Quoting: justaBoss
He has requested for a trade, he hasn't developed to any direction in last couple of years, his performance stats wise is equal to your average mid-6 winger from last 3 years but his cap is (now) higher than your average mid-6 winger.
Maybe he is worth more, but I personally don't think he's anything special or worth spending that much to. He doesn't really stand out in any manner whatsoever.
Quoting: aadoyle
That and if we look at a strong comparable trade
Buchnevich went for how much again?
And he had 20 goals and 28 assists in 54 games
And he was 25 when traded so no use using age factor
So my guess rn is 2 2nds at most. As often players who want out often get less then when they are just straight up traded. Debrusk is a big wildcard here as he started producing with Marchand and Bergeron. Whats the guarantee he will do that with his new team. Could end up going flat again.
Quoting: A_Habs_fan
Teams will haggle but best-case scenario for the Bruins, you're looking at a player swap or 2nd+
as justaboss stated buch didnt have an extension he was simply just rights and the Rangers werent willing to pay him 6m pretty much had to choose kreider or buch and they chose kreider. not only that he had one 20 goal year before his career year in a contract year. i think we can safely say that wasnt a fluke but he had less goals in the same 5 year sample than debrusk does right now. hes got far more assists though which helps when you play with guys who can also shoot the puck...
Im not sure what you mean when "he hasnt developed in any direction" Debrusk's biggest issue is streakiness and effort. Is everyone still stuck on 1 bad year?
His 5 year sample size:
Rookie: 16G 27A 43P 70 GP
y2: 27G 15A 42P 68 GP
y3: 19G 16A 35P 65 GP
y4: (covid/injury year) 5G 9A 14P 41G
y5: 21G 13A 34P 65GP
hes a 2 time 20 goal scorers, pace wise 3 time, hes shown he can pass with marchand and bergeron and hes still scoring when given top 6 minutes. if you average out his 5 years hes a 17.6 goal per year 16 assist per year... if you take out the outlier covid year that will likely never happen again (situation wise) hes a 20.75g 17.75A player per year player. also while not being a huge powerplay guy, can be a solid back checker (when engaged) just because he requested a trade doesnt mean bruins have to honor it (as seen by the latest not moving him by the TDL).
IMO i get marchand and bergeron will "inflate" numbers but hes still a primary goal scorer. thats his main job. in 5v5 situations this year hes outscoring alot of big name top 6 players. including tavares, nylander, garland, pavelski, kane and tied with barkov, svechnikov, bjorkstrand etc.
I just dont understand the slander on debrusk. He started the year off cold, on a line with haula and foligno who also started off ice cold. debrusk was still scoring on that line though. he has been projected for 20+ goals all year long. the assists are starting to catch up playing with better quality teammates. as haula and foligno have a combined 14 goals between them to this date. i think they had a whopping 3 or 4 goals before bruce changed the lineups around while jake had 9 or 10.
Just like at the TDL i dont think the bruins are simply gunna dump a player just to honor a trade request. PLD wanted the hell out of columbus, tanked major value and still returned laine and roslovic... im not saying debrusk is PLD but stating his value is singificantly lower than it is is a bit of a stretch. i can see debrusk as a 1 or 2 LW for a team being a 30-20 player especially given pp time.
Debrusk is 33rd ranked LW in goals atm. tied with killorn, ahead of panarin, bunting, arvidsson, saad, teravainen, burakovsky. none of the guys around him on this list played half the year bouncing around with inconsistent linemates. serious thought where is debrusk if hes playing with matthews and marner? where is debrusk if hes playing the entire year with bergy and marchy vs 20ish games?
Idk just dont understand the low valuations, i definitely have a little homer bias but 25 year old consistent proven 20 goal scorers dont grow on trees.