SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Pens constant retool with Sid extention

Créé par: Pens3lieve
Équipe: 2025-26 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 21 mars 2024
Publié: 23 mars 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
playing off my last ACGM... pens move any and all expiring deals they can for mainly prospects, change of scenery trades and moving bigger deals out...

don't take most of this too seriously, i'm not a prospect expert, and everyone and their mother including overvalues prospects at times (see Sprong, Daniel) but most of these moves are more theories about the general direction of PIT

NOTE-some of these trades happen this upcoming offseason and next years TDL in advance of the SID extention, another FA, etc...

stick tap to @F50Marco for the MTL trade idea

@mokumboi your thoughts on the STL idea for Pettersson at 50% retained?
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 150 000 $
1900 000 $
1775 000 $
2775 000 $
2775 000 $
2775 000 $
2775 000 $
2775 000 $
2775 000 $
21 100 000 $
2950 000 $
2850 000 $
2900 000 $
2850 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
38 700 000 $
21 700 000 $
1800 000 $
1775 000 $
22 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
PIT
  1. Holmberg, Pontus [Droits de RFA]
2.
PIT
  1. Anderson, Josh
  2. Barron, Justin [Droits de RFA]
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (WPG)
  4. Choix de 7e ronde en 2024 (WSH)
  5. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (VAN)
MTL
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (PHI)
Détails additionnels:
Reilly Smith, 1x$5M
Note: the 2024 2nd is conditional and can be upgraded to a 1st if CAR makes the SC Final, this post assumes they don't
3.
NJD
  1. Graves, Ryan
Détails additionnels:
Matt Nieto 1x900K
4.
PIT
  1. Edwards, Ethan [Liste de réserve]
  2. Málek, Jakub [Liste de réserve]
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2026 (NJD)
  4. Choix de 4e ronde en 2026 (NJD)
Détails additionnels:
2026 2nd condition-upgrades to a 1st if NJD makes the EC final
2026 4th condition-the best of the 3 4rd round picks
5.
PIT
  1. Kaskimäki, Aleksanteri [Liste de réserve]
  2. Lindstein, Theo
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (STL)
  4. Choix de 5e ronde en 2025 (STL)
Détails additionnels:
STL #5/#14 prospects per the Athletic
2nd upgrades to a 1st in either 2025 or 2026 (STL choice) if STL makes it to the 2nd round of playoffs
STL
  1. Gruden, Jonathan [Droits de RFA]
Détails additionnels:
LHD Marcus Pettersson 50% retained, 1x~2M
6.
PIT
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2026 (COL)
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2026 (MIN)
MIN
    C Lars Eller, 50% retained, 1x1.225M
    7.
    PIT
    1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2025 (BOS)
    2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2026 (BOS)
    BOS
    1. Haula, Erik (1 575 000 $ retained)
    Rachats de contrats
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2024
    Logo de WPG
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de WSH
    2025
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de STL
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de STL
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de FLA
    2026
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de NJD
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de COL
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de NJD
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de MIN
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de CHI
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2391 500 000 $74 577 500 $0 $557 500 $16 922 500 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Devils du New Jersey
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
    C
    UFA
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    6 100 000 $6 100 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
    AG
    UFA
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    AD, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    850 000 $850 000 $
    C, AG
    RFA
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    950 000 $950 000 $
    C, AG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    900 000 $900 000 $
    AD, AG
    RFA
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    900 000 $900 000 $
    DG
    RFA
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    6 100 000 $6 100 000 $
    DD
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    G
    UFA
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    850 000 $850 000 $
    DG
    RFA
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
    DD
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    886 667 $886 667 $
    G
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
    DG
    RFA - 1
    1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
    DD
    RFA
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    805 833 $805 833 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
    AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    775 000 $775 000 $
    C
    RFA
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    775 000 $775 000 $
    DD
    RFA
    Équipe de réserve
    775 000 $775 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    G
    UFA
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    800 000 $800 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    AD
    UFA

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    23 mars à 13 h 59
    #1
    Hockey IQ
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 3,024
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,492
    stick tap to @F50Marco for the MTL trade idea

    @mokumboi your thoughts on the STL idea for Pettersson at 50% retained?
    F50marco a aimé ceci.
    23 mars à 14 h 3
    #2
    Prime Primeau
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2023
    Messages: 5,457
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,169
    We have near 20m in cap space for next season. Why exactly should we pay a first and a very good RD prospect to dump Anderson?
    NorthernLeafsFan05, Campabee, Just_A_Guess and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
    23 mars à 14 h 4
    #3
    Amirov Forever
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2022
    Messages: 6,612
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,073
    Not only is Holmberg better than Acciari, but he is also cheaper and younger. Literally zero reason for Toronto to do that
    23 mars à 14 h 4
    #4
    mokumboi
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2019
    Messages: 29,313
    Mentions "j'aime": 11,371
    Quoting: Pens3lieve
    stick tap to F50Marco for the MTL trade idea

    mokumboi your thoughts on the STL idea for Pettersson at 50% retained?


    Pettersson retained for one year doesn't even get you Lindstein, sir. If Krug goes they might do the conditional 2nd and a different LD prospect like Buchinger or Gaudet or Loof. Maybe even Perunovich. Lindstein isn't available.
    23 mars à 14 h 11
    #5
    Démarrer sujet
    Hockey IQ
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 3,024
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,492
    Quoting: GuyGuyGuy
    We have near 20m in cap space for next season. Why exactly should we pay a first and a very good RD prospect to dump Anderson?


    did you miss the 2nd and Reilly Smith going the other way lol?
    23 mars à 14 h 13
    #6
    Démarrer sujet
    Hockey IQ
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 3,024
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,492
    Quoting: mokumboi
    Pettersson retained for one year doesn't even get you Lindstein, sir. If Krug goes they might do the conditional 2nd and a different LD prospect like Buchinger or Gaudet or Loof. Maybe even Perunovich. Lindstein isn't available.


    like i said i'm not a prospect expert, i was not aware Lindstein was the reincarnated Al McInnis/Chris Pronger mutant beast defenseman lol excuse my hyperbole tears of joy

    if PIT was taking Krug's contract then we'd want to be sending a longer deal the other way, like rakell, rust type stuff

    lol tears of joy all good... just getting your take
    23 mars à 14 h 14
    #7
    Démarrer sujet
    Hockey IQ
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 3,024
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,492
    Quoting: NorthernLeafsFan05
    Not only is Holmberg better than Acciari, but he is also cheaper and younger. Literally zero reason for Toronto to do that


    except that Treliving like players with snot or something lol tears of joy

    fair enough, just trying to find a taker
    23 mars à 14 h 16
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2018
    Messages: 15,525
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,448
    Habs pass, remove Anderson, Barron, Smith and the 1st and it's a deal. We don't need to dump Anderson (who I still believe GM's value) and Smith holds no value to us with Armia already here on a cheaper contract
    Just_A_Guess a aimé ceci.
    23 mars à 14 h 18
    #9
    Amirov Forever
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2022
    Messages: 6,612
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,073
    Quoting: Pens3lieve
    except that Treliving like players with snot or something lol tears of joy

    fair enough, just trying to find a taker


    Treliving chose Holmberg over Acciari last summer 🤷‍♂️
    23 mars à 14 h 23
    #10
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2023
    Messages: 863
    Mentions "j'aime": 286
    i dont see montreal doing antyhign like that for the next ...many years if at all.
    kent hughes is the iceman
    23 mars à 14 h 35
    #11
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2021
    Messages: 4,933
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,257
    That is not a good trade for MTL, heavy duty pass.
    23 mars à 14 h 36
    #12
    Boris Bagel
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2016
    Messages: 2,848
    Mentions "j'aime": 609
    Habs definitely decline
    23 mars à 14 h 45
    #13
    Prime Primeau
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2023
    Messages: 5,457
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,169
    Quoting: Pens3lieve
    did you miss the 2nd and Reilly Smith going the other way lol?


    I did miss Reilly Smith. The second is pretty much whatever. Smith could bring up a first maybe at the deadline. So we are still paying Barron to unnecessarily get out of Anderson’s contract
    23 mars à 14 h 55
    #14
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2021
    Messages: 4,407
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,254
    Palat isn't waiving a NMC for PIT
    23 mars à 15 h 25
    #15
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2021
    Messages: 959
    Mentions "j'aime": 412
    Quoting: Pens3lieve
    did you miss the 2nd and Reilly Smith going the other way lol?


    Even with Smith and the 2nd going the other way, I dislike Anderson's contract so much that I'm not considering it from the Pens' perspective.
    We could probably move Smith's 1 year for some low picks/prospects and use that cap space on someone like Teravainen or Mantha.
    23 mars à 16 h 53
    #16
    You know nothing JS
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 7,041
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,431
    Quoting: Pens3lieve
    did you miss the 2nd and Reilly Smith going the other way lol?


    He asking you why would MTL give the Pens 2x1st and that's your answer? Keep your scraps.
    23 mars à 17 h 10
    #17
    mokumboi
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2019
    Messages: 29,313
    Mentions "j'aime": 11,371
    Quoting: Pens3lieve
    like i said i'm not a prospect expert, i was not aware Lindstein was the reincarnated Al McInnis/Chris Pronger mutant beast defenseman lol excuse my hyperbole tears of joy

    if PIT was taking Krug's contract then we'd want to be sending a longer deal the other way, like rakell, rust type stuff

    lol tears of joy all good... just getting your take


    Nobody ever said Lindstein was any of that stuff, but he definitely is currently the only legit top 4 D prospect in the organization. So yeah, he's a protected species. And yes, he's worth more than one season of Pettersson.

    And I did not mean to move Krug to Pittsburgh, just in general.
    23 mars à 18 h 47
    #18
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2022
    Messages: 2,773
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,411
    That’s a stinker of a deal for the Blues.
    23 mars à 23 h 24
    #19
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2022
    Messages: 3,045
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,464
    Honestly the blues trade makes little sense for us. Petterson only has 1 more year before he needs a new contract. We are retooling/rebuilding around younger players and giving out another big extension to a LHD heading into his age 30 season is a bad move for us. We already have Krug eating up a lot of cap so adding more is just a misuse of cap space.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage