SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Good comparables for Zadorov

Créé par: Byrr
Équipe: 2023-24 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 10 nov. 2023
Publié: 10 nov. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Who are the good comparable trades for Zadorov? Here's a shrot list of recently moved, non-1st pair defensemen and their returns. I avoided RFAs like Sandin and Durzi because they all would still be at an age where they are expected to get better and have a lot of team control remaining. They'd make for lousy comparables.
Transactions
1.
ANA
    2025 4th round pick
    2.
    CGY
    1. Petry, Jeff
    Détails additionnels:
    50% retained
    DET
      2025 4th round pick
      Gustav Lindström
      3.
      NJD
        5th Round Pick
        4.
        CGY
        1. Edmundson, Joel
        Détails additionnels:
        50% retained
        WSH
          2024 3rd round pick
          2025 7th round pick
          5.
          CBJ
            2023 3rd round pick
            6.
            DET
              2026 3rd round pick
              7.
              CGY
              1. Hronek, Filip
              Détails additionnels:
              2023 4th round pick
              2 seasons of term
              VAN
                2023 1st round pick
                2023 2nd round pick
                8.
                NSH
                  2023 3rd round pick
                  Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
                  2024
                  Logo de CGY
                  Logo de CGY
                  Logo de CGY
                  Logo de CGY
                  Logo de CGY
                  2025
                  Logo de FLA
                  Logo de CGY
                  Logo de CGY
                  Logo de CGY
                  Logo de CGY
                  Logo de CGY
                  2026
                  Logo de CGY
                  Logo de CGY
                  Logo de CGY
                  Logo de CGY
                  Logo de CGY
                  Logo de CGY
                  Logo de CGY
                  TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
                  2583 500 000 $83 832 916 $0 $227 500 $-332 916 $
                  Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
                  Logo de Flames de Calgary
                  10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
                  AG, AD
                  NMC
                  UFA - 8
                  Logo de Flames de Calgary
                  7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
                  C
                  NMC
                  UFA - 6
                  Logo de Flames de Calgary
                  5 800 000 $5 800 000 $
                  AD, AG
                  M-NTC
                  UFA - 2
                  Logo de Flames de Calgary
                  3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
                  C, AG, AD
                  UFA - 2
                  Logo de Flames de Calgary
                  5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
                  C
                  NMC
                  UFA - 1
                  Logo de Flames de Calgary
                  4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
                  AD, AG
                  NTC
                  UFA - 4
                  Logo de Flames de Calgary
                  762 500 $762 500 $
                  AG, C
                  UFA - 1
                  Logo de Flames de Calgary
                  4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
                  C, AD
                  UFA - 1
                  Logo de Flames de Calgary
                  825 000 $825 000 $
                  AD
                  UFA - 2
                  Logo de Flames de Calgary
                  2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
                  AG, AD, C
                  RFA - 1
                  Logo de Flames de Calgary
                  775 000 $775 000 $
                  AD
                  RFA - 1
                  Logo de Flames de Calgary
                  863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
                  AG, C
                  RFA - 2
                  Logo de Flames de Calgary
                  762 500 $762 500 $
                  AD, AG
                  UFA - 1
                  Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
                  Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
                  687 500 $687 500 $
                  DD
                  UFA - 1
                  Logo de Flames de Calgary
                  3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
                  DG/DD
                  UFA - 1
                  Logo de Flames de Calgary
                  6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
                  G
                  NMC
                  UFA - 3
                  Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
                  2 343 750 $2 343 750 $
                  DD
                  M-NTC, NMC
                  UFA - 2
                  Logo de Flames de Calgary
                  2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
                  G
                  UFA - 2
                  Logo de Capitals de Washington
                  875 000 $875 000 $
                  DG/DD
                  M-NTC
                  UFA - 1
                  Logo de Flames de Calgary
                  813 333 $813 333 $ (Bonis de performance15 000 $$15K)
                  G
                  RFA - 1
                  Logo de Devils du New Jersey
                  1 850 000 $1 850 000 $
                  DD
                  UFA - 1
                  Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
                  6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
                  DD
                  NTC
                  UFA - 8
                  Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
                  4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
                  DG/DD
                  M-NTC
                  UFA - 1
                  Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
                  4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
                  DD
                  RFA - 1
                  Logo de Predators de Nashville
                  2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
                  DD
                  UFA - 3
                  Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
                  Logo de Flames de Calgary
                  4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
                  DD
                  UFA - 3
                  Logo de Flames de Calgary
                  1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
                  DG
                  M-NTC
                  UFA - 1
                  Logo de Flames de Calgary
                  762 500 $762 500 $
                  DG
                  UFA - 1
                  Logo de Flames de Calgary
                  1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
                  DD
                  M-NTC
                  UFA - 1
                  Logo de Flames de Calgary
                  762 500 $762 500 $
                  DD
                  UFA - 1
                  Logo de Flames de Calgary
                  6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
                  DG/DD
                  NTC
                  UFA - 8
                  Logo de Flames de Calgary
                  2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
                  DG/DD
                  UFA - 1
                  Logo de Flames de Calgary
                  1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
                  C
                  UFA - 1

                  Code d'intégration

                  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
                  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

                  Texte intégré

                  Cliquer pour surligner
                  10 nov. 2023 à 23 h 51
                  #1
                  Just Keep Swimming
                  Avatar de l'utilisateur
                  Rejoint: juin 2018
                  Messages: 9,314
                  Mentions "j'aime": 5,656
                  I figure he'd probably cost a 2nd, but given we don't have one go with a protected first and Klingberg for Zadorov and a depth guy. Maybe Ruzicka?
                  10 nov. 2023 à 23 h 54
                  #2
                  Avatar de l'utilisateur
                  Rejoint: oct. 2020
                  Messages: 3,618
                  Mentions "j'aime": 1,319
                  I'd think Edmundson is the closest comparable but I think Zadorov would go for a bit more. 2nd plus prospect/bottom 6 roster player
                  Byrr a aimé ceci.
                  10 nov. 2023 à 23 h 57
                  #3
                  Démarrer sujet
                  Avatar de l'utilisateur
                  Rejoint: juill. 2019
                  Messages: 6,289
                  Mentions "j'aime": 3,037
                  Quoting: Mediumyeet
                  I'd think Edmundson is the closest comparable but I think Zadorov would go for a bit more. 2nd plus prospect/bottom 6 roster player


                  If I was going to throw out a guess, I'd probably go with a 3rd + a prospect given the recent history of dman trades.
                  Mediumyeet a aimé ceci.
                  11 nov. 2023 à 0 h 3
                  #4
                  Avatar de l'utilisateur
                  Rejoint: juill. 2023
                  Messages: 1,122
                  Mentions "j'aime": 164
                  Retaining could get you anywhere from a 1st -3rd depending on how much you retain. + a player back and propsect. i would guess.
                  KingofRnR a aimé ceci.
                  11 nov. 2023 à 0 h 3
                  #5
                  TrevorA
                  Avatar de l'utilisateur
                  Rejoint: janv. 2021
                  Messages: 6,824
                  Mentions "j'aime": 1,850
                  Quoting: Mediumyeet
                  I'd think Edmundson is the closest comparable but I think Zadorov would go for a bit more. 2nd plus prospect/bottom 6 roster player

                  Quoting: Byrr
                  If I was going to throw out a guess, I'd probably go with a 3rd + a prospect given the recent history of dman trades.

                  The most recent Edmundson Trade is a very weak comparable considering Edmundson’s career should probably be and is most likely soon to be over, given his back is shot

                  He hasn’t been able to play a full season in, well EVER!

                  I’m missed about this news, so don’t mind me but we are expecting a high return if Zadorov gets Traded. Like somewhere around Ben Chiarot high
                  11 nov. 2023 à 0 h 5
                  #6
                  Démarrer sujet
                  Avatar de l'utilisateur
                  Rejoint: juill. 2019
                  Messages: 6,289
                  Mentions "j'aime": 3,037
                  Quoting: KingofRnR
                  The most recent Edmundson Trade is a very weak comparable considering Edmundson’s career should probably be and is most likely soon to be over, given his back is shot

                  He hasn’t been able to play a full season in, well EVER!

                  I’m kissed about this news, so don’t mind me but we are expecting a high return if Zadorov gets Traded. Like somewhere around Ben Chiarot high


                  Given most Flames fans opinions so far on CapFriendly, this is a very generous usage of the word 'we'.
                  11 nov. 2023 à 0 h 6
                  #7
                  Avatar de l'utilisateur
                  Rejoint: août 2019
                  Messages: 3,793
                  Mentions "j'aime": 3,262
                  Nhl gms love the big “defensive defenseman” types. See chariot and savard. Those are the more likely compareables imo. I personally don’t value him that high but based on prior trades that seems to be the going rate for those kinds of players. Several of these trades were made in the off-season to dump money so they accepted a lower value.
                  KingofRnR a aimé ceci.
                  11 nov. 2023 à 0 h 9
                  #8
                  TrevorA
                  Avatar de l'utilisateur
                  Rejoint: janv. 2021
                  Messages: 6,824
                  Mentions "j'aime": 1,850
                  Quoting: Byrr
                  Given most Flames fans opinions so far on CapFriendly, this is a very generous usage of the word 'we'.

                  I don’t think you’ve been following the posts other than the ones coming up tonight and there’s only one saying he wouldn’t expect to get a 1st for Zadorov straight up, but with retention he could
                  11 nov. 2023 à 0 h 11
                  #9
                  Avatar de l'utilisateur
                  Rejoint: mai 2016
                  Messages: 14,570
                  Mentions "j'aime": 6,152
                  Quoting: TyeZerker
                  Retaining could get you anywhere from a 1st -3rd depending on how much you retain. + a player back and propsect. i would guess.


                  I don't think you're going to get a 1st round pick for retaining less than $2M for 75% of a season.

                  If Calgary retains 50%, they can get a 2nd and an ok prospect. If they retain 50% and take back an expiring contract, they can get a 2nd and a good prospect. If they don't retain and don't take back a contract, they'll likely only get a 3rd.
                  11 nov. 2023 à 0 h 17
                  #10
                  Avatar de l'utilisateur
                  Rejoint: mai 2017
                  Messages: 1,232
                  Mentions "j'aime": 419
                  When looking for comparable players, you have to have comparable situations too.

                  I don't think most of the guys listed were pending UFAs. Zadorov is both a pending UFA and signed pretty cheap. He's a low-end #4, high-end #5, he's big, physical, he can skate and he can score.

                  I think if the Flames eat 50%, we can get a 2nd+ for him, maybe a 1st if a team is desperate for defensive help.
                  Friendly_Cannon a aimé ceci.
                  11 nov. 2023 à 0 h 19
                  #11
                  Démarrer sujet
                  Avatar de l'utilisateur
                  Rejoint: juill. 2019
                  Messages: 6,289
                  Mentions "j'aime": 3,037
                  Quoting: Lunatik
                  When looking for comparable players, you have to have comparable situations too.

                  I don't think most of the guys listed were pending UFAs. Zadorov is both a pending UFA and signed pretty cheap. He's a low-end #4, high-end #5, he's big, physical, he can skate and he can score.

                  I think if the Flames eat 50%, we can get a 2nd+ for him, maybe a 1st if a team is desperate for defensive help.


                  I mean being a pending UFA would only lower his value compared to someone with term unless it was a cap dump. Also let's not try to pretend Zadorov is a big goal scoring defenseman when he's had 1 season with more than 10 goals and is currently on pace for 7 in the current season.
                  11 nov. 2023 à 0 h 22
                  #12
                  Avatar de l'utilisateur
                  Rejoint: août 2019
                  Messages: 3,793
                  Mentions "j'aime": 3,262
                  Honestly I could see a toronto trade where they give up klingberg and a first/second and good prospect for zadorov 50% retained.
                  Dump a terrible klingberg and gain a much needed zadorov, probably could extend him as well.
                  Just spitballing so don’t crucify me lol
                  11 nov. 2023 à 0 h 24
                  #13
                  Avatar de l'utilisateur
                  Rejoint: mai 2017
                  Messages: 1,232
                  Mentions "j'aime": 419
                  Quoting: Byrr
                  I mean being a pending UFA would only lower his value compared to someone with term unless it was a cap dump.

                  Not when teams have little to no cap space. Rentals always get more than summer deals because it's more of a sellers market.
                  11 nov. 2023 à 0 h 24
                  #14
                  Démarrer sujet
                  Avatar de l'utilisateur
                  Rejoint: juill. 2019
                  Messages: 6,289
                  Mentions "j'aime": 3,037
                  Quoting: Lunatik
                  Not when teams have little to no cap space. Rentals always get more than summer deals because it's more of a sellers market.


                  You have a very misperceived view of trade values. Rentals do not get more than summer deals.
                  11 nov. 2023 à 0 h 26
                  #15
                  Avatar de l'utilisateur
                  Rejoint: mai 2017
                  Messages: 1,232
                  Mentions "j'aime": 419
                  Quoting: Byrr
                  You have a very misperceived view of trade values. Rentals do not get more than summer deals.

                  They do when no teams have cap space. Look at this past summer, it was clearly a buyers market.
                  11 nov. 2023 à 0 h 26
                  #16
                  Démarrer sujet
                  Avatar de l'utilisateur
                  Rejoint: juill. 2019
                  Messages: 6,289
                  Mentions "j'aime": 3,037
                  Quoting: Lunatik
                  They do when no teams have cap space. Look at this past summer, it was clearly a buyers market.


                  I can look at more than just this summer, I can look at many summers, and they will all show that you have no basis for this claim.
                  11 nov. 2023 à 0 h 28
                  #17
                  Avatar de l'utilisateur
                  Rejoint: mai 2017
                  Messages: 1,232
                  Mentions "j'aime": 419
                  Quoting: Byrr
                  I can look at more than just this summer, I can look at many summers, and they will all show that you have no basis for this claim.

                  I was specially talking about no cap space due to the flat cap Einstein. If you are going to argue, learn to read.
                  11 nov. 2023 à 0 h 32
                  #18
                  Démarrer sujet
                  Avatar de l'utilisateur
                  Rejoint: juill. 2019
                  Messages: 6,289
                  Mentions "j'aime": 3,037
                  Quoting: Lunatik
                  I was specially talking about no cap space due to the flat cap Einstein. If you are going to argue, learn to read.


                  So do you think only this season had a flat cap?
                  11 nov. 2023 à 0 h 35
                  #19
                  Judd Bracket ripoff
                  Avatar de l'utilisateur
                  Rejoint: juill. 2019
                  Messages: 6,957
                  Mentions "j'aime": 3,581
                  Slipping Hronek is in here as a comp sure is a choice
                  11 nov. 2023 à 0 h 35
                  #20
                  Démarrer sujet
                  Avatar de l'utilisateur
                  Rejoint: juill. 2019
                  Messages: 6,289
                  Mentions "j'aime": 3,037
                  Quoting: The_Rocket
                  Slipping Hronek is in here as a comp sure is a choice


                  More examples provides a better picture. Hronek adds context to what a defenseman who gets 1st back looks like.
                  The_Rocket, Canucks33 et Billy12Bob a aimé ceci.
                  11 nov. 2023 à 0 h 36
                  #21
                  Avatar de l'utilisateur
                  Rejoint: mai 2017
                  Messages: 1,232
                  Mentions "j'aime": 419
                  Quoting: Byrr
                  So do you think only this season had a flat cap?

                  No, but I do think this was the worst, which was why we saw no trades on teh draft floor.
                  11 nov. 2023 à 0 h 37
                  #22
                  Démarrer sujet
                  Avatar de l'utilisateur
                  Rejoint: juill. 2019
                  Messages: 6,289
                  Mentions "j'aime": 3,037
                  Modifié 11 nov. 2023 à 0 h 47
                  Quoting: Lunatik
                  No, but I do think this was the worst, which was why we saw no trades on teh draft floor.


                  But that would effect more than just the draft floor, right? How about the summer as a whole? Would that not be better context?

                  It's kind of like trying to claim that it will be busy trade deadline because no trade was made the Thursday the week before and the GMs are all waiting.
                  11 nov. 2023 à 8 h 2
                  #23
                  Avatar de l'utilisateur
                  Rejoint: juin 2016
                  Messages: 12,583
                  Mentions "j'aime": 5,455
                  Ben Chiarot is the obvious one. Severson isn't comparable, he's better, more of an offensive D-man and was a UFA in 3 weeks. NJ got a 3rd because they let CBJ get the 8th year.
                  11 nov. 2023 à 8 h 6
                  #24
                  Démarrer sujet
                  Avatar de l'utilisateur
                  Rejoint: juill. 2019
                  Messages: 6,289
                  Mentions "j'aime": 3,037
                  Quoting: bhavikp27
                  Ben Chiarot is the obvious one. Severson isn't comparable, he's better, more of an offensive D-man and was a UFA in 3 weeks. NJ got a 3rd because they let CBJ get the 8th year.


                  People always like to say Chiarot is a comparable but no one has used him as one since his trade. He's not a comparable for anything, he's an outlier. Half a dozen fanbases, including half the trades above, have tried to say 'we'll get more, just look at what Chariot got' then didn't get more.
                  11 nov. 2023 à 8 h 14
                  #25
                  Avatar de l'utilisateur
                  Rejoint: juin 2016
                  Messages: 12,583
                  Mentions "j'aime": 5,455
                  Quoting: Byrr
                  People always like to say Chiarot is a comparable but no one has used him as one since his trade. He's not a comparable for anything, he's an outlier. Half a dozen fanbases, including half the trades above, have tried to say 'we'll get more, just look at what Chariot got' then didn't get more.


                  I don't know for the others, people often overestimate their players but I think Chiarot is the exact comparable. The type of players GMs love to overrate, both big players, both really physical and lots of teams will be interested. Zadorov is younger and doesn't have a M-NTC like Chiarot. Playoffs' experience and time on ice are different but I'm confident the asking price will be a 1st and they will get it (unless Conroy is really dumb).
                   
                  Répondre
                  To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
                  Question:
                  Options:
                  Ajouter une option
                  Soumettre le sondage