Éditer l'avatar
  • png, jpeg
  • La grandeur minimale recommandée se veut de 800px par 800px
  • Grandeur maximale: 1MB
Glisser l'image pour repositionner
Sauvegarder
Annuler

Random2152

Just Keep Swimming
Membre depuis
30 jun 2018
Équipe préférée
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Messages dans les forums
5909
Messages par jour
6,3
Sujets de discussion
140
Biographie
I am always one year ahead of the general public - so I get a lot of hate and no credit.
Forum: Armchair-GM14 jan à 22 h 49
Sujet: Question for my fellow Habs fans not on my ignore list - about PLD
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GMs</b></div><div>That is where you are wrong. PLD had 49 points in 70 games last year and Suzuki 41 in 71 games. One is CBJ #1C one year older, the other is a rookie who started on the 4RW playing with Nate Thompson. He managed to outplay Kotkaniemi, after mid season Domi, to finally become MTL #1C during the playoffs outplaying Danault. We are not overrating him, he is just freaking good. He is a better 2-way player than PLD, he might even outplay him this season. He is finally our #1C, will get minutes and PP time. We expect him to be a PPG this year, you might say wtf you guys are crazy, just wait for it. Not saying he will, but at least be close to be a PPG</div></div>

Yeah, If you're using points to evaluate a player in 2021, you're not gonna get very far. Look Suzuki is going to be good. PLD is already there and still getting better. Take the Boat. Or don't I'm a fan of a divisional rival.
<img class="for_img" src="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EnVYXyxW4AkH6mH?format=jpg&amp;name=large" alt="EnVYXyxW4AkH6mH?format=jpg&amp;name=large"><img class="for_img" src="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Egb0RxAVoAI20Mx?format=jpg&amp;name=large" alt="Egb0RxAVoAI20Mx?format=jpg&amp;name=large"><img class="for_img" src="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Eql48dmXYAUaZKb?format=jpg&amp;name=large" alt="Eql48dmXYAUaZKb?format=jpg&amp;name=large"><img class="for_img" src="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Eql3QI2XYAII1Y9?format=jpg&amp;name=large" alt="Eql3QI2XYAII1Y9?format=jpg&amp;name=large"><img class="for_img" src="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Eql2vcMW4AEat4S?format=png&amp;name=900x900" alt="Eql2vcMW4AEat4S?format=png&amp;name=900x900"><img class="for_img" src="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Eqlu9SMXAAQxJy9?format=png&amp;name=medium" alt="Eqlu9SMXAAQxJy9?format=png&amp;name=medium">
Forum: Armchair-GM12 jan à 22 h 30
Sujet: And now for something completely different
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>AndrewLadd</b></div><div>Maybe it’s decent value wise and I get it’s an ACGM so like I don’t wanna like ruin ur fun or anything cuz people do that too much but in the end I think Buffalo would most likely decline</div></div>

Sure. As I've said 100 times in this thread i can understand them preferring some other combo of the value (less players more prospects, or less prospects more players, etc). I just think this is in the realm of possibility value wise and an offer that could be made. And looking at previous Buffalo trades would any of us be surprised if Buffalo goes with a trade closer to this structure?

What I've been arguing against the while time is the people who say the value isn't there when it is from a business perspective.
If I were a buf fan I'd be pissed at this, but from an uninterested nhl hockey man perspective this seems on par.
Forum: Armchair-GM12 jan à 22 h 25
Sujet: And now for something completely different
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>AndrewLadd</b></div><div>Let’s put it this way, if the penguins came at the leafs with this offer for matthews would you take it? I’m assuming not. Both players are super young and elite 1Cs and they don’t grow on trees</div></div>

I never said I would take it. I just said that I would prefer quality over quantity too.
What I have been arguing this entire time is that the overall value is there and that it is a competitive offer that buf management would consider. I understand why they don't like it as fans, what I disagree with is their saying the actual trade value isn't there. I think the Sabres would consider this on par and as this agm is from the angle of a potential Pittsburgh future I have buf going with this offer.