Burnout

Membre depuis

10 janv. 2022

Messages dans les forums

1392

Messages par jour

2.0

MESSAGES

SUJETS

MENTIONS "J'AIME"

ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG

Forum: Armchair-GMHier à 18 h 8

Sujet: reconstructing this roster

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Capitalfail67</b></div><div>"You’re delusional"

Lars Eller: 60gp 16p Avs traded a 2nd for Eller last year
SM : 60gp 33p

woof</div></div>

Eller is a center who tend to be worth more.

More importantly, Montreal's rebuilding so they'd have no interest in Milano.

Forum: Armchair-GMHier à 18 h 4

Sujet: SIMPLE

-I don't see either team doing the 1st
-That seems like a lot for Tanev, but Calgary may be able to get better future(s) in a trade with retention given the lack of D available
-Hard to know what Reimer is worth, but that seems like a light return
-Montreal's not even going to consider that.

Forum: Armchair-GMmer. à 12 h 36

Sujet: Vlasic for Armia

Montreal doesn't have room for Vlasic, Armia doesn't have the same trade protections, fills a spot better and is done earlier. They easily decline.

Not that San Jose should tie up all their retention spots until the 2025 without getting assets.

Forum: Armchair-GMmer. à 10 h 30

Sujet: Shake Up

Montreal would easily prefer Caufield over Mercer, a 1st over a 2nd, and even Allen over Vanecek (although if Montreal is trading Allen its because they have too many goalies).

Is there even an argument for why you think Montreal would consider this?

Forum: Armchair-GMsam. à 17 h 1

Sujet: Cap Space with Allen

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ht42</b></div><div>Habs accept, good deal, but I'm not sure if NJD fans will like that.............</div></div>

Really? Whatever your opinion on Allen, a 3rd isn't worth the retention for Montreal

Forum: Armchair-GM1 déc. à 13 h 45

Sujet: Moving JEE

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ross_Johnston</b></div><div>don't think mtl would use their last retention spot on a two year deal if they are only getting a UFA back</div></div>

Montreal also wouldn't move a goalie+ in a trade that doesn't resolve their 3 goalie rotation issue.

Forum: Armchair-GM28 nov. à 19 h 8

Sujet: deadline fix

At first glance:

-I don't really see what the benefit for the Rangers is there. For their roster construction, betting on Chytil makes a lot more sense than spending longterm on Lindholm and they're not getting what they need for giving up all that.
-What's the benefit for Calgary to make the Lightning trade?
-Montreal is definitely not going to be a buyer at the deadline, don't care about Armia's contract and don't care about a soon-to-be 28 year old winger given where they are in their rebuild.

Forum: Armchair-GM24 nov. à 16 h 59

Sujet: bare minimum

Chicago and Montreal aren't doing those deals.

Forum: Armchair-GM24 nov. à 12 h 51

Sujet: 24-25 Two Trades For A Deeper Team

There's no reason Montreal would retain on Anderson (or any player with a long term contract) for that kind of return. They don't need the space.

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>fil97</b></div><div>rakell can't be considered a struggling player. had a very unfortunate 15games, but he is still a very solid player.</div></div>

That sounds like the textbook definition of a "struggling player".

Forum: Armchair-GM23 nov. à 12 h 28

Sujet: Lots of work to do

If Montreal is moving a goalie, its in part to relieve their logjam at the position. That trade doesn't do that.

Forum: Armchair-GM23 nov. à 9 h 22

Sujet: goalie defence

I don't see any of the non-Oilers teams accepting these.

Forum: Armchair-GM22 nov. à 15 h 29

Sujet: Attitude change in Edm

I heard the Seravalli piece, that's not the "reported" price, its what he speculates it may cost. Take from that what you will.

I'm skeptical that Arizona is a place Campbell would ok a trade to or that Arizona wants to deal with the real money of his contract, although it fits their MO.

Don't really see Montreal considering that trade given their needs and preferences.

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Xspyrit</b></div><div>Wait, what do you think Allen and Monahan are worth?

McLeod (solid bottom-6 forward) and a 2nd is actually a good return for 2 UFAs, one of which is a goalie and don't hold much value if any</div></div>

Montreal is working on re-signing Montembault, they don't actually want to trade him, Monahan is a center who can play anywhere in a line-up and those rentals tend to return a lot, and Montreal (like the vast majority of sellers) likely isn't really looking for a "solid bottom-6 forward".

Forum: Armchair-GM20 nov. à 13 h 24

Sujet: clear the decks and get pick back

I think most of these favour the Flames and don't really understand the needs of the other teams. For instance:

-Montreal doesn't need to move bad contracts and aren't going to be enticed by a 27 year old winger
-Swapping Dobson for Hanifin and Tanev doesn't really make the Islander's D better and makes no sense for any team from a team building POV

Forum: Armchair-GM17 nov. à 13 h 32

Sujet: If Chytil is shut down for the year

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Rags21</b></div><div>Well for all these trades, the base is the conditional 2nd and 4th. Obviously different variables play a role is how much more the NYR add. But in this scenario they’re adding a 3C, so I’d hope they’re not overpaying for a bottom 6 center</div></div>

That's fine, but (at least) half of those guys aren't bottom 6 centers. They may even play as a bottom 6 center on the Rangers. If the Rangers want that kind of flexibility then they have to pay for it. Or just trade for a center that can't offer that kind of flexibility.

Forum: Armchair-GM17 nov. à 12 h 21

Sujet: Burn it

Gallagher likely has San Jose on his NTC/NMC list. Montreal is not going to retain on Gallagher and likely aren't interested in moving him at all (as they don't need the cap space). If they were to move him AND retain, they certainly wouldn't give all that up. For the same reason San Jose wouldn't trade 2 3rds, PIT's 1st, Mukhamadullin and Vlasic (2 mil retained) to Montreal for a Kunin-like player.

Forum: Armchair-GM17 nov. à 11 h 57

Sujet: If Chytil is shut down for the year

The quality of those players vary, so some are definitely way off.

-Lindholm is definitely worth more as a rental, you probably have to look at something like the Horvat trade as a starting point.
-Novak is definitely worth more at his age and how he's performed in the NHL. Not as much as Lindholm because of track record, but definitely a 1st+.
-If Monahan is healthy at the deadline, he's definitely worth more. If he's not healthy, the Rangers wouldn't want him.
-Henrique is close given the NTC protection, but I tend to think he'd be worth a bit more too (or rather the Ducks could get more by retaining more).

Forum: Armchair-GM14 nov. à 16 h 1

Sujet: Burn it Down

Montreal doesn't need to "unload" Dvorak. Hell, with Dach done for the year, I doubt they even want to move Dvorak. Zadorov is a rental and a seller isn't going to pay for him. And Dube is not the kind of player Montreal would pay that kind of price for.

Anaheim has Mintyukov and Zellweger and Fowler as notable left shot D. Don't see why they'd be a team to pay up for Hanifin.

Forum: Armchair-GM14 nov. à 12 h 30

Sujet: deadline

-Montreal can't retain on two contracts and, provided that Monahan plays at the level he has and remains healthy enough to be a trade target at the deadline, wouldn't accept that offer.

-Feels low for Stetcher too.

Forum: Armchair-GM13 nov. à 14 h 2

Sujet: Ny Rangers REAL

Montreal aint touching that, just buy him out.

Forum: Armchair-GM13 nov. à 10 h 22

Sujet: Looking Ahead

I don't see what Boston would be willing to offer that Montreal would agree to in exchange for Xhekaj.

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jonh514</b></div><div>I'm not sure about Xhekaj. My fellow Habs fans will want the moon, but I think his value is not that high. <strong>Definite sophomore slump.</strong>

I think the Habs expect that the next 15 years of team toughness will come from the Xhekaj brothers, so I doubt they consider a trade unless it's a crazy overpay.</div></div>

What sophmore slump? He's shooting less, but his defence is significantly improved.

It's more a case of why would Montreal trade Xhekaj? Let alone to Boston? He's a young, big, physical D-man with decent underlying numbers (albeit in sheltered minutes) and a lot of team control. The PIMs are bad, but Montreal probably lives with it for now given that its not easy to find D like Xhekaj and how valuable they are in the playoffs.

Forum: Armchair-GM10 nov. à 7 h 59

Sujet: How do you fix this roster

These trades don't work even if Edmonton wasn't desperate. Philly and Montreal aren't going to give Edmonton what they need and take care of problems out of the goodness of their hearts, you need to give them a reason to do so

Forum: Armchair-GM9 nov. à 17 h 9

Sujet: Hitters

Montreal has 3 goalies, they don't need another one. If they did, they certainly wouldn't want Murray. Its not worth it to Montreal to move Pez for a 7th right now.

Forum: Armchair-GM9 nov. à 13 h 4

Sujet: TDL 2024

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jetman</b></div><div>Monahan wont be resigned by the Jets anyways, MTL can get their 2nd back plus another solid bottom 6 player(who has a bother in MTL) for releasing Monahan for 3 months</div></div>

Montreal doesn't need another solid bottom 6 player and certainly aren't going to move Monahan to move up in the 2nd round. Come on.

Forum: Armchair-GM8 nov. à 15 h 16

Sujet: Improving the issues

These are really bad for Calgary and Montreal.

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>lowblocksniper</b></div><div>I highly doubt any team will pay an unprotected 1st, his injury history is too extensive to risk it straight up

They might add decent mid level prospects but, not a for sure 1st IMO</div></div>

He's a rental, all that matters if there is a belief that he can be healthy this year. If he's healthy and continues to perform at the level he has this year and last, then that performance has generally returned even more than a 1st from a buyer. Under those circumstances, a trade may not be worth it to Montreal if they think they can re-sign him.

Forum: Armchair-GM8 nov. à 13 h 28

Sujet: josh anderson

No.

12 Suivant

Page 1

PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE

COTES DES PARIS

LANGUE

ARCHIVES

CBA

CALCS

OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY

OUTILS

JOUEURS

CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST

CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST

OUTILS INTERACTIFS

Burnout

Membre depuis

Messages dans les forums

Messages par jour