PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
budgeteam
couldnt afford 2nd t
Membre depuis
26 sept. 2021
Équipe favorite
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Deuxième équipe favorite
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Messages dans les forums
1014
Messages par jour
1.1
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Trade Machine Proposals
3 avr. à 16 h 0
Sujet:
Stl - Ott Brady goes home
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MoxNix</b></div><div>Robert Thomas is the last guy they'd trade for Tkachuk, the two aren't just good friends, Thomas having billeted with the family in junior is practically like a 3rd Tkachuk brother.</div></div>
I don't think St.Louis would trade him. I think it is who Ottawa would ask for.
Forum:
Trade Machine Proposals
3 avr. à 12 h 26
Sujet:
Off Season But Thoughts
If you take Ullmark out of that trade, then it might make sense.
No one is trading for Norris until he proves he isn't an LTIRetirement candidate. If the Senators could dump him for future considerations, they should consider it. Which isn't to say he is never going to play again, but at this point he is a liability cap wise because he has a long road to getting back to his previous form. He wasn't close to it this year, and that was before injuring his shoulder and having to get another surgery.
Forum:
Trade Machine Proposals
3 avr. à 12 h 23
Sujet:
Stl - Ott Brady goes home
Another team would easily beat that offer. Look at what Matthew got, and Matthew could choose his destination by refusing to sign long term with certain teams. Brady does not have any trade protection for another year and has 4 more years of term. A power forward in his prime with captain level intangibles would have teams lining up to acquire him.
Robert Thomas would be the player Ottawa would ask for. Staios is familiar with him from his stint in the OHL. It's closer to a lateral move than Kyrou. Ironically, Thomas and Tkachuk are good friends.
Forum:
Trade Machine Proposals
14 mars à 14 h 30
Sujet:
Chabingo bango
It's Karlsson for Chabot.
Both are still "good" players, both have bad contracts relative to their on ice contributions. Karlsson's contract is worse because of his age and injury history. Chabot has been injury prone, but most of his injuries have been smaller ones, he is still young and in his prime.
Ottawa only does this to change the conversation around their bad season and get fans excited about the team.
Korpisalo is included to equalize the cap instead of Pittsburgh burning a retention spot. Pittsburgh can buy him out, bury him, or keep him as a backup goalie with the idea being it saves them 1.5 million to 2.5 million on a second goalie in free agency.
Forum:
Trade Machine Proposals
11 janv. à 8 h 55
Sujet:
the best way for Tampa to solve their goalie problem daccording to me
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MoxNix</b></div><div>Seattle declines. Daccord is their best goalie, they wont' trade him for a 2026 1st that's likely to be a very late one.</div></div>
I agree.
Forum:
Trade Machine Proposals
11 janv. à 8 h 55
Sujet:
the best way for Tampa to solve their goalie problem daccording to me
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MoxNix</b></div><div>No way Tampa gives up a 1st for an AHL goalie.</div></div>
I disagree that he is an AHL goalie.
Forum:
Trade Machine Proposals
10 janv. à 18 h 51
Sujet:
the best way for Tampa to solve their goalie problem daccording to me
Vasilevskiy is struggling, which is a problem. He is a premium goalie, but he clearly needs time to get back to form. Acquiring another solid goalie gives him room to do that.
Daccord is signed 2 years at 1.2M. Which means he can fit into the Tampa roster the next two seasons with little to no cap gymnastics.
Forum:
Trade Machine Proposals
10 janv. à 18 h 48
Sujet:
Tim Stutzle 1 4 1 4 Robert Thomas
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>AC14</b></div><div>No reason for either team to do this. Alot more could go wrong for both teams than could go right. I'd imagine both teams are pretty happy with their guy too. Both are really good young 1Cs.</div></div>
I don't think you're wrong. The idea behind the trade comes from most GMs and coaches having a bias towards players they have won with, and the rumors that Ottawa might try to send a lightning bolt through their core. Add in the connection between Thomas and the Tkachuk family, it has a pretty solid backstory for a trade proposal.
If I am St.Louis, I would absolutely do this, but I agree that it is unlikely that either side would do this in real life. It's too much risk.
Thomas is the better player right now, but Stutzle has the higher ceiling, and his floor is not that far below where Thomas is now. Stutzle also does not have a full-NTC, Thomas does starting in 2025 until 2030. Stutzle only has a 10-team NTC. That gives St.Louis a lot more flexibility long-term.
Forum:
Trade Machine Proposals
3 janv. à 16 h 19
Sujet:
Tim Stutzle 1 4 1 4 Robert Thomas
Steve Staios goes out and gets him and head coach John Gruden their star player from their Memorial Cup winning Hamilton Bulldogs team, and in the process shatters the country club atmosphere of the Ottawa Senators. Thomas is a player who also happens to be close with Brady Tkachuk.
Forum:
Trade Machine Proposals
19 déc. 2023 à 17 h 13
Sujet:
Revenge of the Jacques Martin
The trade is basically:
-Batherson for Lafreniere 1 for 1
-Tarasenko @ 1.25M for a 2026 3rd+2024 4th
-Chicago is a placeholder for a third party team who will facilitate the trade. The historical cost for this is usually a 4th, but it could be any team.
-Tarasenko has a NMC and while he has been solid, is not the same player he used to be. A 2nd or 3rd seems reasonable considering he will choose how destination.
-Batherson was the Senators best player prior to his injury 2 years ago. His lack of a commitment to a 2 way game and his contract being moveable might make him a target for a management group that needs a shakeup. Lafreniere is not a great fit due to handedness, but that is a short term problem.
Forum:
Trade Machine Proposals
8 nov. 2023 à 20 h 45
Sujet:
Mantha for Huberdeau
Calgary gets out of an albatross contract.
Washington's window centres around an ageing core. Similar to Pittsburgh acquiring Karlsson, Washington is in a position where if 4 years from now Huberdeau is an albatross, it won't really matter.
Washington gambles on Huberdeau turning it around with a change of scenery. Mantha is only in the trade for cap flexibility and redundancy. At heart, the trade is Huberdeau for FC.
The value going to Calgary is getting out of a toxic buyout proof contract and being able to hit the reset button and move on without retention. Mantha's money is off the books at the end of the season.
Forum:
Trade Machine Proposals
26 oct. 2023 à 23 h 44
Sujet:
the best way for Tampa to solve their goalie problem daccording to me
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Boltsradynasty</b></div><div>. I was being very friendly actually by giving you the benefit of the doubt you weren't actually dumb enough to believe I meant the fifth over all pick and attributed it to miscommunication. I may have been wrong, I apologize for that I I am
The other 2 types of people who responded as you did are morons and trolls if you're either and found anything I said offensive or unfriendly that's on you.
Seriously Johansson is a year older , played 18 more NHL games has a better GAA and same save % as Daccord so please provide an intelligent explanation why TB considers giving up a first round pick? My offer of a fifth was actually a legitimate and reasonable offer unlike the extremely outrageous bulls*** you delusionally expect.</div></div>
The reply was a joke. The way you wrote your previous post, it left things up to interpretation because instead of saying a 5th round pick, you said "a 5". A 5 could mean a 5th round pick or a 5th overall pick. It's reasonable to assume that you meant a 5th round pick, because we are nearly a year away from the draft, we don't know who has the 5th overall pick. Those two things in combination create humour around a common misunderstanding. It was my way of connecting with you, as one human to another.
You could say my reply was capricious, but you could also say I was trying to being friendly, almost like I was being, capfriendly.
Forum:
Trade Machine Proposals
16 oct. 2023 à 23 h 29
Sujet:
the best way for Tampa to solve their goalie problem daccording to me
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Boltsradynasty</b></div><div>Correct, I never indicated the fift I said a five big difference. I understand English probably isn't your first language, so I'll take that as the reason for a second graders comprehension level.</div></div>
The website is called Capfriendly, not CapUnfriendly.
Forum:
Trade Machine Proposals
4 oct. 2023 à 21 h 24
Sujet:
the best way for Tampa to solve their goalie problem daccording to me
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Boltsradynasty</b></div><div>TB counters a 5</div></div>
I don't think Tampa is gonna have the 5th overall pick.
Forum:
NHL Signings
29 sept. 2023 à 14 h 12
Sujet:
Minnesota Wild signed Mats Zuccarello (2 Years / $4,125,000 AAV)
He will be 37 when the contract kicks in.
It is difficult to come up with comparable contracts, because there aren't that many forwards who sign at that age. There are quite a few forwards who sign contracts somewhere around age 34-35, but it seems like there is a huge difference in risk between a 34 year old and a 37 year old with how likely it would be that a player might decline between the ages of 34-38.
It is similar to what Pavelski got if you combine his previous two 1 year contracts and average out the AAV.
I think it is more likely that the Wild might regret the second year on this contract, but at the same time there is the human element. Zuccarello is a veteran player who over the last few years has played above his cap hit. If he is important to their room, I can see how they might have been motivated to get it done and avoid the implications of booting out a well-liked core veteran.
I don't think he should have gotten 2 years in this scenario, but I can see why they might have done it. Year-to-year is always better for veterans at that age, where they can fall off a cliff at any moment. If he were a few years younger, 2-3 years would be fine.
Forum:
Trade Machine Proposals
29 sept. 2023 à 12 h 26
Sujet:
the best way for Tampa to solve their goalie problem daccording to me
Tampa sends Seattle a 2026 or 2027 1st Round pick in exchange for Joey Daccord.
Daccord is cost controlled for the next 2 years at 1.2M.
If the cap doesn't work, also send Myers to Seattle for an additional 2028th 4th round pick to even things out.
I doubt Seattle wants to trade Daccord. He is a late bloomer who has a decent shot at being a 1B or better NHL goalie. He is also cost controlled for the next 2 years, so if he has a Gustavsson style breakout this season, they don't have to worry about paying him. With that said, a 1st, even one a few years from now, is an overpayment. They can gamble on Driedger putting it back together enough to be their backup.
Forum:
NHL Trades
29 sept. 2023 à 12 h 18
Sujet:
(SJS / OTT) - Karlsson, Perron for Tierney, DeMelo, Norris, Balcers & picks
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LeafsForLife</b></div><div>To quote Tntpod , “thIs agED liKE FInE winE!”</div></div>
Why? I didn't say Matthews wouldn't extend. I said he would get a return if he wouldn't discuss a contract before his NMC kicked in.
While he didn't sign prior to July 1st, they pretty clearly were already in discussions and had a mutual understanding that there would be an extension, which made the NMC deadline irrelevant. It wasn't a "I want to play out the season" type scenario.
I am all for a good badly aged post, and I am sure like most people I have a lot of them, but you're looking for something that isn't there.
Forum:
Trade Machine Proposals
28 sept. 2023 à 0 h 19
Sujet:
just for fun
Neither team does this.
Ducks don't do this because of the risks with Norris and his injury history.
The Senators don't do this because of how it disrupts team chemistry. Norris is best friends with Tkachuk.
Also, if the Ducks don't want to pay Zegras on a long-term deal, and are haggling over a bridge deal, I assume they don't want to take on a player with a much bigger ticket. Otherwise, why not just sign Zegras to 6-8 years at 8.XXM per?
Norris is the better player, but on paper I would take Zegras because the Norris contract worries me with his injury history. With Stutzle slotted in as the 1C, the difference between Norris and Zegras at 2C would be less of an issue.
Forum:
Trade Machine Proposals
26 sept. 2023 à 13 h 25
Sujet:
Joseph for Ryan Ellis LTIRetired
Ignore the draft picks. The trade machine kept giving me an error with Ellis in any trade.
The trade is:
M. Joseph (3 x 3M)
for
R. Ellis (4 x 6.25M) (LTIRetired)
This is similar to Dadonov for Weber. LTIR is a massive competitive handicap. Despite the common misconception on fan forums, it is not the same as "free" cap space. Having a long-term LTIR contract is a massive headache. The Senators are backed into a corner and do not want to give up a 1st round pick, so they take back an LTIRetired player for the short term benefit of getting Pinto signed. It doesn't hurt the Senators this season since they will be right at the 83.5M cap ceiling. With that said, it will likely hurt them sometime in the next four years.
The Flyers get out of LTI and free up additional cap space which can be used at the trade deadline to facilitate trades as a third team, or can be used to acquire cap dumps for draft picks. The rumour is that they like Joseph as a player, but want a major asset to take him. Ottawa taking Ellis is that major asset.
This trade heavily favours Philadelphia, and I highly doubt the Senators would do this unless they had no other option. It would almost be preferably to give up a protected 1st or Boucher and wipe their hands from the cap issues. Acquiring a big money LTIRetired contract with 4 years remaining will cause headaches down the line and the Ellis contract would likely cost more to move in terms of picks/prospects next year than the Joseph one does now.
The big difference between this contract and the Weber contract is that the Weber contract was owed very little real money (a few hundred k per season after insurance). That made it easy for the Knights to eventually dump. Ellis is owed a lot of money. We also don't know if he is insured. Even if he is insured, he will still be owed seven figures per season, which would not be easy to find a taker for in the future if the Senators want to get out of LTI.
Forum:
Trade Machine Proposals
25 sept. 2023 à 17 h 22
Sujet:
Joseph - Stanley Trade
The Senators don't need Stanley, unless Brannstrom or JBD is going the other way. Thomson will also be waiver eligible this season, although I could see him possibly going unclaimed.
A first is a fair ask for dumping Joseph right now, but I don't think the Senators will want to pay it. There are creative ways around opening up enough space to sign Pinto and roll with a 21 player roster. Especially if they can move one of Brannstrom or Kubalik without cap coming back. At that point, if they bury Joseph and Forsberg (temporarily), they can sign Pinto at 2.5M and ice a 21 player roster. If Norris is going to be LTIR eligible to start the season, it also makes it easier because they won't have to bury anybody until Norris is ready to return and they can run with a 23 player roster.
Forum:
NHL Signings
22 sept. 2023 à 13 h 10
Sujet:
Ottawa Senators signed Djibril Touré (3 Years / $805,000 AAV)
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CSStrowbridge</b></div><div>There's a limit to the number of contracts a team can have and I'm not sure why a team would use one of its six remaining contract slots on this player.</div></div>
The Senators only had 5 picks in the 2023 draft. Most of those were in the 7th round. Their earliest pick was in the 4th round. Additionally, they do not have a deep prospect pool. For a team that has come out of a long rebuild, they did not accrue the same level of prospects that most other teams do. They averaged about 7 picks per draft since the rebuild started in 2018. So it isn't as if the rebuild allowed them to restock the cupboards by all that much. They did an exceptional job at drafting a core of top-end players like Stutzle, Sanderson, Tkachuk, etc - but did not build up as much organizational depth as would usually be expected in a successful rebuild.
This is because they were unable to capitalize on their cap space due to the combination of a restrictive budget, and an owner who needed cash flow through ticket sales. Meaning, they couldn't go scorched earth. They had to make trades like a 2nd round pick for Derek Stepan, or make moves like holding on to Mark Stone and Matt Duchene throughout the season rather than trading them at the draft in their contract year, when they likely would have commanded the biggest return.
The short of it is, they are unlikely to have issues with their contract limit during the 3 year period of this contract because they simply don't have a higher-than-normal amount of players who will come from the reserve list and command ELCs. The Senators have nobody on their reserve list to sign until 2025.
On a side note, this is not a random signing. Toure played in Carleton-Place and Hawkesbury. Basically, in the Senators backyard. Who knows what his Junior career might have looked like if things weren't so fragmented due to COVID. Had the 2020-21 season not been cancelled, perhaps he would have ended up in the CHL earlier, and by extension maybe he ends up drafted. He is a late bloomer. It's a free 7th round pick basically.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
22 sept. 2023 à 10 h 3
Sujet:
Dorion Gets Creative
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Xspyrit</b></div><div>I agree that we can afford to trade Brannstrom because Kleven is coming up and fits more the team plans
However I disagree that he'd have negative value right now, his metrics last season were more than excellent, they have shown that he was actually too good for a 3rd pairing. And he proved it when Chabot was injured as he looked even better in games where he played more minutes
Did you know that he has averaged 24 pts per 82 games over the last 3 seasons, since he was 21 y/o? If he just adds a little bit offense he would become a very hot commodity as he just turned 24 y/o and is still on his RFA years
Pearson on the other hand only played 14 games last season and didn't have great production in the last 3 seasons. He's not very good defensively so he has to produces to have value</div></div>
The issue is that we are in the worst time all season to dump cap space. Less than a third of the league have the cap flexibility to add a 2M player. Out of those 10 or so teams, a few of them are budget teams. Which means even if they have the cap, they do not have the spending to back it up.
A team would give up an asset for Brannstrom at the trade deadline, since they could acquire him as either a rental (by not qualifying him) or a long term piece, and it is easier to fit in cap at the deadline. I don't think there would be a market for Brannstrom (or Kubalik for that matter) right now without cap coming back, because cap is too valuable and scarce. Cap coming back defeats the point, unless it is LTIRetired players that can be placed on LTIR to raise the Senators ceiling once they hit 83.4XX.
The above is the thinking behind Brannstrom and the ARZ trade. Yes, it would be much easier if it could just be Brannstrom to whoever for a draft pick, I just don't think that's likely.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
21 sept. 2023 à 11 h 55
Sujet:
Dorion Gets Creative
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Xspyrit</b></div><div>Soderstrom is still waivers exempt so that is a plus. If it makes it work with the cap then I'd be ok with this
I wanted to trade Brannstrom for a young forward but that could work as well, although the defense is already very crowded for now and the future
Also good for the Yotes because Brannstrom is quite good at this thing called hockey</div></div>
Brannstrom still has potential to be a very useful #4 defenceman. At worst, he's a bottom pairing defender who could PP the #1 unit on a less talented team, or a #2 unit on a good team. The reason he is expendable has more to do with Ottawa's team makeup than Brannstrom's trajectory.
He's probably worth a 3rd-4th round pick at the trade deadline, but he might have negative value right now. It's the most difficult possible time to move out salary cap. Look at how Vancouver just paid a 3rd round pick to move out Tanner Pearson on an expiring contract at a net cap of 1.45M (3.25M minus DeSmith's 1.8M hit going back to VAN).
Forum:
Armchair-GM
20 sept. 2023 à 20 h 34
Sujet:
Dorion Gets Creative
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Yotes269</b></div><div>The first paragraph is correct. The 2nd just explains what they already plan to do with söderstrom, plus he’s a rhd which is more valuable anyways. The trade doesn’t work for Arizona at all.</div></div>
As stated in my post, you can take Soderstrom out of the deal entirely, or replace him with another six figure depth D. Getting Soderstrom back is useful, but not the key component of the deal.
The main component for the Senators is moving out cap with only LTIR cap coming back.
The main component of the deal for Arziona is that it is 2.25M in money out, and 2.00M in money in. With the context being the 2.25M is to pay players not to play, while the 2M gives them a roster player. Additionally, since Brannstrom almost certainly makes their NHL roster, it's really only 1.25M+ in, because that means someone on a 2-way contract of 775k or more gets sent down to the AHL as Brannstrom takes their spot. So that's nearly a million in real money savings and they get a bottom pairing D/PP QB with some slight upside.
A more ideal trade for Ottawa would be Brannstrom somewhere for the best possible non-cap asset (even if that is only "future considerations"), but I don't think a team would take him at 2M. There just isn't much cap to go around right now.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
20 sept. 2023 à 16 h 30
Sujet:
Dorion Gets Creative
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Herb_Brooks</b></div><div>but the sens are the Canadian coyotes and are also cheap</div></div>
Sens are no longer a budget team. Which I miss in a way. Even Dorion recently commented on how they now don't have to account for sending 1-way contracts to the minors, because they have the spending power to do that sort of stuff without it negatively affecting them. (They have sent guys down in the past, but it's always been a big deal last resort sort of thing)
1
2
Suivant
Page 1
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com