SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

rebuild

Créé par: ppittman178
Équipe: 2023-24 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 20 avr. 2024
Publié: 20 avr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Acciari, Noel
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (PHI)
  3. Choix de 7e ronde en 2024 (NYR)
2.
SEA
  1. Yager, Brayden [Liste de réserve]
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2026 (SJS)
3.
NJD
  1. Waeber, Ludovic
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2024 (PIT)
  3. Choix de 7e ronde en 2024 (PIT)
4.
5.
PIT
  1. Cowan, Easton
  2. Edmundson, Joel
  3. Choix de 7e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
TOR
  1. Bunting, Michael
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2026 (PIT)
6.
PIT
  1. Jenner, Boone
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (CBJ)
CBJ
  1. Graves, Ryan
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (PIT)
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2026 (PIT)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CBJ
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de TOR
2025
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2026
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2483 500 000 $81 934 342 $0 $400 000 $1 565 658 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
6 100 000 $6 100 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 125 000 $3 125 000 $
AD, C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
850 000 $850 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 450 000 $2 450 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
AD, C
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 025 175 $4 025 175 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 375 000 $5 375 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
825 000 $825 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
6 100 000 $6 100 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 925 000 $1 925 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
775 000 $775 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
875 000 $875 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
935 833 $935 833 $
AG, C
RFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
800 000 $800 000 $
AD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
20 avr. à 22 h 32
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2024
Messages: 736
Mentions "j'aime": 533
Loooool wtf is this
CaseyFlyman a aimé ceci.
20 avr. à 22 h 34
#2
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,516
Mentions "j'aime": 25,398
You have to start using the 2024-2025 skeleton to create your ACGM's. Max Domi and Joel Edmundson become free agents on July 1, so no team would have to trade for them.
StutzlesNumber1Fan a aimé ceci.
20 avr. à 22 h 35
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,749
Mentions "j'aime": 7,382
why are the leafs trading you guys who are gonna be UFAs in the off season?
In what world is bunting worth half that?
20 avr. à 22 h 44
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 4,446
Mentions "j'aime": 2,279
Quoting: StutzlesNumber1Fan
Loooool wtf is this


"That's bait"
21 avr. à 1 h 16
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 4,416
Mentions "j'aime": 906
CBJ politely declined and might not pick up the phone again for them.
21 avr. à 1 h 20
#6
mostly harmless
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 6,749
Mentions "j'aime": 3,231
Y'all don't have the assets to get either of Boone or the Jackets' 1st this year, let alone both together.
21 avr. à 1 h 23
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 2,096
Mentions "j'aime": 1,770
Jenner + 2024 CBJ 1st for Graves + 2025 PIT 3rd + 2026 PIT 1st + Crosby.

There, I fixed it for you.
21 avr. à 1 h 35
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 737
Mentions "j'aime": 168
Domi is re signing in TOR sorry bruh
21 avr. à 2 h 2
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 9,609
Mentions "j'aime": 4,588
Why would the Avs even consider trading Colton who plays a position of need for Smith who isn't and get older and add more cap when they're already up against it? Answer - they wouldn't.
Xqb15a a aimé ceci.
21 avr. à 8 h 18
#10
SkateOrDie
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 2,289
Mentions "j'aime": 380
Quoting: Viqsi
Y'all don't have the assets to get either of Boone or the Jackets' 1st this year, let alone both together.


eh I don't know.
CBJ 2024 1st is probably same level as PIT 2026 1st. Maybe even better give how bad they played this year.
Depends what draft class you like better really.
21 avr. à 8 h 23
#11
SkateOrDie
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 2,289
Mentions "j'aime": 380
at least there is some recognition here that Shane Wright should be demanding a trade out of SEA.
But why would he want to go to a team that didn't play him?
21 avr. à 8 h 28
#12
Dolzhenkov Is Coming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 3,648
Mentions "j'aime": 5,279
Quoting: LuckyMoneyPuck
eh I don't know.
CBJ 2024 1st is probably same level as PIT 2026 1st. Maybe even better give how bad they played this year.
Depends what draft class you like better really.


A guaranteed high 1st today is worth a hell of a lot more than a possibly high 1st 2 years from now. One is likely 1-4 years away from helping your team and the other is 3-6 years away. A team that still has Crosby on it is also never going to fully commit to tanking so I seriously doubt that pick will be higher than the 8-16 range.
Viqsi et CaseyFlyman a aimé ceci.
21 avr. à 9 h 43
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2021
Messages: 139
Mentions "j'aime": 18
This has to be bait
21 avr. à 9 h 57
#14
SkateOrDie
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 2,289
Mentions "j'aime": 380
Quoting: dk325
A guaranteed high 1st today is worth a hell of a lot more than a possibly high 1st 2 years from now. One is likely 1-4 years away from helping your team and the other is 3-6 years away. A team that still has Crosby on it is also never going to fully commit to tanking so I seriously doubt that pick will be higher than the 8-16 range.


This all depends where these picks end. CBJ pick could very well be lower than you think. The pens pick higher than you think as 8-16 is pretty generous. They were in the 8 range already this year. If the last two weeks of the season didn't go as it did they could have finished lower than 8.
So give them 2 years of getting older, and you just don't know what you are going to get.

Again the draft class has a lot to do with it as well. Some are deeper than others. A 10 pick in one is worth more than a 6 pick in another.
Either way, the point is, my estimation of where those two picks end up aren't very far off. Pens could very well be picking top 3 in 2 years. Even with Crosby on the team.
It's not like Dubas has worked some voodoo magic to improve the team.
21 avr. à 10 h 20
#15
Dolzhenkov Is Coming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 3,648
Mentions "j'aime": 5,279
Quoting: LuckyMoneyPuck
This all depends where these picks end. CBJ pick could very well be lower than you think. The pens pick higher than you think as 8-16 is pretty generous. They were in the 8 range already this year. If the last two weeks of the season didn't go as it did they could have finished lower than 8.
So give them 2 years of getting older, and you just don't know what you are going to get.

Again the draft class has a lot to do with it as well. Some are deeper than others. A 10 pick in one is worth more than a 6 pick in another.
Either way, the point is, my estimation of where those two picks end up aren't very far off. Pens could very well be picking top 3 in 2 years. Even with Crosby on the team.
It's not like Dubas has worked some voodoo magic to improve the team.


Getting a top 3 pick is a whole lot harder than you're giving it credit for. It's far easier to get stuck in the mushy middle and with the Pens making an effort to continue winning it's very likely that that's exactly where they'll end up. You're also continuing to ignore that adding two years of development time and a complete unknown of the draft position drops the value of that pick a significant amount. You don't get to estimate the value of a proposal off of applying the worst case scenario to one asset and the best case scenario to the other. That's not how that works.

Also, no the CBJ pick can't be lower than I think. It is guaranteed to be top 6. That's how the season being over and knowing the draft lottery positions works.
Viqsi et CaseyFlyman a aimé ceci.
21 avr. à 10 h 31
#16
SkateOrDie
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 2,289
Mentions "j'aime": 380
Quoting: dk325
Getting a top 3 pick is a whole lot harder than you're giving it credit for. It's far easier to get stuck in the mushy middle and with the Pens making an effort to continue winning it's very likely that that's exactly where they'll end up. You're also continuing to ignore that adding two years of development time and a complete unknown of the draft position drops the value of that pick a significant amount. You don't get to estimate the value of a proposal off of applying the worst case scenario to one asset and the best case scenario to the other. That's not how that works.

Also, no the CBJ pick can't be lower than I think. It is guaranteed to be top 6.


again, as I said before it depends on what you think of the two draft classes. This years draft isn't exactly deep. Is the 2026 draft deeper.
That supersedes the development time.
while you think it's hard to not finish bottom 3 really it isn't. The penguins got that part down trust me. Been there done that.
You really over value how old that team will be in 2026. Crosby 38 Malkin 39 Rust 33, Rakell 32 EK 35 Letang 38 Acciari 34
It's one thing if it's just Crosby being the old guy on the team trying to play well... but you can't float all that age. That right there spells bottom 3 team. It's not only too many players but too much cap.
Like 40% of the cap tied up in guys who are ancient by NHL standards. Teams like that don't win $#!t. not even middle of the road wins.
21 avr. à 10 h 37
#17
Dolzhenkov Is Coming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 3,648
Mentions "j'aime": 5,279
Quoting: LuckyMoneyPuck
again, as I said before it depends on what you think of the two draft classes. This years draft isn't exactly deep. Is the 2026 draft deeper.
That supersedes the development time.
while you think it's hard to not finish bottom 3 really it isn't. The penguins got that part down trust me. Been there done that.
You really over value how old that team will be in 2026. Crosby 38 Malkin 39 Rust 33, Rakell 32 EK 35 Letang 38 Acciari 34
It's one thing if it's just Crosby being the old guy on the team trying to play well... but you can't float all that age. That right there spells bottom 3 team. It's not only too many players but too much cap.
Like 40% of the cap tied up in guys who are ancient by NHL standards. Teams like that don't win $#!t. not even middle of the road wins.


Regardless of where you think the Penguins will finish, there's zero chance that pick gets traded without protection. It's either a mid pick or a 2027 1st. This is a non-sense proposal that the Jackets don't consider for a second.
21 avr. à 10 h 41
#18
SkateOrDie
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 2,289
Mentions "j'aime": 380
Quoting: dk325
Regardless of where you think the Penguins will finish, there's zero chance that pick gets traded without protection. It's either a mid pick or a 2027 1st. This is a non-sense proposal that the Jackets don't consider for a second.


I never said the CBJ would consider it.
The claim was they don't have the assets.... well I disagree. That 2026 pick is just as valuable. You can't look at that aging roster and tell me they can win games. It's a nursing home out there on the ice.
teams build to be picking 1st in 2026, not to win a cup.
21 avr. à 11 h 34
#19
mostly harmless
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 6,749
Mentions "j'aime": 3,231
Quoting: LuckyMoneyPuck
I never said the CBJ would consider it.
The claim was they don't have the assets.... well I disagree. That 2026 pick is just as valuable.

It is not, because of the massive time difference. The Penguins empirically do not have the assets.
21 avr. à 13 h 45
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 2,096
Mentions "j'aime": 1,770
Quoting: LuckyMoneyPuck
I never said the CBJ would consider it.
The claim was they don't have the assets.... well I disagree. That 2026 pick is just as valuable. You can't look at that aging roster and tell me they can win games. It's a nursing home out there on the ice.
teams build to be picking 1st in 2026, not to win a cup.


A guaranteed top-6 pick this year is objectively more valuable than a 1st-rounder 2 years from now, full stop. There's nothing to argue. It could turn out great if the Penguins finish dead last and land 1OA in a great draft class. But to guarantee it's at least as valuable as a top-6 pick now, they'd have finish 4th-last or worst, in an equally strong or better draft class just to make up for the 2-year difference, and there's just too many variables for a GM to say "yes, that's likely enough that this pick is equal in value".

But even IF those picks were equal, we're supposed to send one of our most valuable players to a division rival for Graves (who is a borderline cap-dump) and a 3rd? If Dubas made that offer, he'd receive an emphatic "get f***ed" from whoever the next GM is. It's an astoundingly, insultingly, laughably bad offer.
Viqsi a aimé ceci.
21 avr. à 13 h 55
#21
Dolzhenkov Is Coming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 3,648
Mentions "j'aime": 5,279
Quoting: LuckyMoneyPuck
I never said the CBJ would consider it.
The claim was they don't have the assets.... well I disagree. That 2026 pick is just as valuable. You can't look at that aging roster and tell me they can win games. It's a nursing home out there on the ice.
teams build to be picking 1st in 2026, not to win a cup.


Which means you're completely incapable of objectively assessing pick value. Nobody would take a pick that's maybe as high in a draft where you're currently trying to assess 15 year olds. It's idiotic.
21 avr. à 15 h 42
#22
SkateOrDie
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 2,289
Mentions "j'aime": 380
Quoting: dk325
Which means you're completely incapable of objectively assessing pick value. Nobody would take a pick that's maybe as high in a draft where you're currently trying to assess 15 year olds. It's idiotic.


honestly get over yourself.
Just come back down to reality and admit that 2026 pick is most likely same range.
And if you think people haven't already summed up drafts and make these valuations you are kidding yourself. Players apply for exceptional status at 15. Don't think no one is evaluating them. Whole drafts are pretty much wrapped up on paper years before their draft year. They are just tweeked here and there along the way.
21 avr. à 15 h 45
#23
Dolzhenkov Is Coming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 3,648
Mentions "j'aime": 5,279
Quoting: LuckyMoneyPuck
honestly get over yourself.
Just come back down to reality and admit that 2026 pick is most likely same range.
And if you think people haven't already summed up drafts and make these valuations you are kidding yourself. Players apply for exceptional status at 15. Don't think no one is evaluating them. Whole drafts are pretty much wrapped up on paper years before their draft year. They are just tweeked here and there along the way.


Players rise and fall all over the draft rankings during their draft year, let alone 3 years before their draft year. There is zero equivalency between a top 6 pick in 2024 and a completely unknown 1st round pick in 2026. You have no idea what you're talking about, and that's the last I'll be hearing from you.
Viqsi a aimé ceci.
21 avr. à 15 h 48
#24
SkateOrDie
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 2,289
Mentions "j'aime": 380
Quoting: CaseyFlyman
A guaranteed top-6 pick this year is objectively more valuable than a 1st-rounder 2 years from now, full stop. There's nothing to argue. It could turn out great if the Penguins finish dead last and land 1OA in a great draft class. But to guarantee it's at least as valuable as a top-6 pick now, they'd have finish 4th-last or worst, in an equally strong or better draft class just to make up for the 2-year difference, and there's just too many variables for a GM to say "yes, that's likely enough that this pick is equal in value".

But even IF those picks were equal, we're supposed to send one of our most valuable players to a division rival for Graves (who is a borderline cap-dump) and a 3rd? If Dubas made that offer, he'd receive an emphatic "get f***ed" from whoever the next GM is. It's an astoundingly, insultingly, laughably bad offer.


i never said anything on the player. I'm just pointing out the value of those two picks, are more close in value than was assumed. That's probably a top 5 pick. CBJ pick is a top 5 pick....
If you think that one drat is better than the other.....
Obviously as stated an actual pick is better than a potential pick. I have said this. but the whole thing is a hypothetical. The CBJ pick you don't know where you are picking yet.
It doesn't have to be as high as you think. And the PIT pick is probably going to be lower than most want to admit. It's a nursing home team being fielded that year with no real prospect of changing that.
You might not even see Crosby on that team by that point. You don't know. What I do know is 38 year old Crosby not going to carry the team on his back in a super human effort like it took this year to not finish 7th or 8th OA like they were headed. If they are that bad now..... how much worse you think it's getting in 2 more years.
21 avr. à 15 h 49
#25
SkateOrDie
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 2,289
Mentions "j'aime": 380
Quoting: dk325
Players rise and fall all over the draft rankings during their draft year, let alone 3 years before their draft year. There is zero equivalency between a top 6 pick in 2024 and a completely unknown 1st round pick in 2026. You have no idea what you're talking about, and that's the last I'll be hearing from you.


actualy they do, people knew for years McDavid was a 1OA, same with Crosby.... down the line.
we aren't talking about predicting a whole draft. Just the top. They have their eye on those guys already.
I'm glad your done, the nonsense was getting to be too much.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage