess, but Hienen needed to go, they solidified the top 6, and they got another bottom 6 winger that isnt a weak kid like Hienen. And they moved Backes' deal for about what I said 50 times they would go it for.

So good job by them, good job by me, and maybe the coulda done more.</div></div>

Lol, you said they would not retain on Backes or move Anderson.

I told you 2 weeks ago watch for 1st/Anderson/Backes for Kase.

I think they did just fine. Addressed 3 needs. A RW for the middle 6 that can score. Added some much needed size/grit/push back/net front presence in top 9. Dumped Backes and created space to sign Krug. Heinen really had to go.

I understand that some are upset that they did not get a big name. But it always looked like Kreider was going to re-sign and Palmeiri was never really on the table.

I would have liked to see them gotten Barclay Goodrow but never would have paid what TB did for him. Or a beefy 3rd pair RD would have been nice.

They certainly did not win the deadline. But they are better off short and long term after it. And did not move Studnivka/Urho/Beecher/Lauzon.

Now let’s hope they stay healthy for the playoffs and see what happens.
Forum: Armchair-GM24 fév à 22 h 01
Sujet: Lines post deadline
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>bsilk18</b></div><div>Those guys are right.
He hasnt player C in boston yet.
Also they sent Kuhlman down, I didnt think they would, but evidently they did. And to me it doesnt seem like it was to make roster space and avoid waivers, because now to call him up they need to place someone on waivers anyway.</div></div>

I did not say he’s played C in Boston, i said he has played there in Prov. He also played some C in college. Last year when he was brought up they talked about being able to use him at C as well and were hoping to give him some time there.

He’s the only FW on the roster that is waiver exempt. It was inevitable he would get sent down. Nobody else would clear waivers. The other option was sending Lauzon down and that was not happening.
Forum: Armchair-GM24 fév à 15 h 13