SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Re-build starts this deadline

Créé par: rb1481
Équipe: 2021-22 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 7 févr. 2022
Publié: 7 févr. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Lots of options, only a few of which will actually be anywhere close to happening. Sets the Habs up to get Shane Wright in the draft. Next year Price will be back healthy, Harris will be added to the 3rd pair on D, and some younger UFA's are added to help short term and long time - Hampus Lindholm 6x$6, Leddy 4x$4, Perron 3x$4, Forsberg 7x$7. Look to move Drouin in the offseason.

Sets up next year for this:
Forsberg-Suzuki-Anderson
Zadina-Dvorak-Caufield
Perron-Wright-Kravtsov
Byron-Evans-Hoffman
Poehling

LIndholm-Edmundson
Romanov-Leddy
Harris-Savard

Price
Allen
Transactions
1.
MTL
  1. Afanasyev, Egor
  2. L'Heureux, Zachary
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (NSH)
2.
MTL
  1. Barron, Justin
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (COL)
COL
  1. Chiarot, Ben (1 750 000 $ retained)
3.
MTL
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2022 (EDM)
4.
5.
MTL
  1. Pelletier, Jakob
  2. Zadorov, Nikita
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (CGY)
6.
MTL
  1. Schnarr, Nathan
  2. Thompson, Tyce
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (NJD)
7.
MTL
  1. Zadina, Filip
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (DET)
8.
MTL
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2022 (FLA)
FLA
  1. Kulak, Brett (700 000 $ retained)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de CAR
Logo de NSH
Logo de CGY
Logo de MTL
Logo de DET
Logo de MTL
Logo de ANA
Logo de CAR
Logo de NJD
Logo de MTL
Logo de TBL
Logo de MTL
Logo de EDM
Logo de MTL
Logo de FLA
Logo de MTL
Logo de STL
2023
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de COL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
2024
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2081 500 000 $51 073 308 $597 561 $3 175 000 $30 426 692 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance537 500 $$538K)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
880 833 $880 833 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
917 831 $917 831 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
875 000 $875 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
880 833 $880 833 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance637 500 $$638K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
761 250 $761 250 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
950 000 $950 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 857 143 $7 857 143 $
DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 875 000 $2 875 000 $
G
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
7 févr. 2022 à 13 h 17
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,084
Mentions "j'aime": 7,766
In before the Wings fans.

popcorn
OldNYIfan et ricochetii a aimé ceci.
7 févr. 2022 à 13 h 19
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 7,654
Mentions "j'aime": 5,236
No one on MTL's roster is worth that return from NSH.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
7 févr. 2022 à 13 h 21
#3
Representing the 505
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,501
Mentions "j'aime": 3,686
Avs say no - there is no reason for them to trade Barron for Chiarot.
Xqb15a, ArakinSkywalker, OldNYIfan and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
7 févr. 2022 à 13 h 24
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2016
Messages: 289
Mentions "j'aime": 22
Except Chiarot can help them win the cup this year, and Barron cannot.
7 févr. 2022 à 13 h 26
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 290
Mentions "j'aime": 144
The picks/prospects are on the wrong side in the NSH and DET deals.
7 févr. 2022 à 13 h 28
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,441
Mentions "j'aime": 9,076
Quoting: rb1481
Except Chiarot can help them win the cup this year, and Barron cannot.


That’s a lie, Chiarot sucks and Barron could play just as well on the 3rd pairing considering COL 3rd pairing get about 13 minutes. But roll with the patented MTL answer of why teams will over pay. COL doesn’t want or need a guy like Chiarot. Easy easy no, you don’t trade a guy you project into a top 4 roll in 2 seasons for a rental that doesn’t fit what you do at all. You tried to show horn a trade that doesn’t work for COL because you wanted to add Barron.
OldNYIfan et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
7 févr. 2022 à 13 h 30
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 10,168
Mentions "j'aime": 9,400
Everyone declines except maybe NYR, Florida, and Edmonton
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
7 févr. 2022 à 13 h 32
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
i would rather play Barron over Chiarot anyday of the week. Barron can skate and move the puck, Chiarot can not
NMAvsFan, mokumboi, OldNYIfan and 2 others a aimé ceci.
7 févr. 2022 à 13 h 43
#9
Representing the 505
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,501
Mentions "j'aime": 3,686
Quoting: rb1481
Except Chiarot can help them win the cup this year, and Barron cannot.


Oh, well, in that case, I'll take your word for it and give you a 20 y/o D with top 4 potential and can skate very well that could play right now for your 30 y/o D that's a 5/6 and isn't playing well. Seems like a good deal.
mokumboi, OldNYIfan, Xqb15a and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
7 févr. 2022 à 13 h 56
#10
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 29,324
Mentions "j'aime": 11,371
Oh dear, and it just gets worse when you read the description.
OldNYIfan, CD282 et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
7 févr. 2022 à 14 h 8
#11
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,473
Mentions "j'aime": 25,370
I highly doubt that Nashville would trade any one of those assets for Brendan Gallagher, let alone any two, let alone all three.

Calgary and Detroit have instantaneous No's. Colorado and New Jersey take a second or two longer.

Toffoli is a decent player on a reasonable contract. But Calgary fans have seen the Pelletier-and-a-first proposal (with or without something extra) for him many times, and all of them have universally objected to it.

Detroit might, just might, be interested in Petry, cheap. But neither the second nor Zadina is "cheap."

Colorado isn't going to exchange a future top-4 defense prospect for a quarter of a season of Chiarot.

Armia might be worth a fourth. He has 5 points in 32 games; Carl Grundstrom has 6 goals and 9 points in 28 in less playing time.
7 févr. 2022 à 14 h 11
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 1,125
Mentions "j'aime": 304
I keep seeing this Kravtsov for Lehkokken trade I dont get why habs fan think thats enough to get Kravtsov based on the asking prices that Rangers fans are putting out there lol.
7 févr. 2022 à 15 h 38
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2016
Messages: 289
Mentions "j'aime": 22
Quoting: Leafsfan16
I keep seeing this Kravtsov for Lehkokken trade I dont get why habs fan think thats enough to get Kravtsov based on the asking prices that Rangers fans are putting out there lol.


What do Rangers fans think Kravtsov can pull in? Most industry speculation thinks a second, which Lehkonen is better than.
7 févr. 2022 à 15 h 39
#14
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2016
Messages: 289
Mentions "j'aime": 22
Quoting: Xqb15a
That’s a lie, Chiarot sucks and Barron could play just as well on the 3rd pairing considering COL 3rd pairing get about 13 minutes. But roll with the patented MTL answer of why teams will over pay. COL doesn’t want or need a guy like Chiarot. Easy easy no, you don’t trade a guy you project into a top 4 roll in 2 seasons for a rental that doesn’t fit what you do at all. You tried to show horn a trade that doesn’t work for COL because you wanted to add Barron.


Disagree, History has always shown teams are willing to trade prospects for guys who can get them THROUGH the playoffs. Colorado needs these kind of guys, and Chairot showed this last year. Exactly the type of dman you want and need for the playoffs. But thats ok, Colorado fans can keep seeing their team losing in the second round, since they dont have guys to get you through the playoffs.
7 févr. 2022 à 15 h 40
#15
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2016
Messages: 289
Mentions "j'aime": 22
Quoting: NMAvsFan
Oh, well, in that case, I'll take your word for it and give you a 20 y/o D with top 4 potential and can skate very well that could play right now for your 30 y/o D that's a 5/6 and isn't playing well. Seems like a good deal.


Wrong. He is playing well and would be a stellar add for a cup contending team to get them through the playoffs. Chiarot showed this last season.
7 févr. 2022 à 15 h 43
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 227
Mentions "j'aime": 58
Oiler's had Wideman, trust me, they don't want him back.
7 févr. 2022 à 15 h 59
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,441
Mentions "j'aime": 9,076
Quoting: rb1481
Disagree, History has always shown teams are willing to trade prospects for guys who can get them THROUGH the playoffs. Colorado needs these kind of guys, and Chairot showed this last year. Exactly the type of dman you want and need for the playoffs. But thats ok, Colorado fans can keep seeing their team losing in the second round, since they dont have guys to get you through the playoffs.

According to who? You? It’s so tired for guys like you to justify a trade because COL lost in the 2nd rd. 3yrs ago they were the 8th seed, 2 years ago they are starting their 3rd goalie in games 6 and 7, last year because of the covid schedule quirk which a crappy MTL team took advantage of COL lost to a team tied with them in the regular season for most points all while not having Kadri, Newhook, Byram, and EJ. COL isn’t trading for Chiarot, COL isn’t trading Barron for a rental. I tell you what, if COL makes that trade I’ll Venmo you $100 if they don’t you Venmo me $5.
NMAvsFan et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
7 févr. 2022 à 16 h 15
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 3,352
Mentions "j'aime": 1,866
I would put Gallagher in the same return category as viktor Arvidsson. Arvidsson was a little more injury prone but had a much more favorable contract and had some 60+ point seasons vs 50s. So a 2nd + a 3rd.
7 févr. 2022 à 16 h 40
#19
Go Habs Go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 10,667
Mentions "j'aime": 4,091
Quoting: Leafsfan16
I keep seeing this Kravtsov for Lehkokken trade I dont get why habs fan think thats enough to get Kravtsov based on the asking prices that Rangers fans are putting out there lol.


Conflict with management, refusing to report, and going back to play in Russia, are all red flags that make GMs nervous. It really hurts his value.
I understand there are circumstances involved, but it doesn't negate the risk of it repeating in another organization. It's difficult to dispel those concerns once they materialize.

I'd estimate his value around a 2nd currently. Nobody is actively seeking an unproven winger with proven issues. NY is going to have to shop him around, and someone like Lehkonen isn't a bad return.
Montreal isn't going to ask for Kravtsov, they are going to be trying for Lundkvist. If NY counters with Kravtsov however, they might consider it.
9 févr. 2022 à 11 h 33
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 1,125
Mentions "j'aime": 304
Quoting: rb1481
What do Rangers fans think Kravtsov can pull in? Most industry speculation thinks a second, which Lehkonen is better than.


Based on what Rangers fans are telling me they think hes worth a top prospect whos in the same boat as kratvsov and a first.
21 mars 2022 à 15 h 0
#21
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2016
Messages: 289
Mentions "j'aime": 22
Quoting: Xqb15a
According to who? You? It’s so tired for guys like you to justify a trade because COL lost in the 2nd rd. 3yrs ago they were the 8th seed, 2 years ago they are starting their 3rd goalie in games 6 and 7, last year because of the covid schedule quirk which a crappy MTL team took advantage of COL lost to a team tied with them in the regular season for most points all while not having Kadri, Newhook, Byram, and EJ. COL isn’t trading for Chiarot, COL isn’t trading Barron for a rental. I tell you what, if COL makes that trade I’ll Venmo you $100 if they don’t you Venmo me $5.


well well well. It wasn't Chiarot, but I was bang on the trade return. Barron and a second for Lehkonen. Not a rental so I guess you keep your $100.
21 mars 2022 à 15 h 6
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,441
Mentions "j'aime": 9,076
Quoting: rb1481
well well well. It wasn't Chiarot, but I was bang on the trade return. Barron and a second for Lehkonen. Not a rental so I guess you keep your $100.

Would have been even baller if you said deal at the time instead. But you didn’t. Next time sack up.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage