SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Follow me down the rabbit hole

Créé par: Prime_Jimbo
Équipe: 2023-24 Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Date de création initiale: 3 janv. 2024
Publié: 3 janv. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Chabot to Caps in exchange for pick and excess RHD

Bedard gets a pal (might be an undersell but may also not be with injuries).

Avs shed RoJo for Tank. Joey is future trade bait for the Sens.

Toronto doesn't blow their load for Tanev.

Schenn isn't being lifted by Hughes and a high flying TO team any longer. But may be a better fit in Ottawa with a younger D prospect from the Norris deal. Swap wingers as Brainstorm has a much brighter future but supplement for Tomasino.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
64 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
OTT
  1. Jensen, Nick
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (WSH)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2026 (WSH)
2.
OTT
  1. Kaiser, Wyatt
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (TBL)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (VAN)
3.
OTT
  1. Foudy, Jean-Luc
  2. Johansen, Ryan
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (COL)
COL
  1. Tarasenko, Vladimir (2 500 000 $ retained)
4.
TOR
  1. Hamonic, Travis
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (OTT)
5.
OTT
  1. Schenn, Luke
  2. Tomasino, Philip
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (NSH)
NSH
  1. Brännström, Erik
  2. Kubalik, Dominik
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (VAN)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de OTT
Logo de DET
Logo de TBL
Logo de COL
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de DET
Logo de TBL
Logo de NSH
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de OTT
Logo de WSH
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
2026
Logo de OTT
Logo de WSH
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $77 760 714 $0 $2 545 000 $5 739 286 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 205 714 $8 205 714 $
AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 350 000 $8 350 000 $
C
UFA - 8
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 975 000 $4 975 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Predators de Nashville
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
796 667 $796 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
894 167 $894 167 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
847 500 $847 500 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 950 000 $2 950 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 850 000 $$2M)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
4 050 000 $4 050 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Predators de Nashville
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
805 000 $805 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
835 000 $835 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
762 500 $762 500 $
AG
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
3 janv. à 18 h 21
#1
Avs fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 41
Mentions "j'aime": 14
Avs keep Foudy and give you a 5th instead? we like him. Also you got any centers instead? maybe Giroux if we say please?
Prime_Jimbo et turtlemountain a aimé ceci.
3 janv. à 18 h 22
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 9,760
Mentions "j'aime": 4,641
Avs decline. Their need is at C not W.
3 janv. à 18 h 23
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,937
Mentions "j'aime": 7,434
if the leafs wanted a really bad defender they can get one much cheaper than that
SomeonesOffended a aimé ceci.
3 janv. à 18 h 24
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,225
Mentions "j'aime": 1,630
not enough
not even remotely close to enough
no, just no
yes yes yes
no
csick et Prime_Jimbo a aimé ceci.
3 janv. à 18 h 25
#5
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 44,001
Mentions "j'aime": 24,670
Switch a 2nd for Iorio
Not enough of a return
Maybe
Yes please
Yes please
Prime_Jimbo et Who_is_Jimmy_Stu a aimé ceci.
3 janv. à 18 h 29
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 9,614
Mentions "j'aime": 4,207
Leafs easily pass that. Leafs need a top 4 dmen. They don't need more bottom pair guys.

And we shouldn't be trading Robertson unless we get a star dmen back. Even then, I would look at moving other pieces before Robertson. I love his heart.
SomeonesOffended et Prime_Jimbo a aimé ceci.
3 janv. à 18 h 38
#7
Démarrer sujet
VAN
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 6,215
Mentions "j'aime": 1,900
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
if the leafs wanted a really bad defender they can get one much cheaper than that


Lol Hammer time in the 6
3 janv. à 18 h 39
#8
Démarrer sujet
VAN
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 6,215
Mentions "j'aime": 1,900
Quoting: Bheck14
Avs keep Foudy and give you a 5th instead? we like him. Also you got any centers instead? maybe Giroux if we say please?


Quoting: TJTwolf
Avs decline. Their need is at C not W.


Rantonen at C? Tank on the wing?
3 janv. à 18 h 40
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 2,710
Mentions "j'aime": 3,025
Isn’t Tarasenko pretty much cooked? He’s not a 1st + Foudy better than Johansen. He’s not even a C.
TJTwolf et Will27 a aimé ceci.
3 janv. à 18 h 42
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 2,710
Mentions "j'aime": 3,025
Quoting: Prime_Jimbo
Rantonen at C? Tank on the wing?


Or they can use all these assets to get an actual center instead of an old Tarasenko rental. Would have been fun 6 years ago though
3 janv. à 18 h 44
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 9,760
Mentions "j'aime": 4,641
Quoting: Prime_Jimbo
Rantonen at C? Tank on the wing?


It was tried for a time but it's not very effective. Rants simply isn't a C as much as I'd like him to be. That would majorly solve some of the Avs problems! But even if this were the case I wouldn't make that trade for Tarasenko.
Prime_Jimbo et SomeonesOffended a aimé ceci.
3 janv. à 18 h 44
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 7,722
Mentions "j'aime": 5,286
Nothing there I'd want to see NSH moving Tomasino for.
Prime_Jimbo a aimé ceci.
3 janv. à 18 h 48
#13
Démarrer sujet
VAN
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 6,215
Mentions "j'aime": 1,900
Quoting: turtlemountain
Isn’t Tarasenko pretty much cooked? He’s not a 1st + Foudy better than Johansen. He’s not even a C.


I guess from a chemistry perspective, it sounds like RoJo isn't meshing and is on the wing too? At least I thought he was. It'll be tough with Tank's NTC, we'll see how much Tank limits Ottawa's options if they ask.
Xqb15a a aimé ceci.
3 janv. à 18 h 50
#14
Démarrer sujet
VAN
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 6,215
Mentions "j'aime": 1,900
Quoting: gmgb
Nothing there I'd want to see NSH moving Tomasino for.


Fair enough. Thinking upgrade Schenn and get a 2nd Kubilak fills in this year and Kemell next.
3 janv. à 18 h 57
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 522
Mentions "j'aime": 244
Not to be rude, but this rabbit hole has an odour to it 😕; Leafs need a top 4, preferably top pair, RHD. Other than being RHD and in the nhl (props for that) - Hamonic is not what they need
Prime_Jimbo et SomeonesOffended a aimé ceci.
3 janv. à 19 h 10
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 11,425
Mentions "j'aime": 11,454
Idk... I'm on the fence with that CHI trade. I am not opposed to moving any of those pieces, necessarily, and I'm sure that is a fine price for Norris. But I'm just not sure what Norris gives us that we need NOW and can't wait for the rebuild to pan out. If CHI is looking at centers, I'd rather just get them through the draft, and when we are closer to contending, maybe then looking outward for ways to improve the roster and holes we might need to fill. We might already have our Norris in our prospect pool.
LivingAnew, Prime_Jimbo, YeahRighttt and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
3 janv. à 19 h 26
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 448
Mentions "j'aime": 588
Quoting: Garak
Idk... I'm on the fence with that CHI trade. I am not opposed to moving any of those pieces, necessarily, and I'm sure that is a fine price for Norris. But I'm just not sure what Norris gives us that we need NOW and can't wait for the rebuild to pan out. If CHI is looking at centers, I'd rather just get them through the draft, and when we are closer to contending, maybe then looking outward for ways to improve the roster and holes we might need to fill. We might already have our Norris in our prospect pool.


I concur with all of this, Garak... Excellent post, IMO. It might be good value for Norris; but, just too soon. We've had a LOT of good picks in the last two years - with more to come. It's painful to be so bad right now, but let's let things play out for now.
Prime_Jimbo, YeahRighttt, Garak and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
3 janv. à 19 h 27
#18
Démarrer sujet
VAN
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 6,215
Mentions "j'aime": 1,900
Quoting: Garak
Idk... I'm on the fence with that CHI trade. I am not opposed to moving any of those pieces, necessarily, and I'm sure that is a fine price for Norris. But I'm just not sure what Norris gives us that we need NOW and can't wait for the rebuild to pan out. If CHI is looking at centers, I'd rather just get them through the draft, and when we are closer to contending, maybe then looking outward for ways to improve the roster and holes we might need to fill. We might already have our Norris in our prospect pool.


Late first. Could be a bargain with all those lefties in the pen.
Garak a aimé ceci.
3 janv. à 19 h 52
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 11,425
Mentions "j'aime": 11,454
Quoting: Prime_Jimbo
Late first. Could be a bargain with all those lefties in the pen.


True. But TBL isn't looking too good this year, either. That pick could easily be 11th to 20th OA, which would likely be GREAT for our rebuild. The idea is totally valid, though. OTT could probably get a healthy package for him.
Prime_Jimbo, RicXX et LivingAnew a aimé ceci.
3 janv. à 20 h 36
#20
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 60,277
Mentions "j'aime": 23,120
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
if the leafs wanted a really bad defender they can get one much cheaper than that


I tend to disagree friend. If Hamonic is NHL capable, it's a good trade for the Leafs,and Hamonic is signed cheap for next season too.
Gee when I other trades posted that the Leafs have to give up so much more for middling Dmen, I kinda think this trade works.
Prime_Jimbo a aimé ceci.
3 janv. à 20 h 40
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,937
Mentions "j'aime": 7,434
Quoting: palhal
I tend to disagree friend. If Hamonic is NHL capable, it's a good trade for the Leafs,and Hamonic is signed cheap for next season too.
Gee when I other trades posted that the Leafs have to give up so much more for middling Dmen, I kinda think this trade works.


He's not though. He's the worst defender on a bad nhl team, hed have to get 10x better to be middling.
The leafs dont need another benoit for free let allne moving an asset for him
3 janv. à 20 h 47
#22
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 60,277
Mentions "j'aime": 23,120
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
He's not though. He's the worst defender on a bad nhl team, hed have to get 10x better to be middling.
The leafs dont need another benoit for free let allne moving an asset for him


OK then. If he isn't better than what we have now, I agree with you.
3 janv. à 21 h 31
#23
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 44,001
Mentions "j'aime": 24,670
Quoting: turtlemountain
Isn’t Tarasenko pretty much cooked? He’s not a 1st + Foudy better than Johansen. He’s not even a C.


On a 63pt pace posting pretty good defensive numbers. Idk if that’s cooked
Prime_Jimbo a aimé ceci.
3 janv. à 21 h 31
#24
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 44,001
Mentions "j'aime": 24,670
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
He's not though. He's the worst defender on a bad nhl team, hed have to get 10x better to be middling.
The leafs dont need another benoit for free let allne moving an asset for him


Benoit has put up some very good defensive numbers tbh
3 janv. à 22 h 48
#25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,626
Mentions "j'aime": 9,233
Tarasenko isn’t a 1st and Foudy better than RyJo.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage