SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/NHL Signings

Chicago Blackhawks signed Petr Mrázek (2 Years / $4,250,000 AAV)

Was this a good signing?
Le graphique a été masqué

Options de sondage


24 janv. à 11 h 24
#1
Petr Mrázek has signed a new contract with the Chicago Blackhawks.
Contrat standard (prolongation)
Contrats comparablesCOMPARER CE CONTRAT
SIGNÉ PAR: Kyle Davidson
Durée: 2 ans
Valeur: 8 500 000 $
Statut à l’échéance du contrat: UFA
% Cap Info-bulle: 5,09
Contrat signé avec: Logo de Blackhawks de ChicagoBlackhawks de Chicago
Date de signature: 24 janv. 2024
Source: CapFriendly

Petr Mrázek a signé un contrat de 2 ans d'une valeur de 8 500 000 $ avec les Blackhawks de Chicago, le 24 janv. 2024. Le contrat comporte un cap hit de 4 250 000 $.

SAISONClauseCap hitInfo-bulleAAV Info-bulleBonis de performanceInfo-bulleBonis de signatureInfo-bulleSalaire de baseInfo-bulleSalaire totalInfo-bulleSalaire mineuresInfo-bulle
2024-254 250 000 $4 250 000 $0 $1 000 000 $3 850 000 $4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
2025-264 250 000 $4 250 000 $0 $1 000 000 $2 650 000 $3 650 000 $3 650 000 $
TOTAL8 500 000 $8 500 000 $0 $2 000 000 $6 500 000 $8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
Rooney a aimé ceci.
24 janv. à 11 h 28
#2
Go Jets Go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 5,422
Mentions "j'aime": 4,163
He's been solid this year! 2 year contract, good for CHI and Mrazek.
AK50 a aimé ceci.
24 janv. à 11 h 32
#3
to be banned soon
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 568
Mentions "j'aime": 541
he's been better but $4+ mil good?
CSStrowbridge a aimé ceci.
24 janv. à 11 h 34
#4
Ban Price trades
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 6,475
Mentions "j'aime": 6,450
While I understand the idea that Chicago was likely going to be riding a goalie carousel in the near future, I don't really understand why committing to an asset now (when there isn't a clear-cut #1 prospect in the system) took precedent over cashing in on what's going to be an expensive goalie market this deadline.

At that AAV, Mrazek couldn't have had many suitors. Should have prioritized the additional asset, even if it was ultimately used in trade for a ready-now player.
A_Habs_fan, turtlemountain, tupty and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
24 janv. à 11 h 42
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 3,559
Mentions "j'aime": 3,410
I feel like Chicago could have a lot more assets if they traded all these guys and threw this type of cash at them in the offseason.
python3504, Chabotrrorr, RukaRadebe and 6 others a aimé ceci.
24 janv. à 11 h 46
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 830
Mentions "j'aime": 716
I’m happy to see Davidson is looking for stability and rewarding players for their play instead of having the team be a revolving door over the next few years. Building the culture is just as important as gaining assets.
exo2769, Chabotrrorr, Jco5ta5 and 9 others a aimé ceci.
24 janv. à 11 h 52
#7
Smythe.over.Hart
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 3,035
Mentions "j'aime": 2,350
The biggest loser here is Kyle Dubas....
draft_em_sign_em_trade_em, AK50, Canucks123 and 2 others a aimé ceci.
24 janv. à 11 h 52
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 12,697
Mentions "j'aime": 17,322
Why? Signing Mrazek makes sense but not when you're paying him over 4mil, what is it with Chicago overpaying veterans
KSIxSKULLS, Andy_Dick, tupty and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
24 janv. à 11 h 56
#9
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,564
Mentions "j'aime": 9,623
I understand that he's been better this year, but it's yet another contract that's simply too much money and Mrazek specifically is consistently inconsistent. KD's very much setting a precedent for his own longer-term players to be asking for much higher values than they deserve. I agree these past 3 players have played well for the Hawks this year, but have they been great? Not really, no. So what happens now with Vlasic who's been better than Mrazek/Foligno/Dickinson? All of a sudden tough guy Davidson shows up? Just need to be careful. This was not a good signing imo.
SadSensFan14 et AK50 a aimé ceci.
24 janv. à 11 h 56
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,079
Mentions "j'aime": 433
Quoting: Earth
I’m happy to see Davidson is looking for stability and rewarding players for their play instead of having the team be a revolving door over the next few years. Building the culture is just as important as gaining assets.


Careful what type of culture you're building. A losing one can be very tough to break.

Signed,
A Sabres Fan
Earth, NARC311, SadSensFan14 and 6 others a aimé ceci.
24 janv. à 12 h 21
#11
down bad
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 3,143
Mentions "j'aime": 1,426
Why not get a 1st + and get Campbell? Still can I guess
SadSensFan14 et rollie1967 a aimé ceci.
24 janv. à 12 h 30
#12
and proud of it
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2023
Messages: 2,204
Mentions "j'aime": 1,577
Chicago continues to make their guys untradable
A_Habs_fan et Anus_McLeod a aimé ceci.
24 janv. à 12 h 35
#13
WentWughes
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 10,684
Mentions "j'aime": 10,256
Terrible NHL Starter that should be struggling to get an NHL contract, let alone being paid over 4 million over multiple years. KD continues to go "0 for" when it comes to signing contracts.
Andy_Dick et rollie1967 a aimé ceci.
24 janv. à 12 h 38
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 7
Mentions "j'aime": 5
Quoting: A_Habs_fan
Why? Signing Mrazek makes sense but not when you're paying him over 4mil, what is it with Chicago overpaying veterans


Because they are going to have to hit the cap floor next season (and the 2025-26 season apparently) and looking for some form of stability with veteran guys to set the culture for the young players coming up. Plus these contracts for Mrazek, Dickinson, and Foligno are all for the next 2 years, just in time for when Bedard and Korchinski need their next deals. Literally no risk.
Jco5ta5 a aimé ceci.
24 janv. à 12 h 53
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 4,281
Mentions "j'aime": 1,211
Quoting: Godzilla318
Because they are going to have to hit the cap floor next season (and the 2025-26 season apparently) and looking for some form of stability with veteran guys to set the culture for the young players coming up. Plus these contracts for Mrazek, Dickinson, and Foligno are all for the next 2 years, just in time for when Bedard and Korchinski need their next deals. Literally no risk.


It could lead to the expectation of overpaying everybody which can be very difficult to break... just ask Toronto
A_Habs_fan, AK50 et rollie1967 a aimé ceci.
24 janv. à 13 h 10
#16
NHL Insider
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2016
Messages: 1,958
Mentions "j'aime": 697
Davidson so lazy with his job just like me.

Just use the same contract over and over and swap the name
M_Swann a aimé ceci.
24 janv. à 13 h 41
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 4,992
Mentions "j'aime": 2,315
Quoting: A_Habs_fan
Why? Signing Mrazek makes sense but not when you're paying him over 4mil, what is it with Chicago overpaying veterans


Yet the same Hawks fans get emotional while saying Dvorak and Anderson are cap dumps at the same cap hits as guys like Dickisnon whom are older. Make it, make sense.
jpsnow13 et Canucks123 a aimé ceci.
24 janv. à 13 h 45
#18
Hawks Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 2,606
Mentions "j'aime": 1,620
Quoting: KSIxSKULLS
Terrible NHL Starter that should be struggling to get an NHL contract, let alone being paid over 4 million over multiple years. KD continues to go "0 for" when it comes to signing contracts.


You never have anything nice to say. Ever.
NARC311 et vanktank a aimé ceci.
24 janv. à 14 h 14
#19
WentWughes
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 10,684
Mentions "j'aime": 10,256
Quoting: Jco5ta5
You never have anything nice to say. Ever.


About KD? Nope I do not. He's easily a bottom 5 GM in a league IMO, it's still way early and he can change that around, but these contracts are not good.
24 janv. à 14 h 28
#20
Hawks Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 2,606
Mentions "j'aime": 1,620
Modifié 24 janv. à 14 h 34
Quoting: KSIxSKULLS
About KD? Nope I do not. He's easily a bottom 5 GM in a league IMO, it's still way early and he can change that around, but these contracts are not good.


I think most of his trades and seemingly a lot of his top 3 round draft picks (not including Bedard) have been top 10 in league compared to peers. These veteran, lockerroom, depth signings I could not care less about. I’m much more concerned with and will judge him on his extensions of Vlasic, Reichel, and Raddysh. One is beyond expectations and two are having worse years than anticipated. This is how to better judge him, IMO. He’s very clear and transparent on his plan and he’s stuck with it.

Not sure how he makes a bottom 5 GM list. Seems you’re not including the facts of his asset accumulation, quality of drafted players, building one of the best prospect pools in the league and still having 5 1sts and 8 2nd round picks to go in next 3 years.

After next season, Hawks only have 2 forwards, 2 Dmen, and a goalie signed. He has a complete clean slate to build his team. Judge him then but now is too early.

What would be your master plan?
SadSensFan14, Just_A_Guess, majormoose007 and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
24 janv. à 14 h 31
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 2,692
Mentions "j'aime": 3,007
I’ve always had a soft spot for Mrazek but this feels hefty.

Nobody on CapFriendly is a goalie expert, but I remember the knock on Mrazek early in his career being that he had some bad tendencies (not squaring up effectively against shooters, too aggressive, etc). That made for some fun games to watch, but not sure I want my starter to be that exciting.
SadSensFan14 a aimé ceci.
24 janv. à 14 h 37
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 27
Mentions "j'aime": 49
It's a different approach but I'm interested to see how it pans out for KD. For a team like this, cap space is at a surplus and that won't be changing between now and the next two seasons. Once Bedard is due for his mega-deal that he will ultimately get at the end of his ELC, these deals will be coming off the books. I think there's something understated about stability in a teams personnel. Being a bad team team is one thing, but being a bad team destined to be a revolving doors of players likely doesnt build much in the way of team culture or commitment. I honestly could see Chicago taking some big steps forward in the next 1-2 seasons.
24 janv. à 14 h 38
#23
MOVE THE COYOTES
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 4,433
Mentions "j'aime": 1,548
He's actually been okay this year, but It's obviously a bad contract, but it keeps the hawks bad and keeps vets around.
24 janv. à 14 h 56
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 1,247
Mentions "j'aime": 727
I guess over paying your own guys now is better than picking through July 1st leftovers just hoping to get to the cap floor
24 janv. à 14 h 57
#25
Bedard23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 9,268
Mentions "j'aime": 4,452
Quoting: Anus_McLeod
I feel like Chicago could have a lot more assets if they traded all these guys and threw this type of cash at them in the offseason.


You think they’d want to return to this ****show?
Jco5ta5 et AK50 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Chargement de l'animation
Soumettre les modifications du sondage