SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Curious would Habs fans like this

Créé par: Xspyrit
Équipe: 2023-24 Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Date de création initiale: 12 oct. 2023
Publié: 12 oct. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Don't pay attention to defensive pairings numbers. Any of the big 3 would always be on the ice, that's the point
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
32 500 000 $
Transactions
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de OTT
Logo de DET
Logo de OTT
Logo de MIN
Logo de OTT
Logo de DET
Logo de TBL
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
2026
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 500 000 $80 517 380 $0 $1 850 000 $2 982 620 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 205 714 $8 205 714 $
AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 350 000 $8 350 000 $
C
UFA - 8
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
7 950 000 $7 950 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 975 000 $4 975 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
775 000 $775 000 $
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
762 500 $762 500 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
835 000 $835 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 950 000 $2 950 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
775 000 $775 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 850 000 $$2M)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
813 333 $813 333 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
766 667 $766 667 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
12 oct. 2023 à 20 h 3
#1
Prime Primeau
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 5,470
Mentions "j'aime": 2,174
Definitely not, remove Ylonen and Kovacevic and downgrade that pick to a fifth
Fran615 a aimé ceci.
12 oct. 2023 à 20 h 4
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 7,144
Mentions "j'aime": 3,507
Quoting: GuyGuyGuy
Definitely not, remove Ylonen and Kovacevic and downgrade that pick to a fifth


Are you kidding me? This has to be a troll.

Kubalik is worth between a 3rd and a 4th right now and Brannstrom is worth a high 3rd or a low 2nd.
12 oct. 2023 à 20 h 8
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 10,506
Mentions "j'aime": 3,721
Quoting: GuyGuyGuy
Definitely not, remove Ylonen and Kovacevic and downgrade that pick to a fifth

I should have put "realistic" before Habs fans lol
12 oct. 2023 à 20 h 8
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,537
Mentions "j'aime": 6,451
Brannstrom offers no value to us with all our LD and LD prospects. I think we would prefer to keep Kovacevic and Ylonen over trading for Kubalik, even if the value is fair
12 oct. 2023 à 20 h 9
#5
FKA Bigtittielarper
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 7,728
Mentions "j'aime": 2,226
Seems like not enough coming from ottawa
12 oct. 2023 à 20 h 15
#6
Rak Wraithraiser
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 151
Mentions "j'aime": 82
Quoting: Campabee
Brannstrom offers no value to us with all our LD and LD prospects. I think we would prefer to keep Kovacevic and Ylonen over trading for Kubalik, even if the value is fair


And we already have our small LD, Hutson. Which I'd take anytime over Brannstrom.
LumberJacques a aimé ceci.
12 oct. 2023 à 20 h 21
#7
Habs 7th round 1983
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 1,623
Mentions "j'aime": 749
It's not about the value of the individual players.

It's about the Sens being insolvent.
Fran615 et Fox_Czar_Cup a aimé ceci.
12 oct. 2023 à 20 h 26
#8
Sennecke is a gem
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2022
Messages: 4,185
Mentions "j'aime": 2,305
I'd do that, maybe lower the pick, but it seems fine
Xspyrit a aimé ceci.
12 oct. 2023 à 20 h 27
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 1,055
Mentions "j'aime": 668
As many have mentioned above LD and pending UFAs are not things that MTL would have any interest in acquiring.
GalchyTheBeast27 a aimé ceci.
12 oct. 2023 à 20 h 32
#10
Rak Wraithraiser
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 151
Mentions "j'aime": 82
Quoting: LumberJacques
As many have mentioned above LD and pending UFAs are not things that MTL would have any interest in acquiring.


I agree about LD, but in term of pending UFA we could if it's a cap dump situation with some sort of a sweetener. Otherwise no, indeed.
LumberJacques a aimé ceci.
12 oct. 2023 à 20 h 39
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 1,055
Mentions "j'aime": 668
Quoting: GalchyTheBeast27
I agree about LD, but in term of pending UFA we could if it's a cap dump situation with some sort of a sweetener. Otherwise no, indeed.


Yeah I agree.

By "acquiring" I meant they wouldn't spend assets to get LD and UFA, though If another team wants to pay to offload those then that's a different story.
GalchyTheBeast27 a aimé ceci.
12 oct. 2023 à 20 h 46
#12
Rak Wraithraiser
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 151
Mentions "j'aime": 82
Modifié 12 oct. 2023 à 21 h 3
Quoting: LumberJacques
Yeah I agree.

By "acquiring" I meant they wouldn't spend assets to get LD and UFA, though If another team wants to pay to offload those then that's a different story.


Totally agree, habs aren't moving picks for guys we don't need. Wouldn't mind moving Ylonen tho, I don't really see a future where he's a Hab.
LumberJacques a aimé ceci.
12 oct. 2023 à 20 h 52
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 3,836
Mentions "j'aime": 2,512
dont think its a move worth to be made. habs wont care about kubalik and i dont think branstrom has enough of an impact to being worth the trade.
12 oct. 2023 à 21 h 3
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 1,055
Mentions "j'aime": 668
Quoting: GalchyTheBeast27
Totally agree, habs aren't moving picks for guys we don't need. Wouldn't mind moving Ylonen tho, I don't really see a future where's he a Hab.


For Ylonen I wouldn't be opposed to moving him either but I just don't think there is much interest or value out there for him right now. In the mean time I think he fills his role quite well and I personally prefer seeing him on the ice than the likes of Pearson or Armia while the younger prospects develop in more appropriate environments.
GalchyTheBeast27 a aimé ceci.
12 oct. 2023 à 21 h 6
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 1,686
Mentions "j'aime": 1,015
Quoting: sens65
Are you kidding me? This has to be a troll.

Kubalik is worth between a 3rd and a 4th right now and Brannstrom is worth a high 3rd or a low 2nd.


Maybe, but neither make any sense for Montreal. Kubalik is just a rental blocking development time for prospects and Montreal has 3 sophomore LD and afew really strong LD prospects, Brannstrom doesn't have value to them.
GalchyTheBeast27 a aimé ceci.
12 oct. 2023 à 21 h 10
#16
B
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 7,995
Mentions "j'aime": 1,453
It's all about being the wrong time of year. Not many teams would would want them for more than a later pick, if at all. Take Kovacevik out to make this fair, they'd probably beg you to take Evans back
12 oct. 2023 à 21 h 11
#17
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 10,506
Mentions "j'aime": 3,721
Quoting: LumberJacques
As many have mentioned above LD and pending UFAs are not things that MTL would have any interest in acquiring.

You'd be able to recoup a 2nd and maybe more for Kubalik at the deadline. Same for Brannstrom, you'd be able to make a nice profit at some point

Note that If Dorion didn't mess things up, I would never look to do that

But the point for Montreal is that despite the LD prospects and the UFA status of Kubalik, you don't have to keep players forever, you buy low sell high since you are in a rebuild. Dorion is easy to benefit from so the trade is made for that. Unless you think Ylonen and Kovacevic would return more than two 2nds or something like that?
12 oct. 2023 à 21 h 22
#18
Prime Primeau
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 5,470
Mentions "j'aime": 2,174
Quoting: sens65
Are you kidding me? This has to be a troll.

Kubalik is worth between a 3rd and a 4th right now and Brannstrom is worth a high 3rd or a low 2nd.


Quoting: sens65
Are you kidding me? This has to be a troll.

Kubalik is worth between a 3rd and a 4th right now and Brannstrom is worth a high 3rd or a low 2nd.

They are worth that in a normal context, not now. You still can’t sign Pinto. No way we help you if we don’t get a big discount
12 oct. 2023 à 21 h 24
#19
Prime Primeau
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 5,470
Mentions "j'aime": 2,174
Quoting: Xspyrit
I should have put "realistic" before Habs fans lol


Are tou really thinking a team will help you? Lol
patnaisnyquil a aimé ceci.
12 oct. 2023 à 21 h 37
#20
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 10,506
Mentions "j'aime": 3,721
Quoting: GuyGuyGuy
Are tou really thinking a team will help you? Lol

I'm not sure in which world people live to be honest so I'm not really trying to understand anymore. The world I live in is there :

https://www.capfriendly.com/trades?min-players=1

How come Leafs got help?
How come the Canucks got help?
How come the Panthers got help?
How come the Stars got help?
How come the Knights got help?
Etc.

Players have the value each team allocate them in regards to their cap hit, term, age, health status, etc. The NHL is not Cap Friendly lol. Both Kubalik and Brannstrom are positive assets

The 31 other NHL teams don't make a zoom call to say "hey everybody, let's not help Ottawa!"

Someone will trade for a player when they have a NEED or see the possibility to make a PROFIT. It's almost like some of you have no idea how life works.
12 oct. 2023 à 21 h 51
#21
Rak Wraithraiser
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 151
Mentions "j'aime": 82
Quoting: Xspyrit
You'd be able to recoup a 2nd and maybe more for Kubalik at the deadline. Same for Brannstrom, you'd be able to make a nice profit at some point

Note that If Dorion didn't mess things up, I would never look to do that

But the point for Montreal is that despite the LD prospects and the UFA status of Kubalik, you don't have to keep players forever, you buy low sell high since you are in a rebuild. Dorion is easy to benefit from so the trade is made for that. Unless you think Ylonen and Kovacevic would return more than two 2nds or something like that?


I just don't think MTL has any interest in doing that, sure Kubalik could either help the top 9 or help getting some more picks down the road but Montreal isn't in any rush compared to Ottawa.

I don't think they wanna move Kovacevic when he looked like one of our better dman during the pre-season. I'm not saying he's an elite dman don't get me wrong, but teams normally value Big RD that can play physical and defensive more than a small LD with some offensive upside.

I also don't think Montreal has any interest in moving a pick for players we have no need for. We already have a bunch of forwards, and there's Dvorak injured. As for Ylonen, he probably doesn't have much value, but I don't think habs wants another LD whether it's a fair deal or not.
LumberJacques et Xspyrit a aimé ceci.
12 oct. 2023 à 22 h 3
#22
Prime Primeau
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 5,470
Mentions "j'aime": 2,174
Quoting: Xspyrit
I'm not sure in which world people live to be honest so I'm not really trying to understand anymore. The world I live in is there :

https://www.capfriendly.com/trades?min-players=1

How come Leafs got help?
How come the Canucks got help?
How come the Panthers got help?
How come the Stars got help?
How come the Knights got help?
Etc.

Players have the value each team allocate them in regards to their cap hit, term, age, health status, etc. The NHL is not Cap Friendly lol. Both Kubalik and Brannstrom are positive assets

The 31 other NHL teams don't make a zoom call to say "hey everybody, let's not help Ottawa!"

Someone will trade for a player when they have a NEED or see the possibility to make a PROFIT. It's almost like some of you have no idea how life works.


None of those teams had a young player unsigned and no cap space.

Teams will take them if they are free, they aren’t gonna pay when they could just wait and exploit Dorion even more. And not a single team have a need and the cap space for Brannstrom or Kubalik. They might take it for an unnecessary luxury but again, it would be for free
12 oct. 2023 à 22 h 22
#23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 450
Mentions "j'aime": 141
This isn't close; Kovacevic is by far the most valuable piece from Montreal's perspective. If the players you're trading away have value on the market, Ottawa should trade them to the teams that would value them.
12 oct. 2023 à 22 h 27
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 1,055
Mentions "j'aime": 668
Quoting: Xspyrit
You'd be able to recoup a 2nd and maybe more for Kubalik at the deadline. Same for Brannstrom, you'd be able to make a nice profit at some point

Note that If Dorion didn't mess things up, I would never look to do that

But the point for Montreal is that despite the LD prospects and the UFA status of Kubalik, you don't have to keep players forever, you buy low sell high since you are in a rebuild. Dorion is easy to benefit from so the trade is made for that. Unless you think Ylonen and Kovacevic would return more than two 2nds or something like that?


I understand where you're coming from but I respectfully disagree about the potential upside of the deal from MTL's perspective.

Firstly I don't believe that Brannstrom carries much value in the league right now, nor do I believe this to change in the short term. Recent trade trends suggest that undersized defensemen aren't in much demand by most teams, especially if those defensemen aren't elite offensively. I firmly believe it would be far easier to get value at the deadline for Kovacevich than Brannstrom. Not only is Kovacevich half a foot taller but he also shoots right and had all of 3 fewer points than Brannstrom last season while costing less than league minimum and less than half of Brannstrom's cap.

For Kubalik's part I don't disagree that he could likely recoup value at the deadline but that would require extra effort to showcase him and likely retention on his contract by MTL. This is where his opportunity cost comes into play since MTL only have 1 retention slot remaining, which they are likely keeping for Monahan. Using a broker would eat into the expected return and reduces the overall upside of the Sens-Habs trade.

In short I believe Kovacevich is not only more important to MTL currently than Brannstrom would be, but also likely holds more value across the league so this part doesn't work for me. Next while I would trade Ylonen for Kubalik I would not include a 3rd because this would significantly reduce the upside of this trade for MTL. While Kubalik would return more than Ylonen (likely around a 2nd based on comparables) this would only result in marginal value if any (about 15 slots between the 2nd and 3rd round picks minus the broker fee of a 4th or 5th).
GalchyTheBeast27 et HabsCanucks a aimé ceci.
13 oct. 2023 à 14 h 15
#25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 195
Mentions "j'aime": 47
Sens fans getting desperate lmao

Youre going to have to move some high picks if you want cap space, Dorion's asset management has been atrocious and every GM in the league knows it.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage