SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

NHLfan10506

Membre depuis
5 mai 2019
Équipe favorite
Devils du New Jersey
Messages dans les forums
43510
Messages par jour
23.1
Forum: Armchair-GM28 mai à 8 h 45
Sujet: Momentum Line
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>So what do they do with him? Wait six months? That is a lot of cap to keep on the sidelines. There should be some sort of negotiated mid point.</div></div>
If you mean Nichushkin, they can use his cap space if they choose. Everybody thinks he’s coming back in November and that isn’t necessarily the case that’s just the earliest he can apply for reinstatement. Personally I think he has played his last game in COL, and at the most recent presser CMC talked generally about it. I think they were looking to terminate his contract before they found out they couldn’t. So I think they are going to use all of his cap space. Landy is different. He was at the presser and he said his come back time was some time between the start of the season and April so I think they use some of his money but not all. That’s part of the reason I don’t think they trade Colton, he plays center and if they have to they can play him at wing in the top 6. Regardless I think COL is shopping at the prove it bin again looking for guys that want to win or want a second chance. The good news it’s wingers they are looking for and not centers like season.
Forum: Armchair-GM26 mai à 16 h 53
Sujet: World Cup Preview
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Rajvinder</b></div><div>1. This is a trade their new coach would want. Management wouldn't have hired him if they were just going to force a team on him that he doesn't trust. This trade gets accepted 10/10 times if offered by Treliving.
2. This 2nd won't help you in the slightest to acquire any of the top goalies on the market (Saros, Ulmark, Markstrom). All of them will require your 1st and/or top prospects.

Insinuating that a 2nd is a major asset to acquire a top goalie is genuinely a shocking statement. Destroys any credibility you might otherwise have.</div></div>

I can promise you roster construction was discussed in the interview. That second round pick <em>is</em> a major asset in acquiring a goaltender. No one else will pay a first round pick for Ullmark or Markstrom (find a team that’ll do it), so why should New Jersey. I advise you stop with your Toronto main character syndrome where everyone who plays for the leafs is worth their weight in gold.

This trade is an outrage.
Forum: Armchair-GM26 mai à 14 h 34
Sujet: Xhekaj Price
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div><a href="https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/3338933">“Why would Montreal move Anderson for less value than what the 2nd OVA pick is? Since the player projected to go 2nd OVA is basically just a younger version of Anderson who has not proved anything to date? To me (and this is just my opinion here) Anderson would have more value than Slafkovsky since Slaf only has about a 10-20% chance of being better and a 50-60% chance at being the same player as Anderson and a 20-40% chance of not being as good. Anderson is already established and Slaf has 5 goals in 31 games in a men's league. How do you plan to suggest to Hughes that he should move Josh for a player (12 OVA) who has a 50% chance to be no more than a 3rd line player and a 50% chance of not even making the NHL? If Anderson is the player Slafkovsky could "potentially" be, why doe he have less value in fans eyes?”</a></div></div>

Classic delusional bias post from Campabee. Nothing new here
Forum: Armchair-GM26 mai à 14 h 37
Sujet: Xhekaj Price
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div><a href="https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/3338933">“Why would Montreal move Anderson for less value than what the 2nd OVA pick is? Since the player projected to go 2nd OVA is basically just a younger version of Anderson who has not proved anything to date? To me (and this is just my opinion here) Anderson would have more value than Slafkovsky since Slaf only has about a 10-20% chance of being better and a 50-60% chance at being the same player as Anderson and a 20-40% chance of not being as good. Anderson is already established and Slaf has 5 goals in 31 games in a men's league. How do you plan to suggest to Hughes that he should move Josh for a player (12 OVA) who has a 50% chance to be no more than a 3rd line player and a 50% chance of not even making the NHL? If Anderson is the player Slafkovsky could "potentially" be, why doe he have less value in fans eyes?”</a></div></div>

Lmaoooo this is real. I thought you were just imitating