PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
Historique des masses salariales
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports d’entrée en vigueur du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Coût par point
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Salaire retenu
Historique - Rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports d’entrée en vigueur du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Coût par point
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Salaire retenu
Historique - Rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
Historique des masses salariales
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
exo2769
exo2769
Membre depuis
28 juill. 2015
Équipe favorite
Blackhawks de Chicago
Messages dans les forums
12434
Messages par jour
4.9
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
il y a 7 heures
Sujet:
Draft day trades
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Wadejos123</b></div><div>From the devils POV would you rather take wright at 2 or trading Wright+2023 1st for Cat? If i'm the devils I take Wright. Just trying to considering the other teams side here.
We interact fairly often on this site so I do want to put this out there. I'll be shocked if cat isn't on the opening night blackhawks roster. I just don't see any team coming up to Davidson's demands, and in the little we've seen from KD he doesn't seem like he's going to back down from them easily. Consider me shocked if cat is traded at all, and even more shocked if its in the next 24 hours before the draft</div></div>
Oh I'm baffled the two teams with the most interest are actually two teams worse than the Hawks last year. It makes zero sense for either of them to pull the 2022 version of the Seth Jones trade. BUT that doesn't mean the Hawks bend to their demands either. I'm 100% ok if he's on the roster. TDL moves get more bang for the buck anyway.
***edit*** I guess maybe the NJD might be able because of their farm system depth. The Hawks traded away futures without having any depth.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
il y a 8 heures
Sujet:
Draft day trades
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Wadejos123</b></div><div>Add Ty smith/ Nolan foote/ zacha whatever surrounding pieces to make it look better to the eye. I don't think NJ is parting with Holtz+2nd Oa nor is any team parting with a package that big. If Kd is really sticking to his guns that he wants that much, i would be very happy to keep cat. Just exploring the option of a Wright for Cat trade, because I do think it is interesting. If this was the exact trade but to MTL for 1st overall I think people would already be more open to it. I get that we should get multiple pieces not just one, but part of the concern here is just optics imo</div></div>
I can understand Holtz may not be part of the deal. But I don't see any reason the 2023 1st with top 10 protection is out of the question. If they can't be a top 20 team in the NHL either of the next two years...what are they truly expecting to happen by acquiring Debrincat?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
il y a 10 heures
Sujet:
Draft day trades
I would be very disappointed if this were to occur. We can't trade an established multiple 40 goal player that's 24 for ANY single prospect because you're trading away a known commodity for the hopes of getting the same thing back. No one expects Wright/Saf/Cooley to be Matthews/McDavid. They could potentially be a #1C in the NHL, but we could also be trading for RNH or Nico Hirschier or Nail Yakupov too. That would be worth firing KD right off the bat.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
il y a 19 heures
Sujet:
Uh Oh Student Drivers
The last time Keith spoke about when his contract is up he said he wanted to sign a new contract...so doubt he reitres.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Hier à 14 h 33
Sujet:
New destinations same players
Obviously, I like the idea of the CAR/Debrincat trade. They have a very deep farm system and are in win now mode. It's just a much better fit than these NJD/PHI theories. Both of those teams had worse records than the Hawks last year. It doesn't make sense for them to give up futures even if Debrincat is only 24. I would like to get a better forward prospect than Suzuki. He's got a lot to prove and in juniors had a very serious eye injury and he's left with a tiny permanent blind spot. It's tiny, but heck, that should be enough for any acquiring team to want to see more production out of him prior to actually trading for him.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Hier à 13 h 22
Sujet:
Rebuild
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Garak</b></div><div>Yeah. Morrow is a great prospect. But people make those kinds of comparisons all the time, especially when they are fans of the team that is trying to sell what a prospects value is. You didn't actually add the pick, btw. But who knows. Necas and Morrow are great prospects/players. So that might be enough value to make up for the 1st or 1st's being late.</div></div>
Oh Shoot! Thanks for the heads up.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Hier à 12 h 55
Sujet:
Rebuild
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Garak</b></div><div>I think the Carolina trade is a little light. But I could see them making a move for Cat too.</div></div>
It's tough because it's light on picks for sure. Picks are something you can assign a hard value to. Even if it's a future pick...it's a kinda roughly known commodity. Once someone gets drafted it no longer matters where they we picked. So, it's more difficult to measure prospects. I'm not 100% sure if you have looked into Scott Morrow, but he's actually tracking Cale Makar's progress at the same exact school. OBVIOUSLY, we can't just translate a prospect into a guy that's literally in a class of (3) of the all-time greats with Orr and Lidstrom. I'm not trying even attempting to say he's the next Makar. As far as prospects go though...I'd much rather have Morrow than another 1st round pick.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Hier à 11 h 35
Sujet:
DeBrincat
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DirtyDangles</b></div><div>Personally, I don't want him and this is the absolute most i'd move for him.</div></div>
100% agreed. I don't understand why PHI or NJD are even trying to trade away futures for Debrincat. Both of those teams were quite literally worse than the Blackhawks last year and the Hawks are the team rebuilding.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Hier à 11 h 25
Sujet:
DeBrincat
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DirtyDangles</b></div><div>All Friedge said was that pick #5 is off the table.</div></div>
PHI doesn't really have anything else that's worth Debrincat. There are a couple other individuals saying the same thing, but it's the interent....maybe all of it's stemming from Friedge???
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Hier à 11 h 21
Sujet:
DeBrincat
Not that I have any inside track...I don't...it's rumored in the Chicago market that PHI is walking away from the table....for now at least.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
lun. à 14 h 30
Sujet:
Toews
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>gdli</b></div><div>If the objective is to go for it in 22-23, I agree. In the words of Denholm Elliot who played the Butler in the 80s movie TRADING PLACES starring Eddie Murphy, Dan Ackroyd and Jamie Lee Curtis "Cracked Crab of Lobster, Can't We do Both." If you also want to retain either or both of them in the out years, the math doesn't work. I tried a KANE-TOEWS-CAT scenario for a boatload of NYRs in return, some who would have had to waive NMCs and NTCs. Assuming the Rangers given in return were acceptable (I did not post this one), the finances worked for the Hawks. an additional sweetener to keep the rebuild going was an additional $10.5M to spend in 23-24. On the Ranger side of this blockbuster, everything looked good TOEW and KANE back at $7.5-$8M for 3-4 years, but collapsed when the NYR couldn't afford cat for the long term. Even if you removed the CAT (I tried that too, the finances would not work in in any scenario for either one of both of them.</div></div>
If I were the NYR I'd treat it like a 1 year rental scenario. Kaner's still elite and Toews is still a good center. Kubalik was Toews most common linemate which he's a nice player but very far from actually playing with a guy like Kane or Panarin. Heck Toews is amazing at the dot...maybe put him between the two.
Anyway as far a finances go, another team will need to step in for cap purposes, BUT both Toews/Kane got their signing bonus on July 1st. So they're each only owed $2.9M in cash. What that means is a team like BUF/ANA/NJD/etc... would need to pay in cash a whopping $1.45M to retain on BOTH Toews/Kane combined. That's not a ton of cash and you could get two different teams so it's only $745k.
As far as trade return. I know Kaapo was a high draft pick, but in this hypothetical scenario...he can't play a top 6 role because he and Kaner play the same position. He's not going to get the proper development he needs to succeed. I think he should be the biggest piece of the trade. The Hawks will log a bazillion minutes for him.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
lun. à 12 h 28
Sujet:
Toews
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Josh</b></div><div>Rangers need a C more, and Toews is a better fit over Kane.
They also need shooters over passers, so I can’t justify giving up a ton of assets for a luxury, especially with the cap.</div></div>
I've been talking to other NYR fans and between Panarin and Kreider it's seems like you've got the shooters. It's the playmaker that fees those two that's a need. I honestly don't know...just saying what I've heard from other NYR fans
Forum:
Armchair-GM
lun. à 12 h 20
Sujet:
Toews
Go for both Kane and Toews? Kane was 4th in the league for primary assists. Should be perfect for the NYR goal scorers.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
lun. à 10 h 30
Sujet:
Debrincat
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>habslife</b></div><div>C'est quand même pas le petit jésus ciboulot...</div></div>
I don't even speak French and I know this isn't a favorable comment.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
lun. à 10 h 23
Sujet:
Deangelo maybe
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>drambui</b></div><div>reports said they were many team wanting deangelo services though, all pretty much around league minimum. dont think he sees carolina the way you mentioned it. thats just my point of view of this situation.</div></div>
Really? You have got to question whatever report you read. I'm curious why the guy coming off a 53 point season in 68 games was bought out of his contract and then when he could choose any team and sign for any amount...he could only get $1M? I mean words and reports are one thing, but the action of signing for only $1M speaks louder than any words. Don't forget he did also clear waivers. I'm not sure I know a better way to show that every single team could have had him and they passed.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
lun. à 9 h 54
Sujet:
Deangelo maybe
I think the "go sell yourself" is a 2 part strategy. I think MANY teams still won't touch him at all. So when CAR offers him a contract that he might feel like is a low ball offer...it's not really a low ball offer. AD should want to stay in CAR. They're the only ones that gave him a 2nd chance.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
lun. à 9 h 48
Sujet:
Apparently Philly made this offer for Deb
The Athletic was reporting that the 2nd...1st round pick might have been the FLA 1st instead of PHIs in 2023.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
lun. à 9 h 40
Sujet:
Apparently Philly made this offer for Deb
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Garak</b></div><div>As a CHI fan, that is interesting. But what is even more interesting is that you called him "Deb" for short. Just makes me think of DeBrincat with curlers in his hair, a night gown on, and a cigarette hanging out his mouth. Makes me feel warm and fuzzy, so I am going to start calling him Deb as well.</div></div>
Hahaha Reminds me of Little Debbie's
Forum:
Armchair-GM
dim. à 20 h 1
Sujet:
A Scouts Idea
This scout must have been in the Leafs organization....
Forum:
Armchair-GM
dim. à 15 h 49
Sujet:
next year
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>Was Lecavalier traded for a top-5 pick?
A top-2 pick in almost any year is likely a franchise-altering pick. Whether it’s Cooley, Wright, Skafkovsky … <strong><em>it would become a centerpiece to any teams rebuild</em></strong>.</div></div>
Fine, "center piece of a rebuild" Let's do this. Draft picks can bust <strong>or simply be decent/mediocre</strong> VERY easily. Can you get a Barkov....sure, but you could just as easily get a Ryan Murray. You're completely ignoring the downside and just saying the #2 OA is a guarantee.
2000 - DiPietro / Heatly - 50%
2001 - Kovy / Spezza - 100%
2002 - Nash / Lehtonen - 50%
2003 - MAF / Eric Staal - 100%
2004 - Ovi - Malkin - 100%
2005 - Crosby / Ryan - 50%
2006 - Johnson / Jordan Staal - 0%
2007 - Kane / JVR - 50%
2008 - Stamkos / Doughty - 100%
2009 - Tavares / Hedman - 100%
2010 - Hall / Seguin - meh...75%/75% I guess. Certainly neither have been franchise altering.
2011 - RNH - Landy - same...75%/75% neither of them worthy of the #1 or #2...they're decent players
2012 - Yak - Ryan Murray - 0%
2013 - MacK - Barkov - 100%
2014 - Ekblad - Reinhart - 0%
2015 - McDavid - Eichel - 100%
2016 - Matthews - Laine - 50%
2017 - Nico - Nolan - 0%
So 7 times out of 17 years have both picks actually been worth of top 2 selections.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
dim. à 15 h 1
Sujet:
Chi Trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>csick</b></div><div>It’ll be one of Quinn , Peterka, Krebs in the deal 100%.
They’d also be interested in Portillo or Levi .
9th
Another 1st</div></div>
I would tend to think that IF BUF decides to jump into this race...it'll be BOTH Kaner and Debrincat going. With how much (at least hear in CHI what we hear) Kaner talks about growing up a BUF fan...it just makes sense to my simple brain.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
dim. à 14 h 47
Sujet:
Hawks Fans what is the return
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hullsy09</b></div><div>They also need a center, and bringing in Kane destroys any chance of bringing back copp/strome. I also think it would be extremely difficult to resign Kane with LAF/Jones/Miller/Schneider/Kaako/Chytil needs deals soon, one or two of those guys are probably going back in the deal but still. I respect your point tho</div></div>
The thing is that Patrick Kane is literally the best (Realistic) piece the NYR could find. Sure McDavid, but that's not realistic. The NYR need primary assist playmakers. Kane was 4th in the NHL in Primary Assists. Yes, they need a #2C as well, but I'm pretty dang sure that if Debrincat and Kaner are gone...Toews wouldn't mind heading to the Rangers as well. They'd of course need AZ/BUF/ANA or some team to jump in and eat cap space, but that shouldn't be hard to find because it's 1 year of cap and their salary is minuscule. The Hawks just paid $4M to each of them two days ago for their signing bonus...only $2.9M left to pay and the Hawks will eat half of that so 25% would mean a TOTAL of $1.45M for a team to eat salary wise.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
dim. à 14 h 18
Sujet:
next year
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>Lecavalier is not a comp.
Top-2 picks never get traded because of their value to bottom-tier teams. Star wingers get moved all the time.
If Devils were to move #2 pick for DeBrincat, that would be it from NJD. No additional 1sts or prospects. And Hawks would probably be thrilled. But NJD isn’t moving the pick unless something special comes along. DeBrincat is good, but there are a lot of good wingers out there.</div></div>
I 100% agree that it won't be TWO top 2 picks. Especially next year. Bedard/Michkov could both be franchise altering players. I would be VERY upset if we just got Logan Cooley. That would just be stupid on the part of Kyle Davidson. You don't trade Debrincat a known product for guy you hope to be Debrincat maybe one day. #2 picks turn out to be Nolan Patrick or Nail Yakupov or Dylan Strome or Sam Reinhart too!
***EDIT*** How is Lecavalier not a comp? Debrincat's outpacing him in every mark. It took Lecavalier 5 seasons to get to the 30 goal mark and 8 seasons to break 40. Unless that's what you meant. Debrincat's actually better, but somehow, I don't think you meant that.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
dim. à 14 h 10
Sujet:
next year
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>IconicHawk</b></div><div>Without protections we back out and that’s not remotely close enough for DeBrincat</div></div>
I'm trying to be realistic. It is the #2 OA pick this year and with (2) potential generational talents next year....I just don't see NJD doing that. I don't see any team willing to risk TWO top 2 picks.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
dim. à 14 h 7
Sujet:
next year
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>Way, way too much. Can you come up with one trade comp, from anytime throughout NHL history, that a team has given a top-2 pick, another 1st and a top-10 prospect?</div></div>
That's a very specific request. I'm going from memory, but I think Vincent Lecavalier. MAF doesn't quite have all the pieces and the 1999 draft is mostly picks and it's a weird 3-4 trade swap. Certainly not recently, but that's only because teams tend to want to keep their 24 year old players that have multiple 40 goal seasons already under their belt and in the bubble he was on a 50 GOAL pace, but if you could get Vincent Lecavalier...you do it. The Cat for Holtz (Or Foote) , 2022 1st, and 2023 1st with protections is reasonable.
It's usually the other way around like Eric Lindros and the Flyers, but no one's thinking that any of these guys are generational talents like a Matthews/McDavid.
1
2
Suivant
Page 1