SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Brodie Out

Créé par: bhunt333
Équipe: 2023-24 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 11 sept. 2023
Publié: 11 sept. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Höglander, Nils
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (VAN)
2.
CBJ
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (NYI)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de VAN
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2026
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 500 000 $82 822 283 $0 $0 $677 717 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
AD, C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 550 000 $3 550 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
766 667 $766 667 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 150 000 $4 150 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 687 500 $4 687 500 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
11 sept. 2023 à 8 h 17
#1
Let Him Cook
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 4,011
Mentions "j'aime": 962
this isnt bad, i like both hog and peeke alot, but i doubt brodie waives for the nucks.
11 sept. 2023 à 8 h 24
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 6,866
Mentions "j'aime": 2,585
WTF does CBJ who's had issues attracting and retaining players consider trading Peeke after just extending him before he's played a second of the extension? F***ING brilliant idea to kneecap themselves.
Boltsradynasty et palhal a aimé ceci.
11 sept. 2023 à 8 h 36
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 3,782
Mentions "j'aime": 1,257
Brodie >>Peeke; huge downgrade to D
CD282 a aimé ceci.
11 sept. 2023 à 8 h 38
#4
Rip
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 11,935
Mentions "j'aime": 3,166
Quoting: Boltsbeathabs
WTF does CBJ who's had issues attracting and retaining players consider trading Peeke after just extending him before he's played a second of the extension? F***ING brilliant idea to kneecap themselves.


Who cares, he's brutal. TO wouldn't ever make this trade
CD282 a aimé ceci.
11 sept. 2023 à 8 h 40
#5
Miss YA Killer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 3,897
Mentions "j'aime": 1,475
Modifié 11 sept. 2023 à 8 h 46
Quoting: MitchJr
Brodie >>Peeke; huge downgrade to D


Peekie 8 years younger 2+ million cheaper and marginally worse Toronto is better off , however Jarmo is moron to do this.
Boltsbeathabs a aimé ceci.
11 sept. 2023 à 8 h 41
#6
Miss YA Killer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 3,897
Mentions "j'aime": 1,475
Quoting: RipNasty
Who cares, he's brutal. TO wouldn't ever make this trade


Ahhh "Mr. Toronto isn't completely fleecing someone so it's a horrible trade for them speaks.". Shut up homer.
11 sept. 2023 à 8 h 52
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 145
Mentions "j'aime": 130
Quoting: Boltsbeathabs
WTF does CBJ who's had issues attracting and retaining players consider trading Peeke after just extending him before he's played a second of the extension? F***ING brilliant idea to kneecap themselves.


Jackets have Boqvist, Severson, Peeke, Gudbranson Blankenburg all on the right side who are NHL level D. Jiricek is basically ready. Cuelemans and others are in the pipeline ready to take over in the future.
11 sept. 2023 à 9 h 3
#8
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2023
Messages: 1,865
Mentions "j'aime": 363
Please no
11 sept. 2023 à 9 h 25
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 6,866
Mentions "j'aime": 2,585
Quoting: hopefullynextyear
Jackets have Boqvist, Severson, Peeke, Gudbranson Blankenburg all on the right side who are NHL level D. Jiricek is basically ready. Cuelemans and others are in the pipeline ready to take over in the future.


So ,they as a team struggling to attract and retain players trades away one who just resigned and has yet to play a second of the extension? That's a Brilliant idea to attract future players to sign/resign there . Absolutely Brilliant move by Jarmo🙄. They may trade a RD,but it won't be Severson or Peeke
squashmaple a aimé ceci.
11 sept. 2023 à 9 h 28
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 6,866
Mentions "j'aime": 2,585
Quoting: RipNasty
Who cares, he's brutal. TO wouldn't ever make this trade


Keep deluding yourself.
11 sept. 2023 à 9 h 36
#11
not a he )
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 3,373
Mentions "j'aime": 4,695
Quoting: hopefullynextyear
Jackets have Boqvist, Severson, Peeke, Gudbranson Blankenburg all on the right side who are NHL level D. Jiricek is basically ready. Cuelemans and others are in the pipeline ready to take over in the future.


So they should give them away? Nah. It's not a charity for richer franchises who couldn't be bothered to build the right side of the defenses.

Babcock is already enamored of Peeke, plus what Boltsbeathabs said. He's going nowhere.
11 sept. 2023 à 9 h 49
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 2,665
Mentions "j'aime": 1,176
Canucks pass. Hoggys a keeper.IMHO.
11 sept. 2023 à 9 h 53
#13
Rip
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 11,935
Mentions "j'aime": 3,166
Quoting: Boltsbeathabs
Keep deluding yourself.


Deluding? Show me anything that makes Peeke look good?
11 sept. 2023 à 9 h 57
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 145
Mentions "j'aime": 130
Quoting: squashmaple
So they should give them away? Nah. It's not a charity for richer franchises who couldn't be bothered to build the right side of the defenses.

Babcock is already enamored of Peeke, plus what Boltsbeathabs said. He's going nowhere.


No clue how that was your takeaway from my response. I was stating why there is a need to move RD and Peeke is one of the potential moves.
CD282 a aimé ceci.
11 sept. 2023 à 10 h 2
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 145
Mentions "j'aime": 130
Quoting: Boltsbeathabs
So ,they as a team struggling to attract and retain players trades away one who just resigned and has yet to play a second of the extension? That's a Brilliant idea to attract future players to sign/resign there . Absolutely Brilliant move by Jarmo🙄. They may trade a RD,but it won't be Severson or Peeke


Geaudreau, Severson, Werenski, Gudbranson all have signed significant deals to be part of the team. Laine made it clear he wants to stick around. The narrative of people not wanting to stay is old. PLD already wanted out of a second team. Jones is about the only legitimate one. Josh Anderson and bobrovsky were moved both got paid way more than they were worth. Duchene always wanted to go to Nashville and was brought in solely as a rental. Atkinson wanted to stay, but it was time for leadership change.

I do agree with the thinking that Boqvist is probably going to be the one to be moved, but I don't think the recent extension is the determining factor in the trade.
11 sept. 2023 à 10 h 9
#16
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 60,251
Mentions "j'aime": 23,113
As suggest above it's a bad move by CBJ, though I'm not that impressed by Peeke. Hoglander can't secure a spot with Canucks, don't know why he could with the Leafs.
Trading Brodie and his M NTC certainly is problematic.
11 sept. 2023 à 10 h 13
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 6,866
Mentions "j'aime": 2,585
Quoting: hopefullynextyear
Geaudreau, Severson, Werenski, Gudbranson all have signed significant deals to be part of the team. Laine made it clear he wants to stick around. The narrative of people not wanting to stay is old. PLD already wanted out of a second team. Jones is about the only legitimate one. Josh Anderson and bobrovsky were moved both got paid way more than they were worth. Duchene always wanted to go to Nashville and was brought in solely as a rental. Atkinson wanted to stay, but it was time for leadership change.

I do agree with the thinking that Boqvist is probably going to be the one to be moved, but I don't think the recent extension is the determining factor in the trade.


Werenski wasn't getting what he got elsewhere. Severson IMO the same. Who else was giving Laine 8.7+ the picks required? No one so, he took the money.
11 sept. 2023 à 10 h 46
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 6,866
Mentions "j'aime": 2,585
Modifié 11 sept. 2023 à 10 h 52
Quoting: RipNasty
Deluding? Show me anything that makes Peeke look good?


Show me one time where you thought a trade was slanted in favor of Toronto and said so. You're a laffs homer every team is supposed to bow down and kiss the ring of the Superior Laffs according to you. Ohh, but wait they're not superior, superior teams win more than one playoff round every 20 years , Superior teams wins Cups atleast a couple of times in 57 years.

He's younger cheaper and a solid player I know bad numbers last year. CBJ was a complete s***show everyone had bad numbers. I will give you credit for consistency you truly believe everything should be done to accommodate the leafs🙄. Absolutely delusional.
11 sept. 2023 à 10 h 52
#19
Bulklav Jr.Star 03
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 1,752
Mentions "j'aime": 262
Cbj could move a right Dman they have four that can play peeke, boqvist, gudbranson, severson
11 sept. 2023 à 10 h 56
#20
Rip
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 11,935
Mentions "j'aime": 3,166
Quoting: Boltsbeathabs
Show me one time where you thought a trade was slanted in favor of Toronto and said so. You're a laffs homer every team is supposed to bow down and kiss the ring of the Superior Laffs according to you. Ohh, but wait they're not superior, superior teams win more than one playoff round every 20 years , Superior teams wins Cups atleast a couple of times in 57 years.


I only comment on really bad deals. Both ways. I have and will continue to say trades are bad if they are one sided.

However let's just breakdown this conversation we are having.

The above trades are bad for TO. Brodie is light-years better than Peeke. No one can say otherwise. Literally nothing but mountains of evidence to support that fact. Hoglander is a small player who can't make it in Vancouver, he isn't the type of player TO needs and if one makes it, it'll be Robertson.

Your response is to attack me for being a homer without offering any but insults and lazy chirps against the leafs.

That is the work of a small person lashing out to make yourself feel good. It's just sad.
11 sept. 2023 à 10 h 58
#21
Rip
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 11,935
Mentions "j'aime": 3,166
Quoting: MaxBorjshlapsky
Cbj could move a right Dman they have four that can play peeke, boqvist, gudbranson, severson


Well 2 of those are pretty awful, Gudbranson has one of the worst contracts in the game and Peeke was absolutely destroyed all last season. Not much to target for a contender.
11 sept. 2023 à 11 h 28
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 3,782
Mentions "j'aime": 1,257
Quoting: Boltsradynasty
Peekie 8 years younger 2+ million cheaper and marginally worse Toronto is better off , however Jarmo is moron to do this.


Brodie >> Peeke, not even close. Who cares if he’s younger (cheaper would help given our cap constraints) - our window is open now.
11 sept. 2023 à 12 h 39
#23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 6,866
Mentions "j'aime": 2,585
Quoting: RipNasty
I only comment on really bad deals. Both ways. I have and will continue to say trades are bad if they are one sided.

However let's just breakdown this conversation we are having.

The above trades are bad for TO. Brodie is light-years better than Peeke. No one can say otherwise. Literally nothing but mountains of evidence to support that fact. Hoglander is a small player who can't make it in Vancouver, he isn't the type of player TO needs and if one makes it, it'll be Robertson.

Your response is to attack me for being a homer without offering any but insults and lazy chirps against the leafs.

That is the work of a small person lashing out to make yourself feel good. It's just sad.


Peeke is younger 2.25 million cheaper just signed. His numbers were bad but everyone had horrible numbers for CBJ last season his numbers were decent prior.
Toronto HAS TO SHED CAP!! Their 2-3 constant nagging injuries from being completely F***ed

Ok I'm picking on you🙄
11 sept. 2023 à 12 h 50
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 10,376
Mentions "j'aime": 9,530
Canucks pass. No cap space and not giving up that much for Brodie
11 sept. 2023 à 12 h 55
#25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 1,531
Mentions "j'aime": 1,063
Canucks easily decline. Don't have the cap space for Brodie and even if we did, we aren't giving up a young promising forward for an old rental defenceman.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage