PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
Salary Cap History
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports d’entrée en vigueur du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Coût par point
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Salaire retenu
Historique - Rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports d’entrée en vigueur du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Coût par point
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Salaire retenu
Historique - Rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
Salary Cap History
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
jr400
Membre depuis
20 juill. 2021
Messages dans les forums
226
Messages par jour
0.7
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
NHL
30 mars à 22 h 0
Sujet:
Fiala trades
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>A_Habs_fan</b></div><div>Fiala's still a good top 6 winger, even if the Wild are in cap hell and may not have the negotiating upper hand, I'd expect a 1st + prospect at least</div></div>
That’s probably about right. If Minnesota can’t find the cap space to sign him, which would be the only reason to trade him, they’ll want to get picks and/or prospects who won’t take much cap space. It’s a bit of a risk to take on an unsigned RFA who’s arbitration eligible, so that lowers his trade value unless the other team is confident they can sign him.
They could let somebody sign him to an offer sheet and take the draft pick compensation. I suspect he’ll sign for between $6,166,097 and $8,221,463, which would make it a 1st, a 2nd and a 3rd. That seems like a reasonable return, but the first won’t be protected so a non-playoff team probably wouldn’t take the chance. If they want to open up the market to more teams or try to get a player who’s closer to NHL ready, they can encourage other teams to negotiate with him and then come to them with a trade offer.
Forum:
NHL
30 mars à 21 h 19
Sujet:
Am I the only one who has trouble finding games on Hulu?
Last night’s game between Carolina and Tampa Bay was supposed to be on Hulu, but when I looked for it a few minutes after the 7:00 start time, I couldn’t find it on either of my TVs. One has a Roku, which I’ve never been able to find any games on. When I search for “NHL” or “hockey” on the Hulu app, I just see movies and TV shows about hockey, no live games. The other TV has a Fire stick. I could see games there, but I only saw future games. I couldn’t find last night’s game.
Any tips, other than signing up for ESPN+?
Forum:
NHL
30 mars à 21 h 10
Sujet:
Which of these two draft picks has the highest odds of becoming a first rounder?
I love the question. I don’t expect either team to win two rounds, but the Metro is close enough that I think it’s going to boil down to who gets hot at the right time, so I give the Rangers about a 1/4 chance. Minnesota may get an easier matchup than New York in the first round if they don’t drop into a wildcard spot, but then they’ll have to get by Colorado or a team that had to be at the top of their game to beat Colorado. I don’t think they can do that, so I’ll give the Rangers the edge on the A clause.
Now let’s look at the B clause. Unless Copp gets hurt he is going to play in 50% of the Rangers’ games. If Minnesota wins two rounds, that’ll be 8 team wins. I expect Fleury to be their starter, so he’ll most likely get at least 4 of them if he’s healthy, but I could see a scenario where Fleury loses a couple of games and they switch to Talbot and turn things around. Slight edge to Copp there too, so he get my vote.
Forum:
NHL Signings
29 mars à 9 h 51
Sujet:
Ottawa Senators signed Jake Sanderson (3 Years / $2,133,333 AAV)
It's great that they signed him, but I don't see much benefit to bringing him up to the NHL now. Let him stay in school.
Forum:
Trade Machine Proposals
29 mars à 9 h 41
Sujet:
Jets 20 Version Of The Hawerchuk Trade
A 29-year-old >PPG centre signed for two more years at $6.125M cap hit and even less than that in actual dollars has huge trade value. I don't think this is enough of a return for him. I've heard rumours about him possibly getting traded but I don't know why Winnipeg would want to do that unless they want to start a rebuild, but their core is still fairly young so I think a re-tool would make more sense.
Forum:
Trade Machine Proposals
29 mars à 9 h 28
Sujet:
I Wish - How Far Off
I think it's going to depend on Johnny Gaudreau. If he leaves, Calgary has to keep Tkachuk, and they should have the cap space to do it. If they have a chance to keep Gaudreau, it's going to be interesting. If they can only afford to keep one of them, I think they'd rather keep Tkachuk, but maybe they'd be better off keeping Gaudreau since they can trade Tkachuk and get something back for him whereas they'd get nothing for Gaudreau. Or maybe they keep both and trade Monahan and Lucic to Arizona (if they'll agree to go) along with some draft picks.
Forum:
Trade Machine Proposals
29 mars à 9 h 10
Sujet:
Fiala to Islanders
I know Minnesota has cap issues with the full impact of their buyouts kicking in next season, but I expect they'll do all they can to find a way to keep Fiala. If they do have to trade him, the fact that he's unsigned and arbitration eligible will reduce his trade value, so this might be a good return depending on how good a prospect Holmstrom is. (I don't know, other than that I can see he hasn't been putting up big numbers in the AHL.)
Forum:
Trade Machine Proposals
29 mars à 8 h 53
Sujet:
DeBrusk for Drouin
I see two problems with this trade:
1) Drouin at $5.5M cap hit is more of a liability than an asset. He hasn't played a full season since 2019, and he doesn't score much when he does play. The only thing he's got going for him is that he seems to produce in the playoffs. He only has one year left on his contract, which makes him less of a liability, but I don't see Boston being interested in him now. Maybe at next year's trade deadline if he's healthy. Montreal should hang onto him until then, because I think that'll be their best chance of getting something of value for him.
2) DeBrusk is signed for only 2 years, after which he can become a UFA. That makes him of little interest to a rebuilding team. To get maximum value for him, Boston will probably need to trade him to a team that at least expects to be in the playoffs.
Forum:
Trade Machine Proposals
29 mars à 8 h 33
Sujet:
vancouver rebuild
No way Calgary gets Miller for Monahan. That part is ridiculous. Take Calgary out of the trade and give Miller to Edmonton, and you might have something worth talking about. Even then, Edmonton gets only one year of Miller (unless they can extend him) for 8 years of Nurse and a first-round pick. That only makes sense for them if they want to dump Nurse's contract, which they just signed last summer. In that case, I think they'd have to find another taker, because the last thing Vancouver needs is another overpaid defenseman.
Forum:
Los Angeles Kings
26 mars à 20 h 3
Sujet:
Chychrun or Provorov for Los Angeles
I like both of them, but it seems that Provorov has been in decline for a few years. On the other hand, I wonder if Chychrun is going to turn out to be one of those guys that had one great season and could never get back to that level again. However, his best season is more recent than Provorov's, he's a bit younger, and he has a lower cap hit, so I'm voting for Chychrun. It may cost you more to get him though, so that would have to be taken into consideration too.
Forum:
Chicago Blackhawks
25 mars à 22 h 19
Sujet:
Thoughts on Hagel Trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CFMan</b></div><div>Everyone is praising Davidson for this but I'm feeling underwhelmed. The optics of this trade is an obvious win for Davidson, 2 firsts and 2 "young" prospects. Are Raddysh and Katchouk really considered prospects anymore? Hagel is younger than Raddysh, and is the same age as Katchouk, dont know why the beat writers are basically advertising them as 18/19/20 year olds. Both Katchouk and Raddysh have an ATOI of around 10 min (11 for Raddysh 9 for Katchouk) So theyre playing 4th line roles on a stacked lightning team. I guess the only explanation is that the Lightning are so skilled that these guys just cant move up but its kinda worrying they couldnt get bigger roles on the team considering TJ, Gourde, Coleman, Goodrow, idk who else but at least 4 forward roster positions opened up and their entire third line poof disappeared, so bigger opportunities were there and both players were unable to capitalize on it. Kind of makes you worry when a team like the lightning cant make the most of their cheap depth players but somehow the blundering hawks are supposed to turn them around? Not to mention that their Jfresh player cards didnt even look that good either, so theyre doing a job and they werent even doing a great job of it. The lightning are at least a top 5 team in the league if not THE top team so they have a really good chance of winning the cup this year and the next couple of years (2023/24 where the firsts are). So we are looking at late firsts in the range of 28-32 both years. So 2 VERY late firsts, essentially early seconds considering 31/32 were second round picks just years ago. In my eyes this looks like 2 seconds and 2 bottom 6ers for a middle 6 winger emerging as a top 6 player. Hagel on a TERRIBLE hawks team has been consistently good and will easily be a 50 (maybe more) point guy on TB easily.You could have had Hagel stay for the remainder of this contract and see where you're at in the rebuild and possibly make him a part of your success in the future. I dont know somebody talk me down from this and tell me Im wrong because I want to be.</div></div>
Sorry, I can’t say you’re wrong. I had many of the same thoughts as you on this trade. (See my comments on the trade forum.) I think it could work out for both teams but it has a better chance of working out for Tampa. If the Hawks had to trade Hagel, it’s a good return, but they didn’t have to trade him.
Forum:
Toronto Maple Leafs
25 mars à 22 h 7
Sujet:
Why Toronto has a hard time getting out of the 1st round
Yes, there are some concerns, and the odds may be against them with the juggernauts in their division (dropping into a wild-card spot and crossing over to the Metro wouldn’t be a cakewalk either), but if Gio fits in well and they get healthy and hot at the right time, they can beat anybody.
Forum:
NHL Trades
25 mars à 21 h 47
Sujet:
(MTL / CHI) - Shaw for draft picks
It's interesting to look back at a trade a few years later and see who the draft picks turned out to be, but I don't think you can judge a trade for draft picks by how good the players who were drafted became. Montreal didn't trade Alex Debrincat and Chad Krys for Andrew Shaw. They traded two second-round picks. One of them turned into a star for Chicago thanks to a combination of luck, good scouting, and the right environment for his development. The trade was made before the draft started, so nobody knew if Debrincat would even be available then, and if Montreal had kept the pick, maybe they would have taken somebody else and Chicago still would have got Debrincat with the other 2nd-round pick they owned.
Forum:
NHL Signings
25 mars à 17 h 53
Sujet:
Arizona Coyotes signed Karel Vejmelka (3 Years / $2,725,000 AAV)
Whenever I’ve seen him play he’s been great. Small sample size though.
Forum:
NHL Trades
25 mars à 17 h 35
Sujet:
Confirmed: (WSH / STL) 2016 1st round pick (28)/2016 3rd round pick (87) - for 2016 1st round pick (26)
St. Louis traded up two places to get Thompson, whose main value to them was being part of the package they traded for O’Reilly, but before he broke out this season, it looked like Thompson wasn’t going to amount to much, and the O’Reilly trade seemed like one of the most lopsided trades ever. If St. Louis had ended up with Johansen instead, I wonder if Buffalo would have taken the deal with Johansen instead of Thompson. Thompson had played some NHL games before the O’Reilly trade, but at that time they were both just prospects.
The other two players Buffalo got in that trade scored a total of 8 goals for Buffalo and went back to Europe, and to add insult to injury, because the Blues won the cup that year, the first-rounder Buffalo got pushed to the end of the round. (He’s still in college, so I guess he could still amount to something.) For a while it looked like the best player they were going to get out of it was Colin Miller, whom they acquired with the second-round pick.
Forum:
Toronto Maple Leafs
25 mars à 12 h 0
Sujet:
It is time to face the facts.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>PJ_Acorn</b></div><div>
Johnny must go now, not in the offseason. I fear the cost otherwise!</div></div>
I agree that of their top players, Tavares is probably the one who’s delivering the least value for the money, and as the oldest he would be the best one to move, but he’s not going anywhere anytime soon. He’s a local boy living his childhood dream of captaining the Leafs, and he made sure he got a contract that lets him live that dream for as long as he wants. No-move for the full duration, and most of the pay is in signing bonuses so it would save them only a few hundred thousand to buy him out. Those are the facts we have to face.
Forum:
NHL Trades
25 mars à 9 h 53
Sujet:
(OTT/BOS) - Brown and cond. 7th for Senyshyn and 5th
I just realized that Senyshyn is also a pending UFA, so that makes this a pretty insignificant trade. Boston gets a bit of insurance for almost no cost. Ottawa gets a small move up in the draft and a younger player they can test drive to see if they want to try to sign him for next year.
Forum:
NHL Trades
25 mars à 9 h 30
Sujet:
(ANA/VGK) - Kesler, Moore for Dadonov and 2nd Round Pick [REVERSED]
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div>Forfeiting the pick is clearly the right penalty -- otherwise, Las Vegas could work the same exact deal with another club not on Dadonov's NTC ten-team-no-trade list and suffer no consequences for having created this mess. In my opinion, the NHL should immediately put a freeze on this draft pick pending a final determination.</div></div>
A second-round pick doesn’t seem like a severe enough penalty if this was a deliberate attempt to circumvent the no-trade clause or Vegas should have known better. It’s unfair to the players involved, and also to the Ducks who might have been able to make a different trade if they knew this one wasn’t going to go through. It was good to see Dadonov welcomed back by the team and the fans and having a good game last night (even though I would really like to see Vegas miss the playoffs).
However, if what’s on CapFriendly is what’s in the CBA, it may not be clear whether the no-trade clause was voided when he was traded from Ottawa to Vegas:
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>anelson115</b></div><div>
- The clause can travel with the player even if he consents to being traded or is claimed on waivers
-- This requires that the acquiring team sign an addendum to the contract ensuring that the clause does in fact travel with the player (written by the player's agent)
-- If the acquiring team refuses to sign the addendum, and the player waives his clause anyway, at that point the clause may be nullified
</div></div>
If Vegas signed the addendum, then it’s clear that the clause still applies, but this doesn’t say what happens if there’s no addendum and the player was traded without having to waive the clause. (If Vegas wasn’t on Dadonov’s no-trade list, Ottawa could have traded him there without him waiving the clause.)
I don’t know if that’s what happened – Elliotte Friedman’s tweet does talk about paperwork being filed – but in any case, there should be an investigation, and if it turns out Vegas was at fault rather than it being due to an ambiguity in the CBA, there should be some penalty. I think it should be at least a first-round pick.
Forum:
NHL Trades
25 mars à 8 h 31
Sujet:
(DAL/ARI) - conditional 4th for Wedgewood
An under the radar deadline deal, but he's probably the player who's made the biggest contribution to his new team so far. I changed my vote based on last night's game in Carolina. He won the game for them. 44 saves including 18 in a scoreless first period. Maybe Oettinger could have done the same thing, but he can't play every game. If the Stars make the playoffs by a point or two, then last night's game makes it a good trade even if he does nothing the rest of the season.
The fact that he was a waiver claim a few months ago is not relevant to this trade because he wasn't going to be available on waivers this time, though if Arizona can take advantage of their low position in the standings to claim guys on waivers and then trade them to teams higher in the standings, good for them. When they claimed Harri Sateri I was surprised that they didn't trade him back to Toronto for a draft pick.
Forum:
NHL Trades
24 mars à 22 h 1
Sujet:
(TOR/PHI) - Menell for future considerations
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LeafsForLife</b></div><div>Future Considerations has to be something, so the real loser here is the Wild.</div></div>
Does future considerations actually have to be something? Is anybody keeping track? Can Dubas call up Fletcher in August and say, “hey Chuck, remember those future considerations from March? I want ‘em now,”, and then Fletcher says, “sorry Kyle, when I said ‘future’ I meant farther in the future, like next year, or maybe the year after?”
Once Carolina traded a player to Florida for future considerations, then the next day Florida traded a different player to Carolina for future considerations. Did one player deserve more consideration than the other, or did Carolina get back their own future considerations? Wouldn’t that be past considerations? How come we don’t see anybody getting traded for past considerations?
Forum:
NHL Signings
23 mars à 20 h 32
Sujet:
Arizona Coyotes signed Jack McBain (2 Years / $1,350,000 AAV)
So he refused to sign with Minnesota because he wanted to go to Arizona?
Forum:
NHL Trades
23 mars à 12 h 54
Sujet:
(OTT/VAN) - 3rd for Hamonic
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Danny12357</b></div><div>What makes this funnier is that I was texting a friend about how this made no sense for Ottawa as it is, but even less when it's likely Dermott moves for similar value. I mean why not take a flier on a younger D man for half the money and hope for some upside. Then Vancouver reveals the master stroke of swapping Hamonic for Dermott at essentially no net cost, while also saving $1.5M on the cap next year.
It kind of reminds me of the deal where San Jose flipped Hoffman back to the east. Vancouver just made it very obvious how bad this deal was for Ottawa within minutes.</div></div>
Yeah, this is a weird one. Those of you who are suggesting that Ottawa would have been better off to trade the pick for Dermott instead of Hamonic are assuming that they had the opportunity to do that. I think GMs have their favourite trading partners and probably don’t call every other GM in the league before they make a deal. Dorion may not have known that Dermott was available for a mid-3rd-rounder.
A couple of other pieces of trivia around this that some of you might find mildly entertaining:
1) Vancouver got back their own 2022 third-round pick from Ottawa, but the pick they sent to Toronto isn’t the same 2022 third-round pick. It’s Winnipeg’s. Based on today’s standings, that would be exactly one pick after Vancouver’s, so if that holds, not only did Vancouver exchange Hamonic for Dermott, they also moved up one spot in the draft.
2) Both of these picks were traded for Nate Schmidt at different times. Vancouver traded their pick to Vegas to get Schmidt, then a year later flipped him to Winnipeg for their pick. Since these picks are going to be pretty close to equal, they got a year of Schmidt for nothing (other than his salary).
Forum:
NHL Trades
23 mars à 12 h 16
Sujet:
(ANA/VGK) - Kesler, Moore for Dadonov and 2nd Round Pick [REVERSED]
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>anelson115</b></div><div>This comes from the CapFriendly FAQ section on the CBA, and applies to NMCs and NTCs:
- The clause can travel with the player even if he consents to being traded or is claimed on waivers
-- This requires that the acquiring team sign an addendum to the contract ensuring that the clause does in fact travel with the player (written by the player's agent)
-- If the acquiring team refuses to sign the addendum, and the player waives his clause anyway, at that point the clause may be nullified
- If the player is traded before the clause takes effect, the acquiring team can opt to void the clause
Seems to me that the issue is with the last bullet point - specifically, whether or not Dadonov's M-NTC was in effect prior to being traded to Vegas by Ottawa. If it was, there may also be an issue with the first bullet point - did Dadonov and Vegas sign an addendum stating that his M-NTC would carry over? I'm not an expert in this, so I might be wrong, but this is how I see it. Will be interesting to see how it plays out as this may set a precedence for the league going forward.
Hope this helps!</div></div>
That is helpful. Thanks.
Looking at Dadonov’s contract details, CapFriendly says the no-trade clause applied to all three years of the contract, so the clause was in effect when he was traded to Vegas. That rules out the last bullet point and takes us to the first point. The question is what happened, or what should have happened, when he became Vegas property. It sounds like Vegas would have had to sign the addendum for his no-trade clause to continue to apply. I don’t know if they signed it, but you’d think they’d know if they did, so let’s assume they didn’t. In that case, it’s not clear to me from this FAQ what would happen. It says, “if the acquiring team refuses to sign the addendum, and the player waives his clause anyway, at that point the clause may be nullified.” However, if Vegas wasn’t on Dadonov’s no-trade list, he could have been traded without waiving the clause – Ottawa did not need his consent to trade him to a team that wasn’t on the no-trade list. So if he didn’t waive the clause, does that mean it wouldn’t be nullified even if Vegas never signed the addendum?
I just noticed that CapFriendly is now showing Dadonov back on Vegas, so I guess the trade has been nullified. That must mean that Dadonov’s no-trade clause was still in effect, and Anaheim was on his no-trade list. I guess either Vegas forgot they signed the addendum, or they didn’t sign it, but the answer to the question in the last sentence of the paragraph above is yes, and Vegas didn’t know that the clause would still be in effect if he didn’t have to waive it to be traded from Ottawa to Vegas. (I’m giving them the benefit of a doubt and assuming this was an honest mistake, and not a deliberate attempt to try to trade a player to a team on his no-trade list.)
As my high school physics teacher used to say, now that you’re thoroughly confused, carry on.
Forum:
NHL Trades
22 mars à 23 h 7
Sujet:
(MIN/SEA) - Rask for future considerations
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JayTea</b></div><div>He's an expiring contract and the Wild didn't need the cap space to make any further deals. Deal was purely about giving Rask a chance to play in the NHL for the rest of the season with Seattle's roster being trimmed down from the TDL.</div></div>
Exactly. Fitting that he goes back to the GM who signed him to that contract. A decent move by the Wild giving him a chance to get back into the NHL.
Forum:
NHL Trades
22 mars à 22 h 58
Sujet:
(ANA/VGK) - Kesler, Moore for Dadonov and 2nd Round Pick [REVERSED]
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TheBoyDuddus</b></div><div>Word is that the deal is likely going to be voided.</div></div>
I thought if a team traded for a player, they didn’t have to honor his no-trade clause after that.
I heard that the NHLPA is looking into it. That makes sense since they are there to protect the players, but are they doing this on their own initiative, or did Dadonov ask them to? It seems to me that it should be up to Dadonov to file a grievance, otherwise the trade should stand. That being said, if Vegas ignored his no-trade list, even if they did so unintentionally, they should be punished for that. That’s a bad faith move.
1
2
Suivant
Page 1