Éditer l'avatar
  • png, jpeg
  • La grandeur minimale recommandée se veut de 800px par 800px
  • Grandeur maximale: 1MB
Glisser l'image pour repositionner
Sauvegarder
Annuler

Anus_McLeod

Membre depuis
27 avr. 2020
Équipe favorite
Avalanche du Colorado
Messages dans les forums
1506
Messages par jour
2.57
Sujets de discussion
120
Forum: Armchair-GMil y a 4 heures
Sujet: Offseason
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NMAvsFan</b></div><div>I like the roster for the most part but I'm still in the camp that is not sure Kuemper is the guy - he's had some good games and some not so good games. The biggest issue with signing Hertl and Bura to those big deals and new deals for Mac, Newhook and Byram upcoming the following year. So long as they don't give trade protection to Hertl and Bura, it could work. They'll need the flexibility the following year because at least one bigger contract will likely need to be moved out.</div></div>

They have EJ, Stastny, and Compher rolling off next year in this acgm, so it might work for at least another year. Agree that they need to avoid trade protection for those guys though (especially Burakovsky). Someone will probably need to go eventually.

My biggest issue is that the chances of Kaut being a top 6 guy are slim and none. Also, Nichushkin is really important to this team. Maybe move Compher for anything to re-sign Nichushkin. Otherwise it looks good to me. The Ingram trade is interesting.
Forum: Armchair-GMHier à 16 h 46
Sujet: Filling Holes
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>RFS_90</b></div><div>Kulak would be a great acquisition provided Ryan Murray is out long-term. Last I read, it doesn't look good. Jack Johnson had an okay start, but he's not good enough to be in the top 6 full time. I'm not married to Kulak, but I was trying to find pending UFA's on a team that's probably not going to make the playoffs.

Maybe you could play around with some of the trade values, but I think Georgiev would have more success in Colorado. The Rangers leak scoring chances more than almost anyone. He'd be an upgrade on Frankie, and he's 25, and under team control after this season.

And yeah, I love the thought of Jake DeBrusk in an Avs jersey.</div></div>

I'm not totally against Kulak. If they retain and it's cheap in terms of the asking price then okay I guess. It does depend on Murray's timeline though, which I don't think has been reported anywhere yet.

I disagree on Georgiev being an upgrade on Francouz. He hasn't played in quite a while, but when Frankie was healthy he was on his way to a starting job somewhere. Georgiev is trending hard in the opposite direction. I'd swap Johansson plus and take him as a third goalie to see if he can revive his career, but I'm not moving Francouz unless it's a very clear upgrade coming back. Georgiev is sadly not that this season.
Forum: Armchair-GMjeu. à 13 h 31
Sujet: Filling Holes
Georgiev has been awful. I might take a flyer on him as an addition to Kuemper and Francouz, but I wouldn't trade the latter and rely on him.

I like the DeBrusk addition, but I'm not sure the trade makes sense. If it's Compher and a kicker, then I'm in. Not sure I want to give up a couple good prospects though, and I'm also not sure Boston would be looking for just futures.

Kulak for cheap (like a 4th or 5th) is fine I guess. My biggest concern here would be cap space and whether it could be better utilized elsewhere. Plus I feel like Johnson, Murray, and MacDonald give the team pretty decent depth options when there are injuries.

Overall I think you are focused on the right holes for the most part. The only one of these acquisitions I'm really in favor of though is the DeBrusk one.
Forum: Armchair-GMmer. à 8 h 43
Forum: Armchair-GMlun. à 14 h 45
Sujet: Point Share Leaders
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Roysboy72</b></div><div>I believe that point shares are calculated on a game-to-game basis, and they're a counting stat, not an average. My source for this was hockey reference, and they list offensive point shares, defensive point shares, and total point shares for each player. I'm not sure how they're calculated, but I tend to keep them in mind when comparing players instead of just going straight to the points column. It allows me to see both sides of a player's game, and while they're not perfect, they're a good counting statistic to look at when comparing players and their impacts on both ends of the ice.</div></div>

Yeah it's a total, so it is off when games played is not equal. I have never had the patience to read through the calculation, lol.
Forum: Armchair-GMlun. à 11 h 2
Sujet: Can this be a thing
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Mergus80</b></div><div>This (among plenty of other reasons) is why we’re all posting on CapFriendly and not working in NHL front offices :tearsofjoy

I wouldn’t be surprised if a team took a chance on him, especially if they can do it at under $2M a year. Maybe a team that’s desperate for offense with a strong veteran locker room, like they had in SJ with Thornton/Marleau/Pavelski when Kane got there. Rick Dhaliwal brought up Vancouver in a tweet yesterday. They’re sure desperate, but I feel adding Kane would be fuel to the dumpster fire that’s already burning.</div></div>

Pretty sure Vancouver is just a hometown connection. I can't imagine a team with locker room issues thinking that adding Kane is a good idea, but stranger things have happened.
Forum: Armchair-GMlun. à 10 h 51
Sujet: Can this be a thing
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Mergus80</b></div><div>Are you allowed to do that? Is the max amount of retained salary 50% per team (like you suggested) or 50% of the player’s total cap hit ($3.5M)?



Definitely agree with this point about contract term as well. Even at a small cap hit, 4 years remaining is a big commitment for a guy that already carries a lot of risk. Kane still has quite a bit of real cash left on his deal, so a buyout wouldn’t be cheap. I have no idea what a buyout would look like if there are multiple teams retaining salary. Maybe someone who knows the CBA better can help out.</div></div>

The first part is why I made the ACGM. I don't know if they can do this or not.

On the buyout, I'm pretty sure it would be a fourth of what the buyout terms are. SJ would probably rather be rid of his contract sooner than later, so they wouldn't want the buyout. Same with Seattle here. The intent was to benefit them by making it so burying him was the more attractive option.

This is uncharted territory for me. Mainly I just think it's interesting. The risk reward profile for the team of final destination is arguably there though if this is allowed.
Forum: Armchair-GMdim. à 11 h 38
Sujet: unstoppable
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Foppa21</b></div><div>I disagree on not missing him at all. Our 4th line is playing EXTREMELY sheltered minutes, and they don't do anything with the puck. It doesn't matter much right now because we're winning games by 4 or 5 goals, but that won't always be the case. With Compher and Kaut back, that pushes guys like Megna and MacDermid out of the lineup, which we'll need soon enough.</div></div>

Compher is overrated and extremely over utilized. He started the season hot, but the numbers indicate that won't last. He has pretty close to the worst underlying stats on the team, and has managed to achieve such a feat with one of the highest ozone start percentages of anyone. They need to upgrade from him to someone who will actually help the middle six (imo). And if they can get an actual asset in return, even better.