Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 1,052
Mentions "j'aime": 548
I’m on the fence on this one. Normally I’d say that extending a commitment to a 36-year-old to 3 years is a bad idea, but he’s coming off the two best seasons of his career, perhaps due to the arrival of Mr. Kaprizov, and unlike Foligno, they got him to take a pay cut. Since he’s already 36, this is less risky than signing a guy who’s still in his early 30s to age 38 because, like Brent Burns in Carolina, they know he’s not aging at the usual rate. If it keeps Kaprizov happy and productive, it’s probably worth it.
Still, I feel like it would have been safer to wait and see how this coming season shapes up for him, especially given Minnesota’s history of having too many old guys signed for too long, a mistake they’re still paying for that probably would have made them a non-playoff team if not for Kaprizov arriving just in time to save them.