PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
tupty
Good nerd
Membre depuis
6 juin 2023
Équipe favorite
Bruins de Boston
Messages dans les forums
761
Messages par jour
2.3
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
il y a 12 heures
Sujet:
Pens
Hard no from Boston. They need higher end picks more than any of the pieces you are sending, and they still have the chance to improve their top 6 in free agency.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Hier à 2 h 2
Sujet:
Keeping PLD
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hckeydude123</b></div><div>Watching the last couple Bruin games Lohrei looks like he’s almost ready to be a full time NHLer so one yr of Gavi as a safety net could benefit him.</div></div>
I would have been with you 100% about three weeks ago, but if I'm the Bruins FO and my choice is a 1st rounder or 1 year of Gavrikov and a 2nd rounder, I am taking the 1st round pick and rolling the dice with Lohrei. Lohrei has shown his ability to rise to the occasion now, so I have far fewer reservations about giving him a top 4 spot next year. They are in a re-tool after all, so if he faulters then it isn't the end of the world.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
lun. à 2 h 57
Sujet:
Leafs are terrible Everyone goes and we dont care about picks
I probably wouldn't even trade Ullmark to the Leafs for that package, let alone Swayman. Forget about the market value: the Bruins are not in the business of taking on the risk of Marner's next contract negotiation or making their division rivals better by fixing a goaltending problem which is going to be tricky to solve if Woll doesn't pan out. Marner is absolutely being scapegoated in Toronto, but I also don't want the Bruins paying him 10m+ for any amount of time. They need that cap space for center improvements over the next few years.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
lun. à 2 h 51
Sujet:
not cheating the cap
Habs fans are constantly trying to trade Jordan Harris to the Bruins for a 3rd, which from the Bruins perspective makes very little sense. Please make this trade and save me from having to see another one of those trade proposals.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
jeu. à 19 h 3
Sujet:
Sens
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>athrin</b></div><div>rofl swayman aint worth a top 20 pick yet alone add more. OTT declines</div></div>
The Swayman trade proposals are getting a bit old anyway. You think its too much, yet it isn't enough for Boston to actually give him up either. The gulf is too wide for Sway to realistically be traded, people should be focused on Ullmark if Boson trades a goalie at all.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
jeu. à 11 h 12
Sujet:
Next Year
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ethanwinters</b></div><div>Not sure why Boston would prefer a 2024 pick after the drop off over a 2025 pick.</div></div>
Just plain old temporal discounting coupled with the fact that the prospect pool is already thin. If they make the pick a year earlier, the player is more likely to be NHL ready a year earlier. They also don't pick until round 3 this year, while they have a 1st rounder next year.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
jeu. à 1 h 29
Sujet:
Next Year
LA gave up so much to get PLD. I can't imagine that they'd give up on him after just 1 year. That seems to be what I've heard from most Kings fans as well.
I don't think Boston needs to send out the 3rd round pick along with Ullmark to get a 1st round pick back in general (NJD fans seem fine with a 2025 1st for Ullmark swap), although the fact that it is a 2024 pick is probably appealing to the Boston FA. I imagine they'd consider sending something more to bump the pick to 2024, but a 3rd rounder is a bit steep.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mer. à 21 h 6
Sujet:
Isles Reset
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>tchockey</b></div><div>I should have wrote it in but I would assume that the trade would also come with a reasonable 2-3 year extension at like 5.5 per</div></div>
I would gladly trade Beecher + a 1st + a 4th for 3 years of Nelson at 5.5m. I don't think he would accept that kind of contract, but if he would then I think the trade is reasonable.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mer. à 19 h 59
Sujet:
Isles Reset
That is way too much for 1 year of Brock Nelson. If someone else will pay that then great, but I sure hope Boston wouldn't. He is also 32, so his next deal is not going to be fun to negotiate. A lot of risk involved since he could fall off in the next 3 seasons but is still skilled enough to undoubtedly want 5-6 more on his next deal.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mer. à 19 h 15
Sujet:
Just Revamping
Bruins FO, right or wrong, seems to think that durability and size are the key qualities they want in defenders. I don't think Ferraro fits that mold, so I don't see them giving up a first for him. I also don't see space on the regular roster for Givani Smith, so I don't see them using a roster spot on him.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mer. à 17 h 57
Sujet:
Goaler
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Celtics21</b></div><div>I believe you are going to see Lysell or Lohrei in one of those spots, but I get why you’d prefer not to add Husso. If it were Wallinder or Buium plus a 2nd, I’d rather have that than include Husso and replace the 2nd with a first,</div></div>
Yeah, I think I'd do that. I want to see Lohrei start the season on the 3rd pairing and Lysell on the 3rd line, and see if they can work their way up. They should both be regulars next year (I hope!), but hopefully we make them earn their way into the top 4 and top 6 respectively.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mer. à 16 h 7
Sujet:
Goaler
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Celtics21</b></div><div>I think we could keep Bussi as a 23rd man on the roster or even bury Husso if we wanted.
It doesn’t impact the ability to secure a top forward at all, but it does impact secondary moves to build depth with more than $2m or less players.
I do think it’s feasible to argue whether the difference between a first and second is worth taking Husso.</div></div>
I believe that in an ideal world, we need 2 top 6 F (one for Jake's spot, maybe Jake himself; the other we have platooned 3rd liners all year) and a top 4 LD. Even if we shed Ullmark's salary in full, I think we cannot target top UFAs in all 3 spots and field a competitive roster.
If we bury Husso, that is more than 3.5m in dead cap. To me, that seems far more likely thank carrying ~5.75m in cap space and 2 roster spots for backup goalies right after signing what appers to be a premier starter.
If you do either of those things, I think Don would need to moneyball 1-2 of those roster spots I mentioned, and even that will be much harder compared to this past offseason when good players had their values depressed by the cap crunch.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
30 avr. à 21 h 10
Sujet:
Goaler
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Celtics21</b></div><div>My perspective is wallinder and a 2nd would net Ullmark. The difference between the first and the second is Boston’s payment for taking Husso.</div></div>
See my most recent comment above for my thoughts on why we need retention. Without it, we probably lose Bussi and can't afford to sign a top 6 F next year. I think it kills the deal. But we can just get a 3rd party to retain to save it.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
30 avr. à 21 h 8
Sujet:
Goaler
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LGRWinLA</b></div><div>I would gladly involve a third party to make it work. My initial build had a half retention, but I couldn't get a full roster that way. I know that a true hockey trade would involve so discomfort from both teams, that's just how it works.</div></div>
Some discomfort for Boston's side as things stand would be missing a true top 6 F next year due to lack of cap space, paying 4.75m for a backup, and possibly losing the current heir apparent backup on waivers (his eligibility is done after this season). It makes the team worse in the short term due to cap and possibly in the long term if Bussi could have been a cheap long term backup.
Is that worth Wallinder and a 1st? Possibly, but with some retention it becomes much more palatable because it gives the Bruins more options, even including burying Husso to keep Bussi. 3rd party retaining gets this over the finish line. Maybe Wings and Bruins both send a pick to the retaining team.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
30 avr. à 15 h 26
Sujet:
Goaler
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LGRWinLA</b></div><div>That's what I'm trying to do. But no Husso no draft picks. That's where the value lies.</div></div>
Obviously you'd need to change things in your ACGM to be cap compliant, but if you took out the 4th rounder, would you consider retaining on Husso for 1 year? Wallinder and a 1st is solid value, but the main reasons to move Ully would be to free up a big chunk of cap space for this offseason and to move up in the 2024 draft. This deal does not do either of those things, but the overall value is better than most proposals I have seen. But maybe some retention on Husso makes it more palatable for the Bs? Maybe you could throw the 4th to another team to do the retention for you. I'd love to see him at 3.25m or less, but that much retention in the offseason probably costs more than a 4th.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
29 avr. à 14 h 16
Sujet:
Fresh
Change post title: Trades from an Auston Matthews fever dream
Now it all makes sense!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
29 avr. à 14 h 13
Sujet:
trades or UFA
Bruins shouldn't trade Ullmark with Bahl + a 2nd as the centerpiece. I think you might be overvaluing Bahl based on both of these trades. I doubt EDM wants ro move Ekholm to dump cap, but I admit that I don't know their situation very intimately.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
29 avr. à 14 h 10
Sujet:
DEBRUSK STAY
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BruinsJoe</b></div><div>Devils need a star goalie and i think they will trade this 1st pick next draft for a top goalie
Bruins love Debrusk and i really think it s good money value for him 40-50pts guy who is a really good 2 way player, and on the market he can get a bit more per me</div></div>
2025 1st seems more like the price to ask for. Devils fans, at least, have been pretty consistent that this year's pick is too high for 1 year of a goalie.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
26 avr. à 12 h 31
Sujet:
Playground
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Xspyrit</b></div><div>Of course Ottawa will be looking to trade Chychrun to a team that would/could extend him, hence not for 1 season``</div></div>
He is a UFA, so you don't have a ton of leverage here. You could grant the team negotiating rights while under contract with you, which could increase the cost, but not by all that much. It depends on how im-demand the player is and how desperate the trading team is to get the player.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Xspyrit</b></div><div>And not all 1sts are equal, it was a 12th OA pick.</div></div>
Honest question: did the teams know that at the time of the trade? I assume they did not, because I though it was a TDL teade and Ottawa was trying to make a last push to get into the playoffs. If that is the case, the fact that it settled at the 12th OA pick is not really relevant in discussing the value of the trade.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Xspyrit</b></div><div>Ottawa would only be interested in that offer if they are interested in Merkulov</div></div>
This is fair. If they don't want Merkulov, then he has 0 value. I am not sure they would want him.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
26 avr. à 0 h 28
Sujet:
Fire Lou Major Retool
No thanks on Pamlieri for a 1st rounder.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
25 avr. à 20 h 32
Sujet:
Playground
I think NJ is overpaying in the Ullmark trade and Boston is overpaying in the Chychrun trade.
Drop the 2nd from the Ullmark trade and I think that is closer to correct.
I'm not sure about Chychrun's value off the top of my head, but I do know that Ottawa paid basically a 1st and 2 2nds for 2.5 seasons, and even that was arguably an overpay. You are proposing a similar value for 1 season of him (Merk is probably not worth a 2nd, but he does have some value like a 3rd or 4th). I doubt Chychrun's value has gone up very much since he was traded and he is now a pending UFA, so I wouldn't give up more than a 1st. If the cost is higher, then another team with more picks/prospects is welcome to pay it.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
23 avr. à 20 h 52
Sujet:
The best team possible - does not mean realistic or likely
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ryminister_92</b></div><div>I can see your point on this, but when Schneider was dealt it was only with 2 years left on his deal and it was a much stronger draft class. I think with the weaker prospects the 1 year less kinda averages it out pretty similar</div></div>
Sure, that all plays into it too. I'm not going to argue too hard against the Bruins getting a better return since I am a B's fan after all!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
23 avr. à 20 h 25
Sujet:
Swayman
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>littlejerryseinfeld</b></div><div>Risky to trade for a goalie who doesn't ever play back to backs</div></div>
Is that the narrative we're going to use now? I guess teams who are looking to trade for goalies are looking for more of a low-risk Shesterkin or Demko type of player.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
23 avr. à 20 h 19
Sujet:
Devils
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>bhavikp27</b></div><div>What's the point of acquiring Boqvist if you don't put him in the lineup?</div></div>
Quit harshing our memes, man!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
23 avr. à 20 h 7
Sujet:
The best team possible - does not mean realistic or likely
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ryminister_92</b></div><div>It’s not a particularly strong draft class this year so a top 10 pick for a Vezina winning goalie isn’t a bad price at all. I’d argue Boston should get more but goalies typically don’t get huge hauls</div></div>
To be fair to the Devils, unless there is an agreement to discuss contracts prior to the trade, they are only getting him for 1 year. I'm not sure any team would give up a top 10 pick for 1 year of any player at any position unless they are going all-in at the TDL (and in that case, they almost never have a top 10 pick anyway).
1
2
Suivant
Page 1
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com