ON3M4N

Ignore List 34
Membre depuis
7 mai 2016
Équipe préférée
Bruins de Boston
Deuxième équipe préférée
Predators de Nashville
Messages dans les forums
5840
Messages par jour
3,85
Sujets de discussion
158
Forum: NHL Tradesil y a 21 heures
Forum: Armchair-GMWed at 10:16 am
Sujet: Hell
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bcarlo25</b></div><div>Do you remember those three points? I do. There was the one where he whiffed on a shot and someone else scored. Assist. There was the one where he basically through it into an opponents skates, and somehow it got to the blue line for a shot that went in. Then there was an empty netter. He’s looked allergic to offense in his brief time in Boston. If the bruins are lucky, he’ll turn into Daniel Paille. I think he could be a good fourth liner.</div></div>

He also had a few assist taken away because of an offsides call. I don't think he's as bad you think he was. He looked good when he got a look on the big club, he was just so focused on playing a responsible game because he knows that's what would have kept him up. I still think he could be a good middle-6 winger, I just don't know if it'll be with the Bruins.
Forum: Armchair-GMWed at 8:08 am
Sujet: Max I would go for eichel
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ngikas</b></div><div>I think this is an interesting take. Production wise both players are pretty similar. If you look at Pasta's career stats after 354 games (Eichel's current career GP) they would be 158-174-332 to Eichel's 137-200-337. So pretty even. I would assume Pastrnak's advanced stats would be better skating alongside Bergy and Marchy. I also don't know much about analytics but <a href="/users/ON3M4N" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@ON3M4N</a> knows more about that if he wants to chime in. Eichel being a center gives him more value than Pastrnak. I don't know how much, probably very little in a Pasta-Eichel swap. Eichel is 7 months younger than Pastrnak, again small value added to Eichel. Contract wise, a 48 goal scorer at $6.6M is a steal, but he will likely get to Eichel's contract when he's due to renew. I think Eichel's contract is really good value wise long term but right now Pasta's contract has the edge. I think a Eichel for Pastrnak swap would be close to a dead even trade value wise. Maybe BOS adds a pick and BUF adds a prospect or vise versa to even out the trade.</div></div>

Pasta wins in CF%, SF%, GF%, xGF% and SCF% by anywhere from 3% to 5% over the last 3 years. However I talent on Boston is significantly better than Buffalo. Looking at each guy from a relative standpoint

<strong>CF% rel</strong>
Eichel - 2.3
Pasta - 3.5

<strong>SF% rel</strong>\
Eichel - 2.3
Pasta - 1.1

<strong>GF% rel</strong>
Eichel - 8.2
Pasta - 9.3

<strong>xGF% rel</strong>
Eichel - 4.0
Pasta - 1.4

<strong>SCF% rel</strong>
Eichel - 3.2
Pasa - 3.5

Again all these are 5v5 over the last 3 season. They're pretty close to one another, but Eichel has a higher xGF% rel which make sense as Buffalo isn't a deep of a team as Boston is.

<strong>5v5 scoring since 2017</strong>
Eichel - 49G / 66A / 0.54 PGP
Pasta - 64G / 71A / 0.62 PGP

Pasta has been the better scoring 5v5, but again he's playing with better linemates. Eichel plays the more important position, but Pasta has a better contract albeit is only got a few years left and Eichel is signed long term.
Forum: Armchair-GMTue at 3:59 pm
Sujet: ARE LEAFS BEST TEAM IN HOCKEY NOW
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TMLSage</b></div><div>You and I both know Rielly has way more heart than this player and was in running for captain of team. Krug is a good player with a small man syndrome and just happens to be playing on a great team. Put in on Buffalo and you would say nothing special.</div></div>

No, I don't know that nor would I agree. Seems like a very odd thing to bring up actually and you come off like your grasping for thing to boast about with Rielly. I don't particularly care if he was in the running for Captain because real leaders don't need a letter on their sweater to be a leader. You overvalue Leafs player and the organization as a whole. You cherry pick numbers to try and form and argument and dismiss numbers when they don't fit your opinion. This is a perfect example of that. The number say Krug and Rielly are similar players over the last 3 years and your argument is "heart" and saying Krug has small man syndrome who just happens to play on a great team. By the way you talk about the Leafs, does Rielly not play for a great team?

Its one thing to be biased towards your favorite team, its another to be a massive homer.