SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Xhekaj Price

Créé par: Campabee
Équipe: 2024-25 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 26 mai 2024
Publié: 26 mai 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
32 250 000 $
Transactions
MTL
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (CGY)
CGY
  1. Xhekaj, Arber
Détails additionnels:
The Habs are not trading Xhekaj for less than they received for Romanov, if your offer doesnt start with at least a 1st round pick in the 7-13 range, then just forget about making an offer cause that is the minimum it is going to take.

The Habs are already turning down significant offers and one was reportedly a young former 1st round pick with 2nd line potential. The price for Wifi is not going to be cheap and we are not interested in adding him to a much larger package just to get what we know is his value alone.
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de MTL
Logo de WPG
Logo de CGY
Logo de COL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MIN
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de SJS
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de EDM
Logo de WSH
2025
Logo de MTL
Logo de CGY
Logo de MTL
Logo de PIT
Logo de MTL
Logo de NJD
Logo de VAN
Logo de MTL
Logo de DET
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
2026
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2087 700 000 $68 086 250 $1 022 500 $4 670 000 $19 613 750 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 7
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
C
UFA - 6
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 500 000 $$4M)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 362 500 $3 362 500 $
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
812 500 $812 500 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance420 000 $$420K)
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance750 000 $$750K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
890 000 $890 000 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
766 667 $766 667 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
26 mai à 13 h 37
#1
Flames
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,366
Mentions "j'aime": 462
Yeah no thanks you can keep him lmao
26 mai à 13 h 37
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 5,086
Mentions "j'aime": 3,667
So according to you, Xhekaj is worth more than Necas. LMAO
CD282 a aimé ceci.
26 mai à 13 h 40
#3
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 14,202
Mentions "j'aime": 3,902
Just want to again clarify we’re talking about an enforcer who is an AHL caliber hockey player
26 mai à 13 h 43
#4
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,942
Mentions "j'aime": 6,650
Quoting: Canesfan21_
So according to you, Xhekaj is worth more than Necas. LMAO


Cause he is, Necas is a soft 1 dimensional winger who averages 55 points a year and disappears in the playoffs. Arber is a good solid defensive D man who keeps opposing teams in check, is tough to play against and is exactly the type of player who gets you through the playoffs and not just to the playoffs. There is a reason GM's are sending significant offers to the Habs for Arber and no one will pay more than a mid/late 1st and a 3rd for Necas
26 mai à 13 h 46
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 5,086
Mentions "j'aime": 3,667
Quoting: Campabee
Cause he is, Necas is a soft 1 dimensional winger who averages 55 points a year and disappears in the playoffs. Arber is a good solid defensive D man who keeps opposing teams in check, is tough to play against and is exactly the type of player who gets you through the playoffs and not just to the playoffs. There is a reason GM's are sending significant offers to the Habs for Arber and no one will pay more than a mid/late 1st and a 3rd for Necas


Necas had 9 points in 11 games this postseason and was more physical than he usually is. And everyone knows Rod’s defense first system holds back his offensive potential. Yes, he probably will always be not great defensively, but he could easily put up 70-80 points in another system. Canes will get a solid haul for him
26 mai à 13 h 46
#6
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,942
Mentions "j'aime": 6,650
Quoting: Ansabch12
Yeah no thanks you can keep him lmao


Really, that is your reaction?! I think you missed the point entirely! We want to keep Xhekaj, it is opposing teams that keep trying to acquire him, the cost is going to be much more than what Romanov returned. If you don't want to pay that, great we will happily keep him since that is what we want anyway and you can look forward to having your sissy team play against him.
26 mai à 13 h 47
#7
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,942
Mentions "j'aime": 6,650
Quoting: Canesfan21_
Necas had 9 points in 11 games this postseason and was more physical than he usually is. And everyone knows Rod’s defense first system holds back his offensive potential. Yes, he probably will always be not great defensively, but he could easily put up 70-80 points in another system. Canes will get a solid haul for him


Keep telling yourself that, you might actually start believing it instead of just pretending
26 mai à 13 h 48
#8
Subbanator
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 7,959
Mentions "j'aime": 3,752
I get your reasoning but Xhejak is quickly becoming that weird value player. He likely tops out as a #4 dman that maybe puts up 30 points a year and is okay defensively, if he wasn't tough he would be would a mid round pick but because of that other aspect of his game the Habs can't get rid of him
26 mai à 13 h 54
#9
fromtherivertothesea
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 3,512
Mentions "j'aime": 968
Romanov got the 13th.


Saying Xhekaj could get us the 9th isn’t crazy. And it would be the asking price.


Calm down everyone.
Campabee a aimé ceci.
26 mai à 13 h 55
#10
fromtherivertothesea
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 3,512
Mentions "j'aime": 968
Quoting: dgibb10
Just want to again clarify we’re talking about an enforcer who is an AHL caliber hockey player


He isn’t Kurtis MacDermid brother..
26 mai à 14 h 0
#11
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,942
Mentions "j'aime": 6,650
Quoting: Subbanator7667
I get your reasoning but Xhejak is quickly becoming that weird value player. He likely tops out as a #4 dman that maybe puts up 30 points a year and is okay defensively, if he wasn't tough he would be would a mid round pick but because of that other aspect of his game the Habs can't get rid of him


I agree he likely tops out at a 3 or 4 guy but Romanov also tops out at that as well, hence the minimum return would have to be what we got for Romy. Since we don't want to move Wifi and he is a much more imposing, enigmatic and polarizing player the cost goes up as well. If they don't like the cost, they simply just don't have to buy, better offers than what they claim are fair have been turned down already so they need to be told what it will take for them to acquire Wifi.
26 mai à 14 h 5
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 43,576
Mentions "j'aime": 19,693
Who_is_Jimmy_Stu, Ledge_And_Dairy, Canesfan21_ and 7 others a aimé ceci.
26 mai à 14 h 18
#13
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,942
Mentions "j'aime": 6,650
Quoting: Canesfan21_
Necas had 9 points in 11 games this postseason and was more physical than he usually is. And everyone knows Rod’s defense first system holds back his offensive potential. Yes, he probably will always be not great defensively, but he could easily put up 70-80 points in another system. Canes will get a solid haul for him


Josh Anderson could potentially put up 40 goals if he played beside McDavid, does that mean we should expect to get a haul for him? Fact is players values are based on what they have done, not what they could potentially do. Necas has proven himself to be a 55 point player not a 70-80 point player, therefore his value is equal to that of Domi not Aho.
26 mai à 14 h 25
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2023
Messages: 3,887
Mentions "j'aime": 1,563
Rangers offer a 2028 7th round pick for the traffic cone.
26 mai à 14 h 34
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 39,939
Mentions "j'aime": 20,537
Canesfan21_, NHLfan10506, Ansabch12 and 2 others a aimé ceci.
26 mai à 14 h 36
#16
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,942
Mentions "j'aime": 6,650


Congrats, you dug up something I said what 2-3 years ago, which by the way I stand by. Typically NHL players have more value than top draft picks since top prospects only have about a 50% chance of even making the NHL let alone becoming impact players. Slaf was expected to go 2nd that year with Wright going 1st at the time of the writing. Looking back, yes Slaf overcame the odds and has become the better player but the same can't be said for the guy who was expected to go 1st and Anderson's value has also plummeted since then as well. Hindsight is always 20/20 and I can play the same card. Holtz was a top 7 pick and hasn't done anything, Kakko was a 2nd OVA pick and might not even be qualifyed. Things change year over year and proven NHL players always have more value than prospects and picks (within reason of course, no one was going to trade Gallagher for Bedard or Savard for J. Hughes) but in general the rule applies, if an NHL GM has the choice between an established player and a prospect with a similar ceiling, they will almost always choose the priven player, unless they are a team that is rebuilding like the Sharks are now.
26 mai à 14 h 37
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 5,086
Mentions "j'aime": 3,667
NHLfan10506 et CD282 a aimé ceci.
26 mai à 14 h 45
#18
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 14,202
Mentions "j'aime": 3,902
Quoting: batman
Romanov got the 13th.


Saying Xhekaj could get us the 9th isn’t crazy. And it would be the asking price.


Calm down everyone.


Romanov was a 20+ minute a night, solid dman. His comp would be Guhle.

Xhekaj is a 15 minute a night part time NHL enforcer
CD282 a aimé ceci.
26 mai à 14 h 50
#19
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 14,202
Mentions "j'aime": 3,902
Quoting: batman
He isn’t Kurtis MacDermid brother..


Both are enforcers who aren’t good at actual hockey
26 mai à 14 h 53
#20
Berkly goat Catton
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 6,029
Mentions "j'aime": 2,390
batman a aimé ceci.
26 mai à 14 h 54
#21
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,942
Mentions "j'aime": 6,650
Quoting: GuyGuyGuy
Bro, how much time did you pass trying to find this. It was 2 years ago lol. I hope you didn’t read all of his acgm just to find a bad take like that


Trust me he did, he has nothing better to do anyway since he lives in his mommas basement
26 mai à 14 h 56
#22
Berkly goat Catton
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 6,029
Mentions "j'aime": 2,390
Quoting: Campabee
Trust me he did, he has nothing better to do anyway since he lives in his mommas basement


How can you have that much time?
26 mai à 15 h 1
#23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 11,674
Mentions "j'aime": 10,439
Quoting: Campabee
Congrats, you dug up something I said what 2-3 years ago, which by the way I stand by. Typically NHL players have more value than top draft picks since top prospects only have about a 50% chance of even making the NHL let alone becoming impact players. Slaf was expected to go 2nd that year with Wright going 1st at the time of the writing. Looking back, yes Slaf overcame the odds and has become the better player but the same can't be said for the guy who was expected to go 1st and Anderson's value has also plummeted since then as well. Hindsight is always 20/20 and I can play the same card. Holtz was a top 7 pick and hasn't done anything, Kakko was a 2nd OVA pick and might not even be qualifyed. Things change year over year and proven NHL players always have more value than prospects and picks (within reason of course, no one was going to trade Gallagher for Bedard or Savard for J. Hughes) but in general the rule applies, if an NHL GM has the choice between an established player and a prospect with a similar ceiling, they will almost always choose the priven player, unless they are a team that is rebuilding like the Sharks are now.


So you’d trade 5th overall this year for Huberdeau then?
CD282 a aimé ceci.
26 mai à 15 h 7
#24
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,942
Mentions "j'aime": 6,650
Quoting: mv21227
So you’d trade 5th overall this year for Huberdeau then?


Not what I said, read my comment again and try to comprehend what I said. unless they are a team that is rebuilding like the Sharks are now. now as for the 5th OVA pick If it is a choice between Lindstrom and Boldly, you take Boldly every time cause you know what he is. Do you think the Sharks wouldn't jump at a chance to trade Celebrini for Suzuki, Boldly, or J. Hughes?! I guarantee they would, not that it would be offered but the point remains established players have more value than prospects with similar ceilings
26 mai à 15 h 15
#25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 11,674
Mentions "j'aime": 10,439
Quoting: Campabee
Not what I said, read my comment again and try to comprehend what I said. unless they are a team that is rebuilding like the Sharks are now. now as for the 5th OVA pick If it is a choice between Lindstrom and Boldly, you take Boldly every time cause you know what he is. Do you think the Sharks wouldn't jump at a chance to trade Celebrini for Suzuki, Boldly, or J. Hughes?! I guarantee they would, not that it would be offered but the point remains established players have more value than prospects with similar ceilings


Suzuki and Boldy are great, but putting them in the same sentence as J Hughes is crazy. The Sharks would absolutely trade 1OA for J Hughes as he’s a proven superstar Center who’s still young and has maybe the best contract in the league. But I don’t think they would for Suzuki and Boldy, because Celebrini has a higher ceiling than those two imo
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage