SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Retooling

Créé par: Timmah007
Équipe: 2020-21 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 10 juin 2020
Publié: 10 juin 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
12 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 000 000 $
11 800 000 $
1950 000 $
13 500 000 $
23 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
EDM
  1. Brown, Logan
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (NYI)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (WPG)
OTT
  1. Benning, Matthew [Droits de RFA]
  2. Puljujärvi, Jesse [Liste de réserve]
2.
EDM
  1. Gallagher, Brendan
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (CHI)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (STL)
MTL
  1. Brown, Logan
  2. Lavoie, Raphael
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (EDM)
3.
EDM
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (EDM)
DET
  1. Neal, James
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (EDM)
4.
EDM
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (WSH)
5.
EDM
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (NYI)
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2020 (NYI)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de EDM
Logo de NYI
Logo de CHI
Logo de STL
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de WPG
Logo de WSH
Logo de NYI
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de NYI
Logo de EDM
2021
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de PIT
Logo de EDM
2022
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $80 764 365 $341 534 $730 000 $735 635 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
UFA - 6
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance230 000 $$230K)
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
808 333 $808 333 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
950 000 $950 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 167 000 $4 167 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 166 666 $4 166 666 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 600 000 $5 600 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
DD
RFA - 3
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
915 000 $915 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
875 000 $875 000 $
AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
10 juin 2020 à 17 h 32
#1
Brace for the Storm
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 12,840
Mentions "j'aime": 6,647
DET easily declines
BStinson et CD282 a aimé ceci.
10 juin 2020 à 17 h 35
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 7,990
Mentions "j'aime": 4,210
I don’t think Ottawa does this, I wouldn’t do the Montreal trade for the oilers. That’s just so much to give up for him..
CD282 et sens2020 a aimé ceci.
10 juin 2020 à 17 h 37
#3
Kafle
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 2,467
Mentions "j'aime": 483
Detroit knows how desperate most teams in the league are. They will easily ask for more
Ottawa declines
I would only do the montreal trade if gallagher signs an extension
sens2020 a aimé ceci.
10 juin 2020 à 17 h 44
#4
Habs for 25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 1,626
Mentions "j'aime": 526
montreal declines
athrin a aimé ceci.
10 juin 2020 à 17 h 45
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 8,634
Mentions "j'aime": 3,931
Think so? Neal could add 20-25 goals per season.
Contract I really don’t see as an overpayment as long as he can be played in top six he still produces his career averages. Edmonton doesn’t fit because Leon’s line is full and his skating isn’t good enough for mcdavids line. Doesn’t make him bad by any stretch. I think wings win this
10 juin 2020 à 17 h 46
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 8,634
Mentions "j'aime": 3,931
Montreal one because of giving up a lot I thought of adding conditions about resigning or production based.
10 juin 2020 à 17 h 54
#7
Pop Pop
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 14,594
Mentions "j'aime": 8,269
Quoting: Timmah007
Think so? Neal could add 20-25 goals per season.
Contract I really don’t see as an overpayment as long as he can be played in top six he still produces his career averages. Edmonton doesn’t fit because Leon’s line is full and his skating isn’t good enough for mcdavids line. Doesn’t make him bad by any stretch. I think wings win this


Yeah he isn't that bad a player but hes getting older amd that contract isn't great. The thing is detroit needs to do it less than Edmonton needs to move him so they're gonna ask for more.
10 juin 2020 à 17 h 57
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 17,005
Mentions "j'aime": 12,007
Lmao that Ottawa deal is terrible for Ottawa. Sens could get WAY more for this package.
sens2020 et athrin a aimé ceci.
10 juin 2020 à 18 h 9
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 8,634
Mentions "j'aime": 3,931
I respectfully disagree. Edmonton can work around that deal signing a cheaper back up and 3c and keep him and use him. I’d honestly be just fine with that but he really doesn’t hurt Edmonton as much as some lead on. Detroit’s goal scoring needs a boost really bad and Neal has proven to be a lock for 20-25.
Option to expose to Seattle if it doesn’t work. Something tells me Detroit won’t be exposing better options with most important pieces being exempt.
10 juin 2020 à 18 h 17
#10
Buffbry
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 8,931
Mentions "j'aime": 5,360
Quoting: Timmah007
I respectfully disagree. Edmonton can work around that deal signing a cheaper back up and 3c and keep him and use him. I’d honestly be just fine with that but he really doesn’t hurt Edmonton as much as some lead on. Detroit’s goal scoring needs a boost really bad and Neal has proven to be a lock for 20-25.
Option to expose to Seattle if it doesn’t work. Something tells me Detroit won’t be exposing better options with most important pieces being exempt.


Detroit is rebuilding, they don't need that guy or that contract, it makes 0 sense to trade a valuable draft pick for a guy they have 0 use for. You would have to pay them a large amount for them to take him, he's a cap dump and that's it. Like edm first and pool party as starters
10 juin 2020 à 18 h 28
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 21,681
Mentions "j'aime": 12,028
Quoting: Timmah007
I respectfully disagree. Edmonton can work around that deal signing a cheaper back up and 3c and keep him and use him. I’d honestly be just fine with that but he really doesn’t hurt Edmonton as much as some lead on. Detroit’s goal scoring needs a boost really bad and Neal has proven to be a lock for 20-25.
Option to expose to Seattle if it doesn’t work. Something tells me Detroit won’t be exposing better options with most important pieces being exempt.


I'm sorry Detroit isn't giving a 2nd for Neal and a 3rd! That's insane you can disagree all you want it will NEVER happen.
10 juin 2020 à 18 h 33
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 8,634
Mentions "j'aime": 3,931
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
Lmao that Ottawa deal is terrible for Ottawa. Sens could get WAY more for this package.


I don’t think so. Brown hasn’t worked out in Ottawa they have to be ready to move on from.
1st rounder is the 3rd a mid round
3rd rounder they have a bunch not much of a loss.
JP is nhl ready and 22 Years old good size and frame very solid skater
Benning is still young but very useful RH defender.
10 juin 2020 à 18 h 51
#13
Subbanator
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 7,348
Mentions "j'aime": 3,351
Montreal, Ottawa and Detroit all say no.

Montreal says no because they wouldn't even accept the trade for Gallagher if you took out both 2nd rounders going to Edmonton, that's how much they like Gallagher.

Ottawa says no because you arent giving them anything worth a 1st round and expect them to give up Brown on top of it.

Detroit says no because they dont see Neal as a positive contract, yes he played better this year but not enough to live up to his contract. They would expect the extra pick to take his contract, not give it positive value.
sens2020 et athrin a aimé ceci.
10 juin 2020 à 18 h 54
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 17,005
Mentions "j'aime": 12,007
Quoting: Timmah007
I don’t think so. Brown hasn’t worked out in Ottawa they have to be ready to move on from.
1st rounder is the 3rd a mid round
3rd rounder they have a bunch not much of a loss.
JP is nhl ready and 22 Years old good size and frame very solid skater
Benning is still young but very useful RH defender.


I don't think the gap in value between Brown and Puljujarvi is that steep. No other team trading for Puljujarvi is giving up a prospect as good as Logan Brown. Even if Puljujarvi is more valuable, the difference isn't more than a 3rd or 4th to me. Benning is fine, but he's a bottom pair D, and his inclusion isn't enough to get Ottawa to add a 1st.
sens2020 et athrin a aimé ceci.
10 juin 2020 à 19 h 36
#15
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 29,220
Mentions "j'aime": 11,335
Not even sure why you'd want Thornton, but paying him that much is crazy.
10 juin 2020 à 21 h 17
#16
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 8,634
Mentions "j'aime": 3,931
It would be very costly for Edmonton to keep Gallagher so with no extension just rental I think that’s huge price to pay. Understand if Habs decide to resign.
Neal is able to play top six minutes give you 20-25 goals. Yes it’s a salary dump for oilers but Detroit is getting a guy still putting up career averages. Only reason not a fit for oilers is playing with mcdavid foot speed struggles. No room on second line. Using on third line production suffers like any player would and that’s when contract is an issues. That’s what went wrong in Calgary too. His contract has no clauses that’s a nice safety net just in case he does decline. I think he’s a good add for a second rounder fact offering a third too I think is a steal.
Ottawa deal i think everyone has a different value for JP.
The ask as far as I’ve heard is a 1st and prospect for JP I see brown being the prospect Ottawa is ready to move on from more than any other Edmonton would also consider. The first is the third of Ottawa’s 3 and are getting an nhl ready prospect with nhl experience. The aspect I think that gets lost with JP is he’s over seas by choice. He’s completely capable of stepping into an nhl line up. His got a big frame and great skater and is defensively responsible. Adding Benning for a third just felt like a nice fit and very reasonable for someone they can keep around for a couple years
I did over pay for Thornton but that was because I really want him for that role to bring benson in full time.
10 juin 2020 à 21 h 30
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,036
Mentions "j'aime": 7,746
Holland is building a long-term contender.

Gallagher is a nice player, but he's 28, a rental, undersized and has a career high of just 54 points.

Lavoie and the 1st will have a far greater impact on the roster than Gallagher will for just 1 year. And if you re-sign him, you're paying for decline years.

I don't think Holland would make this trade.
10 juin 2020 à 22 h 27
#18
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 8,634
Mentions "j'aime": 3,931
With Gallagher gaining two seconds for deep draft.
The first is the year after which should be a late 1st.
11 juin 2020 à 2 h 59
#19
Red Wing Nut
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 1,963
Mentions "j'aime": 302
Why do wings want Neal horrid cap hit AND SEND AWAY nice draft pick??...yea...thats NOT happening
11 juin 2020 à 3 h 3
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2018
Messages: 310
Mentions "j'aime": 122
Gallagher for Lavoie is a good trade for both parties imo.
11 juin 2020 à 11 h 26
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 1,063
Mentions "j'aime": 215
Are u actually signing Thornton to 3.5 million 🤣🤣 and Bear should get more money around 3.5 million with 3-4 years
11 juin 2020 à 11 h 49
#22
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 8,634
Mentions "j'aime": 3,931
I went with only a one year prove it deal before a multi year. I believe he’s legit but singing term after one break out season seems like a risk cap strap teams shouldn’t do. Also think with the state of the league and flat cap it can be in his best interest to take a smaller pay bump now cash in better later. Thornton I know is sizeable overpayment however I think it’s very important to get a veteran with his vision and experience on that line to give benson a real shot at success. Clearly well past his prime but the traits he still has are traits I want benson exposed to like puck protection, vision, hockey iq in general. Over pay to ensure getting the guy I see as best fit for the current need.
29 juin 2020 à 17 h 35
#23
Nick
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 2,595
Mentions "j'aime": 823
Montreal won’t trade Gally unless it’s an overpayment.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage