SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Signing Jack Campbell

Créé par: OldNYIfan
Équipe: 2022-23 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 22 janv. 2022
Publié: 10 févr. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I think that the best way for Edmonton to solve their goalie problem long-term is to sign unrestricted free agent Jack Campbell. That wouldn't require as much cap jostling as many people might think.

The Kassian trade can occur anytime between now and the 2022 draft. I think that he won't be as difficult to move as many have suggested because he's still a reasonable bottom-six player and contending teams like Nashville and Columbus are undersubscribed in forwards both this year and for the 2022-2023 season, with only a few viable promotable prospects. (Nashville has 8 forwards under contract plus 2 RFAs and over $25 million in projected cap space; Columbus has 9 and 2, respectively, with over $29 million in projected cap space.) But I could be optimistic.

The Barrie trade is made in the off-season before or at the draft and is, of course, primarily motivated by the need to clear cap space for Campbell. Edmonton gets another second-round pick in this year's draft; Arizona gets a move up into the third round from the fourth in 2023. (Note: Arizona has only Dysin Mayo and Timmins, plus Victor Soderstrom, under contract at RD for next season.) The assumption is that the Islanders pick is the latest of Arizona's five (5!) 2022 second-rounders but still in the top half of the draw.

RW is so obviously weak that maybe Zach Hyman should be put over there.

From this construction, it seems to me that if Jack Campbell can't be signed for less than $7 million, he's beyond Edmonton's reach. I think that Colorado and his hometown team will be serious suitors for him.

I'm assuming that Mike Smith retires after his injury problems this season.

There remains the problem of the right side of the defense once Barrie is gone. Originally in this construction, I had Edmonton trading with Boston for Connor Clifton (who has a $1 million cap hit and would replace Koekkuk or Niemelainin on the roster) for a prospect and a pick. Given the shallowness of the Edmonton prospect pool, the Oilers might prefer to sign a free-agent RD to fill the bottom pair rather than spend assets on Clifton.

Of course, the retirement of Duncan Keith would change the picture drastically, opening up a wealth of possibilities -- the most obvious of which would be to re-sign Evander Kane, which would also be the alternative plan if Campbell goes somewhere else.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3925 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
54 500 000 $
21 750 000 $
21 250 000 $
2850 000 $
2850 000 $
2800 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
66 500 000 $
31 750 000 $
Transactions
1.
EDM
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (NSH)
NSH
  1. Kassian, Zack
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
2.
EDM
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (NYI)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (ARI)
ARI
  1. Barrie, Tyson
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de NYI
Logo de NSH
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2023
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de ARI
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2024
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $82 102 795 $896 000 $2 200 000 $-602 795 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 6
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
C, AG
UFA
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 1
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
G
UFA - 5
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
850 000 $850 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 167 000 $4 167 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
G
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
10 févr. 2022 à 16 h 3
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 2,170
Mentions "j'aime": 903
Tough for the Leafs to come out and match a deal like that to hold onto Campbell. Interesting option for sure, do you think that's the money Campbell will get?
10 févr. 2022 à 16 h 4
#2
Tintin over 1122
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 15,931
Mentions "j'aime": 10,168
Jesse doesn’t get that contract yet
10 févr. 2022 à 16 h 5
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 10,273
Mentions "j'aime": 7,131
NSH isn't paying for Kassian-- but they're not trading for him either way.

And you say they only have 8 forwards signed while leaving out they have two RFAs in Kunin and Trenin that will make that 10. Re-signing Forsberg or another UFA forward is 11. Then they also have Glass who likely starts next season (12), plus Afansyev and Olivier and Novak (if re-signed) as viable options as well. They're not really hurting for forwards-- maybe they could use a top 6 guy, but they have enough bottom 6 options at much cheaper price tags than Kassian.
josi4norris et TroutJohnson a aimé ceci.
10 févr. 2022 à 16 h 8
#4
Roster Architect
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 2,643
Mentions "j'aime": 909
Ah yes. Edmonton's solution is to overpay for a goalie that's on the wrong side of 30 and sign him to term?

Campbell isn't worth $6M+
10 févr. 2022 à 16 h 10
#5
Démarrer sujet
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,701
Mentions "j'aime": 25,529
Quoting: villenash
NSH isn't paying for Kassian-- but they're not trading for him either way.


How is exchanging one fourth for another "paying for" him?

You guys have 8 forwards under contract plus 2 RFAs plus Glass and Afanasyev next season. I think that it's a lively possibility that you'll pick up a couple of bottom-6 forwards on the trade market.
10 févr. 2022 à 16 h 10
#6
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,974
Mentions "j'aime": 22,931
I like Kassian,,,,when he's at his best. But I think his term and $$$ are too much for any (good) to take on. Maybe Arizona takes him for free. Same with Barrie, is he really worth his contract?

I feel sorry for Campbell if he signs that contract. Not for money but I don't see him being worth 6.5m and for his six years. Soon he next whipping boy on the Oilers.

Having Keith retire...will bring cap help for the Oilers.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
10 févr. 2022 à 16 h 14
#7
Démarrer sujet
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,701
Mentions "j'aime": 25,529
Quoting: yycofred
Tough for the Leafs to come out and match a deal like that to hold onto Campbell. Interesting option for sure, do you think that's the money Campbell will get?


I'm budgeting here more than predicting -- my aim with this construction is to show that it's possible. But this is Campbell's one chance to get a big payday, and I think he'll be able to cash in on his success this year. I think a minimum for him is $5 million for 5 years. Edmonton, Detroit, Chicago and San Jose at the least will be interested in him, and perhaps some Eastern teams, too.
10 févr. 2022 à 16 h 16
#8
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 5,265
Mentions "j'aime": 2,154
why would he sign his life away in edmonton
10 févr. 2022 à 16 h 17
#9
Hakuna Matata
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 34,487
Mentions "j'aime": 21,104
Modifié 10 févr. 2022 à 16 h 22
Holland didnt want to give Markstrom that kind of deal. Doubt he does it for Campbell

Literally if he offered Markstrom what Calgary offered he would have chose Edmonton. But Holland was not comfortable giving him 6 years. Its the same with his time in Detroit Mrazek wanted 4mill Holland traded him as he didnt feel comfortable giving him that kind of money.

Maybe Holland is just bad at goalie contracts.

But heres the thing why does Campbell leave the team hes having sucess with to go to a team out of a playoff spot and has a worse Dcore. The last goalie who went chasing money over staying with a competitive team has seen his stats tank (remember Grubauer). Yikes

All indications and comments to me suggest Campbell is probs resigning in Toronto. But dont worry Edmonton will get its goalie from Toronto but it wont be Campbell as Holland will just go trade for Mrazek. Makes sense as hes making under 4mill
OldNYIfan et Trickster a aimé ceci.
10 févr. 2022 à 16 h 19
#10
Démarrer sujet
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,701
Mentions "j'aime": 25,529
Quoting: palhal
I feel sorry for Campbell if he signs that contract. Not for money but I don't see him being worth 6.5m and for his six years. Soon the next whipping boy on the Oilers.


I was looking at Binnington's $6 million for 6 years and trying to adjust for inflation as well as competition for his services, as well as demonstrating that Edmonton will be able to sign him even if they have to pay him a premium. I really suspect he'll get from $5 to $6 million for 5 or 6 years.
palhal a aimé ceci.
10 févr. 2022 à 16 h 21
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,622
Mentions "j'aime": 6,170
Quoting: TrueCanuck
Ah yes. Edmonton's solution is to overpay for a goalie that's on the wrong side of 30 and sign him to term?

Campbell isn't worth $6M+


Campbell is absolutely worth $6M. I'd be hesitant to give him 6 years at age 30. But I think $6-6.5M for 3-4 years is just about right.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
10 févr. 2022 à 16 h 23
#12
Hakuna Matata
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 34,487
Mentions "j'aime": 21,104
Quoting: tkecanuck341
Campbell is absolutely worth $6M. I'd be hesitant to give him 6 years at age 30. But I think $6-6.5M for 3-4 years is just about right.


I would give him 5-5.5 mill rn. Hes good but recently hes been on a slump. Gru was top 3 in Vezina and got 5.9, Markstrom took Van to round 3 (technically), and Binnington won a cup. Saros type of deal makes the most sense as both guys just started being starters.


Now if he takes us to the semi-finals or heck wins us a cup **** yeah 6mill easy
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
10 févr. 2022 à 16 h 24
#13
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,974
Mentions "j'aime": 22,931
Quoting: OldNYIfan
I was looking at Binnington's $6 million for 6 years and trying to adjust for inflation as well as competition for his services, as well as demonstrating that Edmonton will be able to sign him even if they have to pay him a premium. I really suspect he'll get from $5 to $6 million for 5 or 6 years.


I wonder if Blues regret giving Binnington six years? He had a great half season and playoff run, then two good seasons. He's fallen off this year (not saying it is his fault)
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
10 févr. 2022 à 16 h 26
#14
Hakuna Matata
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 34,487
Mentions "j'aime": 21,104
Quoting: palhal
I wonder if Blues regret giving Binnington six years? He had a great half season and playoff run, then two good seasons. He's fallen off this year (not saying it is his fault)


Probs yeah as look at Husso's numbers...

He basically took over his starting job and hes a UFA

For a guy making 6mill having a 0.901SV is unacceptable
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
10 févr. 2022 à 16 h 26
#15
Démarrer sujet
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,701
Mentions "j'aime": 25,529
Quoting: TrueCanuck
Ah yes. Edmonton's solution is to overpay for a goalie that's on the wrong side of 30 and sign him to term?

Campbell isn't worth $6M+


If you have an alternative suggestion, I'm sure we'd all love to hear it. You think that a goalie who will be on the UFA market along with Campbell, like Francouz or Kuemper, is a better choice? Or that Boston will trade Linus Ullmark to Edmonton? Or that some other starting goalie with term will suddenly magically appear?
10 févr. 2022 à 16 h 28
#16
Roster Architect
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 2,643
Mentions "j'aime": 909
Quoting: tkecanuck341
Campbell is absolutely worth $6M. I'd be hesitant to give him 6 years at age 30. But I think $6-6.5M for 3-4 years is just about right.


Absolutely not. He doesn't have the history of a starter to be worth more than Markstrom. Why is he worth more than what Ullmark got last off-season? Similar stats with similar playing time? Anything more than 4 years x $5M is a drastic overpay just because the Toronto media overhypes him
10 févr. 2022 à 16 h 28
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,622
Mentions "j'aime": 6,170
Quoting: aadoyle
I would give him 5-5.5 mill rn. Hes good but recently hes been on a slump. Gru was top 3 in Vezina and got 5.9, Markstrom took Van to round 3 (technically), and Binnington won a cup. Saros type of deal makes the most sense as both guys just started being starters.


Now if he takes us to the semi-finals or heck wins us a cup **** yeah 6mill easy


He has just as impressive resume (if not more) than Hellebuyck when he signed his 6-year, $6M+ deal. Campbell's playoff numbers last year were insane. It's not his fault the rest of the Leafs didn't show up for that series.

If Campbell carries the Leafs to the Conference finals or beyond this year, then he's worth even more IMO.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
10 févr. 2022 à 16 h 28
#18
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: tkecanuck341
Campbell is absolutely worth $6M. I'd be hesitant to give him 6 years at age 30. But I think $6-6.5M for 3-4 years is just about right.


Good comp would probably be Markstrom. Hard to find a goalie with those kind of numbers cheaper…

Not referencing you here, but I get a kick out of the “Leafs defence isn’t good” and “Don’t overpay for Campbell” groups…

Campbell has been excellent in Toronto, and if he wants, should get a solid, good termed contract. You’re essentially buying years 1-4, and, given how aging graph predict players declining, stuck with years 5-6
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
10 févr. 2022 à 16 h 29
#19
Démarrer sujet
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,701
Mentions "j'aime": 25,529
Quoting: aadoyle
I would give him 5-5.5 mill rn. Hes good but recently hes been on a slump. Gru was top 3 in Vezina and got 5.9, Markstrom took Van to round 3 (technically), and Binnington won a cup. Saros type of deal makes the most sense as both guys just started being starters.


Now if he takes us to the semi-finals or heck wins us a cup **** yeah 6mill easy


Plus, take a look at the last two years of Jonathan Quick's contract. Those six years aren't nearly as onerous if Campbell's getting paid $3 million for them, and it makes a potential buyout much more palatable.
10 févr. 2022 à 16 h 32
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,622
Mentions "j'aime": 6,170
Quoting: TrueCanuck
Absolutely not. He doesn't have the history of a starter to be worth more than Markstrom. Why is he worth more than what Ullmark got last off-season? Similar stats with similar playing time? Anything more than 4 years x $5M is a drastic overpay just because the Toronto media overhypes him


Hellebuyck is the perfect comparable. He had about 149 NHL games under his belt, with one standout season as a starter.

Campbell is on pace to be at 140ish NHL games after this season, with one standout season as a starter.

Why does Campbell deserve less than Hellebuyck?
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
10 févr. 2022 à 16 h 32
#21
Hakuna Matata
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 34,487
Mentions "j'aime": 21,104
Quoting: tkecanuck341
He has just as impressive resume (if not more) than Hellebuyck when he signed his 6-year, $6M+ deal. Campbell's playoff numbers last year were insane. It's not his fault the rest of the Leafs didn't show up for that series.

If Campbell carries the Leafs to the Conference finals or beyond this year, then he's worth even more IMO.


Im just saying if we look at when Markstrom got 6mill x 6 years he took the Canucks to the round 3 (technically) and had 2 previous 50 game seasons. Campbell has not done that yet. This is his first true season as the starter. Hes never played more than 35 games in a starting role and so it makes things tricky. Has he done well so far in the role yes. But we got to tread carefully as look at the Blues. Binnington won a cup got 6mill then fell off a cliff. While Campbell has not done that his numbers have begun to drop. Not saying this will continue but rn I see 5.5mill x 5 years being fair considering many goalies signed for 5-5.9mill.

Like am I saying he cant get 6mill no. What im saying is rn I dont think hes earned it yet. This is the season though to prove it and he has delivered to some degree. Lets just hope this slump does not continue. But still 5.5mill x 5 years aint bad. Would get him more than Ullmark, Saros, and a tad less than Shesterkin whose leading the Vezina vote and is making 5.6mill
OldNYIfan, TrueCanuck et Trickster a aimé ceci.
10 févr. 2022 à 16 h 36
#22
Hakuna Matata
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 34,487
Mentions "j'aime": 21,104
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Plus, take a look at the last two years of Jonathan Quick's contract. Those six years aren't nearly as onerous if Campbell's getting paid $3 million for them, and it makes a potential buyout much more palatable.


In general to me rn Im eyeing a Saros/Shesterkin type of deal

Shesterkin is the fav for the Vezina so it makes 0 sense Campbell to make more unless he takes his team further in the playoffs, wins them a cup, or heck beats him for the trophy. But who knows rn lul

Still 5-6mill range aint bad. Better than 10mill am I right lul.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
10 févr. 2022 à 16 h 40
#23
Roster Architect
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 2,643
Mentions "j'aime": 909
Quoting: OldNYIfan
If you have an alternative suggestion, I'm sure we'd all love to hear it. You think that a goalie who will be on the UFA market along with Campbell, like Francouz or Kuemper, is a better choice? Or that Boston will trade Linus Ullmark to Edmonton? Or that some other starting goalie with term will suddenly magically appear?


Look to the trade market. Overspending just creates more cap issues to not be able to further address other areas of weakness (wingers and defenceman).

Tons of options could be available for cheaper and then they can build a more solid team around the goalie to keep it more competitive. But overspending is the worst thing you can do. That contract will come back to bite them in the ass the same way every other overpaid player does.
10 févr. 2022 à 16 h 45
#24
Roster Architect
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 2,643
Mentions "j'aime": 909
Quoting: Lenny7
Good comp would probably be Markstrom. Hard to find a goalie with those kind of numbers cheaper…

Not referencing you here, but I get a kick out of the “Leafs defence isn’t good” and “Don’t overpay for Campbell” groups…

Campbell has been excellent in Toronto, and if he wants, should get a solid, good termed contract. You’re essentially buying years 1-4, and, given how aging graph predict players declining, stuck with years 5-6


Absolutely terrible comparison of Markstrom for Campbell. Markstrom had 3 seasons of being a full time starting goalie under his belt plus playoff success when he signed that deal. Campbell will only have 1 year of being a starter and maybe 1 year of playoff success. Nothing justifies that comparable except the Toronto media trying to overhype him the same way they overhyped Hyman last off-season.
10 févr. 2022 à 16 h 47
#25
Roster Architect
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 2,643
Mentions "j'aime": 909
Quoting: tkecanuck341
Hellebuyck is the perfect comparable. He had about 149 NHL games under his belt, with one standout season as a starter.

Campbell is on pace to be at 140ish NHL games after this season, with one standout season as a starter.

Why does Campbell deserve less than Hellebuyck?


Hellebuyck was 25 when he signed that deal and was a RFA. Winnipeg had to spend more to buy out more years of his prime. Campbell will be a UFA at 30. $6M is not justifiable at all.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage