SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

2C filled

Créé par: CapFriendlysFinest
Équipe: 2021-22 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 14 sept. 2021
Publié: 14 sept. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
BOS
  1. Hertl, Tomas
Détails additionnels:
Comes with 5 year extension at 6500000
SJS
  1. DeBrusk, Jake
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (BOS)
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (BOS)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de BOS
Logo de CGY
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2023
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2024
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $81 810 674 $1 956 507 $125 000 $-310 674 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
AG, C, AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 375 000 $2 375 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 687 500 $3 687 500 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance125 000 $$125K)
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
725 000 $725 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
14 sept. 2021 à 15 h 16
#1
Patient Sharks Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 926
Mentions "j'aime": 519
I don't see a top prospect here. Wilson would be fired on the spot if he made this trade. What a joke
CheechYou a aimé ceci.
14 sept. 2021 à 15 h 18
#2
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 226
Mentions "j'aime": 25
Bruins very easily reject. This is a major overpay for a rental.

Stop with these if yall arent going to think with Hockey and Business senses
14 sept. 2021 à 15 h 19
#3
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 226
Mentions "j'aime": 25
Quoting: lilfimpen
I don't see a top prospect here. Wilson would be fired on the spot if he made this trade. What a joke


Bruins reject too, they lose out value-wise, Sharks lose out piece-wise

Both teams dont like this trade, though sharks could take just because they win value-wise
14 sept. 2021 à 15 h 25
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,520
Mentions "j'aime": 19,668
Quoting: LogicOnly
Bruins very easily reject. This is a major overpay for a rental.

Stop with these if yall arent going to think with Hockey and Business senses


It clearly states he comes with a 5 year extension with a sweetheart cap hit. This is an underpay from Boston
yikes, Jupetto, UBS_ARENA and 7 others a aimé ceci.
14 sept. 2021 à 15 h 27
#5
EklundCelebriniSmith
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 10,093
Mentions "j'aime": 12,835
Modifié 14 sept. 2021 à 15 h 37
Sharks would probably decline without an extension let alone with one. Not saying hes worth 3 firsts just not the right return at all, Id rather a steal like Newhook and a 3rd even over this tbh.

Its like talking to a wall:

The Sharks want multiple prospects (depending on the value of each of them or 1 good one) and a first as a base for a trade which they easily will be retaining 50% of Hertl and can take cap back. They will find a good trade and this aint it.

So for example:

Prospect that would enter their top 5 guys (Eklund (S/ A+ value give or take), Bordeleau (I view Bordeleau as a S but really hes an A), NEW PROSPECT (about an A value prospect), Merkley (A-/ B+), Kniazev (B+), Wiesblatt(B))
1st
Cap move
Additional Asset varies

for

Hertl 50%
maybe a pick or roster depth

Now Boston shouldn't trade for Hertl because Lysell IS NOT A SUPER HIGH END PROSPECT but Boston has a depleted pool. so while Lysell isnt a amazing prospect hes by far Bostons best and needed guy, and he would need to be involved so Boston shouldn't inquire on Hertl. Lysell would probably be the Sharks 3rd-6th best prospect (A lot people are high on Gushchin, Gaudreau so he could fall between Wiesblatt and lower) (Eklund, Bordeleau, Merkley, Lysell, Kniazev, Wiesblatt, Gushchin is where I'd place him).
Bias_it_self et capsfan2121 a aimé ceci.
14 sept. 2021 à 15 h 27
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,583
Mentions "j'aime": 5,455
Not enough for Hertl.
UBS_ARENA, Bias_it_self et CheechYou a aimé ceci.
14 sept. 2021 à 15 h 48
#7
Lets Go Blues
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 6,777
Mentions "j'aime": 4,333
Just a pet peeve of mine but none of these trades come "with extension". If a buying team is confident in their ability to manage the extension after a trade, they'll offer more. But the concept of the selling team working out the extension and then demanding some price that is a lot higher is nonsense as far as I'm concerned. Vegas was confident that they could get Patches and Stone extended to the point that they were willing to give up Suzuki and Brannstrom. If Boston was confident they could get Hertl extended, they'd probably be willing to include Lysell, etc etc. The selling team can't cling to an expiring UFA like he's still their property, the contract is coming up. It's up to the buying team to decide how much they can invest.
MisstheWhalers et capsfan2121 a aimé ceci.
14 sept. 2021 à 15 h 49
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,507
Mentions "j'aime": 4,566
If Hertl is coming with a team friendly extension, its going to cost a lot more than that lol
14 sept. 2021 à 16 h 5
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,520
Mentions "j'aime": 19,668
Quoting: Jupetto
Logic, eh?


This is his norm, he thinks DeBrusk is the next Panarin and not the next Drouin
Jupetto, ON3M4N, Bias_it_self and 2 others a aimé ceci.
14 sept. 2021 à 18 h 45
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Its not funny anymore, tell different jokes
CheechYou a aimé ceci.
14 sept. 2021 à 18 h 51
#11
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: lilfimpen
I don't see a top prospect here. Wilson would be fired on the spot if he made this trade. What a joke


Any other centers of hertl’s caliber that come to mind that have done better than a good young roster player, a 1st, and a 2nd as a rental?
14 sept. 2021 à 21 h 4
#12
Dekesaladekes
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 3,001
Mentions "j'aime": 1,074
Quoting: yikes
Sharks would probably decline without an extension let alone with one. Not saying hes worth 3 firsts just not the right return at all, Id rather a steal like Newhook and a 3rd even over this tbh.

Its like talking to a wall:

The Sharks want multiple prospects (depending on the value of each of them or 1 good one) and a first as a base for a trade which they easily will be retaining 50% of Hertl and can take cap back. They will find a good trade and this aint it.

So for example:

Prospect that would enter their top 5 guys (Eklund (S/ A+ value give or take), Bordeleau (I view Bordeleau as a S but really hes an A), NEW PROSPECT (about an A value prospect), Merkley (A-/ B+), Kniazev (B+), Wiesblatt(B))
1st
Cap move
Additional Asset varies

for

Hertl 50%
maybe a pick or roster depth

Now Boston shouldn't trade for Hertl because Lysell IS NOT A SUPER HIGH END PROSPECT but Boston has a depleted pool. so while Lysell isnt a amazing prospect hes by far Bostons best and needed guy, and he would need to be involved so Boston shouldn't inquire on Hertl. Lysell would probably be the Sharks 3rd-6th best prospect (A lot people are high on Gushchin, Gaudreau so he could fall between Wiesblatt and lower) (Eklund, Bordeleau, Merkley, Lysell, Kniazev, Wiesblatt, Gushchin is where I'd place him).


lysell isn't a top prospect?????????? what are you talking about most analysts had him as a top 6 prospect in this draft, he was ranked the biggest steal of this draft idk what crack you are smo0king but you obviously under value every other teams prospects and way over value san jose's prospects. Lysell fell in the draft due to apparent "attitude issues" which ended up being him not watching to play for his u17 team and go to the SHL for harder competition, maybe go do some research before talking you are obviously just a casual fan. Ill give you credit yet eklund has a higher ceiling then lysell but **** bordeleau is barely a top 5 guy on that michigan team next year not to mention being better then lysell. and yes im taking beniers, hughes, power and johnson over bordeleau every day of the week, hell even brisson is porducing at close to the same pace as bordeleau and hes not even ranked as one of vegas's top 3 prospects
14 sept. 2021 à 21 h 23
#13
EklundCelebriniSmith
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 10,093
Mentions "j'aime": 12,835
Quoting: Dekes
lysell isn't a top prospect?????????? what are you talking about most analysts had him as a top 6 prospect in this draft, he was ranked the biggest steal of this draft idk what crack you are smo0king but you obviously under value every other teams prospects and way over value san jose's prospects. Lysell fell in the draft due to apparent "attitude issues" which ended up being him not watching to play for his u17 team and go to the SHL for harder competition, maybe go do some research before talking you are obviously just a casual fan. Ill give you credit yet eklund has a higher ceiling then lysell but **** bordeleau is barely a top 5 guy on that michigan team next year not to mention being better then lysell. and yes im taking beniers, hughes, power and johnson over bordeleau every day of the week, hell even brisson is porducing at close to the same pace as bordeleau and hes not even ranked as one of vegas's top 3 prospects


You clearly can’t read cause I didn’t say Lysell wasn’t a top prospect so the rest of your comment is irrelevant as your “blind” moronic rage is pretty funny

Also Eklund is the general consensus steal of the draft, tho Lysell is a good selection as well smile
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage