PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
Epic_Ninja_Dude
Membre depuis
14 févr. 2022
Équipe favorite
Canucks de Vancouver
Messages dans les forums
1515
Messages par jour
1.9
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 avr. à 3 h 37
Sujet:
Ideal set up for next year
Don't think the Canucks would be interested in Faulk at all. In the end I think they'll talk some sense into Hronek and he'll resign (same as Petey where people were talking 12M+, then he took significantly less than expected). Assuming they did trade him, Faulk doesn't really fit the mold of the team. The new management group has been very clear since coming in that they're focused on acquiring younger talent who fit the timeline of their current core. In two and a half years, Rutherford and Allvin have only added two players on the wrong side of 30, Cole and DeSmith, and both were on 1 year deals to fill a major hole. Faulk, given his age and more importantly his term, just doesn't fit in with the clear vision management has for this team. I could maybe see them being interested if Faulk had one year, they didn't like any of the FA options or other trade market options, and the price was right, but I just don't think Faulk would fit in with the type of player Rutherford and Allvin have been looking to add to the Canucks core.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
7 avr. à 3 h 21
Sujet:
Next season
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mv21227</b></div><div>Laughably bad offer for Miller
Canucks counter with Mikheyev and Soucy for Suzuki</div></div>
It's a terrible offer for Miller, and Mikheyev and Soucy for Suzuki is the exact same equivalent I thought of when I saw that Miller deal too!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
5 avr. à 16 h 7
Sujet:
Hronek
Can’t see the Canucks being interested in that, it doesn’t fit their needs. I’d be hesitant to deal Boeser for Marner 1 for 1, let alone add a 1st and Hronek on top. Yes, Marner is an upgrade on Boeser, but he’s not enough of an upgrade to justify paying nearly twice the salary with Vancouver’s current cap situation. This deal would fill the need for a top 6 winger, but would leave a much bigger hole on the defence with only about $8M in cap space to sign 3 top 4 defencemen. With the current market, you’d be insanely lucky to get even 2 guys with that cap space, getting 3 isn’t even a possibility.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 avr. à 13 h 7
Sujet:
Marner for Hronek
Can’t see the Canucks being interested in this. The deal would leave them with like $8M in cap space to sign 3 top 4 defencemen, they’d be lucky to even get two with that amount of money. The hole in the top 6 would be fixed, but it would make a much bigger hole on the defence.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 avr. à 13 h 2
Sujet:
CanesCanucks
If that’s all it takes to sign Hronek, then the Canucks will pay him that. If they move him, he’s getting $8M x 8 absolute bare minimum, might be closer to $8.5M even.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
1 avr. à 17 h 54
Sujet:
Trades
Canucks easily decline. Lekkerimaki is a top prospect and is untouchable, they aren't trading him for a late first and two fringe NHLers who can't stay healthy for more than 20 games in a season.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
30 mars à 1 h 43
Sujet:
stanley cup champions
Canucks would rather sign Zadorov or Cole than give up assets for a worse player in Kulak.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
28 mars à 18 h 7
Sujet:
Offseason
Canucks will give you Mikheyev alone for that package. Hronek won't get moved, but if he did, the Canucks wouldn't trade him for a package that isn't even worth half of what they gave up to get him, especially after he's had a career year no less.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
27 mars à 15 h 51
Sujet:
A Fun Offseason
You want a breakout winger closing in on 40 goals with a near PPG pace, and all you're willing to give up is a conditional 2nd and a 3rd pairing defenceman. Canucks will give you Mikheyev or maybe Garland for that offer. Boeser isn't available to begin with, but certainly not for such an underpay.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
27 mars à 15 h 45
Sujet:
Hronek to the Caps
Hronek is having a career year, so why on earth would the Canucks trade him for less than half of what they paid to get him? That deal makes absolutely no sense, there's no reason to be selling Hronek, let alone for a massive underpay.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
23 mars à 19 h 16
Sujet:
nuckn
I wouldn't give up future considerations alone for that package with Gallagher even at 50% retention, let alone give up a 1st pair defenceman who is part of one of the best pairs in the league.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
17 mars à 1 h 56
Sujet:
Next season
Canucks give up Hronek for less than they paid despite the fact he's having a career year. Where is the logic behind that? (Hint, there isn't any, Allvin laughs and hangs up after not even considering that offer)
Forum:
Armchair-GM
14 mars à 18 h 45
Sujet:
Markstrom Quinn Hughes and Cole Caufield
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dgibb10</b></div><div>And from NJDs perspective it would presumably have to start around Hamilton.
Which means it would likely be no trade to be made. Unless Quinn Hughes demands a trade to NJD (not realistic at all). And then obviously in that case NJD would probably get a bargain with no other option. And even in that case there’s no trade protection on Quinn’s contract so he can’t exactly control his destination (Jack interestingly has no trade protection either)
But for the sake of stupidity:
Hamilton (50% retained)+1st for Quinn
4 years of Hamilton at 4.5 mill vs 3 years of Quinn at 7.85, and NJD chucks on a top 10 1st.
Quinn is still very valuable even at an effective hit of 13.8 mill for us (7.85x3+4.5x4= 41.55 /3 =13.8). And then the hope is to get him retained.
Hamilton at 4.5 mill would be an absolute bargain, and then a 1st on top.
I put approximately 10 seconds of thought into that so it’s still probably ridiculous</div></div>
Realistically, I can't see Hughes asking for a trade, but beyond that in the absurdly unlikely scenario he did the Devils and Canucks don't make sense as trade partners. The only possible scenario I can see Hughes wanting out is to play with his brothers, in which case the Devils know he wants to be there and won't give up a fortune for him. Canucks would be best off shipping him elsewhere for a much better return than the Devils would be willing to give up.
Canucks would probably want the price to start with either Hischier or Nemec, Devils wouldn't give up either for a guy who at that point they'd think 95% certain they can have for free in a few years. The two teams just don't line up as trade partners, as either the Devils are way overpaying for a guy who wants to play for them and only them, or the Canucks are selling way low on a guy they can get a lot more for elsewhere.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 mars à 2 h 43
Sujet:
Leafs Trade Nylander To Vancouver In Deadline Blockbuster
Canucks decline on account of the salary cap existing. Acquiring Nylander would force us to either lose one of our stars in Petey/Miller or lose all of our depth, either way it doesn't make sense for Vancouver cause it would completely screw up the structure of the team.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 mars à 2 h 41
Sujet:
1B Goalie and Depth D
Canucks easily decline. They were targeting Zadorov for over a year before they finally got him, they aren't gonna give him away for free now. They're also a top team in the league and they aren't selling.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
7 mars à 23 h 35
Sujet:
FLEECE
Wonder if the Pens fans will finally believe us that they aren't getting a Lekkerimaki or a Nikishin for Guentzel.
Great piece of work by Carolina though, I assumed it'd be a pretty crazy price by the reports. I was happy the Canucks dropped out based on the reported ask, but I'm kind of disappointed now seeing how underwhelming that return is.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
7 mars à 15 h 34
Sujet:
Canucks
Canucks wouldn’t give up Lekkerimaki for Guentzel, why on earth would they give him up for that package. Savard isn’t an upgrade on Myers, it’s a wash at best, and Matheson would only be a minor upgrade on Zadorov given his stats would fall off in Vancouver due to a massive drop in ice time and playing under a new system that wouldn’t fit his play style at all. Canucks would rather just keep Zadorov over Matheson anyways, his play style fits Tocchet’s system much better and he provides a skill set that no one else has, whereas Matheson wouldn’t fit the system and we already have two similar but much better players in Hughes and Hronek.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
7 mars à 14 h 14
Sujet:
according to the rumors
And according to the rumours the Canucks have dropped out of the Guentzel race presumably because of the absurd asking price. They're now pursing Toffoli.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 mars à 13 h 53
Sujet:
Realistic TDL
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TheAlien</b></div><div>If the Cap can pay the bonus I'd do it but I'm not sure they're allowed</div></div>
Bonuses are paid as they are met, and since Pacioretty has already met all his bonuses, they've all been paid. The bonuses are then counted towards the teams salary cap the next season, and I'd assume since WSH paid the bonuses they'd also get stuck with the cap hit from them, though being traded could move the bonus overage to the new team (not exactly sure how that part works).
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 mars à 13 h 47
Sujet:
This Is Where The Fun Begins
Can't see the Canucks parting with either of those pieces, especially for a rental.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 mars à 13 h 41
Sujet:
Deep gloves n Mitts
Canucks decline. They have no reason to trade Zadorov for less than they gave up for him. They had been targeting him for a long time and like his style of play, it would take significantly more than they gave up to pry him away, not less.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 mars à 3 h 1
Sujet:
goodbye buch
When are fans of both teams gonna give this deal up? Blues should be keeping Buchnevich, it would take a massive haul to pry him away from them. Willander is untouchable, and the Canucks aren't giving up the kind of haul it would take to pry Buch away. It doesn't make sense for either side, every Buch deal is either the Blues selling way to cheap to get an offer that would actually interest the Canucks or the Canucks mortgaging their entire future and moving multiple assets they've stated are untouchable for a single player.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 mars à 21 h 2
Sujet:
Who Says No
Canucks definitely decline. Hughes is easily a top 5, arguably top 3 defenceman in the league. There chance Nemec becomes as good as Hughes is probably less than 1%, he'll be great bust absolute best case scenario is they're even. Chances are Nemec becomes a good to great top 4 defenceman, but he won't be Hughes. Giving up the surefire top 3 defenceman for a chance at getting one back doesn't make any sense, when the odds are that guy doesn't even reach Hughes' potential. Getting a late 1st doesn't come close to moving the needle on that front, the chances that pick turns into an impact player are already not great.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 mars à 20 h 58
Sujet:
Trades for Jake
Don't think the Canucks would be willing to do that. Hoglander has been great this year, and will be expected to step up into a more prominent role next year. Getting a potential top 6 forward on a bargain $1M contract will be a major asset for a cap strapped team in Vancouver. Lekkerimaki is also untouchable, only possible situation I can see the Canucks trading him is in a deal for a under 25 top pairing right-handed defenceman with term.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 mars à 0 h 16
Sujet:
TDL action
Doubt the Canucks would be interested in giving up assets for a guy who wouldn't make their top 6 and would be an overpaid 7th d
1
2
Suivant
Page 1
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com