Modifié 29 déc. 2020 à 21 h 41
Quoting: kclar
I understand that they're taken into account but its not a 100% science, probably never will be. Just as ignoring analytics completely isn't smart, following analytics and treating them as the complete accurate value of a player is also lazy
This implies that an eye test is somehow 100% accurate, or even better than the analytics at doing this when all research points in exactly the opposite direction. Don't let the good be the enemy of the perfect. It isn't perfect, but it is one of the best tools we have and it is damn good. That is no reason to discount it.
Plus, any good eye test will tell you Risto ****ing sucks lol. Remember that analytics are just what happens on the ice written down and presented in an "easy" to digest way. No one ever argued you should only use analytics, only you brought that up. You're moving the goalposts in this conversation and bringing up irrelevant points to distract from the argument whether it is intentional or not.
I think what I am trying to say, to put it more succinctly is that nothing you have said here discredits or invalidates anything these models say. Risto is bad. One of the worst Dmen in the league and there isn't a good argument otherwise, just like there isn't a good argument against analytics.