SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

doaftheloaf

Membre depuis
13 mai 2024
Équipe favorite
Canadiens de Montréal
Messages dans les forums
193
Messages par jour
4.3
Forum: Trade Machine Proposalssam. à 6 h 14
Sujet: Holtz to Montreal
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>Tony Marinaro on his podcast

“A name that has come up recently is Alexander Holtz. One team that wants him badly, and I mean badly, because I’m sure there’s a couple of teams that would take him. The Montreal Canadiens want Alexander Holtz badly. Believe me when I tell you that. They’re not trading Nick Suzuki and they’re not trading Cole Caufield. I don’t know how much they’d be willing to give up, but they have some assets that are in play. I’m talking about defenceman Kaiden Ghule, I’m talking about defenceman David Reinbacher, I am talking forward Kirby Dach. They want Alexander Holtz and they want him badly. It won’t be a ‘one-vs-one’ deal. They will spice it up by throwing in other players or top picks, but I can tell you right now, based on what I’m hearing, that Kent Hughes wants Holtz BADLY.”</div></div>

Marinaro is an idiot, whether he said that or not. Hughes is not so stupid. If we're giving that up, Jack Hughes had better be the return. I wouldn't give up the 26 for Holtz at his point. He's proven nothing yet at the NHL level. It's a bit too early to say for sure, but Holtz could bust. He does still have potential, and on this site he's being thrown in to every Devils trade like he's nothing, and he's not, as the Devils still value him enough to have kept him around, but he was never worth this. He never had the potential to be worth this.

So...this has got to be satire.
Forum: Trade Machine Proposalsven. à 4 h 23
Sujet: Utah finds a goalie
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>PenguinMullet68</b></div><div>Yeah that’s not getting Boston’s 3rd stringer never mind Ullmark</div></div>

I'm not sure why you're so high on Bussi, other than his name being fun to say. He's not even the most suggestive goalie name in their system, as Reid Dyck is also a Bruins prospect.

Sure, the deal's not enough for Ullmark, and it creates a logjam in the Utah net, but it's more than any goalie not on the active roster is worth.

Utah has Ingram and Vejmelka. They don't really need a goalie, and if they trade Vejmelka, they don't need a starter, they need a tandem goalie. A 1B. Someone capable of 35 starts. Ullmark will want 55-60 starts wherever he goes. Also, Ullmark wants to stay in the east. He'll nix this one.
Forum: Trade Machine Proposals19 juin à 6 h 57
Sujet: Markstrom Draft Take 2
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CD25</b></div><div>I agree with you to some extent. If I were KH, I would not do if Demidov or Parekh is still available and they truly believe that they can be game changers. Lindstrom, I don't know; I was super keen to draft him before it came out that his back injury was in fact a herniated disc... If this is indeed true, it seems like a huge risk.

If I had the choice between drafting a LHD at 5 OA, or two forwards at 9 and 10 OA, then I'd take the latter.</div></div>

Even at RD we already have Reinbacher and Mailloux. No need for Parekh.

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bcarr</b></div><div>Habs say no imo.. retaining cap isnt the issue but going from 5th and 26th to 9th and 10th is a huge risk. drafting someone like Demidov, Lindstrom, Parakeh is an option at 5 but not at 9&amp;10. Sure Iginla and Eiserman is great, but id rather the habs package some of their many prospects with the 26th to move into the top 12 instead.</div></div>

If the Flames are trading up to 5 it's for Iginla. We would have to hope Catton is available. I guess Eiserman would be the other pick. Who else is even an option? Helenius, maybe. or a dman - one of Parekh, Dickinson, or Buium.

This is not even something I consider until I know who CBJ is taking.