Quoting: awesome
1. you are immensely undervaluing Maatta. He is worth a second on his own.
2. You are overblowing the Gudbranson contract, they don't need to do a terrible trade like that. He actually played well after they traded for him. They aren't gonna give up assets to get rid of him, and they sure as heck aren't gonna retain on it.
3. Im not in favor of trading kessel or geno, but IF it were to happen, Arizona would be a reasonable destination for Phil. Florida doesn't make as much sense however, if they want to sign both Panarin and Bob, and take on a net of 5million in acquiring malkin, they would have to unload several other pieces to get under the cap.
3a. As for the fairness of the deals. I think you need to get a bit more for Kessel although that's in the relative ballpark.
3b. While I like Trocheck you need to get more in any deal that moves malkin away.
1. Maatta's value isn't that high according to Elliotte Freidman, the Pens have tried to move him before and nothing has materialized, I really doubt Montreal even thinks about something like this even though it addresses a need for them.
2. Gudbranson played well down the stretch, yes, but that was a very small sample size, there's a very low chance he plays like that for an extended amount of time, it comes down to moving money at that point
3. In this scenario, Malkin is traded to Florida under the assumption they miss out on Panarin and Bobrovsky. He would give them arguably the best top 6 in the league
3a. It will be hard to get more than that for Kessel, even though his cap hit and production are attractive, his age is a big detractor
3b. Similar case to Kessel. Name is a selling point, but age is a risk. This deal is about what the Pens should expect in any potential deal, a replacement, another roster player a 1st and another piece