SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

awesome

Membre depuis
9 juin 2018
Équipe favorite
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Messages dans les forums
945
Messages par jour
0.4
Forum: Armchair-GM23 mai 2019 à 20 h 52
Forum: Armchair-GM8 mai 2019 à 18 h 23
Forum: Armchair-GM8 mai 2019 à 10 h 6
Forum: Armchair-GM30 avr. 2019 à 17 h 59
Forum: Armchair-GM24 avr. 2019 à 15 h 1
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>awesome</b></div><div>that's why I kinda adjusted it to begin with so it wasn't as much unless Kessel had a very good season still.

The problem with doing one where its just one pick and a player is teams trading for kessel are gonna be teams interested in competing either now or very soon. So unless they are trading away from immense depth for a need(for example, Nashville trading defense for Phil) its tough to make happen. There are only a few situations where that would work. There are some teams that wouldn't be able to do that type of deal but could give up picks instead. Then there is the fact of where Phil would or wouldn't want to go. So the number of potential trade partners (IF he is traded) isn't too high.</div></div>

I have never once stated trading Phil would be easy. But they aren't moving him unless there is a real return and how to quantify that return is the problem.
A bubble team like AZ isn't going to give up two 1st. Even a trade to a team like Nashville, isn't likely. Most of the ACGM trades on here between the two really don't give a great return.
And that's the problem in trading Kessel. You got a PPG player, on a very low contract (thanks again toronto the curse of the hotdog still lives on), and there is a NMC, while he's a aging player.

There is really one 1 "bad" year on that contract. The last year. The rest of the years shouldn't be all to bad. Good players can play well in their early 30s so the next two years are just fine He'll only be 33.
He's got at least two high scoring quality years left. The question is what is that worth and to whom.
Forum: Armchair-GM24 avr. 2019 à 22 h 37