detectColorScheme();
Éditer l'avatar
  • png, jpeg
  • La grandeur minimale recommandée se veut de 800px par 800px
  • Grandeur maximale: 1MB
Glisser l'image pour repositionner
Sauvegarder
Annuler

exo2769

exo2769
Membre depuis
28 jui 2015
Équipe favorite
Blackhawks de Chicago
Messages dans les forums
10089
Messages par jour
4.59
Sujets de discussion
441
Biographie
Canes and Yotes are tied for my 2nd favorite teams. I lived in AZ and NC for a bit. Both tremendously fun places.
Forum: Armchair-GMil y a 21 heures
Sujet: Logical lineup with pieces we have
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>HatterTParty</b></div><div>Okay, I definitely get your feeling on kurashev, and it’s very fair. I’m all about giving prospects and youngsters the time they deserve to make their way in the NHL. However, here’s a big theory I have on prospects: I don’t care what round or what number you are picked at, you put in the work, you get your chances. Kurashev fits that criteria in my mind, even more than Hagel! Most importantly though, if pushing kurashev too far too fast is an issue, then I’d argue that Dach shouldn’t be in the top 6 either. His first two years have been so so and realistically the only reason he’s propped up as he is is because of his draft spot. I’m not throwing shade, I just wanna see every prospect, regardless of draft position, earn what they get. Kurashev, without exception, is the best of the lot in my opinion in terms of the work put in.</div></div>

Yeah, I hear ya on Dach too. I would have kept in the WHL one more year. Stan didn't. I know Dach hasn't put up tremendous point totals, but in my mind he's worked the boards REALLY well. Better than a lot of veterans. When it comes to maneuvering the puck and keeping possession...I do see shades of Hossa there. He 100% needs ice time. Fluke Injury, yeah. Sucks for everyone involved.

I'm a bit torn on "draft status" because 99.9% of the time...I do agree with you. I think things get a bit murkier when you're a top 10 pick. Take out the name Dach and insert Strome (or anyone). I do think AZ messed up his development with the back and forth OHL, NHL, OHL, AHL, NHL...etc... To a degree, I think CHI is doing the same with the center to wing constant transitioning. When you're a top 10 pick...you've been selected because you're ceiling is supposed to be "elite". You need elite players to win cups. Of course the Nail Yakupov's of the world exist...AND the Mark Stone's of the world do too. So it's not just top 10 picks that become elite. It's just that it's more likely to be the case.
Forum: Armchair-GMil y a 22 heures
Sujet: Logical lineup with pieces we have
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>HatterTParty</b></div><div>Agree with everything you say and that each pairing can be feasible. I am a little skeptical about strome being with TJ and Hagel, but it’s worth a shot. The One part I do disagree with though is the use of kurashev. I don’t believe he should be a fourth liner given how well he played last year. He deserves top 6 minutes with toews or whoever else. I don’t wanna send our prospects the wrong message when we prioritize youth we trade over youth we develop.</div></div>

Yeah, I hear ya on that too. I think we kinda are with Jones/Stillman. I just don't want to rush Kurashev into too much. I really like his game. He's fast and strong with the puck. I want to see him get more comfortable/in control with the puck the offensive zone.
Forum: Armchair-GMil y a 22 heures
Sujet: Logical lineup with pieces we have
I hear what you're saying. I'd prefer to see

Kubs - Toews - Dach... Dach plays a cylce game like Toews, but is also a playmaker which can feed Kubalik's snipe.
Debrincat - Borgstrom Kane ... I don't think Borgstrom is the given #2C, but I do see shades of this line carrying the center much like the AK72 line did.
Hagel - Strome - TJ ... Strome is a more natural center, but TJ can take the faceoffs if Strome isn't performing well. Both Hagel and TJ are energy guys which helps Strome's more methodical pace.
JK - Gaudetter - PK - This is a rotation in my mind.

I'm good with the Dpairs, but i don't think Stan/JC will keep Beaudin at the NHL level. It's too easy an excuse to put both he and Mitchell in Rockford and allow Jones/Stillman more time. They'll rotate into the NHL as needed.
Forum: Armchair-GMTue at 11:58 am
Sujet: The fit seems too good to not do
I like having this conversation. I'm not talking about Pre season. That's the reason I keep saying Day 2 of the season. Let's try this from a different angle. Tampa Bay!
https://www.capfriendly.com/teams/lightning

A.) How do you think they will be cap compliant when the season starts with Seabs contract?
B.) After the season starts, what would happen if someone (like Palat) got hurt? AND was officially out for the season.

The answers are for
A.) exactly what you're suggesting for Seabs. He'll be LTIR and TBLs cap hit drops by $6.875M and they'll be compliant. It's why everyone is suggesting they crushed the TJ - Seabs trade. No LTIR bucket.

B.) If Palat gets hurt during the season then the standard LTIR "Event A and Event B" occur. TBL will first send him the LTIR "Event A" and secondly recall or trade for someone else "Event B".

These two example have different results. The reason they're different is because of the exact thing you brought up initially. Cap accrues on a daily basis....once the season starts. It's not accruing right now. There were 116 days to the NHL last season. You need to start the clock...and then once it's started each day the daily cap amount adjusts.

So what I'm proposing...fits in category B above. It's after the season starts. It's not in the summer. There's a reason Shaw will stay on IR vs LTIR until after the season starts...Like Horton in 2017 and 2019. Bundle the "first" and "secondly" parts together. In the LTIR example by Cap Friendly...there will be $900k in ADDITIONAL relief. $3.9M - $3M = $900k.
Forum: Armchair-GMTue at 10:28 am
Sujet: The fit seems too good to not do
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GenXHockey</b></div><div>Offseason is slightly different. No ACSL to set and adds on top of the offseason overage. Day 1 - day 2 no difference.

This just shows you are a bit confused. When a team recurves a player on ltir that team needs to set it’s own ACSL from scratch. A team can not accrue cap space while operating over the ACSL (using relief).

Shaw does nothing to help Vegas afford strome. Will only hurt them at TDL by not allowing them to accrue space and to acquire players. When using ltir relief players full yearly cap hit counts against the team.</div></div>

You're a Leafs fan, so the best example I can give is Nathan Horton. Link below to his official transactions. Why do you think he was LTIR'd on SPECIFICALLY Oct 4th 2017 and Oct 1st 2019, BUT not in 2018? He hadn't played since 2014, BUT there are reasons why he was and wasn't LTIR'd in different seasons. What do you think those reasons are?

https://www.capfriendly.com/transactions/players/nathan-horton
Forum: Armchair-GMTue at 9:58 am
Sujet: The fit seems too good to not do
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Lenny7</b></div><div>I'm semi confused here...If Vegas were to take Shaw/Strome, and then put Shaw on LTIR, they'd be at $84.537 mil cap-wise. Plus, that's without signing Nolan Patrick.</div></div>

It's after Day 1 of the season. So every team needs to be cap compliant on Day 1. From the Vegas side...neither Strome nor Shaw will go toward the Day 1 compliance because the trade won't happen until after the season starts. Once the season starts, then the Hawks (or any team) can send Shaw to LTIR and accrue an "LTIR bucket." While that bucket accrues at a $3.9M pace...Strome will account for $3M out of that $3.9M. So Vegas is actually accruing MORE cap space as the year goes on. At the TDL they will have accrued enough cap space to fit roughly another $2M player. (just an estimate, I didn't do the full math)
Forum: Armchair-GMTue at 9:15 am
Sujet: we need a LD and RW
I don't want to do that Dunn trade if Beaudin is required. I understand acquiring Dunn means there 1 less NHL spot to claim for these prospects, but between Beaudin/Kalynuk/Jones/Stillman...we need to rely on someone to actually develop into an NHL Dman. I thought Kalynuk and Beaudin played well. Could they use more seasoning? Yes. I'm just not convinced Dunn is head and shoulders better. I do think Strome will be traded. Stan's comments didn't include him within the discussion of centers...which I think he's better at. That's why I proposed the Vegas trade yesterday with Shaw after the season starts. Vegas is A.) ALL "the F" in / going for it at all costs. B.) Still needs a scoring center that can help their PP and C.) Have zero cap space. I just see that being almost to perfect to be true. Stan just needs to make sure he gets value from that trade.
Forum: Armchair-GMMon at 5:46 pm
Sujet: Perhaps this is too much
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>arafay</b></div><div>That’s not particularly how LTIR works. LTIR is only beneficial in the case of bonuses and rfa’s holding out into the season. The jets won’t have any big rfa’s holding out since both Copp and pionk have an arbitration deadline and the only bonuses really are only if perfetti and or heinola play, which only amount to 1.4ish M so little’s LTIR is enough. This would definitely be valuable for other teams though. That’s my understanding of LTIR at least.</div></div>

What you're describing is certainly one way LTIR can be an advantage. Another way is what TOR did with Riley Nash last year. They acquired someone on LTIR at the tdl and he was supposed to be LTIR until the end of the regular season. That in essence created an "LTIR bucket" of cap space to utilize. The issue occurs when the players is projected to come back at some point because then that bucket dissappears and a tram is forced to make a trade to be complaint.