SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Celtics21

Membre depuis
28 mai 2023
Équipe favorite
Bruins de Boston
Deuxième équipe favorite
Kings de Los Angeles
Messages dans les forums
3824
Messages par jour
11.2
Forum: Armchair-GMil y a 2 heures
Sujet: kings
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>tryger</b></div><div>This was already posted earlier today, but without the 4th.

LA is going to press hold on Ullmark, Bruins let the cat out of the bag during negotiation, Ullmark nixed the trade, and Ullmarks value becomes cheaper after Swayman is signed.</div></div>

Is the hope here that cap issues force the Bruins to sell cheap on Ullmark? With their current cap situation, that isn’t an issue. My guess is if there are enough teams with piss poor goalie situations where atleast one is going to pay up. If not, having two great goalies has its advantages.

In reality, I don’t see the Kings being in a position to take Ullmark unless they trade a contract as part of the deal. Their cap position probably means another year of picking up the journeyman and hoping they step up
Forum: Armchair-GMil y a 3 heures
Sujet: PLD Trade makes sense for PIT
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jfkst1</b></div><div>I think most of the Dubois ACGMs on here are pure delusion. I do agree that if Blake moves him, it needs to be re-cooping largely what value was traded to acquire him. Otherwise Blake probably does get terminated so he'll keep Dubois and hope for an improvement over that happening. Especially given the Kings haven't accomplished anything meaningful this year despite a solid overall season.</div></div>

1. Recouping the value of the original trade might be more delusional than the deal posted in this AGM

2. I view Jarry as a negative contract, so I wouldn’t do this deal.

3. LA fans might want to consider that keeping DuBois is just as likely to get Robitaille/Blake fired as trading him. Cutting him probably increases that likelihood. This isn’t the deal, but if you could trade him for a name that could be viewed positively; I could see it improving their job security.
Forum: Armchair-GMHier à 14 h 14
Forum: Armchair-GMmer. à 18 h 24
Sujet: Options
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Smitty426</b></div><div>To start its a B's poster. Most fans on both sides have more or less agreed on a '25 1st with some type of protection top 10-ish. A small add form Jersey like a 3rd.
I don't know anything about Lysell, but is he honestly worth a 23 year old defender, 2 - 2nds, and another 1st rounder (overdrafted for sure, so say 2nd rounder)? I can answer that, No!
And Fitz is not interested in giving the 10 OA this year. Stick to the trade we all can get with '25 1st for Linus</div></div>

You added Lysell who frankly is better than anything else you are adding to the equation.

Ullmark statistically has been the best goalie in the league over the last two years. Acknowledge that his contract status impacts his value to a degree

To give you context, I would not trade Lysell and Ullmark for Berkly Catton. I would trade 2025 #1 and Ullmark for him.

But I agree that the 2025 first and something of value to overcome the fact that it’s not a 2024 pick likely is the price if it is Jersey.

I’d assume that something of value would be greater than Stillman or atleast younger than him.
Forum: Armchair-GMmer. à 16 h 11
Sujet: Goaler
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>tupty</b></div><div>I believe that in an ideal world, we need 2 top 6 F (one for Jake's spot, maybe Jake himself; the other we have platooned 3rd liners all year) and a top 4 LD. Even if we shed Ullmark's salary in full, I think we cannot target top UFAs in all 3 spots and field a competitive roster.

If we bury Husso, that is more than 3.5m in dead cap. To me, that seems far more likely thank carrying ~5.75m in cap space and 2 roster spots for backup goalies right after signing what appers to be a premier starter.

If you do either of those things, I think Don would need to moneyball 1-2 of those roster spots I mentioned, and even that will be much harder compared to this past offseason when good players had their values depressed by the cap crunch.</div></div>

I believe you are going to see Lysell or Lohrei in one of those spots, but I get why you’d prefer not to add Husso. If it were Wallinder or Buium plus a 2nd, I’d rather have that than include Husso and replace the 2nd with a first,